PDF(1386 KB)
PDF(1386 KB)
PDF(1386 KB)
研发费用加计扣除政策影响中小企业创新力的微观机制研究
A study on the micro-level mechanisms of the impact of pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure on SMEs’ innovative capacity
中小企业受制于资金和规模限制,在创新之路上常常难以“独善其身”,创新力不强的困境近年来不断凸显。探讨如何运用政策工具驱动中小企业创新力提升具有重要意义。本文基于2013—2020年A股中小板和创业板上市公司数据构建双重差分模型,从合作创新的视角考察了研发费用加计扣除政策影响中小企业创新力的微观机理。研究发现:(1)研发费用加计扣除政策的实施能够显著提升中小企业创新力,体现为创新持续性、创新质量和全要素生产率的提高。(2)机制分析表明,研发费用加计扣除政策对中小企业创新力产生影响的机制是促进企业间的合作创新。(3)该政策通过加计扣除与合作创新相关的费用,降低了合作伙伴的搜索成本和知识泄露的风险成本,从而提升了中小企业的合作创新意愿。(4)研发费用加计扣除政策对中小企业合作创新的促进效应在数字化程度较高的企业中表现得更明显,且高技术密集度行业以及科技中介和创新平台建设更完善区域的企业从政策优惠中获益更大。本文丰富了中小企业创新政策的理论和实证研究,对中小企业通过合作创新促进创新力提升具有重要启示。
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are constrained by financial and scale limitations, and it is often difficult for them to “do it alone” on the road of innovation. The status quo of SMEs’ weak innovative capacity has been highlighted in recent years. It is of great significance to discuss how to use policy tools to promote innovation in SMEs. This paper constructed a DID model based on the data of listed companies on SEM and GEM boards from 2013 to 2020, and examined the micro-mechanism of the impact of pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure on SMEs’ innovation ability from the perspective of cooperative innovation. The study found that: (1) The implementation of pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure can significantly enhance the innovation capacity of SMEs, which is reflected in the improvement of innovation continuity, innovation quality and total factor productivity. (2) Mechanism analysis shows that the mechanism by which pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure affects SMEs’ innovation capacity is to promote collaborative innovation among firms. (3) The policy reduces the search costs for collaborative partners and risk costs for knowledge leakage by adding the deduction of costs related to collaborative innovation, thus enhancing the willingness of SMEs to collaborate and innovate. (4) The promotional effect of pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure on SMEs’ collaborative innovation is more pronounced in highly digitized firms, and firms in highly technology-intensive industries and in regions with better science and technology intermediation and innovation platforms have benefited more from the policy benefits. This paper enriches the theoretical and empirical research on SMEs’ innovation policies, and will provide important insights into the promotion of innovative capacity through collaborative innovation in SMEs.
SMEs / pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure / cooperative innovation
| [1] |
刘微微, 金英哲, 毕克新. 多维邻近性、创新开放度与合作创新绩效:基于网络演化视角[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(8):162-172.
|
| [2] |
龙小宁, 刘灵子, 张靖. 企业合作研发模式对创新质量的影响:基于中国专利数据的实证研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023, 39(10):174-192.
|
| [3] |
任海云, 宋伟宸. 企业异质性因素、研发费用加计扣除与R&D投入[J]. 科学学研究, 2017, 34(8):1232-1239.
|
| [4] |
李新, 汤恒运, 陶东杰, 等. 研发费用加计扣除政策对企业研发投入的影响研究:来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2019(8):81-93+169.
|
| [5] |
田红云, 李永友, 李忠正. 研发费用加计扣除政策对中小企业高质量创新的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 44(3):53-63.
|
| [6] |
陈金勇, 汪小池, 长昊东, 等. “专精特新”认定政策与中小企业技术创新[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(3):20-30.
|
| [7] |
We build a model of firm-level innovation, productivity growth, and reallocation featuring endogenous entry and exit. A new and central economic force is the selection between high- and low-type firms, which differ in terms of their innovative capacity. We estimate the parameters of the model using US Census microdata on firm-level output, R&D, and patenting. The model provides a good fit to the dynamics of firm entry and exit, output, and R&D. Taxing the continued operation of incumbents can lead to sizable gains (of the order of 1.4 percent improvement in welfare) by encouraging exit of less productive firms and freeing up skilled labor to be used for R&D by high-type incumbents. Subsidies to the R&D of incumbents do not achieve this objective because they encourage the survival and expansion of low-type firms. (JEL D21, D24, H25, L52, O31, O34)
|
| [8] |
– The purpose of this paper is to synthesize the extant literature on open innovation (OI) in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
|
| [9] |
谷军健, 赵玉林. 中国如何走出科技创新困境?:基于科技创新与人力资本协同发展的新视角[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(1):129-138.
本文立足于中国科技创新投入高速增长、全要素生产率增速放缓的典型事实,从科技创新与人力资本协同发展的视角,探讨如何破解科技创新困境的问题。首先分析了科技创新与人力资本相互作用的协同机理,基于中国制造业行业面板数据,实证检验了科技创新与人力资本的协同效应,并探讨了两者协同效应的行业差异。研究发现:单独自主研发创新、合作研发创新、非研发创新均没有提升制造业绿色全要素生产率,但三者与人力资本的协同互动具有显著促进效应,这说明实现科技创新与人力资本协同发展,是破解中国科技创新困境、“研发—生产率悖论”以及促进经济高质量发展的关键;人力资本与科技创新的协同效应存在行业差异,高技术行业中两者的协同效应不明显,这可能与高技术行业需要更高的人力资本与之协同有关。本文的发现为党的十九大提出的建设“协同发展的产业体系”提供了理论依据,并且对中国走出科技创新困境、实现经济高质量发展具有政策参考意义。
Based on the typical facts of rapid growth of China's R&D investment and slowdown in TFP, this paper seeks to explore the issue of how to solve the dilemma of scientific & technological (S&T) innovation from a new perspective of its synergistic development with human capital accumulation. Firstly, it analyzes the synergistic mechanism of S&T innovation and human capital affecting green TFP, and then the impact of the synergy between S&T innovation and human capital is empirically examined with industrial panel data of China’s Manufacturing. This paper also discusses the differences of synergistic effeccts in different industries. The results show that independent R&D innovation, cooperative R&D innovation and non-R&D innovation have no significant impact on the green TFP solely, but the synergy between S&T innovation and human capital has a significant and positive effect on the green TFP. This suggests that the synergistic development between S&T innovation and human capital is the key to cracking the predicament of S&T innovation, "R&D - productivity paradox" and promoting the high-quality development. The synergistic effect of human capital and S&T innovation differs in different industries, and it is not significant in high-tech industries, which could be related to the higher demand for human capital in high-tech industries. These findings provide theoretical basis and decision reference for the idea of "accelerating the building of industrial system in which real economy, scientific and technological innovation, modern finance, and human resources develop synergistically" and China’s economy transforming into the stage of high-quality development proposed by the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China
|
| [10] |
连燕玲, 郑伟伟, 高皓. 创新困境下的制造业企业战略响应:基于创新绩效期望落差与响应式搜索行为的研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023, 39(8):174-192.
|
| [11] |
何郁冰, 周慧, 丁佳敏. 技术多元化如何影响企业的持续创新?[J]. 科学学研究, 2017, 35(12):1896-1909.
基于技术战略和创新经济学的视角,从理论上分析了技术多元化影响企业持续创新的机理,并利用中国制造业上市公司2006–2014年的面板数据进行了实证检验。研究结果表明,技术多元化在总体上有助于企业的持续创新;相关技术多元化和开发式技术多元化对持续创新有正向影响,但探索式技术多元化对投入维度的持续创新有抑制作用。此外,相关技术多元化与非相关技术多元化的协同对持续创新有正向影响,但同时开展探索式技术多元化与开发式技术多元化并不利于企业持续创新。研究还发现互补资产和产品多元化对“技术多元化–持续创新”关系有不同程度的调节效应。
From the perspective of technology strategy and innovation economics, this paper analyzes the influence of technological diversification on the persistence of firm’s innovation, and then conducts an empirical test based on a sample of Chinese manufacturing listed firms from the year of 2006 to 2014. The result shows that, technological diversification has a positive influence on firm’s persistent innovation; both related technological diversification and exploitative technological diversification have a positive influence on firm’s persistent innovation, but explorative technological diversification has a negative influence on the persistence of firm’s innovation input. The synergy between related technological diversification and unrelated technological diversification has a positive influence on the persistence of firm’s innovation. However, firm conducts explorative technological diversification and exploitative technological diversification simultaneously will be harmful to its persistent innovation. The paper also finds the different moderating effects of product diversification and complementary assets on the relationship between technological diversification and persistent innovation.
|
| [12] |
李雪松, 党琳, 赵宸宇. 数字化转型、融入全球创新网络与创新绩效[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022, 38(10):43-61.
|
| [13] |
杨震宁, 赵红. 中国企业的开放式创新:制度环境、“竞合”关系与创新绩效[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 35(2):139-160+224.
|
| [14] |
应瑛, 刘洋, 魏江. 开放式创新网络中的价值独占机制:打开“开放性”和“与狼共舞”悖论[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(2):144-160+188.
|
| [15] |
刘晔, 林陈聃. 研发费用加计扣除政策与企业全要素生产率[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 38(10):1790-1802.
|
| [16] |
曹春方, 张超. 产权权利束分割与国企创新:基于中央企业分红权激励改革的证据[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(9):155-168.
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
徐佳, 崔静波. 低碳城市和企业绿色技术创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020, 36(12):178-196.
|
| [20] |
王黎萤, 吴瑛, 朱子钦, 等. 专利合作网络影响科技型中小企业创新绩效的机理研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(1):57-66.
|
| [21] |
姚鹏, 李金泽. 以水定城:资源节约型评比达标赛如何“去”资本错配[J]. 世界经济, 2023, 46(3):233-256.
|
| [22] |
江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5):100-120.
|
| [23] |
王巍, 姜智鑫. 通向可持续发展之路:数字化转型与企业异地合作创新[J]. 财经研究, 2023, 49(1):79-93.
|
| [24] |
赵宸宇, 王文春, 李雪松. 数字化转型如何影响企业全要素生产率[J]. 财贸经济, 2021, 42(7):114-129.
|
| [25] |
张永珅, 李小波, 邢铭强. 企业数字化转型与审计定价[J]. 审计研究, 2021(3):62-71.
|
| [26] |
尹美群, 盛磊, 李文博. 高管激励、创新投入与公司绩效:基于内生性视角的分行业实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, 21(1):109-117.
|
| [27] |
龙静, 黄勋敬, 余志杨. 政府支持行为对中小企业创新绩效的影响:服务性中介机构的作用[J]. 科学学研究, 2012, 30(5):782-788+790-792.
|
| [28] |
何瑛, 于文蕾, 杨棉之. CEO复合型职业经历、企业风险承担与企业价值[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(9):155-173.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |