PDF(1204 KB)
PDF(1204 KB)
PDF(1204 KB)
创新发展政策范式历史演进及其主要特征研究
Research on the historical evolution and main characteristics of the innovation-driven development policy paradigms
当前,新一代科技创新政策正成为政策制定者和学术界共同关注的焦点。在重新界定“创新”“发展”“创新发展”和“政策范式”等概念基础上,提出了创新发展政策的概念,作为新一代科技创新政策发展方向,分析了从科技政策到创新政策,再到创新发展政策的范式转变过程及其主要特征,为创新发展政策制定提供了一套理论思想体系。文章主要结论包括:(1)创新是一个多元价值创造并实现增值循环的过程,包括科学价值、技术价值、经济价值、社会价值和文化价值的创造。(2)创新发展是指创新驱动经济、社会、环境、文化发展和科学技术自身发展,其实质是在创新和发展的目标与行动高度耦合下,实现多元价值创造并实现增值循环,强调创新对于发展的主要驱动力作用以及创新与发展之间的强耦合关系和发展的可持续性。(3)创新发展政策是新一代科技创新政策,是指政府和政党为实现创新驱动经济、社会、环境、文化发展和科学技术自身发展所确定的行为准则和采取的行动计划。(4)政策范式是指政策制定过程中利益相关者共同认可的政策价值理念、政策标准规范和政策概念体系。(5)科技创新政策范式经历了从科技政策范式到创新政策范式,再到创新发展政策范式的历史演进,核心是对创新与发展内涵外延以及两者之间系统耦合关系认识的拓展。本研究为创新发展政策制定提供理论方法指导,为创新发展政策科学发展奠定重要理论思想基础。
The new generation of science, technology and innovation policy is now becoming a focal point for both policymakers and the academia. Based on the redefinition of concepts such as "innovation", "development", "innovation-driven development" and "policy paradigm", the concept of innovation-driven development policy is proposed as the new generation of science, technology and innovation policy. This paper analyzed the paradigm shift process from science and technology policy to innovation policy and then to innovation-driven development policy, along with its main characteristics, therefore providing a theoretical framework for the formulation of innovation-driven development policy. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) Innovation is a process of diversified value creation and value-added circulation, encompassing the creation of scientific value, technological value, economic value, social value, and cultural value. (2) Innovation-driven development refers to innovation-driven economic, social, environmental and culture development, as well as the development of science and technology. Its essence lies in achieving diversified value creation and value-added circulation under the high coupling of goals and actions of innovation and development. It emphasizes the primary driving force of innovation for development, and the strong coupling relationship between innovation and development as well as the sustainability of development. (3) Innovation-driven development policy is the new generation of science, technology and innovation policy, which refers to the conduct code and action plan adopted by governments and political parties to achieve innovation-driven economic, social, environmental and culture development, as well as science and technology development. (4) Policy paradigm refers to the policy value concepts, policy standards and norms, and policy conceptual system that are commonly recognized by stakeholders in the policy-making process. (5)The science, technology and innovation policy paradigm has undergone a historical evolution from the science and technology policy paradigm to the innovation policy paradigm, and then to the innovation-driven development policy paradigm. The core of this evolution lies in the expansion of understanding of the connotations and extensions of innovation and development, as well as the systematic coupling relationship between innovation and development. This study will provide theoretical and methodological guidance for the formulation of innovation-driven development policy, and lay an important theoretical foundation for the development of innovation-driven development policy science.
innovation-driven development policy / innovation policy / innovation-driven development / paradigm shift
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
穆荣平. 创新政策篇: 创新发展政策[M]// 陈劲, 吴贵生. 中国创新学派: 30年回顾与未来展望. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2018: 227-235.
|
| [10] |
梁正. 从科技政策到科技与创新政策:创新驱动发展战略下的政策范式转型与思考[J]. 科学学研究, 2017, 35(2): 170-176.
|
| [11] |
马名杰, 熊鸿儒. 新时期创新政策转型思路与重点: 以补短板为主向同时注重锻长板转变[J]. 经济纵横, 2020(12): 54-62+2.
|
| [12] |
杨欣萌, 何光喜. 面向可持续发展的转型创新政策:理论与中国实践[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021(1):1-9.
|
| [13] |
王昶, 张翠虹, 姚海琳, 等. 任务导向型创新政策: 框架、理论与实践[J]. 科学学研究, 2023, 41(1):30-37.
任务导向型创新政策是为应对重大社会挑战而兴起的新政策范式,已成为许多国家解决“急、难、险、重”等科学问题的系统性政策干预方案。文章围绕任务导向型创新政策的概念内涵、要素构成、主要特征、理论解释与政策实践等不同维度展开全面分析。研究表明,任务导向型创新政策主要由政策目标、政策主体、政策工具和政策过程等要素构成,并具有方向引导、市场创建、协同参与和动态评估等特征。转型失灵理论为任务导向型创新政策干预创新活动的合法性提供了理论解释。现有任务导向型创新政策实践主要聚焦于保障国防安全、实现产业追赶和应对重大社会挑战三个方面。研究可为中国制定和实施任务导向型创新政策提供理论支撑和经验借鉴。
Countries around the world are increasingly concerned about grand social challenges including climate change, aging, and global pandemics, all of which may negatively affect people’s life and well-being. These “wicked” challenges are complex, systemic, interconnected, and urgent. Traditional innovation policy systems are unable to effectively deal with them due to a lack of holistic strategic orientation and policy coordination, as well as fragmented policy instruments. Policymakers global wide are looking for a new systemic policy intervention to achieve transformational societal changes. In this context, many countries have been experimenting with a systemic intervention to give a long-term orientation to innovation support, usually referred to as ‘mission-oriented innovation policy’.Mission-oriented innovation policy is a new policy paradigm that has emerged in response to grand societal challenges and has become a systematic policy intervention solution to “urgent, difficult, dangerous, and critical” scientific problems in many countries. It emphasizes mission-directed orientation, encompasses a variety of policy instruments and combinations, and involves multiple sectors, disciplines, and actors. Although the attention of mission-oriented innovation policy is rising, it has not been fully explored as a new policy paradigm. Prior studies have not reached a consensus on the concept, connotation, constituent elements, and main characteristics of mission-oriented innovation policy, nor have they clearly explained the legitimacy of its intervention in innovation activities. In light of the above gaps, this paper focuses on three aspects. First, we construct an analytical framework of mission-oriented innovation policy and present a comprehensive analysis of its concept connotation, element composition, main characteristics. Second, we explore the legitimacy of mission-oriented innovation policy interventions in innovation activities through an explanation of the four types of failures (directionality failure, demand articulation failure, policy coordination failure, reflexivity failure) contained in transformational failures. Finally, we take the US Apollo program, China's new energy vehicle program, and the European Union's "Horizon Europe (2021-2027)" program as examples to conduct in-depth discussions on three typical mission-oriented innovation policy practices. The results show that mission-oriented innovation policy is mainly composed of policy objectives, policy subjects, policy instruments, and policy processes, and is characterized by direction guidance, market creation, collaborative participation, and dynamic evaluation. Transformational failure theory provides a theoretical explanation for the legitimacy of mission-oriented innovation policy intervention in innovation activities. Mission-oriented innovation policy can solve the problems of directionality failure, demand articulation failure, policy coordination failure, reflexivity failure contained in transformational failures by guiding innovation direction, shaping the new market, and coordinating the participation of a wider range of actors. The existing practice of mission-oriented innovation policy focuses on three areas: ensuring national defense and security, achieving industrial catch-up, and addressing grand social challenges. These three policy practices reflect that a country has different urgent problems in different development stages and environments, resulting in different dominant strategic missions.Our work can provide theoretical support and empirical reference for the formulation and implementation of mission-oriented innovation policies in China. With the frequent occurrence of challenges today, China must enhance the awareness of opportunities and accelerate the improvement of the mission-oriented innovation policy system under the special scenario. This is not only an important measure for China to effectively deal with unstable factors in the international context but also a strategic choice for major missions such as safeguarding national industrial security and breaking through foreign technology blockades.
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
穆荣平, 宋河发, 任中保. 关于创新型国家建设的若干问题思考[M]//中国科学院. 2010高技术发展报告. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 246-253.
|
| [19] |
日本政府. 科学技術基本計画[R]. 2011.
Government of Japan. Science and technology basic plan[R]. 2011.
|
| [20] |
OECD/EUROSTAT. Oslo Manual 2018:Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th edition)[R]. Paris: OECD Publishing/Luxembourg: Eurostat, 2005.
|
| [21] |
National Science Board.The state of U.S. science & engineering 2024: Science and engineering indicators[R]. 2024.
|
| [22] |
亚当·斯密. 国富论[M]. 胡长明译. 北京: 人民日报出版社, 2009.
|
| [23] |
张培刚, 张建华. 发展经济学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2009.
|
| [24] |
The World Commissiom On Environment And Development. Our common future[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
|
| [25] |
国务院. 中国21世纪议程:中国21世纪人口、环境与发展白皮书[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1994.
The State Council.
|
| [26] |
俞慈声, 穆荣平, 等. 中关村科技园区发展规划研究总报告[M]// 林文漪. 托起明天的太阳:中关村科技园区发展规划研究. 北京: 北京科学技术出版社, 2000.
|
| [27] |
中国未来20年技术预见研究组. 中国未来20年技术预见[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006.
Research Group for Technology Foresight of China Towards 2020. Technology foresight of China towards 2020[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2006.
|
| [28] |
穆荣平, 陈凯华. 2019国家创新发展报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020.
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
洪银兴. 关于创新驱动和协同创新的若干重要概念[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2013, 33(5): 5-12.
实施创新驱动发展战略,是经济发展转向新的发展方式的重要标志。以科学发现为源头的科技进步模式,体现知识创新和技术创新的衔接和融合,是技术进步路径的革命性变化。由于科技创新的源头主要是科学发现和知识创新,因此创新需要大学和企业的协同,科学家和企业家的协同。产学研协同是指产业发展、人才培养和科学研究三方功能的协同,特别需要提高知识创新能力。
The strategy of innovation-driven growth was the important signal of economic development to transit a new mode.Collaborative innovation required the corporation of research institutes and firms,as well as the collaborative development of industries,human capital and research capability
|
| [39] |
中国科学院. 创新促进发展, 科技引领未来:关于我国科技发展的战略思考[M]// 中国科学院. 2005科学发展报告. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005: 144-157.
Chinese Academy of Sciences. Innovation promotes development and S&T takes the lead in the future[M] // Chinese Academy of Sciences. 2005 Science development report. Beijing: Science Press, 2005: 144-157.
|
| [40] |
中国科学院创新发展研究中心. 2009中国创新发展报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
The Center for Innovation and Development of CAS. The report on innovation and development in China 2009[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2009.
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
陈振明. 政策科学:公共政策分析导论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2003.
|
| [44] |
托马斯·库恩. 科学革命的结构[M]. 金吾伦, 胡新和译. (第四版). 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2012.
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
王作跃. 为什么美国没有设立科技部?[J]. 科学文化评论, 2005(5): 36-49.
|
| [49] |
方晓东, 董瑜. 法国国家创新体系的演化历程、特点及启示[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2021, 43(5): 616-632.
|
| [50] |
黄群. 联邦德国40年科技政策概述[J]. 管理世界, 1991(4): 207-209.
|
| [51] |
National Science Board. Science indicators 1972[R]. 1973.
|
| [52] |
钟少颖, 聂晓伟. 美国联邦国家实验室研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017.
|
| [53] |
泓文. 苏联科学院[J]. 苏联东欧问题, 1986(1): 85-91+93.
|
| [54] |
A. Б.彼得罗夫斯基, Л.K. 谢苗诺夫, Б.C. 马洛夫, 等. 苏联科学院的人员组成、结构与动态[J]. 世界研究与发展, 1991(3):17-25.
|
| [55] |
OECD. Science,
|
| [56] |
OECD. Proposed standard practice for surveys of research and development[R]. Paris, 1963
|
| [57] |
韩晋芳. 论科研院所的转制之路[J]. 当代中国史研究, 2023, 30(4): 64-77+158.
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
OECD. Innovation policy[R]. Paris: OECD, 1982. 转引自柳卸林. 新时期我国促进自主创新的政策解读:以财政政策为例. 山西大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2007, 30(3): 177-182+226.
OECD. Innovation policy[R]. Paris: OECD, 1982. As cited in LIU Xielin. The policy interpretation of self-reliant innovation of China in new era. Journal of Shanxi University (Philosophy & Social Science), 2007, 30(3): 177-182+226.
|
| [62] |
OECD. OECD proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data-Oslo Manual[R]. Paris, 1992.
|
| [63] |
方新. 论科技政策与科技指标[J]. 科技管理研究, 2001(1):6-9.
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
INSEAD. Global innovation index 2009-2010[R]. 2010.
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
中国科技发展战略研究院. 国家创新指数报告2010[R]. 2011.
Chinese Academy of Science and Technology for Development. National innovation index report 2010[R]. 2011.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |