PDF(1118 KB)
PDF(1118 KB)
PDF(1118 KB)
管理层能力对企业可持续发展的影响研究:基于行为决策理论
The effect of managerial ability on corporate sustainable development:Based on Behavioral Decision Theory
管理层能力是企业实现可持续发展的核心驱动力,深入探究管理层能力在内外部环境约束下如何提升企业可持续发展绩效,对理解企业在高质量发展阶段优化治理结构、提升绿色竞争力并实现长期价值创造具有重要意义。本研究运用行为决策理论,以2010—2021年沪深两市A股上市公司作为研究样本,基于DEA-Tobit两阶段回归模型,利用多元回归方法进行实证检验。研究发现,管理层能力显著提升企业可持续发展绩效,即管理层能力通过修正短视偏差、政策认知偏差与信息不对称偏差,推动企业制定并执行可持续发展决策;薪酬激励在二者关系中呈现倒U型调节效应,低度激励导致管理层利益与企业长期目标脱节,适度激励通过利益绑定激活长期动机,过度激励则引发短期利益锚定偏差进而削弱管理层能力的效能发挥;媒体关注发挥正向调节作用,即通过减少管理层信息不对称并增加短视决策成本,共同优化决策环境,提升管理层能力向可持续发展绩效的转化效率。本研究拓展了管理层能力的研究领域,深化了行为决策理论在可持续发展领域的应用,同时为企业优化高管激励机制、合理引导媒体监督提供了实践参考。
Managerial ability is a critical antecedent to achieving corporate sustainable development. Examining how managerial ability influences corporate sustainable development performance through the lens of decision bias correction is of great significance for understanding how firms can optimize governance structures, enhance green competitiveness, and create long-term value. Drawing on behavioral decision theory, this study takes A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2010 to 2021 as the research sample, and conducts empirical tests using a two-stage DEA-Tobit regression model along with multiple regression methods. This study reveals that managerial ability significantly contributes to corporate sustainable development performance. Specifically, managerial ability prompts enterprises to formulate and implement sustainable development decisions by correcting myopia bias, policy cognitive bias and information asymmetry bias. Executive compensation demonstrates an inverted U-shaped moderating effect on the relationship between managerial ability and sustainable development performance. Low-intensity incentives tend to induce managerial myopia and damage the long-term sustainable development of enterprises, while high-intensity incentives trigger short-term benefit locking bias and thereby weaken the effectiveness of managerial ability. Media attention plays a positive moderating role. It constrains and optimizes the decision-making environment by reducing managerial information asymmetry and raising the cost of myopic decisions, to enhance the effect of managerial ability on sustainable development performance. This study contributes to the literature by expanding the application of managerial ability research and the behavioral decision theory in the sustainability context. It also provides practical insights for optimizing executive incentive systems and guiding media supervision more effectively.
管理层能力 / 企业可持续发展 / 薪酬激励 / 媒体关注 / 行为决策理论
managerial ability / corporate sustainable development / compensation incentives / media attention / behavioral decision theory
| [1] |
余菲菲, 毛佳怡, 蒋庆. 企业数绿转型协同对可持续发展绩效的影响及作用机制研究:地方低碳政策的调节效应分析[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(11):89-98.
|
| [2] |
姜秀珍, 马政. 绿色人力资源管理对企业可持续发展绩效的影响研究[J]. 上海对外经贸大学学报, 2024, 31(6):92-105.
|
| [3] |
李辽辽, 张亚莉, 杨朝君. 数字化转型、组织韧性与企业可持续发展:双元学习视角[J]. 软科学, 2024, 38(10):69-76.
|
| [4] |
倪娟, 王帆. 管理层能力提高了研发绩效吗?:基于内控视角[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(4):220-228.
|
| [5] |
席龙胜, 赵辉. 高管双元环保认知、绿色创新与企业可持续发展绩效[J]. 经济管理, 2022, 44(3):139-158.
|
| [6] |
郑景丽, 高明珠, 李忆. 管理者心理韧性、数字化转型与企业绩效[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2025, 45(1):229-252.
数字化转型逐渐成为数字经济背景下企业发展的重要驱动力.文章结合数字化转型中存在的“数字技术基础薄弱”与“数字技术难以业务赋能”问题,从资源与能力视角将数字化转型划分为数字技术资源与数字技术赋能两个维度,探寻促进转型问题解决的前因(管理者心理韧性),并明确转型经济后果(企业绩效).根据中国香港联合证券交易所上市的557家企业在2010-2020年的数据,利用文本分析法实证发现:1)管理者心理韧性显著促进数字技术资源与数字技术赋能,且对数字技术赋能的作用更强;行业竞争负向调节管理者心理韧性对数字技术赋能的作用,但不调节管理者心理韧性对数字技术资源的作用.2)数字技术赋能正向影响企业绩效,数字技术资源对企业绩效无显著影响.3)管理者心理韧性对数字技术资源与数字技术赋能的促进作用、数字技术赋能对企业绩效的正向影响,均在大型企业、非制造业企业中更强.4)心理韧性强的管理者能够优化管理层人力资本结构,促进企业建设数字技术与提高数字技术赋能能力,助力数字化转型;数字技术赋能通过提高企业运营效率与营业成本控制效率获得企业绩效;心理韧性强的管理者可帮助企业获取数字技术赋能能力提高企业绩效.文章结论为企业实施数字化转型,获取数字化转型的经济效益提供了重要启示.
Digital transformation has gradually become an important driving force for enterprise development under the background of digital economy. Combining the problems of “weak digital technology foundation” and “difficult business empowerment of digital technology” from digital transformation, this paper divides digital transformation into digital technology resources and digital technology empowerment from the perspective of resources and capabilities to explore the antecedent (managerial resilience) that promote the solution of transformation problem and identify the economic consequence of transformation (firm performance). Based on the data of 557 firms listed in the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong, China from 2010 to 2020, the text analysis method is used to demonstrate that: 1) Managerial resilience has positive effects on both digital technology resources and digital technology empowerment, and has a stronger effect on digital technology empowerment; Industry competition negatively moderates the effect of managerial resilience on digital technology empowerment, but doesn't moderate the effect of managerial resilience on digital technology resources. 2) Digital technology empowerment has positive impacts on firm performance, while digital technology resources have no significant impact on firm performance. 3) Both “the promotion effect of managerial resilience on digital technology resources and digital technology empowerment” and “the positive impact of digital technology empowerment on firm performance” are stronger in large firms and non-manufacturing firms. 4) Managers with strong resilience promote the construction of digital technology and improve digital technology empowerment ability of firms by optimizing the human capital structure of management to help digital transformation; Digital technology empowerment enables firms to gain performance by improving operational efficiency and operating cost control efficiency; Managers with strong resilience can help firms acquire digital technology empowerment capabilities to improve firm performance. The conclusion of this paper provides important enlightenment for firms to implement digital transformation and obtain the economic benefits of digital transformation.
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
刘晓慧, 王爱国. 管理层能力、内部控制与企业创新效率[J]. 财会通讯, 2020(4):27-31.
|
| [14] |
赵胜民, 于星慧. 企业社会责任对企业创新的影响研究:来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(4):144-153.
|
| [15] |
王海花, 谭钦瀛, 李烨. 数字技术应用、绿色创新与企业可持续发展绩效:制度压力的调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(7):124-135.
|
| [16] |
李钧, 柳志娣, 王振源. 管理层能力对企业创新绩效的影响研究:产权性质与产品市场竞争的调节作用[J]. 华东经济管理, 2020, 34(6):47-55.
|
| [17] |
杨旭东, 彭晨宸, 姚爱琳. 管理层能力、内部控制与企业可持续发展[J]. 审计研究, 2018(3):121-128.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
徐怀宁, 董必荣. 数字化转型如何推动企业可持续发展:基于企业核心竞争力塑造的视角[J]. 当代经济管理, 2023, 45(7):44-53.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
陈琪, 刘卓琦. 经济政策不确定性与企业ESG表现[J]. 财会月刊, 2023, 44(5):69-76.
|
| [22] |
王若兰, 刘灿雷. 市场竞争、利润分享与企业间工资不平等:来自外资管制政策调整的证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(11):42-59.
|
| [23] |
王博, 康琦. 数字化转型与企业可持续发展绩效[J]. 经济管理, 2023, 45(6):161-176.
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
王新霞, 柳春. 民营企业经营者的股东权力关联及其绩效影响研究[J]. 当代经济科学, 2016, 38(5):106-113+128.
|
| [27] |
沈达勇. 股票流动性、管理层激励与企业技术创新[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 37(5):31-39.
|
| [28] |
王建华, 李伟平, 张克彪, 等. “创新型企业”高管薪酬对创新绩效存在过度激励吗[J]. 华东经济管理, 2015, 29(1):119-125.
|
| [29] |
马庆魁, 樊梦晨. 管理层激励、机构投资者持股与企业异质研发[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(9):140-149.
|
| [30] |
罗进辉. 媒体报道与高管薪酬契约有效性[J]. 金融研究, 2018(3):190-206.
|
| [31] |
李志斌, 邵雨萌, 李宗泽, 等. ESG信息披露、媒体监督与企业融资约束[J]. 科学决策, 2022(7):1-26.
|
| [32] |
阳镇, 陈劲, 凌鸿程. 媒体关注、环境政策不确定性与企业绿色技术创新:来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 管理工程学报, 2023, 37(4):1-15.
|
| [33] |
郭金花, 常帅文, 焦嶕. 工业机器人应用、媒体关注与企业绿色创新[J]. 南京财经大学学报, 2024 (5):100-110.
|
| [34] |
刘娥平, 莫凡. 媒体关注:信息效应抑或炒作效应?[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 42(3):141-152.
|
| [35] |
夏同水, 高佳蕊. ESG表现、媒体关注与企业信息透明度[J]. 会计之友, 2024(15):136-144.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |