PDF(1544 KB)
PDF(1544 KB)
PDF(1544 KB)
共建“一带一路”技术标准创新生态系统的治理机制——基于中车株机的探索性案例研究
The governance mechanism of technology standard innovation ecosystem in joint construction of the Belt and Road projects: An exploratory case study of CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive CO.,LTD.
提升我国企业国际技术标准话语权是实现高水平科技自立自强的重要内容,也是亟待突破的重大理论问题。本研究结合网络编排理论,对中车株机共建“一带一路”标准融通的客观实践进行了探索性案例研究。研究发现:(1)共建“一带一路”技术标准创新生态系统的演进具有阶段性特征。在 “孵化-扩张-稳定发展”的迭代过程中,相互间的网络关系依赖度和技术互补性逐步增强,共建“一带一路”技术标准创新生态系统呈现从局部试点向全球协同的演化路径;(2)核心企业的网络编排实践被视为共建“一带一路”技术标准创新生态系统治理机制落地的关键杠杆。网络编排实践由合法耦合探索、创新杠杆管理及网络生态拓展三部分构成,其推动该系统从核心企业主导治理向多元共治转变;(3)共建“一带一路”技术标准创新生态系统的治理逻辑呈现由合法化逻辑向融通逻辑过渡的特征。本文最终形成的理论框架,既是对网络编排理论在跨国情境下的应用拓展,同时也是在中美技术脱钩背景下,中国企业技术突围和技术标准融通治理的理论规律的挖掘、尝试与探索。
Enhancing the global influence of Chinese enterprises in technology standards is crucial for achieving high-level S&T self-reliance. This study applied the network orchestration theory to explore how CRRC Zhuzhou Locomotive Co.,Ltd. has contributed to integrating standards along the Belt and Road Initiative. The study found that: (1) The evolution of the technology standards innovation ecosystem in the joint development of the Belt and Road Initiative shows clear stage-based characteristics. During the iterative process of "incubation-expansion-stable development," the dependency on network relationships and the level of technological complementarity gradually increase. The ecosystem follows a trajectory that evolves from localized pilot projects to global coordination. (2) The network orchestration practices of core enterprises play a critical role in the implementation of governance mechanisms within the ecosystem. These practices consist of three key components: legal coupling exploration,innovation leverage management,and network ecosystem expansion. The study identified a shift in governance from a single-firm-dominant to co-governance. (3) The governance logic of the jointly developed Belt and Road technology standard innovation ecosystem shows a transition from legitimization logic to integration logic. This study has developed a theoretical framework that extends application of the network orchestration theory in a multi-national context. It has also explored how Chinese enterprises navigate technological breakthroughs and standard-setting under the pressures of Sino-US technological decoupling.
“一带一路” / 技术标准创新生态系统 / 网络编排 / 治理 / 融通逻辑
Belt and Road Initiative / technology standard innovation ecosystem / network orchestration / governance / integration logic
| [1] |
周青, 吴童祯, 杨伟, 等. 面向“一带一路”企业技术标准联盟的驱动因素与作用机制研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2021, 24(3):150-159.
|
| [2] |
周茂, 武家辉, 李雨浓, 等. 共建“一带一路”与互联互通深化:基于沿线国家间的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(11):1-21+93+22.
|
| [3] |
张运生, 陈祖琼. 技术标准化创新生态系统如何推动销售增长[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(7):1317-1324.
|
| [4] |
詹爱岚, 陈衍泰. 标准创新生态系统治理与知识产权战略演化[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(7):1326-1334.
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
谭劲松, 宋娟, 陈晓红. 产业创新生态系统的形成与演进:“架构者”变迁及其战略行为演变[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(9): 167-191.
|
| [7] |
杨力, 刘敦虎, 魏奇锋. 共生理论下区域创新生态系统能级提升研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2023, 41(10):1897-1909.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
ADNERR. Ecosystem as structure[J]. Journal of Management, 2016, 43(1): 39-58.
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
王道平, 韦小彦, 方放. 基于技术标准特征的标准研发联盟合作伙伴选择研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(1):81-89.
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
陈衍泰, 厉婧, 程聪, 等. 海外创新生态系统的组织合法性动态获取研究:以“一带一路”海外园区领军企业为例[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(8):161-180.
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
周青, 陈静, 杨伟, 等. 后发企业如何提升国际技术标准话语权?:中车株洲所的探索性案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(7):82-100.
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
魏江, 王丁, 刘洋. 来源国劣势与合法化战略:新兴经济企业跨国并购的案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(3):101-120.
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |