创新发展政策范式历史演进及其主要特征研究

穆荣平, 池康伟

科研管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2) : 1-14.

PDF(1204 KB)
PDF(1204 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2) : 1-14. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.02.001  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2026.02.001

创新发展政策范式历史演进及其主要特征研究

作者信息 +

Research on the historical evolution and main characteristics of the innovation-driven development policy paradigms

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

当前,新一代科技创新政策正成为政策制定者和学术界共同关注的焦点。在重新界定“创新”“发展”“创新发展”和“政策范式”等概念基础上,提出了创新发展政策的概念,作为新一代科技创新政策发展方向,分析了从科技政策到创新政策,再到创新发展政策的范式转变过程及其主要特征,为创新发展政策制定提供了一套理论思想体系。文章主要结论包括:(1)创新是一个多元价值创造并实现增值循环的过程,包括科学价值、技术价值、经济价值、社会价值和文化价值的创造。(2)创新发展是指创新驱动经济、社会、环境、文化发展和科学技术自身发展,其实质是在创新和发展的目标与行动高度耦合下,实现多元价值创造并实现增值循环,强调创新对于发展的主要驱动力作用以及创新与发展之间的强耦合关系和发展的可持续性。(3)创新发展政策是新一代科技创新政策,是指政府和政党为实现创新驱动经济、社会、环境、文化发展和科学技术自身发展所确定的行为准则和采取的行动计划。(4)政策范式是指政策制定过程中利益相关者共同认可的政策价值理念、政策标准规范和政策概念体系。(5)科技创新政策范式经历了从科技政策范式到创新政策范式,再到创新发展政策范式的历史演进,核心是对创新与发展内涵外延以及两者之间系统耦合关系认识的拓展。本研究为创新发展政策制定提供理论方法指导,为创新发展政策科学发展奠定重要理论思想基础。

Abstract

The new generation of science, technology and innovation policy is now becoming a focal point for both policymakers and the academia. Based on the redefinition of concepts such as "innovation", "development", "innovation-driven development" and "policy paradigm", the concept of innovation-driven development policy is proposed as the new generation of science, technology and innovation policy. This paper analyzed the paradigm shift process from science and technology policy to innovation policy and then to innovation-driven development policy, along with its main characteristics, therefore providing a theoretical framework for the formulation of innovation-driven development policy. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) Innovation is a process of diversified value creation and value-added circulation, encompassing the creation of scientific value, technological value, economic value, social value, and cultural value. (2) Innovation-driven development refers to innovation-driven economic, social, environmental and culture development, as well as the development of science and technology. Its essence lies in achieving diversified value creation and value-added circulation under the high coupling of goals and actions of innovation and development. It emphasizes the primary driving force of innovation for development, and the strong coupling relationship between innovation and development as well as the sustainability of development. (3) Innovation-driven development policy is the new generation of science, technology and innovation policy, which refers to the conduct code and action plan adopted by governments and political parties to achieve innovation-driven economic, social, environmental and culture development, as well as science and technology development. (4) Policy paradigm refers to the policy value concepts, policy standards and norms, and policy conceptual system that are commonly recognized by stakeholders in the policy-making process. (5)The science, technology and innovation policy paradigm has undergone a historical evolution from the science and technology policy paradigm to the innovation policy paradigm, and then to the innovation-driven development policy paradigm. The core of this evolution lies in the expansion of understanding of the connotations and extensions of innovation and development, as well as the systematic coupling relationship between innovation and development. This study will provide theoretical and methodological guidance for the formulation of innovation-driven development policy, and lay an important theoretical foundation for the development of innovation-driven development policy science.

关键词

创新发展政策 / 创新政策 / 创新发展 / 范式转变

Key words

innovation-driven development policy / innovation policy / innovation-driven development / paradigm shift

引用本文

导出引用
穆荣平, 池康伟. 创新发展政策范式历史演进及其主要特征研究[J]. 科研管理. 2026, 47(2): 1-14 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.02.001
Mu Rongping, Chi Kangwei. Research on the historical evolution and main characteristics of the innovation-driven development policy paradigms[J]. Science Research Management. 2026, 47(2): 1-14 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.02.001
中图分类号: F204   

参考文献

[1]
LUNDVALL B Å. Transformative innovation policy:Lessons from the innovation system literature[J]. Innovation and Development, 2024, 14(2): 297-314.
[2]
WEBER K M, ROHRACHER H. Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework[J]. Research Policy, 2012, 41(6): 1037-1047.
[3]
SCHOT J, STEINMUELLER W E. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change[J]. Research Policy, 2018, 47(9): 1554-1567.
[4]
EDLER J, OSTERTAG K, SCHULER J. Social innovation, transformation, and public policy: Towards a conceptualization and critical appraisal[J]. Science and Public Policy, 2024(51):80-88.
[5]
DIERCKS G, LARSEN H, STEWARD F. Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(4): 880-894.
[6]
CANTNER U, VANNUCCINI S. Elements of a Schumpeterian catalytic research and innovation policy[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2018, 27(5): 833-850.
[7]
MAZZUCATO M. From market fixing to market-creating: A new framework for innovation policy[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2016, 23(2): 140-156.
[8]
MAZZUCATO M. Mission-oriented innovation policies: Challenges and opportunities[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2018, 27(5): 803-815.
[9]
穆荣平. 创新政策篇: 创新发展政策[M]// 陈劲, 吴贵生. 中国创新学派: 30年回顾与未来展望. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2018: 227-235.
MU Rongping. Innovation policy section: Innovation development policy[M] // WUGuisheng.Chinese innovation school: 30 year's review and future prospects. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2018: 227-235.
[10]
梁正. 从科技政策到科技与创新政策:创新驱动发展战略下的政策范式转型与思考[J]. 科学学研究, 2017, 35(2): 170-176.
LIANG Zheng. From science and technology policy to science, technology and innovation policy:A reflection on transformation of policy paradigm in the context of Innovation-Driven Development Strategy[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2017, 35(2): 170-176.
[11]
马名杰, 熊鸿儒. 新时期创新政策转型思路与重点: 以补短板为主向同时注重锻长板转变[J]. 经济纵横, 2020(12): 54-62+2.
MA Mingjie, XIONG Hongru. The framework and priority of innovation policy transformation in the new era: From improving weaknesses to boosting strengths[J]. Economic Review Journal, 2020(12): 54-62+2.
[12]
杨欣萌, 何光喜. 面向可持续发展的转型创新政策:理论与中国实践[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021(1):1-9.
YANG Xinmeng, HE Guangxi. Transformational innovation policy for sustainable development: Theory and practice in China[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2021(1):1-9.
[13]
王昶, 张翠虹, 姚海琳, 等. 任务导向型创新政策: 框架、理论与实践[J]. 科学学研究, 2023, 41(1):30-37.
摘要
任务导向型创新政策是为应对重大社会挑战而兴起的新政策范式,已成为许多国家解决“急、难、险、重”等科学问题的系统性政策干预方案。文章围绕任务导向型创新政策的概念内涵、要素构成、主要特征、理论解释与政策实践等不同维度展开全面分析。研究表明,任务导向型创新政策主要由政策目标、政策主体、政策工具和政策过程等要素构成,并具有方向引导、市场创建、协同参与和动态评估等特征。转型失灵理论为任务导向型创新政策干预创新活动的合法性提供了理论解释。现有任务导向型创新政策实践主要聚焦于保障国防安全、实现产业追赶和应对重大社会挑战三个方面。研究可为中国制定和实施任务导向型创新政策提供理论支撑和经验借鉴。
WANG Chang, ZHANG Cuihong, YAO Hailin, et. al. Mission-oriented innovation policy: Framework, theory and practice[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2023, 41(1):30-37.
Countries around the world are increasingly concerned about grand social challenges including climate change, aging, and global pandemics, all of which may negatively affect people’s life and well-being. These “wicked” challenges are complex, systemic, interconnected, and urgent. Traditional innovation policy systems are unable to effectively deal with them due to a lack of holistic strategic orientation and policy coordination, as well as fragmented policy instruments. Policymakers global wide are looking for a new systemic policy intervention to achieve transformational societal changes. In this context, many countries have been experimenting with a systemic intervention to give a long-term orientation to innovation support, usually referred to as ‘mission-oriented innovation policy’.Mission-oriented innovation policy is a new policy paradigm that has emerged in response to grand societal challenges and has become a systematic policy intervention solution to “urgent, difficult, dangerous, and critical” scientific problems in many countries. It emphasizes mission-directed orientation, encompasses a variety of policy instruments and combinations, and involves multiple sectors, disciplines, and actors. Although the attention of mission-oriented innovation policy is rising, it has not been fully explored as a new policy paradigm. Prior studies have not reached a consensus on the concept, connotation, constituent elements, and main characteristics of mission-oriented innovation policy, nor have they clearly explained the legitimacy of its intervention in innovation activities. In light of the above gaps, this paper focuses on three aspects. First, we construct an analytical framework of mission-oriented innovation policy and present a comprehensive analysis of its concept connotation, element composition, main characteristics. Second, we explore the legitimacy of mission-oriented innovation policy interventions in innovation activities through an explanation of the four types of failures (directionality failure, demand articulation failure, policy coordination failure, reflexivity failure) contained in transformational failures. Finally, we take the US Apollo program, China's new energy vehicle program, and the European Union's "Horizon Europe (2021-2027)" program as examples to conduct in-depth discussions on three typical mission-oriented innovation policy practices. The results show that mission-oriented innovation policy is mainly composed of policy objectives, policy subjects, policy instruments, and policy processes, and is characterized by direction guidance, market creation, collaborative participation, and dynamic evaluation. Transformational failure theory provides a theoretical explanation for the legitimacy of mission-oriented innovation policy intervention in innovation activities. Mission-oriented innovation policy can solve the problems of directionality failure, demand articulation failure, policy coordination failure, reflexivity failure contained in transformational failures by guiding innovation direction, shaping the new market, and coordinating the participation of a wider range of actors. The existing practice of mission-oriented innovation policy focuses on three areas: ensuring national defense and security, achieving industrial catch-up, and addressing grand social challenges. These three policy practices reflect that a country has different urgent problems in different development stages and environments, resulting in different dominant strategic missions.Our work can provide theoretical support and empirical reference for the formulation and implementation of mission-oriented innovation policies in China. With the frequent occurrence of challenges today, China must enhance the awareness of opportunities and accelerate the improvement of the mission-oriented innovation policy system under the special scenario. This is not only an important measure for China to effectively deal with unstable factors in the international context but also a strategic choice for major missions such as safeguarding national industrial security and breaking through foreign technology blockades.
[14]
SCHUMPETER J A. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1934.
[15]
SCHUMPETER J A. Business cycles:A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process (Volume I)[M]. New York and London: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc, 1939.
[16]
MYERS S. MARQUIS D G. Successful industrial innovations: A study of factors underlying innovation in selected firms[R]. Washington, D. C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969.
[17]
European Commission. Green paper on innovation[R]. Belgium, 1995.
[18]
穆荣平, 宋河发, 任中保. 关于创新型国家建设的若干问题思考[M]//中国科学院. 2010高技术发展报告. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 246-253.
MU Rongping, SONG Hefa, REN Zhongbao. Recommendations for making China be innovation-driven nation[M]// Chinese Academy of Sciences. 2010 High technology development report. Beijing: Science Press, 2010: 246-253.
[19]
日本政府. 科学技術基本計画[R]. 2011.
Government of Japan. Science and technology basic plan[R]. 2011.
[20]
OECD/EUROSTAT. Oslo Manual 2018:Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th edition)[R]. Paris: OECD Publishing/Luxembourg: Eurostat, 2005.
[21]
National Science Board.The state of U.S. science & engineering 2024: Science and engineering indicators[R]. 2024.
[22]
亚当·斯密. 国富论[M]. 胡长明译. 北京: 人民日报出版社, 2009.
SMITH A. The wealth of nations[M]. Tanslated by HU Changming. Beijing: People Daily Press, 2009. (in Chinese)
[23]
张培刚, 张建华. 发展经济学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2009.
ZHANG Peigang, ZHANG Jianhua. Development economics[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2009.
[24]
The World Commissiom On Environment And Development. Our common future[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
[25]
国务院. 中国21世纪议程:中国21世纪人口、环境与发展白皮书[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1994.
The State Council. China's Agenda 21 - White paper on population, environment and development in the 21st Century[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 1994.
[26]
俞慈声, 穆荣平, 等. 中关村科技园区发展规划研究总报告[M]// 林文漪. 托起明天的太阳:中关村科技园区发展规划研究. 北京: 北京科学技术出版社, 2000.
YU Cisheng, MU Rongping, et al. General report on the development planning of Zhongguancun Science and Technology Park[M] // LIN Wenyi. Tomorrow the sun:Research on the development planning of Zhongguancun Science and Technology Park. Beijing: Beijing Science and Technology Publishing, 2000.
[27]
中国未来20年技术预见研究组. 中国未来20年技术预见[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006.
Research Group for Technology Foresight of China Towards 2020. Technology foresight of China towards 2020[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2006.
[28]
穆荣平, 陈凯华. 2019国家创新发展报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020.
MU Rongping, CHEN Kaihua. The report on national innovation and development[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2020.
[29]
SOLOW R M. A contribution to the theory of economic growth[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1956, 70(1): 65-94.
[30]
ROMER P M. Increasing returns and long-run growth[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94(5): 1002-1037.
[31]
ROMER P M. Endogenous technological change[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98: 71-102.
[32]
LUCAS Jr R E. On the mechanics of economic development[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1988, 22(1): 3-42.
[33]
NELSON R R, WINTER S G. An evolutionary theory of economic change[M]. Cambrige, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982.
[34]
FREEMAN C. Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan[M]. London, Pinter: 1987.
[35]
LUNDVALL B A. National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning[M]. London: Pinter, 1992.
[36]
NELSON R R. National innovation systems: A comparative analysis[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
[37]
PORTER M. The competitive advantage of nations[M]. New York: The Free Press, 1990.
[38]
洪银兴. 关于创新驱动和协同创新的若干重要概念[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2013, 33(5): 5-12.
摘要
实施创新驱动发展战略,是经济发展转向新的发展方式的重要标志。以科学发现为源头的科技进步模式,体现知识创新和技术创新的衔接和融合,是技术进步路径的革命性变化。由于科技创新的源头主要是科学发现和知识创新,因此创新需要大学和企业的协同,科学家和企业家的协同。产学研协同是指产业发展、人才培养和科学研究三方功能的协同,特别需要提高知识创新能力。
HONG Yinxing. Some conceptions on innovation-driven growth and collaborative innovation[J]. Economic Theory and Business Management 2013, 33(5): 5-12.
The strategy of innovation-driven growth was the important signal of economic development to transit a new mode.Collaborative innovation required the corporation of research institutes and firms,as well as the collaborative development of industries,human capital and research capability
[39]
中国科学院. 创新促进发展, 科技引领未来:关于我国科技发展的战略思考[M]// 中国科学院. 2005科学发展报告. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005: 144-157.
Chinese Academy of Sciences. Innovation promotes development and S&T takes the lead in the future[M] // Chinese Academy of Sciences. 2005 Science development report. Beijing: Science Press, 2005: 144-157.
[40]
中国科学院创新发展研究中心. 2009中国创新发展报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
The Center for Innovation and Development of CAS. The report on innovation and development in China 2009[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2009.
[41]
ANDERSON J E. Public policymaking:An introduction (5th edition)[M]. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2003.
[42]
FRIEDRICH C J. Man and his government: An empirical theory of politics[M]. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1963. 转引自:陈振明. 政策科学:公共政策分析导论. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2003.
FRIEDRICH C J. Man and his government: An empirical theory of politics[M]. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1963. As cited in Chen Zhenming. Policy science:An introduction to public policy analysis. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2003.
[43]
陈振明. 政策科学:公共政策分析导论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2003.
CHEN Zhenming. Policy science: An introduction to public policy analysis[M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2003.
[44]
托马斯·库恩. 科学革命的结构[M]. 金吾伦, 胡新和译. (第四版). 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2012.
KUHN T S. The structure of scientific revolutions [M]. Translated by JIN Wulun, HU Xinhe. (4th edition). Beijing: Peking University Press, 2012.
[45]
HALL P A. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain[J]. Comparative Politics, 1993, 25(3):275-296.
[46]
BUSH V. Science—The endless frontier: A report to the president on a program for postwar scientific research[R]. Washington,D. C.: National Science Foundation, 1945.
[47]
United Nations. Science and technology for development:Report on the United Nations conference on the application of science and technology for the benefit of the less developed areas[R]. New York:1963.
[48]
王作跃. 为什么美国没有设立科技部?[J]. 科学文化评论, 2005(5): 36-49.
WANG Zuoyue. Why hasn't the United States established a Ministry of Science and Technology?[J]. Science and Culture Review, 2005(5): 36-49.
[49]
方晓东, 董瑜. 法国国家创新体系的演化历程、特点及启示[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2021, 43(5): 616-632.
FANG Xiaodong, DONG Yu. The evolution process, characteristics and enlightenment of French national innovation system[J]. World Sci-Tech R&D. 2021, 43(5): 616-632.
[50]
黄群. 联邦德国40年科技政策概述[J]. 管理世界, 1991(4): 207-209.
HUANG Qun. Overview of the 40-Year science and technology policy of the Federal Republic of Germany[J]. Journal of Management World, 1991(4): 207-209.
[51]
National Science Board. Science indicators 1972[R]. 1973.
[52]
钟少颖, 聂晓伟. 美国联邦国家实验室研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017.
ZHONG Shaoyiny, NIE Xiaowei. A study on federally funded research and development centers[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2017.
[53]
泓文. 苏联科学院[J]. 苏联东欧问题, 1986(1): 85-91+93.
HONG Wen. Academy of Sciences of the USSR[J]. Soviet Union and East European Studies, 1986(1): 85-91+93.
[54]
A. Б.彼得罗夫斯基, Л.K. 谢苗诺夫, Б.C. 马洛夫, 等. 苏联科学院的人员组成、结构与动态[J]. 世界研究与发展, 1991(3):17-25.
A.Б. PETROVSKY, Л.K. SEMYONOV, Б.C. MALOV, et al. Composition, structure, and dynamics of the personnel of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR[J]. World R&D, 1991(3):17-25.
[55]
OECD. Science, The Oxford handbook of innovation. economic growth and government policy[R]. Paris:1963. As cited in LUNDVALL B Å, BORRAS S. Science, technology and innovation policy// FAGERBERG J, MOWERY D, NELSON R, eds. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005: 599-631.
[56]
OECD. Proposed standard practice for surveys of research and development[R]. Paris, 1963
[57]
韩晋芳. 论科研院所的转制之路[J]. 当代中国史研究, 2023, 30(4): 64-77+158.
HAN Jinfang. On the transformation of scientific research institutes[J]. Contemporary China History Studies, 2023, 30(4): 64-77+158.
[58]
ROTHWELL R, ZEGVELD W. Industrial innovation and public policy: Preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s[M]. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1981.
[59]
ROTHWELL R. Public innovation policy: To have or to have not?[J]. R&D Management, 1986, 16(1): 25-36.
[60]
EDQUIST C. Systems for innovation for development (SID)[R]. Background Paper for Chapter I: “Competitiveness, Innovation and Learning: Analytical Framework” for the UNIDO World Industrial Development Report (WIDR), 2001.
[61]
OECD. Innovation policy[R]. Paris: OECD, 1982. 转引自柳卸林. 新时期我国促进自主创新的政策解读:以财政政策为例. 山西大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2007, 30(3): 177-182+226.
OECD. Innovation policy[R]. Paris: OECD, 1982. As cited in LIU Xielin. The policy interpretation of self-reliant innovation of China in new era. Journal of Shanxi University (Philosophy & Social Science), 2007, 30(3): 177-182+226.
[62]
OECD. OECD proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data-Oslo Manual[R]. Paris, 1992.
[63]
方新. 论科技政策与科技指标[J]. 科技管理研究, 2001(1):6-9.
FANG Xin. Research on science and technology policy and science and technology indicators[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2001(1):6-9.
[64]
LUNDVALL B Å, BORRAS S. Science, technology and innovation policy[M]// FAGERBERGJ, MOWERYD, NELSONR, et al. The Oxford handbook of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005: 599-631.
[65]
INSEAD. Global innovation index 2009-2010[R]. 2010.
[66]
European Commission. European innovation scoreboard 2021[R]. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2021.
[67]
中国科技发展战略研究院. 国家创新指数报告2010[R]. 2011.
Chinese Academy of Science and Technology for Development. National innovation index report 2010[R]. 2011.

PDF(1204 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/