PDF(1283 KB)
PDF(1283 KB)
PDF(1283 KB)
母体发起型裂变企业组织惯例形成路径研究
A study on the formation path of organizational routines in spin-off start-ups initiated by parent enterprises
母体发起型裂变企业在惯例继承方面具有优势,但是其惯例形成的具体方式和路径尚不明晰。本研究借助创业学习理论,对母体发起的两家不同类型的裂变企业进行对比研究,提炼归纳得到创业学习视角下母体发起型裂变企业组织惯例形成过程模型。研究发现:(1)母体发起型裂变企业组织惯例的形成路径有先与母体联动探索后选择利用以及先效仿母体后试错调整两条不同的路径。(2)惯例的形成过程包括起源、发展和稳定三个阶段,分别对应着惯例的触发情境、集体共识的形成和组织规范的形成。(3)母体发起型裂变企业的惯例形成过程也是大中小企业发挥各自优势的过程。研究结论加深了对裂变创业特殊性的理解,并拓展了组织惯例和创业学习的相关研究,对裂变创业驱动的大中小企业融通创新具有重要的理论和实践意义。
The parent company's proactive spin-off start-ups have an advantage in the inheritance of established routines. However, the specific methods and pathways through which its routines are formed remain unclear. With the help of entrepreneurial learning theory, this study conducted a double case comparative study on the organizational convention formation process of two different types of spin-off start-ups initiated by the parent, and summarized the organizational convention formation process model of spin-off start-ups from the perspective of entrepreneurial learning. The study found that: (1) The formation path of the organizational routines in parent-initiated spin-off start-ups includes two distinct routes: “exploring in conjunction with the parent company and then choosing to utilize” and “imitating the parent company and then adjusting through trial and error”. (2) The process of routine formation includes three stages, namely origination, development, and stabilization, and they correspond to the triggering context of the routine, formation of collective consensus, and establishment of organizational norms. (3) The routine formation process of parent-initiated spin-offs is also a process in which large, medium and small enterprises play their own advantages. The conclusions of this study will enhance the grasp of spin-off entrepreneurship's unique dynamics and expand the research on organizational routines and entrepreneurial learning. They will also bear substantial theoretical and practical significance for the innovation-driven integration and growth of enterprises across scales, fostered by spin-off entrepreneurial initiatives.
spin-off entrepreneurship / organizational routine / entrepreneurial learning / dual case study
| [1] |
李志刚, 杜鑫, 杨德林, 等. 新创企业与在位企业视角下裂变创业研究评述与展望[J]. 管理学报, 2023, 20(3):461-472.
通过梳理国际裂变创业研究领域的相关文献来进一步推进国内研究进展。首先,回溯了裂变创业研究的兴起与概念演变;其次,通过文献检索与编码,将裂变创业文献归类于两个视角,即新创企业视角与在位企业视角,并从这两大视角对现有裂变创业研究主题进行梳理;最后,基于研究回溯与文献梳理对当前研究脉络进行总结,并对未来研究进行展望,以相关回顾与展望内容共同形成了裂变创业研究的整体性框架。
This study intends to further promote the domestic research progress by combing the relevant international literature. Firstly, this study reviews the conceptual evolution of spin-off entrepreneurship. Secondly, through literature retrieval and coding, this study classifies the spin-off entrepreneurship literature into two perspectives, namely the new venture perspective and the incumbent enterprise perspective, and reviews the existing spin-off entrepreneurship research issues from the two perspectives. Thirdly, this study summarizes the current research based on the literature review and prospects the future research.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
马鸿佳, 吴娟, 郭海, 等. 创业领域即兴行为研究: 前因, 结果及边界条件[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5): 211-229.
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
魏龙, 党兴华. 惯例复制、网络闭包与创新催化:一个交互效应模型[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, 21(3):165-175+190.
|
| [11] |
For all its richness and potential for discovery, qualitative research has been critiqued as too often lacking in scholarly rigor. The authors summarize a systematic approach to new concept development and grounded theory articulation that is designed to bring “qualitative rigor” to the conduct and presentation of inductive research.
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
林海芬, 陈梦雅, 曲廷琛. 组织学习视角行业惯例的演化过程案例研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(2):137-148.
|
| [14] |
李宇, 马征远. 大企业内部创业“裂生式”与“创生式”战略路径:基于海尔和思科的双案例研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020(11):99-117.
|
| [15] |
王永伟, 韩亚峰. 环境不确定情境下组织惯例更新的前因与后果[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(10):268-277.
|
| [16] |
张璐, 韩玉琪, 严子淳, 等. 主导逻辑:内涵、研究议题及未来展望[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(4):165-176.
|
| [17] |
米捷, 林润辉, 瞿皎姣. 组织惯例的结构特征、内部干预和变化过程研究[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(6):243-256.
|
| [18] |
崔淼, 周晓雪. 克服组织惯性:数字化战略更新的实现及演进路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(10):89-98.
|
| [19] |
买忆媛, 叶竹馨, 陈淑华. 从“兵来将挡,水来土掩”到组织惯例形成:转型经济中新企业的即兴战略研究[J]. 管理世界, 2015(8):147-165.
|
| [20] |
肖瑶, 郭京京, 李全升. 基于破坏事件的双元惯例治理选择研究[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(8):105-113.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |