基于科学/经验的学习对企业创新绩效的影响:环境动态性的调节作用

科研管理 ›› 2013, Vol. ›› Issue (6): 1-8.

• 论文 • 下一篇

基于科学/经验的学习对企业创新绩效的影响:环境动态性的调节作用

郭爱芳¹, 陈劲²

1. 浙江理工大学经济管理学院, 杭州浙江 310018;
2. 清华大学经济管理学院, 北京 100084

收稿日期:2011-12-15 修回日期:2013-05-10 出版日期:2013-06-27 发布日期:2013-06-18
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目(71202139,起止时间:2013.1-2015.12);国家自然科学基金面上项目项目(71273230,起止时间:2013.1-2016.12);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJC630050,起止时间:2011.9-2014.12);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(12YJA630014,起止时间:2012.2-2014.12);浙江省哲学社会科学规划项目(12JCGL06YB,起止时间:2012.6-2014.12);浙江理工大学科研启动基金项目(1105144-J,起止日期:2011.1-2013.12)。浙江理工大学521人才培养计划资助。

The effect of STI/DUI learning on innovation performance:The moderative role of environmental dynamicity

Guo Aifang¹, Chen Jin²

1. School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310018, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2011-12-15 Revised:2013-05-10 Online:2013-06-27 Published:2013-06-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 已有文献大多笼统分析组织学习对创新绩效的影响,而细化分析企业不同学习行为对创新绩效影响的研究较少。本文分析了基于科学/经验的两种学习对创新绩效的影响以及环境动态性在其中的调节作用,并以我国230家制造企业为样本进行了实证检验。结果表明:(1)基于科学/经验的两种学习对创新绩效都有显著的正向影响;(2)科学/经验两种学习密切相关,交互促进企业的技术创新;(3)环境动态性对科学/经验学习与创新绩效之间的关系起调节作用。研究结论对我国企业提升自主创新能力和创新绩效有指导意义。

关键词: 基于科学的学习, 基于经验的学习, 创新绩效, 环境动态性

Abstract: Exsisting studies mainly devote to the general analysis on how organizational learning determines innovation performance; however a thorough and systematic research involving the effects of different learning behaviors on the inovation performance of enterprises is quite rare. The impact of Science, Technology, Innovation(STI)/Doing, Using, Interacting(DUI)-based learning on technological innovation performance as well as the moderative effect of environmental dynamicity is studied, and by taking the survey of 230 manufacturing enterprises in China as sample, a empirically study is carried out. Results indicate that (1) both STI-based learning and DUI-based learning are able to facilitate the technological innovation performance of enterprises; (2) STI learning and DUI learning are closely related with each other and are able to complementarily facilitate the technological innovation of enterprises; (3) environmental dynamicity moderates the relationship between STI learning and DUI learning and innovation performance. Hopefully, the findings are able to provide the guidance for enterprises to enhance their innovative capabilities and innovation performance.

Key words: STI-based learning, DUI-based learning, innovation performance, environmental dynamicity

中图分类号:

F273.1

郭爱芳, 陈劲. 基于科学/经验的学习对企业创新绩效的影响:环境动态性的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2013, (6): 1-8.

Guo Aifang, Chen Jin. The effect of STI/DUI learning on innovation performance:The moderative role of environmental dynamicity[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, (6): 1-8.

参考文献

[1] Lundvall B. ., Lorenz E., Drejer I. How Europe’s economies learn . Report for the Loc Nis Policy Workshop, 2004.
[2] Jensen M.B., Johnson B., Lorenz E., et al. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation [J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(5): 680-693.
[3] 郭爱芳,陈劲. 科学学习和经验学习:概念、特征及理论意义[J]. 技术经济, 2012, 31(6): 16-20.
[4] Decarolis D.M., Deeds D.L. The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(10): 953-968.
[5] Fabrizio K.R. Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation [J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38(38): 255-267.
[6] Fleming L., Sorenson O. Science as a map in technological search [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2004, 25(8/9): 909-928.
[7] Baba Y., Shichijo N., Sedita S.R. How do collaborations with universities affect firms’ innovative performance? The role of "pasteur scientists" in the advanced materials field [J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38(5): 756-764.
[8] Lorenz E., Valeyre A. Organizational forms and innovative performance: a comparison of the EU-15 [M].in Lorenz E, Lundvall B. . How Europe’s Economies Learn: Coordinating Competing Models. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
[9] Von Hippel E. The sources of innovation [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
[10] Bidault F., Despres C., Butler C. The drivers of cooperation between buyers and suppliers for product innovation [J]. Research Policy, 1998, 26(7-8): 719-732.
[11] 朱朝晖,陈劲. 开放创新的技术学习模式[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.
[12] Hu J.L., Hsu Y.H. The more interactive, the more innovative a case study of South Korean cellular phone manufacturers [J]. Technovation, 2008, 28(1-2): 75-87.
[13] Nelson R.R. The role of knowledge in R&D efficiency [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1982, 97(3): 453-470.
[14] Geiger S.W., Makri M. Exploration and exploitation innovation processes: the role of organizational slack in R&D intensive firms [J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2006, 17(1): 97-108.
[15] Fleck J. Informal information flow and the nature of expertise in financial services [J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 1996, 11(1/2): 104-128.
[16] Cara J., Lundvall B. ., Mendon S. The changing role of science in the innovation process: from queen to cinderella? [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2009, 76(6): 861-867.
[17] Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1): 128-152.
[18] Jaworski B.J., Kohli A.K. Market orientation: antecedents and consequences [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1993, 57(3): 53-70.
[19] Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Knowledge, innovative activities and industrial evolution [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2000, 9(2): 289-314.
[20] Miller W.L., Morris L.著,关山松等译. 第四代研发:管理知识、技术与革新[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2005.
[21] Fleming L., Sorenson O. Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data [J]. Research Policy, 2001, 30(7): 1019-1039.
[22] Hult G.T.M., Ketchen D.J., Arrfelt M. Strategic supply chain management: improving performance through a culture of competitiveness and knowledge development [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(10): 1035-1052.
[23] Akgün A.E., Keskin H., Byrne J.C., et al. Emotional and learning capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance [J]. Technovation, 2007, 27(9): 501-513.
[24] Alegre J., Chiva R. Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: an empirical test [J]. Technovation, 2008, 28(6): 315-326.
[25] Akgün A.E., Byrne J.C., Lynn G.S., et al. New product development in turbulent environments: impact of improvisation and unlearning on new product performance [J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2007, 24(3): 203-230.
[26] 侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟. 结构方程模型及其应用[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2004.
[27] 黄芳铭. 结构方程模式:理论与应用[M]. 北京: 中国税务出版社, 2005.
[28] Herrera L., Mu D.M., Nieto M. Mobility of public researchers, scientific knowledge transfer, and the firm’s innovation process [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2010, 63(5): 510-518.
[29] Love J.H., Roper S. Organizing innovation: complementarities between cross-functional teams [J]. Technovation, 2009, 29(3): 192-203.

基于科学/经验的学习对企业创新绩效的影响:环境动态性的调节作用

The effect of STI/DUI learning on innovation performance:The moderative role of environmental dynamicity

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘微微金英哲毕克新. 多维邻近性、创新开放度与合作创新绩效——基于网络演化视角[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(8): 162-172.
[2]	马增林, 于璟婷, 王磊. 远程工作对远程员工创新绩效的双刃剑效应[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(8): 173-182.
[3]	赵富强胡伟陈耘张秋红. 整合共享型人力资源实践与个体创新绩效——知识交换与目标导向的作用[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(8): 183-192.
[4]	肖艳红张刚庞立君马晶梅. 网络双重嵌入与数字创新搜寻战略匹配研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(7): 134-143.
[5]	吴航陈劲. 网络伙伴多样化的影响因素与创新情景[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(6): 137-143.
[6]	赵胜民于星慧. 创新失败对企业再创新绩效的影响：高管薪酬激励的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(6): 183-192.
[7]	张秀峰胡贝贝陈伟张树静. FDI数量、质量与国家高新区创新绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(5): 54-61.
[8]	刘欣萌李随成张彩林王祥. 伙伴关系对企业创新绩效的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(4): 154-163.
[9]	齐丽云, 王佳威, 刘旸, 吕正纲. 高管团队异质性对企业绿色创新绩效影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(4): 175-184.
[10]	王伟楠王凯严子淳. 区域高质量发展对“专精特新”中小企业创新绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(2): 32-44.
[11]	王海花杜梅刘钊成. 高校知识网络对产学协同创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(2): 116-126.
[12]	周楠, 杨竹. 制度距离与中国企业跨国并购创新绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(2): 81-88.
[13]	李梓涵昕. 创新漏斗视角下开放性和独占性机制对企业创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9): 99-108.
[14]	孟凡生徐野赵刚. “智能+”对制造企业创新绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9): 109-118.
[15]	芮正云, 马喜芳. 反思性知识重构、企业即兴能力及其创新效应[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9): 176-184.