PDF(1141 KB)
PDF(1141 KB)
PDF(1141 KB)
科技创新对新质生产力的影响研究——基于技术突破和要素配置的机制分析
Research on the influence of scientific and technological innovation on new quality productive forces: Mechanism analysis based on technological breakthroughs and factor allocation
发展新质生产力是推动经济社会高质量发展的内在要求和重要着力点。本文以2011—2022年战略性新兴产业的A股上市企业为研究样本,试图探究并阐释科技创新在培育新质生产力过程中的作用机制。研究发现:(1)科技创新能够显著提高企业新质生产力水平,该结论经过一系列稳健性检验和工具变量法处理内生性后依然成立;(2)作用机制检验表明,科技创新投入主要通过实现关键核心技术突破和数字技术创新的技术突破赋能机制、提升企业资源配置效率和数据要素利用水平的要素配置赋能机制,加快培育新质生产力;(3)异质性分析发现,知识产权保护和数字基础设施等外部环境、高科技行业和技术密集型特征等内部条件,均有助于增强科技创新对新质生产力发展的驱动作用。本文的研究结论能够为我国在经济高质量发展过程中把握发展新机遇、加快形成新质生产力提供有益启示,并为企业在竞争中占领新高地、坚持自主创新和实现可持续发展提供理论参考。
Developing new quality productive forces is the essential demand and key breakthrough for high-quality economic and social development. Taking A-share listed enterprises in strategic emerging industries from 2011 to 2022 as research samples, this paper attempts to explore and explain the mechanism of technological innovation in the process of cultivating new quality productivity. The results show that:(1) Technological innovation can significantly improve the level of new quality productive forces of enterprises, and the conclusion is still valid after a series of robustness tests and the instrumental variable method to deal with the endogeneity.(2) The test of action mechanism shows that technological innovation investment accelerates the cultivation of new quality productive forces mainly through the technological breakthrough enabling mechanism of key technology breakthrough and digital technology innovation, factor allocation enabling mechanism of improving enterprise resource allocation efficiency and data factor utilization level.(3) Heterogeneity analysis finds that external environment such as intellectual property protection and digital infrastructure, and internal conditions such as high-tech industries and technology-intensive characteristics all help to enhance the driving effect of technological innovation on the development of new quality productive forces. The research conclusions of this paper provide useful enlightenment for China to grasp the new development opportunities and accelerate the formation of new quality productive forces in the process of highquality economic development, and provide theoretical reference for enterprises to occupy new heights in the competition, adhere to independent innovation and achieve sustainable development.
新质生产力 / 科技创新 / 关键核心技术突破 / 生产要素资源配置
new quality productive forces / technological innovation / breakthroughs in key and core technologies / resource allocation of production factors
| [1] |
卿陶, 黄先海. 环境规制下的企业技术进步路径:自主创新还是技术引进?[J]. 经济科学, 2023(4):126-144.
|
| [2] |
刘伟. 科学认识与切实发展新质生产力[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(3):4-11.
|
| [3] |
毛世平, 张琛. 以发展农业新质生产力推进农业强国建设[J]. 农业经济问题, 2024(4):36-46.
|
| [4] |
张夏恒. 数字经济加速新质生产力生成的内在逻辑与实现路径[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 50(3):1-14.
|
| [5] |
宋佳, 张金昌, 潘艺. ESG发展对企业新质生产力影响的研究:来自中国A股上市企业的经验证据[J]. 当代经济管理, 2024, 46(6):1-11.
|
| [6] |
徐波, 王兆萍, 余乐山, 等. 新质生产力对资源配置效率的影响效应研究[J]. 产业经济评论, 2024(4):35-49.
|
| [7] |
韩文龙, 张瑞生, 赵峰. 新质生产力水平测算与中国经济增长新动能[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(6):5-25.
|
| [8] |
赵国庆, 李俊廷. 企业数字化转型是否赋能企业新质生产力发展?:基于中国上市企业的微观证据[J]. 产业经济评论, 2024(4):23-34.
|
| [9] |
黄群慧, 盛方富. 新质生产力系统:要素特质、结构承载与功能取向[J]. 改革, 2024(2):15-24.
|
| [10] |
姚加权, 张锟澎, 郭李鹏, 等. 人工智能如何提升企业生产效率?:基于劳动力技能结构调整的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(2):101-116+133+117-122.
|
| [11] |
叶祥松, 刘敬. 异质性研发、政府支持与中国科技创新困境[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(9):116-132.
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
李香菊, 王洋. 完善我国激励企业科技创新的税收政策研究[J]. 税务研究, 2021(7):39-43.
|
| [14] |
卡尔·马克思. 资本论[M]. 第一卷(中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译)北京: 人民出版社,2004:47-54.
|
| [15] |
田秀娟, 李睿. 数字技术赋能实体经济转型发展:基于熊彼特内生增长理论的分析框架[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(5):56-74.
|
| [16] |
郑江淮, 荆晶. 技术差距与中国工业技术进步方向的变迁[J]. 经济研究, 2021, 56(7):24-40.
|
| [17] |
唐未兵, 傅元海, 王展祥. 技术创新、技术引进与经济增长方式转变[J]. 经济研究, 2014, 49(7):31-43.
|
| [18] |
刘潘, 张子尧. 地方公共债务与资源配置效率:企业间全要素生产率分布差异的视角[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(10):114-133.
|
| [19] |
倪婷婷, 王跃堂. 区域行政整合、要素市场化与企业资源配置效率[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2022, 39(11):136-156.
|
| [20] |
吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现:来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7):130-144+10.
|
| [21] |
王超, 余典范, 龙睿. 经济政策不确定性与企业数字化:垫脚石还是绊脚石?[J]. 经济管理, 2023, 45(6):79-100.
|
| [22] |
段云龙, 柳艳, 吴广伟. CEO职能经历丰富度对企业创新质量的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(1):173-182.
|
| [23] |
毛捷, 郭玉清, 曹婧, 等. 融资平台债务与环境污染治理[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(10):96-118.
|
| [24] |
王永钦, 董雯. 人机之间:机器人兴起对中国劳动者收入的影响[J]. 世界经济, 2023, 46(7):88-115.
|
| [25] |
黄先海, 高亚兴. 数实产业技术融合与企业全要素生产率:基于中国企业专利信息的研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(11):118-136.
|
| [26] |
尹美群, 盛磊, 李文博. 高管激励、创新投入与公司绩效:基于内生性视角的分行业实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, 21(1):109-117.
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
黄勃, 李海彤, 刘俊岐, 等. 数字技术创新与中国企业高质量发展:来自企业数字专利的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(3):97-115.
|
| [29] |
赵涛, 张智, 梁上坤. 数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展:来自中国城市的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(10):65-76.
|
| [30] |
黄群慧, 余泳泽, 张松林. 互联网发展与制造业生产率提升:内在机制与中国经验[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(8):5-23.
|
| [31] |
孔东民, 徐茗丽, 孔高文. 企业内部薪酬差距与创新[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(10):144-157.
|
| [32] |
权小锋, 尹洪英. 中国式卖空机制与公司创新:基于融资融券分步扩容的自然实验[J]. 管理世界, 2017(1):128-144+187-188.
|
| [33] |
易靖韬, 张修平, 王化成. 企业异质性、高管过度自信与企业创新绩效[J]. 南开管理评论, 2015, 18(6):101-112.
|
| [34] |
吴超鹏, 唐菂. 知识产权保护执法力度、技术创新与企业绩效:来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(11):125-139.
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
赵星. 新型数字基础设施的技术创新效应研究[J]. 统计研究, 2022, 39(4):80-92.
|
| [37] |
杨兴哲, 周翔翼. 治理效应抑或融资效应?股票流动性对上市公司避税行为的影响[J]. 会计研究, 2020, 95(9):120-133.
|
| [38] |
We examine the concerns that new technologies will render labor redundant in a framework in which tasks previously performed by labor can be automated and new versions of existing tasks, in which labor has a comparative advantage, can be created. In a static version where capital is fixed and technology is exogenous, automation reduces employment and the labor share, and may even reduce wages, while the creation of new tasks has the opposite effects. Our full model endogenizes capital accumulation and the direction of research toward automation and the creation of new tasks. If the long-run rental rate of capital relative to the wage is sufficiently low, the long-run equilibrium involves automation of all tasks. Otherwise, there exists a stable balanced growth path in which the two types of innovations go hand-in-hand. Stability is a consequence of the fact that automation reduces the cost of producing using labor, and thus discourages further automation and encourages the creation of new tasks. In an extension with heterogeneous skills, we show that inequality increases during transitions driven both by faster automation and the introduction of new tasks, and characterize the conditions under which inequality stabilizes in the long run. (JEL D63, E22, E23, E24, J24, O33, O41)
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |