区域性技术创新政策绩效评价的实证研究—基于相关性和灰色关联分析的视角

汪晓梦

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5) : 38-43.

PDF(1 KB)
PDF(1 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5) : 38-43.
论文

区域性技术创新政策绩效评价的实证研究—基于相关性和灰色关联分析的视角

  • 汪晓梦1,2
作者信息 +

An empirical study on performance evaluation of regional technology innovation policy—Based on perspective analysis of correlation and grey correlation

  • Wang Xiaomeng1,2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

技术创新已经成为区域经济发展的重要推动力。技术创新政策有力地促进了区域技术创新的发展。构建技术创新政策绩效评价的指标体系,选取合肥市作为分析案例,根据统计数据,运用相关性分析和灰色关联度方法,对合肥市技术创新政策绩效进行评价。同时将分析结果与有关城市进行横向比较,找出存在的问题与原因。在此基础上,提出优化合肥市技术创新政策绩效的对策和建议,进一步提高技术创新能力和水平。分析方法和结论对区域性技术创新政策实施效果评价具有借鉴和参考意义。

Abstract

Technology innovation has become an important driving force for regional economic development. Technology innovation policies have effectively promoted development of regional technology innovation. This paper constructs evaluation index system of technology innovation policy performance, by selecting Hefei as a case, using statistics data, and adopting evaluation method of correlation analysis and grey correlation, to evaluate technological innovation policy performance of Hefei. At the same time, the results are laterally compared with relevant cities, to find out problems and reasons of technology innovation in Hefei. On this basis, the paper puts forward optimization countermeasures and suggestions about technology innovation policy performance of Hefei, to further improve technology innovation ability and level. Here, the analysis method and conclusion about regional technology innovation policy implementation are of good reference roles.

关键词

技术创新 / 政策 / 绩效 / 对策

Key words

technology innovation / policy / performance / countermeasures

引用本文

导出引用
汪晓梦. 区域性技术创新政策绩效评价的实证研究—基于相关性和灰色关联分析的视角[J]. 科研管理. 2014, 35(5): 38-43
Wang Xiaomeng. An empirical study on performance evaluation of regional technology innovation policy—Based on perspective analysis of correlation and grey correlation[J]. Science Research Management. 2014, 35(5): 38-43
中图分类号: F061.5   

参考文献

[1] Friedrich, C. J. Public Policy [M], Style Press, 2007. [2] Mills, Claudia, Values and Public Policy [M], Cengage Learning Press, 1991. [3] Bert, Adam Cornelius. Technology Policy [M], Chromo Publishing, 2012. [4] Box, Louk, Science and Technology Policy for Development[M], Anthem Press,2006. [5] Michal Skorepa, Decision-Making [M], Palgrave Macmillan Press, 2011. [6] (美)沃恩,(美)巴斯著.沈崇麟译.科学决策方法:从社会科学研究到政策分析[M].重庆大学出版社,2006. [7] 喻金田,吴倩.武汉市自主创新政策绩效评价[J].科技创业月刊,2010(12):122-124. [8] 张凌,李锦慧.黑龙江自主创新政策绩效研究[J].科技管理研究,2009(2):51-53. [9] 刘晓娥,卢艳红,喻金田.企业技术政策绩效评价[J].统计与决策,2008(8):85-87. [10] 汪晓梦.我国中东部城市科技创新政策实施效果评价及建议[J].学术交流,2013(3):72-74. [11] 汪晓梦.基于灰色关联度分析的合肥与苏州科技创新能力比较[J].皖西学院学报,2013(3):68-71. [12] 汪晓梦.财政资金支持企业技术创新绩效的评价比较[J].滁州学院学报,2013(3):9-12. [13] 李朝鲜.社会经济统计学(第二版)[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2006. [14] 刘思峰,党耀国,方志耕,谢乃明.灰色系统理论及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2010. [15] 许香存.基于灰色理论的外资利用的定量分析[D].成都:电子技术大学出版社,2004.

PDF(1 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/