境外机构投资者持股对企业ESG表现的影响研究

李笑冲, 王静, 黄银, 张娜

科研管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3) : 156-165.

PDF(1166 KB)
PDF(1166 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3) : 156-165. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.03.016  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2026.03.016

境外机构投资者持股对企业ESG表现的影响研究

作者信息 +

Research on the impact of foreign institutional investors' shareholding on the ESG performance of firms

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

随着中国资本市场的逐步开放,境外机构投资者可能基于国际ESG标准与持股偏好对企业ESG表现提出更高要求,这能否对当前非刚性的ESG制度环境构成有益补充尚不明晰。因此,本文以2009—2022年中国沪深A股上市公司为样本,采用多维面板固定效应Ols的回归方法,展开境外机构投资者持股对企业ESG表现的影响研究。研究发现:(1)境外机构投资者持股能够提高企业ESG表现,结论经过一系列内生性和稳健性检验后依然成立;(2)境外机构投资者持股具体通过降低管理层短视、缓解融资约束和提高风险承担,提高了企业ESG表现;(3)分析师关注、媒体监督以及政府约束强化了境外机构投资者持股对企业ESG表现的提升作用;(4)境外机构投资者持股通过提高ESG表现,能够进一步助力企业提升探索式创新水平。在中国ESG制度非刚性背景下,未来应持续完善资本市场开放的有关机制,并充分发挥分析师、媒体、政府等外部利益相关者的协同提升作用,从而提高境外机构投资者持股对企业ESG表现的积极治理作用。

Abstract

As the capital market is gradually opening up,foreign institutional investors will impose higher requirements for the ESG performance of firms based on the international ESG standards and shareholding preferences. However,it is still not clear whether it can be a beneficial complementary mechanism for non-rigid ESG institutional environment in China. Therefore,this paper selected Chinese A-share listed firms of Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange from 2009 to 2022 as the sample and examined the influence mechanism of foreign institutional investors' shareholding on the ESG performance of firms with the panel OLS regression with fixed-effects. The paper comprised four conclusions. Firstly,foreign institutional investors' shareholding improves the ESG performance of firms. This conclusion remains robust after the endogeneity and robustness tests. Secondly,foreign institutional investors' shareholding improves the ESG performance through reducing managerial myopia,alleviating financing constraints,and enhancing risk-taking. Thirdly,analyst following,media supervision,and government constraint further enhance the positive effect of foreign institutional investors' shareholding on the ESG performance of firms. Finally,foreign institutional investors' shareholding further promotes exploratory innovation through improving the ESG performance of firms. Considering China's non-rigid ESG institutional environment,the departments concerned should improve the mechanism of China capital market opening and fully play the collaborative promotion effect of external stakeholders including analysts,media,and government,in order to increase the positive governance effect of foreign institutional investors' shareholding on the ESG performance of firms.

关键词

境外机构投资者 / 企业ESG表现 / 探索式创新 / 资本市场开放

Key words

foreign institutional investor / ESG performance of firms / exploratory innovation / capital market opening

引用本文

导出引用
李笑冲, 王静, 黄银, . 境外机构投资者持股对企业ESG表现的影响研究[J]. 科研管理. 2026, 47(3): 156-165 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.03.016
Li Xiaochong, Wang Jing, Huang Yin, et al. Research on the impact of foreign institutional investors' shareholding on the ESG performance of firms[J]. Science Research Management. 2026, 47(3): 156-165 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.03.016
中图分类号: F272.3   

参考文献

[1]
谢红军, 吕雪. 负责任的国际投资:ESG与中国OFDI[J]. 经济研究, 2022, 57(3):83-99.
XIE Hongjun, LYU Xue. Responsible multinational investment: ESG and Chinese OFDI[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2022, 57(3):83-99.
[2]
连立帅, 朱松, 陈关亭. 资本市场开放、非财务信息定价与企业投资:基于沪深港通交易制度的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(8):136-154.
LIAN Lishuai, ZHU Song, CHEN Guanting. Capital market openness, non-financial information pricing, and corporate investment: Empirical evidence based on the Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Hong Kong Stock Connect trading system[J]. Journal of Management World, 2019, 35(8):136-154.
[3]
HU J, ZOU Q, YIN Q. Research on the effect of ESG performance on stock price synchronicity: Empirical evidence from China's capital markets[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2023, 55:1-7.
[4]
WANG K, YU S, MEI M, et al. ESG performance and corporate resilience: An empirical analysis based on the capital allocation efficiency perspective[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(23):1-31.
[5]
ARENEKE G, ADEGBITE E, TUNYI A. Transfer of corporate governance practices into weak emerging market environments by foreign institutional investors[J]. International Business Review, 2022, 31(5):1-21.
[6]
SHIN I, PARK S. Role of foreign and domestic institutional investors in corporate sustainability: Focusing on R&D investment[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(20):1-13.
[7]
庄明明, 梁权熙. 境外机构投资者能促进企业投资效率提升吗?[J]. 世界经济研究, 2021(2):102-117.
ZHUANG Mingming, LIANG Quanxi. Foreign institutional ownership and investment efficiency[J]. World Economy Studies, 2021(2):102-117.
[8]
ZHAO P, YAO X, SHEN R. Capital market internationalization and firms' ESG performance: Evidence from the inclusion of China A-shares in the MSCI Emerging Market Index[J]. Energy Economics, 2024, 133:1-12.
[9]
HUANG R, DUAN K. Research on the influence of capital market liberalization on the ESG performance of listed companies:A quasinatural experiment based on the Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connects[J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2024, 83:1-11.
[10]
DAI R, LIANG H, NG L. Socially responsible corporate customers[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2021, 142(2):598-626.
[11]
DARENDELI A, FIECHTER P, HITZ J, et al. The role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) information in supply-chain contracting: Evidence from the expansion of CSR rating coverage[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2022, 74(2-3):1-26.
[12]
沈坤荣, 林剑威, 傅元海. 网络基础设施建设、信息可得性与企业创新边界[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(1):57-75.
SHEN Kunrong, LIN Jianwei, FU Yuanhai. Network infrastructure construction, information accessibility and the innovation boundaries of enterprises[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2023(1):57-75.
[13]
赵健宇, 廖文琦, 袭希. 创业导向与探索式创新的关系:一个双中介效应模型[J]. 管理科学, 2019, 32(2):33-49.
ZHAO Jianyu, LIAO Wenqi, XI Xi. Relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and exploratory innovation: A multiple mediating effect model[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2019, 32(2):33-49.
[14]
刘柏, 卢家锐, 琚涛. 形式主义还是实质主义:ESG评级软监管下的绿色创新研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023, 26(5):16-28.
LIU Bai, LU Jiarui, JU Tao. Formalism or substantialism: Research on green innovation under soft market supervision of ESG rating[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2023, 26(5):16-28.
[15]
LI Z, WANG P, WU T. Do foreign institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? Evidence from listed firms in China[J]. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2021, 48(1-2):338-373.
[16]
WU S, LI Y. A study on the impact of digital transformation on corporate ESG performance: The mediating role of green innovation[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(8):1-17.
[17]
万源星, 王怡舒, 刘云. 股票市场开放与企业研发国际化:来自沪深港通的证据[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(5):96-104.
WAN Yuanxing, WANG Yishu, LIU Yun. Stock market liberalization and R&D internationalization of firms:Some evidence from SH-SZ-HK stock connect[J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(5):96-104.
[18]
LIU H, ZHANG Z. The impact of managerial myopia on environmental, social and governance (ESG) engagement: Evidence from Chinese firms[J]. Energy Economics, 2023, 122:1-10.
[19]
YANG T, CUI Y, LI R. Exploitation or exploration? Managerial myopia, economic policy uncertainty and ambidextrous innovation investment[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(9):1-20.
[20]
LIU X. Managerial myopia and firm green innovation: Based on text analysis and machine learning[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13:1-12.
[21]
李沁洋, 何银莹, 刘向强, 等. 资本市场开放对企业融资约束的影响机制研究:基于“沪深港通”的经验证据[J]. 世界经济研究, 2023(4):87-102.
LI Qinyang, HE Yinying, LIU Xiangqiang, et al. Capital market opening and corporate financing constraints: Evidence from the Shanghai-Hong Kong and the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect[J]. World Economy Studies, 2023(4):87-102.
[22]
庞家任, 张鹤, 张梦洁. 资本市场开放与股权资本成本:基于沪港通、深港通的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020(12):169-188.
PANG Jiaren, ZHANG He, ZHANG Mengjie. Capital market liberalization and the cost of equity: Empirical evidence from the Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect Programs[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2020(12):169-188.
[23]
许志勇, 韩炳. 资产结构错配与企业高质量发展:技术创新与融资约束的中介效应[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2023, 43(10):2881-2907.
XU Zhiyong, HAN Bing. The effect of asset structure mismatch on the high quality development of enterprises: The mediation effect of technological innovation and financing constraints[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2023, 43(10):2881-2907.
[24]
方先明, 胡丁. 企业ESG表现与创新:来自A股上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(2):13-24.
FANG Xianming, HU Ding. Corporate ESG performance and innovation: Empirical evidence from A-share listed Companies[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2023, 58(2):13-24.
[25]
王建玲, 李玥婷, 吴璇. 企业社会责任与风险承担:基于资源依赖理论视角[J]. 预测, 2019, 38(3):45-51.
WANG Jianling, LI Yueting, WU Xuan. Corporate social responsibility and risk-taking behavior: Based on resource dependence theory[J]. Forecasting, 2019, 38(3):45-51.
[26]
朱炳昇, 田增瑞, 王浩宇, 等. 创业投资对企业可持续发展的影响路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(1):132-142.
ZHU Bingsheng, TIAN Zengrui, WANG Haoyu, et al. Research on the influence paths of venture capital on the sustainable development of enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(1):132-142.
[27]
吕晓军, 胡华夏, 王红建. 资本市场开放与企业创新质量:基于中国企业重数量轻质量的“创新陷阱”视角[J]. 系统管理学报, 2022, 31(5):1018-1027.
LYU Xiaojun, HU Huaxia, WANG Hongjian. Capital market liberalization and enterprise innovation quality: Based on the perspective of "innovation trap" of Chinese enterprises emphasizing quantity over quality[J]. Journal of Systems & Management, 2022, 31(5):1018-1027.
[28]
叶志伟, 张新民, 胡聪慧. 企业为何短贷长投:基于企业战略视角的解释[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023, 26(1):29-44.
YE Zhiwei, ZHANG Xinmin, HU Conghui. Corporate operating strategy and short-term loans used as long-term investment[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2023, 26(1):29-44.
[29]
虞义华, 赵奇锋, 鞠晓生. 发明家高管与企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(3):136-154.
YU Yihua, ZHAO Qifeng, JU Xiaosheng. Inventor executives and innovation[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018(3):136-154.
[30]
雷雷, 张大永, 姬强. 共同机构持股与企业ESG表现[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(4):133-151.
LEI Lei, ZHANG Dayong, JI Qiang. Common institutional ownership and corporate ESG performance[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2023, 58(4):133-151.
[31]
江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5):100-120.
JIANG Ting. Mediating effects and moderating effects in causal inference[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022(5):100-120.
[32]
刘贝贝, 李春涛. 合格境外机构投资者与公司盈余管理[J]. 管理科学, 2022, 35(2):97-110.
LIU Beibei, LI Chuntao. Qualified foreign institutional investor and corporate earnings management[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2022, 35(2):97-110.
[33]
WANG X, WANG W, SHI X Y. Qualified foreign institutional investors and corporate innovation: From the perspective of corporate governance[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13:1-18.
[34]
LIU Y, ZHANG J, DAI Y. Analyst following and greenwashing decision[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2023, 58:1-6.
[35]
ZHANG C, WU X. Analyst coverage and corporate ESG performance[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(17):1-21.
[36]
QUAN Y, WU H, LI S, et al. Firm sustainable development and stakeholder engagement: The role of government support[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2018, 27(8):1145-1158.
[37]
ZHU T, PENG H. Research on the impact of ambidextrous innovation on sustainable entrepreneurial performance from a policy-oriented perspective[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(18):1-17.
[38]
杜勇, 娄靖, 胡红燕. 供应链共同股权网络下企业数字化转型同群效应研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(4):136-155.
DU Yong, LOU Jing, HU Hongyan. Peer effect of enterprise digital transformation in the network constructed by supply chain common-ownership[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2023(4):136-155.

基金

教育部人文社科青年基金项目:“制度非刚性与社会高需求冲突下企业ESG行为的同伴效应研究”(23YJC630097)
教育部人文社科青年基金项目:“制度非刚性与社会高需求冲突下企业ESG行为的同伴效应研究”(2023—2026)
中央高校基本科研业务费项目:“企业ESG表现的同伴效应研究”(3132024286)
中央高校基本科研业务费项目:“企业ESG表现的同伴效应研究”(2024—2025)
中国博士后科学基金面上项目:“‘一带一路’绿色投资下大股东驱动企业高质量发展的作用机制与效果评价研究”(2021M700649)
中国博士后科学基金面上项目:“‘一带一路’绿色投资下大股东驱动企业高质量发展的作用机制与效果评价研究”(2022—2024)

PDF(1166 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/