网络位置、地理临近性与企业创新绩效——一个交互效应模型

科研管理 ›› 2013, Vol. ›› Issue (3): 7-13,30.

网络位置、地理临近性与企业创新绩效——一个交互效应模型

党兴华¹, 常红锦^1,2

1. 西安理工大学经济与管理学院, 陕西西安 710054;
2. 山西师范大学经济与管理学院, 山西临汾 041000

收稿日期:2012-07-03 修回日期:2012-11-20 出版日期:2013-03-27 发布日期:2013-03-19
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目"基于知识权力的技术创新网络治理机理及其实现研究"(国家自然科学基金: 70972051,2009-03至2012-03)。

Network position, geographical proximity, and innovation performance: An interactive effect model

Dang Xinghua¹, Chang Hongjin^1,2

1. School of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710054, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041000, China

Received:2012-07-03 Revised:2012-11-20 Online:2013-03-27 Published:2013-03-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文从网络中心性和结构洞两个方面研究了网络位置与地理位置的交互作用对企业创新绩效的影响。并应用多元回归分析方法对133家国内企业的调查数据进行实证分析。结果显示,网络中心度与地理临近性的交互作用对创新绩效有显著的正向影响作用;而结构洞与地理临近性的交互作用对企业创新绩效没有显著的影响。结果表明,地理集聚创造的优势很大程度上依赖于企业在其所处社会网络中的位置,而地理空间能够改变信息和资源在网络空间的转移效果。

关键词: 网络位置, 地理临近性, 交互作用, 创新绩效

Abstract: The effect of interaction between network position and the geographical proximity on the enterprise’s innovation performance is studied from two aspects of network centrality and structural holes. And through multiple regression analysis on the survey data of 133 domestic enterprises, the results show that the interaction between network centrality and geographical proximity has a significantly positive effect on enterprise’s innovation performance, however the interaction between structure holes and geographical proximity has an insignificant effect on enterprise’ s innovation performance. The results also indicate that the advantage of geographical agglomerative creations largely depends on the enterprise’s network position, and the geographical space is able to change the transfer effect of information and resources in the network space.

Key words: network position, geographical proximity, interaction, innovation performance

中图分类号:

F273.7

党兴华, 常红锦. 网络位置、地理临近性与企业创新绩效——一个交互效应模型[J]. 科研管理, 2013, (3): 7-13,30.

Dang Xinghua, Chang Hongjin. Network position, geographical proximity, and innovation performance: An interactive effect model[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, (3): 7-13,30.

参考文献

[1] Burt R S. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.
[2] Andrew V S. Firm Scope Experience, Historic Multimarket Contact with Partners, Centrality, and the Relationship Between Structural Holes and Performance [J]. Organization Science, 2009, 1(20): 85-106.
[3] 郑登攀,党兴华.网络嵌入性对企业选择合作技术创新伙伴的影响 [J].科研管理, 2012, 1(33): 154-160.
[4] 陈伟,张永超等.区域装备制造业产学研合作创新网络的实证研究———基于网络结构和网络聚类的视角 [J].中国软科学, 2012(2): 96-107.
[5] Antonelli C. Collective Knowledge Communication and Innovation: the Evidence of Technological Districts [J]. Regional Studies, 2000, 6(11): 535-547.
[6] Ganesan S & Malter A J. Does Distance Still Matter? Geographic Proximity and New Product Development [J]. Joumal of Marketing, 2005, 69(4): 44-60.
[7] Whittington K B & Owen-Smith J. Networks, Propinquity, and Innovation in Knowledge-intensive Industries [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2009, 54(1): 90-122.
[8] Lahiri N. Geographic Distribution of R&D Activity: How Does It Affect Innovation Quality? [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(5): 1194-1209.
[9] Powell W W & Koput K W. Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(1): 116-145.
[10] Zaheer A & Bell G G. Benefiting from Network Position: Firm Capabilities, Structural Holes, and Performance [J]. Strategic Management Joumal, 2005, 26(9): 809-825.
[11] Arikan A T. Interfirm Knowledge Exchanges and the Knowledge Creation Capability of Clusters [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2009, 34(4): 658-676.
[12] Singh J. Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns [J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(5): 756-770.
[13] Casper S. Creating Silicon Valley in Europe: Public Policy towards New Technology Industries [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[14] Teece D. Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation: Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1992, 18(1): 1-25.
[15] Gertler M S. Best Practice? Geography, Learning and the Institutional Limits to Strong Convergence [J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2001, l: 5-26.
[16] 钱锡红,杨永福.企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效 [J]. 管理世界, 2010(5): 118-129.
[17] Burt R S, Hogarth R M & Michaud C. The Social Capital of French and American Managers [J]. Organization Science, 2000, 11(2): 123-147.
[18] McEvily B. & Zaheer A. Bridging Ties: A Source of Firm Heterogeneity in Competitive Capabilities [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(12): 1133-1158.
[19] Hagedoon J & Cloodt M. Measuring Innovative Performance: Is There an Advantage in Using Multiple Indicators? [J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(8): 1365-1379.
[20] Devinnye T M. How well do Patents Measure New Product Activity? [J]. Economic Letters, 1993, 41(4): 447-450.
[21] Podsakoff P M & D W Organ. Self-reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects [J]. Journal of Management, 1986, 12(4): 531-544.
[22] Harmon H H. Modern Factor Analysis [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1967.