绿色创业导向对企业负责任创新的影响研究

张秀娥, 滕欣宇, 王超

科研管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2) : 107-115.

PDF(1101 KB)
PDF(1101 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2) : 107-115. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.02.011  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2026.02.011

绿色创业导向对企业负责任创新的影响研究

作者信息 +

Research on the impact of green entrepreneurial orientation on the responsible innovation of enterprises

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

作为一种平衡利润增长需求和社会价值诉求的新兴创新范式,负责任创新已被越来越多的企业视为其积极承担社会责任并实现可持续发展目标的有效路径。鉴于当前以科技创新助力农业可持续发展的广泛呼吁,探讨农业领域负责任创新议题极为必要。本研究基于资源编排理论,构建了绿色创业导向影响企业负责任创新的研究模型。采用层次回归和MEDCURVE宏程序对来自248家农业企业的两时点调研数据进行分析,实证结果表明:(1)绿色创业导向对绿色供应链整合有正向影响;(2)绿色供应链整合对企业负责任创新有倒U型影响;(3)绿色供应链整合在绿色创业导向与企业负责任创新间发挥中介作用;(4)大数据分析能力正向调节绿色创业导向对绿色供应链整合的线性关系,以及绿色供应链整合与企业负责任创新间的倒U型关系。本研究不仅丰富了企业负责任创新的形成机制研究,也为企业管理者和政策制定者推动企业负责任创新提供实践启示。

Abstract

As an emerging innovation paradigm that balances the demand for profit growth and social value, responsible innovation has been increasingly recognized by enterprises as an effective approach for them to proactively assume social responsibilities and achieve sustainable development goals. In view of the widespread appeal to promote the sustainable development of agriculture with scientific and technological innovation, it is extremely necessary to discuss the topic of responsible innovation in agriculture. Based on the resource orchestration theory, this study constructed a theoretical model that explores how green entrepreneurial orientation influences enterprise responsible innovation. The research data from 248 agricultural enterprises were analyzed using the hierarchical regression and MEDCURVE macro-program. The empirical results indicated that: (1) green entrepreneurial orientation positively influences green supply chain integration; (2) green supply chain integration, in turn, has an inverted U-shaped influence on enterprise responsible innovation; (3) green supply chain integration acts as a mediator between green entrepreneurial orientation and enterprise responsible innovation; and (4) big data analytics capability positively moderates the linear relationship between green entrepreneurial orientation and green supply chain integration, as well as the inverted U-shaped relationship between green supply chain integration and enterprise responsible innovation. This study has not only enriched the research on the formation mechanism of enterprise responsible innovation, but also provided practical enlightenment for managers and policy makers to promote enterprise responsible innovation.

关键词

负责任创新 / 绿色创业导向 / 绿色供应链整合 / 大数据分析能力 / 农业企业

Key words

responsible innovation / green entrepreneurial orientation / green supply chain integration / big data analysis capability / agricultural enterprise

引用本文

导出引用
张秀娥, 滕欣宇, 王超. 绿色创业导向对企业负责任创新的影响研究[J]. 科研管理. 2026, 47(2): 107-115 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.02.011
Zhang Xiu'e, Teng Xinyu, Wang Chao. Research on the impact of green entrepreneurial orientation on the responsible innovation of enterprises[J]. Science Research Management. 2026, 47(2): 107-115 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.02.011
中图分类号: F272.2   

参考文献

[1]
张森, 温军. 数字经济赋能新质生产力:一个分析框架[J]. 当代经济管理, 2024, 46(7):1-9.
ZHANG Sen, WEN Jun. Digital economy empowers new quality productivity: An analytical framework[J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 2024, 46(7):1-9.
[2]
XIE X M, WU Y H, TEJEROB C B G. How responsible innovation builds business network resilience to achieve sustainable performance during global outbreaks: An extended resource-based view[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2024, 71: 12194-12208.
[3]
刘战雄. 农业负责任创新及其对农业伦理的理念助推[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2020, 36(11):61-67.
LIU Zhanxiong. Responsible innovation of agriculture and its theoretical nudge for agricultural ethics[J]. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 2020, 36(11): 61-67.
[4]
DE LOS REYES G, SCHOLZ M. Assessing the legitimacy of corporate political activity: Uber and the quest for responsible innovation[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2023, 184(1): 51-69.
Building on literature in political CSR and corporate political activity (CPA) as well as responsible innovation and responsible lobbying, we introduce a framework to assess the legitimacy status of corporate political activity. We focus on the fact that companies frequently face sharp regulatory backlash after penetrating markets with their innovations. In response to regulatory backlash, big tech companies often employ an arsenal of corporate political activities to (re-)shape national and local regulatory environments, which raises the important questions about the legitimacy of CPA tactics that we address. To develop and apply this framework, we briefly survey and then assess Uber’s corporate political activities in its 2015 New York City political campaign.
[5]
HADJ T B. Effects of corporate social responsibility towards stakeholders and environmental management on responsible innovation and competitiveness[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 250(20): 1-10.
[6]
ADOMAKO S, TRAN M D. Environmental collaboration, responsible innovation, and firm performance: The moderating role of stakeholder pressure[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2022, 31(4): 1695-1704.
[7]
曹霞, 吕丹, 付向梅. 社会资本对负责任创新的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(3):74-82.
CAO Xia, LYU Dan, FU Xiangmei. A study of the impact of social capital on responsible innovation[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(3):74-82.
[8]
UREÑA-ESPAILLAT H J, BRIONES-PEÑALVER A J, BERNAL-CONESA J A, et al. Knowledge and innovation management in agribusiness: A study in the Dominican Republic[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2023, 32(4): 2008-2021.
[9]
SIRMON D G, HITT M A, IRELAND R D. Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breath, depth, and life cycle effects[J]. Journal of Management, 2011, 37: 1390-1412.
In this article, the authors discuss how an emerging research stream, which they term resource orchestration, has the potential to extend the understanding of resource-based theory (RBT) by explicitly addressing the role of managers’ actions to effectively structure, bundle, and leverage firm resources. First, the authors review this emerging stream by comparing two related frameworks, resource management and asset orchestration. This comparison leads to their integration, which enables a more precise understanding of managers’ roles within RBT. Then the authors discuss what is known and what remains to be known about resource orchestration. This leads to in-depth reviews of three areas where research on resource orchestration can be used to extend RBT. These areas are (1) breadth (resource orchestration across the scope of the firm), (2) life cycle (resource orchestration at various stages of firm maturity), and (3) depth (resource orchestration across levels of the firm). They close with a discussion of future research that will extend resource orchestration and contribute to a more robust RBT.
[10]
张青, 华志兵. 资源编排理论及其研究进展述评[J]. 经济管理, 2020, 42(9):193-208.
ZHANG Qing, HUA Zhibing. Review of resource orchestration theory and its research progress[J]. Business and Management Journal, 2020, 42(9): 193-208.
[11]
邓渝. “做正确的事与正确地做事”:资源编排视角下的创业企业绩效[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(5):34-46.
DENG Yu. “Do right things and do things right”: The performance of start-ups from the perspective of resource orchestration[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2021, 43(5):34-46.
[12]
JIANG W B, CHAI H Q, SHAO J, et al. Green entrepreneurial orientation for enhancing firm performance: A dynamic capability perspective[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 198(2): 1311-1323.
[13]
张秀娥, 李清. 绿色创业导向能提高农业新创企业绩效吗?[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(1):93-102.
摘要
基于自然资源基础观和战略匹配理论,以“绿色创业导向—创业机会识别—企业绩效”为研究逻辑,构建绿色创业导向、创业机会识别、环境不确定性与农业新创企业绩效之间关系的理论模型,通过对301份有效样本进行实证分析,研究表明:绿色创业导向对农业新创企业财务绩效和环境绩效均有正向影响,创业机会识别在绿色创业导向与农业新创企业财务绩效和环境绩效的关系中起部分中介作用,环境不确定性负向调节创业机会识别与农业新创企业环境绩效之间的关系,并调节创业机会识别在绿色创业导向与农业新创企业环境绩效之间的中介作用。
ZHU Xiu-e, LI Qing. Does green entrepreneurial orientation improve the performance of agricultural new ventures?[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2021, 39(1): 93-102.
[14]
ZHANG X, TENG X, LE Y, et al. Strategic orientations and responsible innovation in SMEs: The moderating effects of environmental turbulence[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2023, 32(4): 2522-2539.
[15]
STILGOE J, OWEN R, MACNAGHTEN P. Developing a framework for responsible innovation[J]. Research Policy, 2013, 42(9): 1568-1580.
[16]
WONG C Y, WONG C W Y, BOON-ITT S. Effects of green supply chain integration and green innovation on environmental and cost performance[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2020, 58(5):1-21.
[17]
WANG G, FENG T, ZHU Z, et al. Enabling green supply chain integration via green entrepreneurial orientation: Does environmental leadership matter?[J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2022, 30(2): 518-530.
[18]
KONG T, FENG T, HUANG Y, et al. How to convert green supply chain integration efforts into green innovation: A perspective of knowledge-based view[J]. Sustainable Development, 2020, 28:1106-1121.
[19]
YANG Q, GENG R, FENG T. Does the configuration of macro-and micro-institutional environments affect the effectiveness of green supply chain integration?[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2020, 29(4): 1695-1713.
[20]
FENG T, SHENG H. Identifying the equifinal configurations of prompting green supply chain integration and subsequent performance outcome[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2023, 32(8): 5234-5251.
[21]
JIANG Q, LI J, SI H, et al. The impact of the digital economy on agricultural green development: Evidence from China[J]. Agriculture (Basel), 2022, 12(8): 1107.
[22]
李树文, 罗瑾琏, 葛元骎. 大数据分析能力对产品突破性创新的影响[J]. 管理科学, 2021, 34(2):3-15.
LI Shuwen, LUO Jinlian, GE Yuanqin. Effects of big data analysis capability on breakthrough product innovation[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2021, 34(2): 3-15.
[23]
BENZIDIA S, MAKAOUI N, BENTAHAR O. The impact of big data analytics and artificial intelligence on green supply chain process integration and hospital environmental performance[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 165, 120557.
[24]
于亢亢, 赵云, 卢强, 等. 供应链流程创新如何影响农业企业发展?整合的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2022, 25(6):97-109.
YU Kangkang, ZHAO Yun, LU Qiang, et al. How does supply chain innovation affect the development of agricultural enterprises? The moderating effects of integration[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2022, 25(6): 97-109.
[25]
江怡洒, 冯泰文. 绿色供应链整合:研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2022, 44(6):135-152.
JIANG Yisa, FENG Taiwen. A literature review and prospects of green supply chain integration[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2022, 44(6):135-152.
[26]
SMETS L, OORSCHOT K, LANGERAK F. Don't trust trust: A dynamic approach to controlling supplier involvement in new product development[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2013, 30(6): 1145-1158.
[27]
ZHAO Y, ZHAO C, GUO Y, et al. Green supplier integration and environmental innovation in Chinese firms: The joint effect of governance mechanism and trust[J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2021, 28(1): 169-183.
[28]
OCASIO W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(S1): 187-206.
[29]
CIAMPI F, DEMI S, MAGRINI A, et al. Exploring the impact of big data analytics capabilities on business model innovation: The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 123: 1-13.
[30]
KHAN A, TAO M. Knowledge absorption capacity's efficacy to enhance innovation performance through big data analytics and digital platform capability[J]. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2022, 7(3), 100201.
[31]
DUBEY R, GUNASEKARAN A, CHILD S J, et al. Big data analytics and organizational culture as complements to swift trust and collaborative performance in the humanitarian supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 210: 120-136.
[32]
ZAHOOR N, KHAN H, KHAN Z, et al. Responsible innovation in emerging markets' SMEs: The role of alliance learning and absorptive capacity[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2024, 41(3): 1175-1209.
This paper presents an examination of the role played by alliance learning in enabling emerging market small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to develop responsible innovation. SMEs based in emerging markets face significant challenges due to their weak resource base and the limited support they receive from formal institutions. In such a context, we argued that alliance learning takes a more prominent role in enabling these firms to develop responsible innovation via their absorptive capacity and sense-making competency. Drawn from 176 survey responses from SMEs originating from Pakistan, our findings shed light on the vital role played by alliance learning in enhancing SMEs’ responsible innovation. Specifically, the findings indicate that absorptive capacity acts as an important mechanism between alliance learning and responsible innovation. In addition, sense-making competency emerges as an important boundary condition and as a vital dynamic capability under which the effects of alliance learning on responsible innovation are stronger through the mediating mechanisms of absorptive capacity. These moderating-mediating findings contribute to the literature on dynamic capabilities and responsible innovation and provide important insights into the mechanisms and boundary conditions of responsible innovation in the context of emerging Asian markets.
[33]
HAANS R F J, PIETERS C, HE Z L. Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(7): 1177-1195.
[34]
BARON R M, KENNY D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173-1182.
[35]
HAYES A F, PREACHER K J. Quantifying and testing indirect effects in simple mediation models when the constituent paths are nonlinear[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2010, 45(4): 627-660.
Most treatments of indirect effects and mediation in the statistical methods literature and the corresponding methods used by behavioral scientists have assumed linear relationships between variables in the causal system. Here we describe and extend a method first introduced by Stolzenberg (1980) for estimating indirect effects in models of mediators and outcomes that are nonlinear functions but linear in their parameters. We introduce the concept of the instantaneous indirect effect of X on Y through M and illustrate its computation and describe a bootstrapping procedure for inference. Mplus code as well as SPSS and SAS macros are provided to facilitate the adoption of this approach and ease the computational burden on the researcher.
[36]
AIKEN L S, WEST S G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions[M]. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1991.
[37]
SHUKLA S, KAPOOR R, GUPTA N, et al. Role of information and communication technology in mitigating risks in Indian agricultural supply chains[J]. Supply Chain Management, 2023, 28(3): 544-558.
Theorising from a resource-based view perspective, the intersection of supply chain management and the use of information technology (IT) has been investigated in this study. This paper aims to investigate supply chain performance (SCP) as an essential outcome of the use of IT and explores the effect of supply chain collaboration (SCC) on SCP. In addition, volume uncertainty (VU) has been explored and tested to establish whether various associated uncertainties can be mitigated when the use of IT is involved.
[38]
黄波, 宋建敏, 李宇雨, 等. 组织视阈下大数据分析能力的整合分析框架构建与未来展望[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(1):151-160.
HUANG Bo, SONG Jianmin, LI Yuyu, et al. Construction of integrated analysis framework and future prospect for big data analytics capability from the organizational perspective[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2023, 40(1):151-160.

基金

国家社会科学基金项目:“乡村振兴战略下农业企业绿色创业导向的测量、驱动机制及对绩效的影响研究”(20BGL059)
国家社会科学基金项目:“乡村振兴战略下农业企业绿色创业导向的测量、驱动机制及对绩效的影响研究”(2020.09—2025.11)

PDF(1101 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/