基于结构和技术的企业环境治理机制研究

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 54-61.

基于结构和技术的企业环境治理机制研究

李昆

南京审计学院管理学院, 江苏南京 211815

收稿日期:2012-12-01 修回日期:2014-01-20 出版日期:2014-05-25 发布日期:2014-05-21
作者简介:李昆（1970-），男，江苏仪征人，管理学博士；企业管理博士后；南京审计学院管理学院教授，研究领域：可持续产业模式、工业系统生态化、清洁技术创新管理等。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金：基于清洁经营风险吸收的企业柔性能力溢出效应研究（项目编号：71072039。基金起止期2010，1-2013，12）；江苏省公共工程审计重点实验室专项基金；江苏省优势学科“审计科学与技术”一期建设项目基金。

Research on environment governance mechanism based on structure and technology

Li Kun

Management School of Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 211815, Jiangsu, China

Received:2012-12-01 Revised:2014-01-20 Online:2014-05-25 Published:2014-05-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 现实中多数企业实施环境战略（增进能效、控制排放）的绩效并非理想，原因在于政府调控的嵌入机制及匹配效率。本文采用情境解析方法，结合“驱动源、治理目标、治理路径”形成的复杂情境，对混合驱动机制下各类复杂治理机制的适配性进行比较分析。研究发现：由于政企缺乏信息沟通，期望管控与市场“混生”出有效的治理机制存在相当大的偶然性，治理效果预期的不确定导致企业实施环境战略的动力不足。复制动态均衡模型研究表明：企业环境治理路径的选择具有策略性，且受制于决策者的风险态度。

关键词: 能效, 排放, 环境治理, 适配性

Abstract: The performance of Environment strategy implementation in most enterprises is not ideal due to the control and regulation mechanism and match efficiency. Combining with the intricate context formed by driving origins, governance objects and governance paths, this paper adopted context analytic method to analyze comparatively the suitability of different complex governance under hybrid driving mechanism. The paper's research found out as follows: owing to the communication deficiency between government and enterprise, the anticipation that effective governance mechanism could be mixedlybreeded by market and administration control displays bigger occasionality, and the uncertainty of governance effect would render enterprise have not enough motivation to implement active environment strategy. Duplication dynamic evolution study proved the choice of environment governance path is strategic and depends on decision maker's risk attitude.

Key words: energy efficiency, emission, environment governance, suitability

中图分类号:

F270

李昆. 基于结构和技术的企业环境治理机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(5): 54-61.

Li Kun. Research on environment governance mechanism based on structure and technology[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(5): 54-61.

参考文献

[1] 张宝珍.在"能源危机"的威胁下,日本是如何进行其产业结构的调整的[J].世界经济,1981(11):58-62. [2] 闫妍.从经济危机与产业结构调整的内在联系探索我国产业结构调整方向[J].特区经济,2010(10):217-219. [3] Jorge Rivera,Jennifer Oetzel,Peter deLeon and Mark Starik.Business responses to environmental and social protection policies:toward a framework for analysis[J].Policy Sciences,Volume 42,2009(1),3-32. [4] Peter M.Kort,Paul J.J.M.van Loon and Mikulás Luptácik.Optimal dynamic environmental policies of a profit maximizing firm[J].Journal of Economics.1991,54(3),195-225. [5] 李兰冰.中国全要素能源效率评价与解构:基于"管理-环境"双重视角[J].中国工业经济,2012(6):57-68. [6] 王兵,吴延瑞等.中国区域环境效率与环境全要素生产率增长[J].经济研究,2010(5):95-107. [7] Schmidheiny S.Changing course:a global business perspective on development and the environment[M].MIT Press,1992,4,221-245. [8] Verfaillie HA,Bidwell R.Measuring eco-efficiency-a guide to reporting company performance[EB/OL].WBCSD,http://www.wbcsd.org/newscenter/reports/2000/Measuring EE.pdf. [9] Zimmerman.M.Toyota suspends plan to build the Prius in the U.S.Los Angeles Times,2008,12,16. [10] The Hydrogen Economy:A Non-Technical Review[R],United Nations Environment Program (UNEP),2009. [11] 奥拉(美),戈佩特(美),普拉卡西(美),胡金波等(译).跨越油气时代:甲醇经济[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2011年第2版:151-153. [12] Hoffmann,P.Tomorrow's Energy.Hydrogen,Fuel Cells,and the Prospects for a Cleaner Planet[M].The MIT Press,2002,56-57. [13] Benjaafar S,Morin TL,Talavage J J.The strategic value of flexibility in sequential decision making[J].European Journal of Operational Research.1995(82),438-457. [14] Ansoff,H.I.Strategies for diversification[J].Harvard Business Review,1957,35(2),113-124.