吸收能力对产品创新性的影响研究

PDF(1 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5) : 62-69.

论文

吸收能力对产品创新性的影响研究

苏中锋, 李嘉

作者信息 +

The impact of absorptive capacity on product innovativeness

Su Zhongfeng, Li Jia

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

由于对现有产品的微小改进已无法保证竞争优势，企业要开发具有创新性的产品。产品创新性与新产品开发过程中投入的知识密切相关。吸收能力能将新知识引入到新产品开发过程中，对产品创新性有重要影响。本文分析了吸收能力与产品创新性的关系以及知识创造能力在该关系中的中介作用。通过对212家企业调研数据的实证检验，本文发现吸收能力和产品创新性及知识创造能力都呈倒U形关系，知识创造能力对产品创新性有正向影响，知识创造能力在吸收能力与产品创新性关系中有中介作用。

Abstract

As minor improvements on extant products can hardly ensure its competitive advantage, a firm needs to develop highly innovative products. Product innovativeness is highly related to the knowledge committed into the new product development process. Absorptive capacity enables to introduce external new knowledge into the new product development process, thus it may impact product innovativeness. Yet, few studies have investigated this issue. This study investigates the relationship between absorptive capacity and product innovativeness as well as the potential mediating effect of knowledge creation capability on this relationship. Based on a data set of 212 firms, this study finds that absorptive capacity has an inverted U-shaped impact on both product innovativeness and knowledge creation capability, knowledge creation capability positively impacts product innovativeness, and knowledge creation capability mediates the relationship between absorptive capacity and product innovativeness.

导出引用

苏中锋, 李嘉. 吸收能力对产品创新性的影响研究[J]. 科研管理. 2014, 35(5): 62-69

Su Zhongfeng, Li Jia. The impact of absorptive capacity on product innovativeness[J]. Science Research Management. 2014, 35(5): 62-69

中图分类号： F273.1

参考文献

[1] Song XM, Montoya-Weiss MM. Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1998, 15: 124-135. [2] Talke K, Salomo S, Rost K. How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields [J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39: 907-918. [3] Akgun AE, Keskin H, Byrne JC, Aren, S. Emotional and learning capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance [J]. Technovation, 2007, 27: 501-513. [4] Brockman BK, Morgan RM. The role of existing knowledge in new product innovativeness and performance [J]. Decision Sciences, 2003, 34: 385-419. [5] Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35: 128-152. [6] Zahra SA, George G. Absorptive capacity: A review and reconceptualization, and extension [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2002, 27: 185-203. [7] Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992, 13: 111-125. [8] Smith KG, Collins CJ, Clark KD. Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48: 346-357. [9] Kraatz MS, Zajac EJ. How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence [J]. Organization Science, 2001, 12: 632-657. [10] Danneels E, Kleinschmidt EJ. Product innovativeness from the firm's perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2001, 18: 357-373. [11] Calantone RJ, Chan K, Cui AS. Decomposing product innovativeness and its effects on new product success [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2006, 23: 408-421. [12] McNally RC, Cavusgil E, Calantone RJ. Product innovativeness dimensions and their relationships with product advantage, product financial performance, and project protocol [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010, 27: 991-1006. [13] Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation [J]. Organization Science, 1994, 5: 14-37. [14] Cillo P, DeLuca LM, Troilo G. Market information approaches, product innovativeness, and firm performance: An empirical study in the fashion industry [J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39: 1242-1252. [15] Durmu?o?lu SS, Barczak G. The use of information technology tools in new product development phases: Analysis of effects on new product innovativeness, quality, and market performance [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2011, 40: 321-330. [16] Stock GN, Greis NP, Fischer WA. Absorptive capacity and new product development [J]. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2001, 12: 77-91. [17] Bettis RA, Prahalad CK. The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995, 16: 5-14. [18] Ahuja G, Lampert, C. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22: 521-544. [19] Christensen C. The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail [M]. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press, 1997. [20] Grant RM. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration [J]. Organization science, 1996, 7: 375-387. [21] Wang D, Su ZF, Yang D. Organizational culture and knowledge creation capability [J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2011, 15: 363-373. [22] Armstrong JS, Overton T. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1997, 14: 396-402. [23] Zhou KZ. Innovation, imitation, and new product performance: The case of China [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2006, 35: 394-402. [24] Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981, 18: 39-50. [25] Churchill GA. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1979, 16: 64-73. [26] Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models [J]. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 1988, 16: 74-94. [27] Podsakoff PM, Organ DW. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects [J]. Journal of Management, 1986, 12: 531-544. [28] Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51: 1173-1182.