不同发展阶段下专利池创新的显著推动因素研究

张利飞; 陈辉; 苏梦瑶

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3) : 150-159.

论文

不同发展阶段下专利池创新的显著推动因素研究

张利飞,陈辉,苏梦瑶

作者信息 +

A research on the dominant promoting factors of patent pool innovation at different development stages

Zhang Lifei,Chen Hui,Su Mengyao

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

以中国AVS专利池作为实证对象，研究不同发展阶段下专利池创新的显著推动因素。研究表明，政府政策支持在AVS专利池组建期和成长期成为推动创新的显著因素，由于技术标准架构下的专利池具有公共品属性，早期专利池需要政府介入以避免市场“失灵”，同时减少各企业“等待和观望”行为。由于竞争性技术MPEG-2专利池与AVS专利池的发展周期不同步，以及MPEG-2专利池专利逐步到期等原因，致使竞争性技术的发展在AVS专利池成长期成为显著推动因素，而在成熟期却与AVS专利池创新呈负相关关系。产业发展需求在AVS专利池成熟期成为显著推动因素，这时进一步推动产业链上下游企业支持使用专利池技术成为关键。

Abstract

Factors of promoting patent pool dominate differently at different patent pool development stages. This factors include competitive technology development,industry development demand, government policy support, workgroup effort.Taking AVS patent pool as the empirical sample, this article studied the dominant factors of promoting patent pool innovation at different stages, including formation,growth and mature stage. The results show that government policy support is the dominant promoting factor at the stage of formation and growth. Patent pool based on technical standard has the trait of public goods. At the early stage, it is essential for government policy support to avoid market "failure" and reduce "waiting and seeing" of enterprises. In order to support the development of AVS, the Chinese government has established relevant institutions, major scientific research projects, and invested financial funds to help the AVS standard incubation. Key projects were set up in the Tenth Five-Year Plan and the National 863 Program to provide support and convenience for its technological research and development. In addition, the development cycle of the competitive technology MPEG-2 patent pool is not synchronized with the AVS patent pool, and the MPEG-2 patent pool patents are gradually expiring. Competitive technology development becomes the the dominant promoting factor at the growth stage, however, there is a negative relation between competitive technology and AVS innovation at the mature stage. Industrial development demand becomes the dominant promoting factor at the stage of maturity. Therefore, it is critical to further promote the use of patent pool technology by upstream and downstream enterprises in the industry chain. There is a strong correlation between the effort of the working group and government policy support. Collinearity problems occurred in the regression at each stage and variable of working group effort were eliminated, which fully shows that the advancement of the working group′s standardization work depends on government support.
Based on the empirical research in this article, the following suggestions are given for the Chinese to build a patent pool of independent intellectual property rights. First of all, in response to the early market failure of the patent pool, the government needs to play a key role to promote the large scale adoption of patent pool technology by key "early bird" enterprises, in particular, promote state-owned enterprises to take the lead in adopting independent standards. At the same time, government public purchases should be strengthened to support independent standard products.
Secondly, although foreign competitive technologies are relatively mature and have a short return on investment profits, their high patent fees have become a long-term hidden danger for Chinese companies. Therefore, in order to balance short-term and long-term interests, China′s independent patent pool should achieve overall compatibility with competitive technologies, and incorporate relevant equipment modification funds into the government′s overall planning to reduce investors′ worries about adopting new standards.
Finally, for some industrial chain links dominated by foreign companies, China needs to make full use of the huge domestic market demand conditions, actively persuade relevant foreign manufacturers to support independent standards, and build chip manufacturers, equipment manufacturers, operators, content providers, etc. The business ecosystem formed by enterprises helps the industrialization of independent standards.

导出引用

张利飞, 陈辉, 苏梦遥. 不同发展阶段下专利池创新的显著推动因素研究[J]. 科研管理. 2021, 42(3): 150-159

Zhang Lifei, Chen Hui, Su Mengyao. A research on the dominant promoting factors of patent pool innovation at different development stages[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(3): 150-159

参考文献

[1] Shapiro C. Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-Setting [J]. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 2001, (1): 119-150.

[2] Kato A. Patent pool enhances market competition[J]. International Review of Law & Economics, 2004, 24(2):255-268.

[3] Lerner J, Tirole J. Efficient Patent Pools [J]. American Economic Review, 2004, 94(3): 691-711.

[4] Brenner S. Optimal Formation Rules for Patent Pools[J]. Economic Theory, 2009, 40(3):373-388.

[5] Kim S H. Vertical Structure and Patent Pools[J]. Review of Industrial Organization, 2004, 25(3):231-250.

[6] Langinier C. Patent Pool,Formation and Scope of Patents[J]. Economic Inquiry, 2011, 49(4):1070–1082.

[7] Lévêque F, Ménière Y. Patent Pool Formation: Timing matters[J]. Information Economics & Policy, 2011, 23(3–4):243-251.

[8] Lampe, R. and P. Moser. Patent Pools and Innovation in Substitute Technologies-evidence from the 19th-century Sewing Machine Industry[J].RAND Journal of Economics, 2013,44(4):757-778.

[9] 朱雪忠,詹映,蒋逊明.技术标准下的专利池对我国自主创新的影响研究[J].科研管理,2007,28(2):180-186.

Zhu Xuezhong,Zhan Ying,Jiang Xunming.The Impact of Patent Pool under Technical Standards on Chinese Independent Innovation[J].Science Research Management,2007,28(2):180-186.

[10] 詹映, 朱雪忠, 长平彰夫. 专利池的形成之困:基于博弈分析的一种新解释[J]. 中国软科学, 2009,(11):42-52.

Zhan Ying, Zhu Xuezhong, Chang Pingzhanfu. The Formation of Patent Pool: A New Explanation Based on Game Analysis [J]. China Soft Science, 2009,(11): 42 - 52.

[11] 张米尔. 技术标准背景下的专利池演进及专利申请行为[J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(7):67-73.

Zhang Mir. The Evolution of Patent Pool and Patent Application Behavior under the Background of Technical Standards[J]. Scientific Research Management, 2012,33(7):67-73.

[12] 杜晓君,马大明,张吉. 基于进化博弈的专利联盟形成研究[J]. 管理科学,2010,(2):38-44.

Du Xiaojun, Ma Daming , Zhang Ji. Research on Patent Alliance Formation Based on Evolutionary Game [J]. Management Science, 2010,(2): 38-44.

[13] 姚远, 宋伟. 专利标准化趋势下的专利联盟形成模式比较——DVD模式与MPEG模式[J]. 科学学研究, 2010, 28(11):1683-1690.

Yao Yuan, Song Wei. Comparison of Patent Alliance Formation Modes under the Trend of Patent Standardization - DVD Mode and MPEG Mode [J]. Scientific Research, 2010,28(11): 1683 - 1690.

[14] 余文斌,罗婷,刘秋霞,任守鹏,甘霖.我国专利池构建与运作模式研究[J].科技管理研究, 2009,(12):494-497.

Yu Wenbin, Luo Ting, Liu Qiuxia, Ren Shoupeng, Gan Lin. Research on the Construction and Operation Mode of Patent Pool in China [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2009,(12): 494-497.

[15] Layne-Farrar A, Lerner J. To Join or not to Join: Examining Patent Pool Participation and Rent Sharing Rules [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2011, 29(2):294-303.

[16] Dequiedt V, Versaevel B.Patent Pools and Dynamic R&D Incentives[J].International Review of Law and Economics, 2013, 36(C): 59-69.

[17] Simon Den U, Bekkers R, Vries H D. Managing Intellectual Property Using Patent Pools: Lessons from Three Generations of Pools in the Optical Disc Industry.[J]. California Management Review, 2013, 55(4):31-50.

[18] Spulber D F. Innovation Economics:the Interplay among Technology Standards,Competitive Conduct, and Economic Performance[J]. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 2013, 9(4):777-825.

[19] 袁晓东, 李晓桃. 专利池的治理结构分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2009, (8): 13-18.

Yuan Xiaodong, Li Xiaotao. Analysis of the Governance Structure of Patent Pool [J]. Science and Technology Management, 2009, (8): 13-18.

[20] 王怀祖, 熊中楷, 黄俊. 交易成本视角下的专利池治理结构研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2009, 10(10): 30-34.

Wang Huaizu, Xiong Zhongkai, Huang Jun. Research on the Governance Structure of Patent Pool from the Perspective of Transaction Cost [J]. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 2009,10 (10): 30-34.

[21] Joshi A M, Nerkar A. When do Strategic Alliances Inhibit Innovation by Firms? Evidence from Patent Pools in the Global Optical Disc Industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2011, 32(11):1139–1160.

[22] Rayna T, Striukova L. What Makes Patent Pools Successful? An Analysis of Optical Disc and Mobile Phone Industries[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation Management, 2017, 19(1/2):6-29.

[23] .Lerner J, Strojwas M, Tirole J, The Design of Patent Pools: The Determinants of Licensing rules [J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2007, 38(3): 610-625.

[24] Siebert R, Graevenitz G V. Jostling for Advantage or not: Choosing between Patent Portfolio Races and Ex ante Licensing[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2010, 73(2):225-245.

[25] Llanes G, Poblete J. Ex Ante Agreements in Standard Setting and Patent‐Pool Formation[J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2014, 23(1):50-67.

[26] Choi J P. Patent Pools: Pools And Cross-Licensing In the Shadow Of Patent Litigation[J]. International Economic Review, 2010, 51(2):441–460.

[27] Meniere Y, Parlane S. Decentralized Licensing of Complementary Patents: Comparing the Royalty, Fixed-fee and Two-part Tariff Regimes[J]. Information Economics & Policy, 2010, 22(2):178-191.