后发装备制造企业价值链转型升级路径分析——逃离“俘获型”价值链

袭讯

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3) : 23-34.

论文

后发装备制造企业价值链转型升级路径分析——逃离“俘获型”价值链

胡峰¹，袭讯¹，俞荣建¹，向荣¹，谢杰²，张月月³

作者信息 +

An analysis of the transformation and upgrading path of the value chains of lagging equipment manufacturers: #br# The "escaping but captured" type of value chain#br#

Hu Feng¹, Xi Xun¹, Yu Rongjian¹, Xiang Rong¹, Xie Jie², Zhang Yueyue³

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

中国装备制造企业正面临“高端回流”与“低端分流”的双重竞争，探究后发装备制造企业参与全球价值链转型升级路径有助于克服低端锁定效应。文中通过“是什么？”、“为什么？”和“怎么办？”的递推逻辑，深挖路径设计契机，主要结论有：依据知识编码程度、生产复杂程度和低端节点发展潜力3个指标差异，将全球价值链分为市场型、模块型、关系型等5种类型；进一步核算知识编码指数等判识中国后发装备制造企业全球价值链主要参与类型为俘获型；并且后发者在参与全球价值链的各阶段中最容易在升级阶段被“俘获”。鉴于上述结论，本文提出了向具有高边际效益和高平衡关系的价值链转型以及链外升级两条“逃离”路径。

Abstract

Chinese equipment manufacturers are facing the dual competition of "high-end reflow" and "low-end diversion". Exploring lagging enterprises′ participation in the global value chain transformation and upgrading path will help overcome the low-end locking effect. Through the logic of "What?", "Why?", "How?" to dig deep into the path design opportunity. The results showed that: According to the differences of knowledge coding degree, production complexity and lagging enterprises development potential, global value chains are divided into market type, module type, relationship type and so on; From the knowledge coding index, the development potential index of lagging enterprises and the production complexity index to further judge that the main type of participation in the global value chain of Chinese lagging equipment manufacturing enterprises is capture type; Based on the actual situation of lagging enterprises participating in global value chains, our paper attempts to divide the process of enterprises participating in global value chains into four periods, the pre-association phase, the association phase, the upgrade phase, and the stable phase. The high-risk period when lagging equipment manufacturing enterprises are captured occurs in the upgrade phase because these enterprises at this stage cannot complete the transition to the high-end production node of global value chains are replaced by external homogeneous enterprises or "captured" by advanced enterprises at low-profit production nodes.
In view of the above conclusions, our paper proposes two "escape" paths to the high marginal benefit, high equilibrium relationship value chain transformation and extra-chain upgrade. When lagging equipment manufacturing enterprises are "captured" by advanced partners at low value-added nodes in the upgrade stage, in addition to "brute force" upgrades, lagging enterprises also learn to be flexible and shift to a value chain with high marginal benefits and high decision-making power, for instance, from capture type to modular type, from capture type to relational type and from capture type to market type. Although the process of transformation and upgrading does not necessarily mean that lagging enterprises can achieve high-end growth and dominate the original production chain, it can help to lag to solve the situation of "sit and wait to die", and can find more development time and opportunities for a subsequent high-end upgrade. Otherwise, the captured enterprises have gone through the value chain upgrade stage but have not completed the high-end upgrade, in addition to continuing to maintain the original production chain, lagging enterprises can rely on their reserve knowledge, technology and human resources to expand other self-led value chains. In this way, the disadvantage of absolutely low value-added production is reversed into a situation where disadvantages and advantages coexist. Each "escape" path is supported by real cases, including Yutong Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., Triangle Group, Hisense Home Appliances and Foxconn. Each "escape" path is supported by real cases, including Yutong Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., Triangle Group, Hisense Appliances and Foxconn. The transformation and upgrading path designed in our paper correspond to these cases one by one, which further demonstrates the effectiveness of the research conclusions. Our study provides management enlightenment for China′s lagging equipment manufacturing enterprises and government.

导出引用

胡峰, 袭讯, 俞荣建, 向荣, 谢杰, 张月月. 后发装备制造企业价值链转型升级路径分析——逃离“俘获型”价值链[J]. 科研管理. 2021, 42(3): 23-34

Hu Feng, Xi Xun, Yu Rongjian, Xiang Rong, Xie Jie, Zhang Yueyue. An analysis of the transformation and upgrading path of the value chains of lagging equipment manufacturers: #br# The "escaping but captured" type of value chain#br#[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(3): 23-34

参考文献

[]方新. 《中国制造业发展研究报告》(系列报告)书评[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(1):290.

Fang Xin. Book review of “Research Report on China’s Manufacturing Development” (series of reports)[J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(1):290.

[]冯之浚, 刘燕华, 方新, 穆荣平, 张伟. 创新是发展的根本动力[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(11):01-10.

Feng Zhijun, Liu Yanhua, Fang Xin, Mu Rongping, Zhang Wei. Innovation is the fundamental driving force for development[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(11):01-10.

[]刘海兵, 许庆瑞. 后发企业战略演进、创新范式与能力演化[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(8):1442-1454.

Liu Haibing, Xu Qingrui. Latecomer firms strategy evolution, innovation paradigm and capabilities evolution[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2018, 36(8):1442-1454.

[]苏敬勤, 高昕. 中国制造企业的低端突破路径演化研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(2):86-96.

Su Jingqin, Gao Xin. A research on Chinese manufacturing enterprises' low-end breakthrough from the perspective of path evolution[J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(2):86-96.

[]詹爱岚. 新兴市场国家标准化与创新互动赶超模式及路径研究:以印度、南非为例[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(8):92-100.

Zhan Aifeng. A study of the catch-up modes and paths in the interplay of standardization and innovation in emerging market countries: The case of India and South Africa[J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(8):92-100.

[]Eng T Y, Spickett-Jones J G. An investigation of marketing capabilities and upgrading performance of manufacturers in mainland China and Hong Kong[J]. Journal of World Business, 2009, 44(4):463-475.

[]赵立龙, 刘洋, 魏江, 王琳. 制造企业服务创新战略与竞争优势获取:机制与权变情境[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(5):20-29.

Zhao Lilong, Liu Yang, Wei Jiang, Wang Lin. Service innovation strategies and competitive advantages for manufacturing firms: Mechanisms and contingencies[J]. Science Research Management, 2017, 38(5):20-29.

[]Gereffi G, Humphrey J, Sturgeon T. The governance of global value chains[J]. Review of International Political Economy, 2005, 12(1):78-104.

[]Gereffi G, Lee J. Economic and social upgrading in global value chains and industrial clusters: Why governance matters[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 133(1):25-38.

[]李若辉, 关惠元. 设计创新驱动下制造型企业转型升级机理研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(3):83-89. Li Ruohui, Guan Huiyuan. The impacting mechanism study of design innovation on manufacturing enterprise transformation and upgrading[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2019, 36(3):83-89.

[]姚洋, 张晔. 中国出口品国内技术含量升级的动态研究——来自全国及江苏省、广东省的证据[J]. 中国社会科学, 2008(2):67-82+205-206.

Yao Yang, Zhang Ye. Upgrading the domestic technological contents of China's exports: Evidence from Jiangsu and Guangdong provinces and China as a whole[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2008(2):67-82+205-206.

[]杨水利, 杨祎. 技术创新模式对全球价值链分工地位的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(12):11-20.

Yang Shuili, Yang Yi. Effect of technological innovation models on global value chains status[J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(12):11-20.

[]陈超凡, 王赟. 垂直专业化与中国装备制造业产业升级困境[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(8):1183-1192. Chen Chaofan, Wang Yun. International vertical specialization and Chinese equipment manufacturing industrial upgrading dilemma[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2015, 33(8):1183-1192.

[]吕文晶, 陈劲, 刘进. 智能制造与全球价值链升级——海尔COSMOPlat案例研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(4):145-156.

Lv Wenjing, Chen Jin, Liu Jin. Intelligent manufacturing and economic upgrading in GVCs--A case study of Haier COSMOPlat[J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(4):145-156.

[]Inomata S. Analytical frameworks for global value chains: An overview[J]. Global Value Chain Development Report, 2017:15-35.

[]王直, 魏尚进, 祝坤福. 总贸易核算法:官方贸易统计与全球价值链的度量[J]. 中国社会科学, 2015(9):108-127+205-206.

Wang Zhi, Wei Shangjin, Zhu Kunfu. Gross trade accounting method: Official trade statistics and measurement of the global value chain[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2015(9):108-127+205-206.

基金

国家社会科学基金重大项目（20&ZD124）；浙江省软科学研究计划重点项目（2021C25027）；国家自然科学基金面上项目（71773115；71973129；71972170；72074195；72072164；72072162）；教育部人文社会科学研究项目（19YJA790107；18YJA790088; 18YJC630253）；浙江省自然科学基金项目（LY17G030005；LQ18G030009；LY18G010002）。