企业集团研发协同影响因素及其效果研究

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 108-115.

企业集团研发协同影响因素及其效果研究

陈志军, 王晓静, 徐鹏

山东大学管理学院,山东济南 250100

收稿日期:2012-05-15 修回日期:2013-12-13 出版日期:2014-03-25 发布日期:2014-04-01
作者简介:陈志军（1965-），男（汉），山东青州人，山东大学管理学院教授，博士生导师，研究方向：战略管理与集团公司管理。
王晓静（1982-），女（汉），山东乳山人，山东大学管理学院博士，研究方向：企业战略管理。
徐鹏（1985-），男（汉），山东鄄城人，山东大学管理学院博士生，研究方向：企业战略管理与集团公司管理。
基金资助:
山东省社会科学规划研究项目（13BGLJ06，2013-2014）；国家自然科学基金青年项目（71302090，2013-2016）。

Research on influencing factors and effect of R&D synergies in enterprise groups

Chen Zhijun, Wang Xiaojing, Xu Peng

School of Management, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China

Received:2012-05-15 Revised:2013-12-13 Online:2014-03-25 Published:2014-04-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以企业集团研发协同为研究对象，将企业集团研发协同分为母子公司研发协同、子公司间研发协同和公司内部研发协同三个维度，构建研发协同影响因素、企业集团各维度协同水平和研发绩效的测量量表。通过回归分析验证了战略导向、组织文化、激励机制及沟通机制四个因素对企业集团研发协同各维度的影响：战略导向对母子公司研发协同水平具有促进作用，对子公司间和公司内部研发水平影响不显著；组织文化对母子公司研发协同和公司内部研发协同水平有正向影响，对子公司间研发协同水平影响不显著；激励机制在子公司之间、公司内部有促进研发协同水平的作用，对母子公司的研发协同水平影响不显著；沟通机制对于企业集团各维度的研发协同水平均有显著正向影响。并在此基础上探索了研发协同各维度的实现水平对集团研发绩效的影响，研究发现母子公司间、子公司间以及公司内部研发协同水平均对研发绩效具有显著正向影响。

关键词: 企业集团, 研发协同, 影响因素, 集团研发绩效

Abstract: In this paper, the author chose the enterprise group R&D synergies as the object, divided the enterprise group R&D synergies into three dimensions: parent-subsidiary corporation R&D synergies, R&D synergies between subsidiaries and internal R&D synergies, then the author built evaluation form of influence factors of R&D synergies, synergies level of enterprise dimensions and R&D performance. Through regression analysis, this paper validated the effect that the following four factors, including the strategic orientation, organizational culture, incentive mechanism and the communication mechanism, exert on enterprise groups R&D collaboration:strategic orientation has positive effect on the parent and subsidiary company R&D collaboration level; the influence on internal R&D level and R&D level between subsidiary companies is not significant; organizational culture has a positive impact on internal R&D collaboration level and parent-subsidiary company R&D collaboration level, and have an unclear influence on R&D coordination level between the subsidiary company; incentive mechanism can promote the development of R&D collaboration level in the company and between subsidiary company; and the influence on parent company R&D coordination level is not significantly; communication mechanism has a positive significant impact on R&D coordination level of dimensions of Group company; on this basis, the author also studied the impact that the level dimensions of R&D coordination can achieved made on company performance. Then the author found out that the R&D coordination level has a significant positive effect on company performance between subsidiary companies, in the parent and subsidiary company, and inside the company.

Key words: enterprise groups, research and development synergies, influencing factors, enterprise group R&D performance

中图分类号:

F270.7

陈志军, 王晓静, 徐鹏. 企业集团研发协同影响因素及其效果研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(3): 108-115.

Chen Zhijun, Wang Xiaojing, Xu Peng. Research on influencing factors and effect of R&D synergies in enterprise groups[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(3): 108-115.

参考文献

[1] 陈志军.集团公司管理——基于三种管控模式[M]. 北京:经济科学出版社,2010. [2] Wolfgang Becker, Jiirgen Dietz. R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms-evidence for the German manufacturing industry [J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33(2):209-223. [3] Luis Miotti, Frederique Sachwalda.Co-operative R&D:why and with whom?An integrated framework of analysis[J].Research Policy,2003,32(8):1481-1499. [4] Deepak K.S.,Michael A.C.. Complementary resources and cooperative research:a model of research joint ventures among competitors[J].Management Science,1991,37(9):1091-1106. [5] Rothwell R.Towards the fifth-generation innovation process [J]. International marketing review, 1994, 11(1): 7-31. [6] 白俊红,陈玉和,李婧.企业内部创新协同及其影响要素研究[J]. 科学学研究,2008(4):409-413. [7] Kessler, E.H., Chakrabarti, A.K. Innovation speed: A conceptual model of context, antecedents, and outcomes [J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21 (4): 1143-1191. [8] Gatignon, H., Xuereb, J.M. Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1997, 34(1): 77-90. [9] 余浩.企业战略导向与技术创新绩效的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010(9):62-66. [10] Wallach, Ellen J.Individuals and Organizations: The Cultural Match [J]. Training and Development Journal, 1983, 2:28-36. [11] Claver, E., Llopis, J., Garcia, D., Molina,H. Organizational culture for innovation and new technological behavior [J]. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 1998, 9 (1):55-68. [12] 简传红,任玉珑,罗艳蓓.组织文化、知识管理战略与创新方式选择的关系研究[J]. 管理世界,2010(2):181-182. [13] Amabile, T.M. Motivating creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do[J]. California Management Review, 1997, 40(1):39-58. [14] Hoyt J, Gerloff E A. Organizational environment, changing economic conditions, and the effective supervision of technical personnel: A management challenge [J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 1999, 10(2): 275-293. [15] Souitaris V. Firm specific competencies determining technological innovation: A survey in Greece [J]. R&D Management, 2002, 32(1): 61-77. [16] Fisher R J, Maltz E, Jaworski B J. Enhancing communication between marketing and engineering: the moderating role of relative functional identification [J]. The Journal of Marketing, 1997, 61(3): 54-70. [17] Mathieu J E, Heffner T S, Goodwin G F, et al. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance [J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2000, 85(2): 273-283. [18] Keller R T. Predictors of the performance of project groups in R & D organizations [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1986, 29(4): 715-726. [19] Asakawa K. Evolving headquarters‐subsidiary dynamics in international R&D: the case of Japanese multinationals [J]. R&D Management, 2001, 31(1): 1-14. [20] Narver J C, Slater S F. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability [J]. The Journal of Marketing, 1990, 54(4): 20-35. [21] Cooper R G, Kleinschmidt E J. Winning businesses in product development: The critical success factors [J]. Research-Technology Management, 2007, 50(3): 52-66. [22] Tsai W. The formation of intraorganizational linkages [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(9): 925-939. [23] Khazanchi S, Lewis M W, Boyer K K. Innovation-supportive culture: The impact of organizational values on process innovation [J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25(4): 871-884. [24] Podsakoff P M, Todor W D, Grover R A, et al. Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behaviors: fact or fiction? [J]. Organizational behavior and human performance, 1984, 34(1): 21-63. [25] M hlemeyer P. R&D Personnel Management by Incentive Management: Results of an Empirical Survey in Research & Development [J]. Personnel Review, 1992, 21(4): 27-36. [26] Downs C W, Hazen M D. A factor analytic study of communication satisfaction [J]. Journal of business communication, 1977, 14(3): 63-73. [27] Penley L E, Hawkins B. Studying interpersonal communication in organizations: A leadership application [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1985, 28(2): 309-326. [28] 钱小军,詹晓丽.关于沟通满意度以及影响的因子分析和实证研究[J]. 管理评论,2005(6):30-34. [29] Leenders M A A M, Wierenga B. The effectiveness of different mechanisms for integrating marketing and R&D [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2002, 19(4): 305-317. [30] Adler P S, Kwon S W. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept [J]. Academy of management review, 2002, 27(1): 17-40. [31] Ruekert,Robert W. and Walker, Orville C. Marketing's interaction with other functional units: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1987, 51(1):1-19. [32] Brouwer E, Kleinknecht A. Innovative output, and a firm's propensity to patent: An exploration of CIS micro data [J]. Research Policy, 1999, 28(6): 615-624. [33] 钱锡红.企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效——一个交互效应模型[J]. 管理世界,2010(5):118-129.