创新驱动发展战略下高新技术企业税收优惠政策的异质性效果研究

曹溪洋, 张航淇, 倪剑

科研管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6) : 111-119.

PDF(1144 KB)
PDF(1144 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6) : 111-119. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.06.011  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2026.06.011

创新驱动发展战略下高新技术企业税收优惠政策的异质性效果研究

作者信息 +

Heterogeneous effects of tax preferential policies for high-tech enterprises under the innovation-driven development strategy

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

企业创新已成为培育新质生产力、实现经济高质量发展的核心引擎。为了积极有效地实施创新驱动发展战略,中国政府把税收优惠政策作为激励企业研发创新的重要手段,将税收减免额逐年提高,但由于研发投入结构失衡、政策执行不到位等问题,企业创新潜力尚未被充分激发。为此,本文通过分析中国上市公司数据,并在传统PSM-DID方法基础上,创新性地引入基于机器学习的异质性检验方法,以深入探究税收优惠政策对不同企业创新影响的差异性。研究发现,一方面,税收优惠政策对于刺激企业创新投资起到一定的正向激励作用,是推进我国新质生产力发展的重要政策工具;另一方面,政策执行过程中依然存在一些亟待优化的问题,尤其是不少企业存在骗取税收优惠的政策套利行为,显著削弱了政策的正向效应,甚至在局部产生不良后果。通过机器学习方法分析识别政策效果的异质性特征,本文发现税收优惠政策对专利数量和质量的积极影响主要集中于约15%的企业,说明不少企业尚未能充分有效利用政策优惠来释放其创新活力,这些未充分受益的企业普遍呈现研发风险高、存在研发操纵、企业家控制较强等特征,需要在后续政策优化调整中予以关注。此外,本研究提出的机器学习异质性分析方法,突破了传统线性模型方法的局限,能更准确地识别政策异质性效果,为政府精准施策、推动新质生产力蓬勃发展提供了新的理论视角和方法论借鉴。

Abstract

Enterprise innovation has become a core engine for cultivating new quality productive forces and achieving high-quality economic development. To effectively implement the innovation-driven development strategy, the Chinese government has utilized tax preferential policies as a crucial measure to incentivize enterprise R&D and innovation, with annual increases in tax reductions. However, issues such as an imbalanced R&D investment structure and inadequate policy implementation have hindered the full realization of China’s enterprise innovation potential. Therefore, based on data from Chinese listed companies, this paper innovatively introduced a machine learning-based heterogeneity analysis method, building upon the traditional PSM-DID method, to deeply explore the heterogeneous impact of tax preferential policies on enterprise innovation. The research found that, on one hand, tax preferential policies demonstrate a certain overall positive incentive effect on stimulating enterprise innovation investment activities and serve as an important policy tool for promoting the development of new quality productive forces in China; but on the other hand, some issues remain to be optimized in policy implementation. Specifically, many enterprises exploit tax incentives through policy arbitrage, significantly weakening the positive effects of the policy and even causing adverse consequences in some cases. Through machine learning analysis to identify the heterogeneous features of policy effects, it is found that the positive impact of tax preferential policies on patent quantity and quality is mainly concentrated in approximately 15% of enterprises. This indicated that many enterprises have not yet been able to fully and effectively utilize policy incentives to unleash their innovation potential. These under-benefited enterprises generally exhibit characteristics such as high R&D risk, R&D manipulation, and strong entrepreneurial control, warranting attention in subsequent policy optimizations and adjustments. Furthermore, the machine learning-based heterogeneity analysis method introduced in this study overcomes the limitations of traditional linear models, enabling a more accurate identification of heterogeneous policy effects, and will provide a new theoretical perspective and methodological reference for precise policy implementation and promoting the vigorous development of new quality productive forces.

关键词

税收优惠政策 / 企业创新 / 异质性 / 机器学习

Key words

tax preferential policy / enterprise innovation / heterogeneity / machine learning

引用本文

导出引用
曹溪洋, 张航淇, 倪剑. 创新驱动发展战略下高新技术企业税收优惠政策的异质性效果研究[J]. 科研管理. 2026, 47(6): 111-119 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.06.011
Cao Xiyang, Zhang Hangqi, Ni Jian. Heterogeneous effects of tax preferential policies for high-tech enterprises under the innovation-driven development strategy[J]. Science Research Management. 2026, 47(6): 111-119 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.06.011
中图分类号: F273.1   

参考文献

[1]
ARROW K J. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention[M]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1962.
[2]
GREENWALD B C, STIGLITZ J E. Externalities in economies with imperfect information and incomplete markets[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1986, 101(2): 229-264.
[3]
RAO N. Do tax credits stimulate R&D spending? The effect of the R&D tax credit in its first decade[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2016, 140: 1-12.
[4]
IVUS O, JOSE M, SHARMA R. R&D tax credit and innovation: Evidence from private firms in India[J]. Research Policy, 2021, 50(1): 104128.
[5]
BLOOM N, GRIFFITH R, VAN REENEN J. Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979-1997[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2002, 85(1): 1-31.
[6]
HALL B, VAN REENEN J. How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence[J]. Research Policy, 2000, 29(4-5): 449-469.
[7]
李林木, 汪冲. 税费负担、创新能力与企业升级:来自“新三板”挂牌公司的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(11): 119-134.
LI Linmu, WANG Chong. Tax burden, innovation ability and enterprise upgrading: Empirical evidence from NEEQ listed companies[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2017, 52 (11): 119-134.
[8]
刘行, 赵健宇. 税收激励与企业创新:基于增值税转型改革的“准自然实验”[J]. 会计研究, 2019(9): 43-49.
LIU Hang, ZHAO Jianyu. Tax incentive and firm innovation: Evidence from China’s value-added tax reform[J]. Accounting Research, 2019(9): 43-49.
[9]
陈诗一, 吴绪成, 王川杰. 税收优惠、人力资本结构调整与高新技术企业创新[J]. 世界经济文汇, 2023(5):1-16.
CHEN Shiyi, WU Xucheng, WANG Chuanjie. Tax incentives, human capital structure adjustment, and innovation in high-tech enterprises[J]. World Economic Papers, 2023(5): 1-16.
[10]
刘诗源, 林志帆, 冷志鹏. 税收激励提高企业创新水平了吗?:基于企业生命周期理论的检验[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(6): 105-121.
LIU Shiyuan, LIN Zhifan, LENG Zhipeng. Whether tax incentives stimulate corporate innovation: Empirical evidence based on corporate life cycle theory[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2020, 55(6): 105-121.
[11]
陈洋林, 宋根苗, 张长全. 税收优惠对战略性新兴产业创新投入的激励效应评价:基于倾向评分匹配法的实证分析[J]. 税务研究, 2018(8): 80-86.
CHEN Yanglin, SONG Genmiao, ZHANG Changquan. An evaluation of incentive effects of tax preference on investment into innovation of the strategic emerging industries[J]. Taxation Research, 2018 (8): 80-86.
[12]
冯海红, 曲婉, 李铭禄. 税收优惠政策有利于企业加大研发投入吗?[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(5): 665-673.
摘要
本文旨在考察政府税收优惠政策对企业研发投资的影响,采用2000-2012年我国28个制造行业大中型工业企业的面板数据进行回归分析,研究发现,在最优的政策力度门限区间内,政府税收优惠政策对企业研发投资有着显著的正向激励作用;而政策力度小于第一门限值时激励作用较为微弱,大于第二门限值则产生反效果。此外,较大的企业规模、较低的国有产权比例和较强的知识技术密集度均有利于税收优惠政策引导企业研发投资作用的发挥。
FENG Haihong, QU Wan, LI Minglu. Does tax incentives induce R&D investment in firms?[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2015, 33(5): 665-673.
[13]
林洲钰, 林汉川, 邓兴华. 所得税改革与中国企业技术创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2013(3): 111-123.
LIN Zhouyu, LIN Hanchuan, DENG Xinghua. Corporate income tax reform and technological innovation of Chinese firms[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2013(3): 111-123.
[14]
杨国超, 刘静, 廉鹏, 等. 减税激励、研发操纵与研发绩效[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(8): 110-124.
YANG Guochao, LIU Jing, LIAN Peng, et al. Tax-reducing incentives, R&D manipulation and R&D performance[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2017, 52(8): 110-124.
[15]
杨国超, 芮萌. 高新技术企业税收减免政策的激励效应与迎合效应[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(9): 174-191.
YANG Guochao, RUI Meng. The incentive effect and catering effect of tax-reducing policy for high-tech enterprises[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2020, 55(9): 174-191.
[16]
何晴, 刘净然, 范庆泉. 企业研发风险与补贴政策优化研究[J]. 经济研究, 2022, 57(5): 192-208.
HE Qing, LIU Jingran, FAN Qingquan. A study on firms’ R&D risks and subsidy policy optimization[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2022, 57(5): 192-208.
[17]
杨瑞龙, 侯方宇. 产业政策的有效性边界:基于不完全契约的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2019(10): 82-94.
YANG Ruilong, HOU Fangyu. The efficient boundary of industrial policy: An incomplete contract perspective[J]. Journal of Management World, 2019(10): 82-94.
[18]
HILL C W L, SNELL S A. External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research-intensive industries[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1988, 9(6): 577-590.
[19]
BURKART M, GROMB D, PANUNZI F. Large shareholders, monitoring, and the value of the firm[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, 112(3): 693-728.
[20]
何晓斌, 朱丹阳, 高勇强. 分享型领导的两个维度与企业创新绩效[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(4): 747-758.
摘要
本文在总结领导力文献的基础上提出了分享型领导的概念。认为分享型领导是介于集中式领导和分布式领导之间的一种领导方式。分享型领导是领导者主动与员工分享企业利润、福利等利益,并鼓励下属员工主动参与企业日常决策的过程。分享型领导包括利益分享和决策分享两个维度。通过实证分析第八次全国私营企业调查获得的全国代表性数据发现,利益分享和决策分享都能显著提升企业的创新绩效。但是随着企业的成长,利益分享对于企业创新绩效的正面影响会减弱,而决策分享对企业创新绩效的促进作用会增强。企业股权集中度可以显著减弱利益分享对于企业创新绩效的正面作用。本文为拓展领导力概念,以及深入理解领导力与企业创新绩效的关系作出了贡献。
HE Xiaobin, ZHU Danyang, GAO Yongqiang. Two dimensions of sharing leadership and enterprise innovation performance[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2020, 38(4): 747-758.
[21]
CHERNOZHUKOV V, CHETVERIKOV D, DEMIRER M, et al. Double/debiased/neyman machine learning of treatment effects[J]. American Economic Review, 2017, 107(5): 261-265.
Chernozhukov et al. (2016) provide a generic double/de-biased machine learning (ML) approach for obtaining valid inferential statements about focal parameters, using Neyman-orthogonal scores and cross-fitting, in settings where nuisance parameters are estimated using ML methods. In this note, we illustrate the application of this method in the context of estimating average treatment effects and average treatment effects on the treated using observational data.
[22]
NI J, CAO X, ZHOU W, et al. Customer concentration and financing constraints[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2023, 82, 102432.
[23]
熊风华, 黄俊. 股权集中度, 大股东制衡与公司绩效[J]. 财经问题研究, 2016(5): 69-75.
XIONG Fenghua, HUANG Jun. Ownership concentration, large shareholders’ balance and firm performance[J]. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2016(5): 69-75.

基金

教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目:“数字经济驱动的链主制度治理范式研究”(24YJA790045)
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目:“数字经济驱动的链主制度治理范式研究”(2024.08—2027.07)

PDF(1144 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/