包容型领导风格对团队绩效的影响—基于员工自我效能感的中介作用

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 152-160.

• 论文 • 上一篇

包容型领导风格对团队绩效的影响—基于员工自我效能感的中介作用

方阳春

浙江工业大学全球浙商发展研究院, 浙江杭州 310023

收稿日期:2012-10-24 修回日期:2013-10-10 出版日期:2014-05-25 发布日期:2014-05-21
作者简介:方阳春（1974-），女，浙江浦江人，浙江工业大学全球浙商发展研究院副教授，硕士生导师，管理学博士。研究方向：组织行为学、人力资源管理。
基金资助:
浙江省发展和改革委员会重大招标项目“我省大力培养企业科学家的对策思路研究”（201306）；浙江省软科学研究项目“产学研合作模式驱动的浙江省中小企业技术创新能力提升及效率评价”（2012C35013）；国家自然青年科学项目“基于互动过程的问题解决团队有效性影响机制”（71101128）。

The effect of inclusive leadership on team performance：Based on the mediating effect of self-efficacy

Fang Yangchun

Global Institute for Zhejiang Merchants Development, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China

Received:2012-10-24 Revised:2013-10-10 Online:2014-05-25 Published:2014-05-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 领导风格影响团队的绩效。本文界定了一种关系型领导风格——包容型领导风格，探讨了包容型领导风格对团队绩效的影响，并深入而系统地分析了自我效能感在包容型领导风格与团队绩效之间的中介作用。通过问卷调查和统计分析，发现包容型领导风格包括领导包容员工的观点和失败、认可并培养员工、公平对待员工等3个维度。包容型领导风格与团队的绩效具有显著正相关：认可并培养员工、公平对待员工对团队任务绩效具有显著正向影响；包容型领导风格的3个维度都对团队周边绩效具有显著的正向影响。领导包容员工的观点和失败、公平对待员工对员工自我效能感有显著影响，而员工自我效能感又显著影响团队的任务绩效和周边绩效。员工自我效能感在领导公平对待员工与团队绩效之间起部分中介作用，在领导包容员工观点失败与团队周边绩效之间起完全中介作用。

关键词: 包容型领导风格, 团队绩效, 自我效能感, 中介作用

Abstract: Leadership has a significant effect on the team performance. This study defines a relational leadership-inclusive leadership, investigates its effect on team performance, and analyzes the mediating effect of self-efficacy between inclusive leadership and team performance. By means of questionnaire surveys and statistical analysis, we conclude that inclusive leadership is composed of three dimensions-being inclusive with the opinions and failures of employees, recognizing and training the employees as well as fair treatment of team members. The inclusive leadership has significant positive correlation with team performance. Recognizing and training the employees as well as fair treatment of team members have significant positive impacts on task performance. All the three dimensions of inclusive leadership have significant positive impacts on contextual performance. Being inclusive with the opinions and failures of employees as well as fair treatment of team members affects the self-efficacy significantly, which then obviously affects the task performance and contextual performance of the team. The self-efficacy plays part mediating role between fair treatment of team members and task performance of the team, and full mediating role between being inclusive with the opinions and failures of employees and the contextual performance of the team.

Key words: inclusive leadership, team performance, self-efficacy, mediating effect

中图分类号:

C933.2

方阳春. 包容型领导风格对团队绩效的影响—基于员工自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(5): 152-160.

Fang Yangchun. The effect of inclusive leadership on team performance：Based on the mediating effect of self-efficacy[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(5): 152-160.

参考文献

[1] 陈旭.团队领导对团队效能的影响机理研究[J].科研管理,2006,27(4):138-141. [2] Temple,J.B.,Ylitalo,J.Promoting inclusive leadership in higher education institutions[J].Tertiary Education and Management,2009,15(3):277–289. [3] 袁行霈.中华文明的历史启示[J].北京大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2007(1). [4] 程萍.包容是改革的催化剂[J].人民论坛,2013(34):6. [5] 唐任伍."包容"是现代文明的标志[J].人民论坛,2013(3):5. [6] 张渝政.马克思主义哲学下意蕴下的包容观[J].理论月刊,2013(5):14-18. [7] Hollander E.P.Inclusive leadership:The essential leader-follower relationship[M]. Taylor & Francis Group,2009:3-6. [8] Garrison-Wade,D.,Sobel,O.,Fulmer,C.L.Inclusive leadership:Preparing principals for the role that awaits them[J].Educational Leadership and Administration,19:117-126. [9] Ryan,J.Inclusive leadership:A review[J].Journal of Education Administration and Foundation,2007,18:92-125. [10] Nembhard,I.M.,Edmondson,A.C..Making it safe:The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2006,27:941–966. [11] Carmeli,A.,Reiter-Palmon,R.,Ziv,E.Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating Role of Psychological Safety[J]. Creativity Research Journal,2010,22(3):250–260. [12] Ospina,S. Leadership, Diversity and Inclusion: Insights from Scholarship[J].Graduate School of Public Service, 2011,3:3-30. [13] 朱其训."包容性增长"实现路径探析——基于"包容性领导"的视角[J].前沿,2011(23):9-11. [14] 高宏.基于企业核心能力的包容性领导力探讨[J]. 上海管理科学,2012(6):10-12. [15] 李燕萍,杨婷,潘亚娟,徐嘉.包容性领导的构建与实施——基于新生代员工管理视角[J]. 中国人力资源开发,2012(3):31-35. [16] 孟慧,宋继文,孙志强等.变革型领导如何影响员工的工作结果[J].心理科学,2011,34(5):1167-1173. [17] Walumbwa, F.O., Avolio, B.J., Gardner, W.L., et al. Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory－based measure[J].Journal of Management, 2008, 34(1):89－126 [18] Fitzsimmons,D., James,K.T. & Denyer,D. Alternative approaches for studying shared and distributed leadership[J].International Journal of Management Reviews, 2011,13:313-328. [19] Borman, W.C.,Motowidlo,S. J.Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual Performance[M]. San Francisco:Jossey Bass,l993.\ [20] 班杜拉著,缪小春等译.自我效能:控制的实施[M].华东师范大学出版社,2003(12). [21] Schwarzer, R.,Babler. J.,Schroder,et a1. The assessment of optimistic self—beliefs: comparisons of the German,Spanish,and Chinese versions of the general self—efficacy scale[J]. Applied Psychology:An International Reviews,1997,46(1):69—88. [22] 杨凯,马剑虹.变革型领导力和交易型领导力:团队绩效的预测指标[J].心理学探新,2009(3):82-88. [23] 段锦云,田晓明.组织内信任对员工建言行为的影响研究[J].心理科学,2011,34(6):1458-1462. [24] Hirak,R.,Peng,A.C., Carmeli,A., et al. Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: The importance of psychological safety and learning from failures[J].The Leadership Quarterly.2012(23):107-117. [25] 叶余建,何铨,聂雪林.中小型企业主的魅力型领导行为方式对下属影响机制研究[J].人类工效学,2007(3):41-43. [26] 颜爱民,裴聪.辱虐管理对工作绩效的影响及自我效能感的中介作用[J].管理学报,2013(2):213-218. [27] Baron, R. M., Kenny,D. A. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual,Strategic,and Statistical Considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173-1182. [28] Luthans F, Youssef C M, Avolio B J. Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge[M].Oxford,UK: Oxford University Press,2007. [29] 韩翼,杨百寅.真实型领导、心理资本与员工创新行为:领导成员交换的调节作用[J].管理世界,2011(12):78-86. [30] 仲理峰,王震,李梅,李超平.变革型领导、心理资本对员工工作绩效的影响研究[J].管理学报,2013(4):536-544. [31] Luthans F., Norman S. M., Avolio B. J., et al. The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital in the Supportive Organizational Climate employee Perform ance Relationship[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2008, 29(2): 219-238. [32] 田喜洲,谢晋宇.组织支持感对员工工作行为的影响:心理资本中介作用的实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论,2010,13(1): 23-29.

包容型领导风格对团队绩效的影响—基于员工自我效能感的中介作用

The effect of inclusive leadership on team performance：Based on the mediating effect of self-efficacy

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李艳妮徐兰香. 先前经验对新产品开发绩效的影响机制[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(3): 142-150.
[2]	王莉, 夏萱. 品牌社区中用户创新行为缘何缺失，又因何兴起？——基于权力感视角的研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(2): 176-183.
[3]	张秀娥王超李帅. 制度环境、创业自我效能感与创业意愿[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(5): 59-66.
[4]	方阳春, 袁庆, 臧睿, 任艳红. 包容型领导风格对新时代员工工作幸福感的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(2): 184-192.
[5]	赵晓鸽钟世虎郭晓欣. 数字普惠金融发展、金融错配缓解与企业创新[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(4): 158-169.
[6]	张海涛肖岚李鹏陈古鹏. 建设性自恋型领导和中层管理者创新创业行为[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(3): 172-179.
[7]	马荣康金鹤. 高校技术转移对科研产出的影响效应研究——科研资助的中介作用与调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(5): 278-288.
[8]	邹旸,崔连广,闫旭. 效果逻辑形成机制研究：自我效能的中介作用[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(7): 224-234.
[9]	尹奎,徐渊,宋皓杰,邢璐. 科研经历、差错管理氛围与科研创造力提升[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(9): 169-176.
[10]	易朝辉段海霞任胜钢. 创业自我效能感、创业导向与科技型小微企业绩效关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(8): 99-109.
[11]	阎亮张治河. 组织创新氛围与员工创新行为——一个混合机制模型[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(9): 97-105.
[12]	段锦云肖君宜夏晓彤. 变革型领导、团队建言氛围和团队绩效：创新氛围的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(4): 76-83.
[13]	屠兴勇，张琪，王泽英，赵紫薇，何欣. 知识工作者内生动机、知识共享意愿与创造力：机制与路径[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(10): 111-118.
[14]	逄键涛温珂. 主动性人格对员工创新行为的影响与机制[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(1): 12-20.
[15]	王颖刘莎莎. 沉默是金吗？——组织沉默对员工负向行为的影响及其作用机制[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(1): 144-152.