PDF(1073 KB)
PDF(1073 KB)
PDF(1073 KB)
企业数字化促进价值共创:自我网络作用机制
Value co-creation promoted by enterprise digitalization: The action mechanism of ego-networks
在新一轮技术革命的驱动下,企业数字化既被视为优化创新网络结构和增强竞争优势的关键抓手,也成为推动价值共创、实现产业协同升级的重要路径。然而,关于企业数字化促进价值共创的机制仍存在认知分歧。本文基于2010至2023年医药制造业148家上市企业研发合作产生的专利数据,构建包含2072个观测值的平衡面板模型,剖析企业数字化对价值共创的总体效应、作用渠道及情境特征。研究发现:(1)企业数字化对价值共创的广度和深度均具有显著的正向影响;(2)自我网络稳定性和自我网络惯例在企业数字化对价值共创的影响中发挥中介作用;(3)合作动机在企业数字化影响价值共创的作用路径中发挥负向调节作用。本文从研发合作视角出发,揭示了企业数字化影响价值共创的内在机制,丰富了企业数字化与价值共创的研究视角,在实践上为企业优化自身网络结构和优化数字化战略提供了实践指导。
Driven by the new round of technological revolution, enterprise digitalization is regarded not only as a key approach to optimizing the innovation network structure and enhancing competitive advantages, but also as an important path to promote value co-creation and achieve industrial collaborative upgrading. However, there are still cognitive differences regarding the mechanism by which enterprise digitalization promotes value co-creation. Based on the patent data generated from the R&D cooperation of 148 listed enterprises in the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry from 2010 to 2023, this paper constructed a balanced panel model containing 2,072 observations to analyze the overall effect, application channels and situational characteristics of enterprise digitalization on value co-creation. The research found that: (1) Enterprise digitalization has a significant positive impact on both the breadth and depth of value co-creation; (2) Ego-network stability and ego-network conventions play a mediating role in the impact of enterprise digitalization on value co-creation; and (3) Cooperative motivation plays a negative moderating role in the path of value co-creation influenced by enterprise digitalization. From the perspective of R&D cooperation, this paper revealed the internal mechanism by which enterprise digitalization affects value co-creation, enriched the research perspectives on enterprise digitalization and value co-creation, and it will provide some practical guidance for enterprises to optimize their own network structure and digital strategy in practice.
enterprise digitization / value co-creation / ego-network / cooperation motivation
| [1] |
This paper aims to make a systematic study on the factors that hinder the development of China’s intelligent automobile manufacturing industry; based on comprehensive understanding of these obstacles and by optimization means, ultimately, the healthy and sustainable development of intelligent automobile manufacturing industry in China can be promoted.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
This study aims to explore the effect of digitalization on the promotion of enterprise R&D cooperation, and it analyzes the microimpact mechanism and boundary conditions of enterprise digitalization on enterprise R&D cooperation.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
王莉静, 徐梦杰, 徐莹莹, 等. 企业数字化转型对服务化价值共创绩效的影响研究:基于合作网络视角[J]. 中国软科学, 2024(6):165-176.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
孙静林, 穆荣平, 张超. 创新生态系统价值共创:概念内涵、行为模式与动力机制[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(2):1-10.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
杨震宁, 侯一凡, 李德辉, 等. 中国企业“双循环”中开放式创新网络的平衡效应:基于数字赋能与组织柔性的考察[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(11):184-205+12.
|
| [10] |
蔡猷花, 傅令菲, 梁娟. 联盟关系演化、网络结构洞与企业合作创新绩效[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021(10):94-103.
|
| [11] |
Much research has shown that firms' ego network configurations-i.e., structural holes or network closure-help them achieve superior innovation outcomes. However, little is known about how the stability of the firm's ego-network composition affects the firm's innovation. In this paper, we investigate the outcomes of ego-network stability in an alliance context, arguing that stability actually reduces innovation for the focal firm. We further investigate two contingencies-namely, the structural holes the focal firm spans and the geographic concentration of its inventive activities-that moderate the detrimental innovation effects of ego network stability. Focal firms can limit the negative effects of ego-network stability on innovation by spanning structural holes in their alliance portfolios, whereas the negative effects are worsened when the focal firms' inventive activities are geographically concentrated in a single country. We empirically test our hypotheses using 198 biopharmaceutical firms headquartered in the United States over a 21-year period from 1985 to 2005. Our results support our predictions.
|
| [12] |
解学梅, 王宏伟, 余生辉. 上下同欲者胜:开放式创新生态网络结构对价值共创影响机理[J]. 管理科学学报, 2024, 27(3):133-158.
|
| [13] |
徐可, 何桢. “新”由“和”生?社会资本激励创新驱动力的倒U型抑扬效应研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(4):28-35.
|
| [14] |
吴友群, 卢怀鑫, 王立勇. 数字化对制造业全球价值链竞争力的影响:来自中国制造业行业的经验证据[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(7):53-63.
数字化是新时期提升制造业GVC竞争力的有效路径。系统梳理数字化影响制造业GVC竞争力的理论机制，并利用2000—2014年中国制造业面板数据进行实证检验。结果表明，制造业数字化通过成本效应、配置效应和协同效应促进GVC竞争力提升；样本考察期内，中国制造业GVC竞争力整体呈不断上升趋势，且基本稳定在前10行列，并以中低知识密集度行业竞争力最强；数字化整体上有利于GVC竞争力提升，分行业看，数字化对中低和中高知识密集度行业的GVC竞争力有显著促进作用；分投入来源看，国际数字化投入比国内数字化投入的促进效果更显著；分投入类型看，软件和信息技术服务业的促进效果最突出。结论可为制造企业制定数字化转型及GVC竞争力提升策略提供参考。
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
黄宏斌, 梁慧丽, 许晨辉. 数字化转型驱动了企业协同创新吗?[J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2023, 43(11):96-113.
|
| [17] |
马艳艳, 刘凤朝, 姜滨滨, 等. 企业跨组织研发合作广度和深度对创新绩效的影响:基于中国工业企业数据的实证[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(6):33-40.
|
| [18] |
范佳颖, 马艳艳. 企业主导产学研合作与关键共性技术创新:结构性权力的调节效应[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(2):61-70+93.
|
| [19] |
陈菊红, 王昊, 张雅琪. 服务生态系统环境下利益相关者价值共创的演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(11):44-53.
服务生态系统作为网络环境下的新型价值创造模式,近年来已成为国内外学术界研究的热点。首先,在明确服务生态系统价值共创模式的基础上,将价值创造过程的利益相关者划分为服务提供者、服务促进者和服务接受者。其次,引入演化博弈的方法,对服务生态系统价值共创的演化均衡状态及其收益进行刻画。最后分析了不同条件下服务生态系统共创收益与均衡状态之间的关系。研究结果表明,价格弹性在服务生态系统的演化过程中起主导作用,直接影响服务化的收益状况和系统的均衡状态;在不对系统收益分配进行调控的情况下,价值滑移降低了系统价值共创的效率,均衡状态的收益值低于系统最大收益值;对系统的收益分配进行调控能够提升价值共创效率,奖励策略能够决定系统的最终演化状态,而惩罚策略则能够加快系统的收敛速度。
As a new pattern of value co-creation under the network environment, service ecosystem has become one of the hot topics in the academic circle in recent years. First, on the basis of a clear model of value co-creation, the stakeholders in the value creation process are divided into service providers, service promoters and service recipients. On this basis, an evolutionary game has been developed to characterize the equilibrium state its benefits of value co-creation in service ecosystem. Finally, we compare and analyze the equilibrium state and the results of the value co-creation of service ecosystem under different conditions. The research results show that: Price elasticity plays a leading role in the evolution of service ecosystem, and directly affects the status of service revenue and the equilibrium state of the system. Under natural conditions, value slip reduces the efficiency of system value creation, and the return value of equilibrium is lower than the maximum value of the system. In order to improve the efficiency of value co-creation, the reward strategy “R” is used to adjust the evolution state, and the penalty strategy “L” is applied to speed up the convergence speed of the system.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
This research considers how different features of informal networks affect knowledge transfer. As a complement to previous research that has emphasized the dyadic tie strength component of informal networks, we focus on how network structure influences the knowledge transfer process. We propose that social cohesion around a relationship affects the willingness and motivation of individuals to invest time, energy, and effort in sharing knowledge with others. We further argue that the network range, ties to different knowledge pools, increases a person's ability to convey complex ideas to heterogeneous audiences. We also examine explanations for knowledge transfer based on absorptive capacity, which emphasizes the role of common knowledge, and relational embeddedness, which stresses the importance of tie strength. We investigate the network effect on knowledge transfer using data from a contract R&D firm. The results indicate that both social cohesion and network range ease knowledge transfer, over and above the effect for the strength of the tie between two people. We discuss the implications of these findings for research on effective knowledge transfer, social capital, and information diffusion.
|
| [22] |
贯君, 徐建中, 林艳. 跨界搜寻、 网络惯例、双元能力与创新绩效的关系研究[J]. 管理评论, 2019, 31(12):61-72.
|
| [23] |
A typical approach to studying capabilities in the operations management literature is to assess the intended or realized competitive operational performance and their contribution to business and organizational objectives. While it is crucial to identify the operational performance that helps create competitive advantage, it is equally important to understand the means for delivering the needed performance at the operational level. Drawing on the resource‐based view (RBV), we argue that routines are a critical source of operations capabilities and subsequently investigate operations capabilities by means of their underlying routines. Because a common problem to studying capabilities is the ambiguous and confusing definitions, we conduct an extensive literature review to address the semantic confusion among various definitions of capabilities and delineate it from other related terms. We identify improvement and innovation as two critical plant level capabilities, each consisting of a bundle of interrelated yet distinct routines. We then empirically measure the two capabilities as second‐order latent variables and estimate their effects on a set of operational performance measures. The results suggest that routines form internally consistent bundles which are significantly related to operational performance. This supports our notion of “capabilities as routine bundles” that are difficult to imitate and thus a source of competitive advantage.
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
马斌. 企业间知识合作动机导向对企业创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 金融经济, 2016(18):103-105.
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现:来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7):130-144+10.
|
| [28] |
袁淳, 肖土盛, 耿春晓, 等. 数字化转型与企业分工:专业化还是纵向一体化[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(9):137-155.
|
| [29] |
江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5):100-120.
|
| [30] |
王娇. 上下游数字化转型实现了价值共创吗?:基于数字溢出的微观证据[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2024, 26(5):92-106.
|
| [31] |
赵宸宇, 王文春, 李雪松. 数字化转型如何影响企业全要素生产率[J]. 财贸经济, 2021, 42(7):114-129.
|
| [32] |
甄红线, 王玺, 方红星. 知识产权行政保护与企业数字化转型[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(11):62-79.
|
| [33] |
余东华, 马路萌. 技术不确定性视角下的企业数字化转型与专业化分工[J]. 经济评论, 2025(2):3-20.
|
| [34] |
吴武清, 赵越, 苏子豪. 企业信息化建设与审计费用:数字化转型时期的新证据[J]. 审计研究, 2022(1):106-117.
|
| [35] |
上官莉娜, 徐云鹏. 从“化繁为简”到“繁简相生”:公共安全政民合作治理的过程机制研究:以深圳市B区义警为例[J]. 求实, 2024(1):57-70+111.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
