PDF(1285 KB)
PDF(1285 KB)
PDF(1285 KB)
国家产业投资基金的创新激励效应研究——来自集成电路企业的证据
Research on the innovation incentive effect of the National Industrial Investment Fund: The evidence from the integrated circuit firms
国家产业投资基金是促进集成电路企业创新的重要政策工具。本文基于“国家大基金”这一政策实践,以2009-2021年中国沪深A股集成电路上市企业为研究样本,采用渐进双重差分模型对国家大基金的创新激励效应及作用机理进行分析。研究发现,国家大基金能够显著促进企业的创新活动,并主要激励被投企业实质性创新产出。机制分析表明,国家大基金既通过改善企业债务期限结构、提高企业商业信用以及吸引投资者关注三个渠道缓解企业融资约束,进而激励企业创新;同时又抑制了企业管理层的短视主义和自利行为,从而通过监督管理层机会主义行为促进企业创新。这两种机制的作用分别会因企业内部控制水平和机构投资者调研而发挥差异化的作用。研究结论对于进一步扩大国家大基金扶持力度、强化其对被投企业创新监督机制以及优化国家大基金投资方向具有一定的政策启示。
The National Industrial Investment Fund is an important policy tool to promote the innovation of integrated circuit firms. Based on the policy practice of the National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund, this paper used China's Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed IC enterprises from 2009 to 2021 as research samples and adopted the staggered difference-in-difference model to analyze the innovation incentive effect and supervision mechanism of the National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund. The research showed that, the National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund can significantly stimulate the innovation activities of the IC firms, and mainly stimulate the substantial innovation output of the invested firms. The mechanism analysis showed that the National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund alleviates the financing constraints of the IC firms through three channels: improving the maturity structure of corporate debt, improving the commercial credit of enterprises and attracting investors' attention, thus encouraging the IC firms to innovate. Meanwhile, the National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund restrains the short-termism and self-serving behaviors of the management, so as to promote the firm innovation by supervising the opportunistic behavior of the management. The impact of these two mechanisms will play a differentiated role depending on the level of internal control and institutional investor research respectively. This paper has certain policy implications for further expanding the support of the National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund, strengthening its innovation supervision mechanism for the invested firms and optimizing the investment direction of the National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund.
国家产业投资基金 / 集成电路 / 创新激励 / 融资约束 / 监督机制
National Industrial Investment Fund / integrated circuit / innovation incentive / financing constraint / supervision mechanism
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
单宇, 刘爽, 马宝龙. 国产替代过程中关键核心技术的适应性重构机制:基于海信集团1969-2022视像技术的纵向案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(4):80-100.
|
| [3] |
杨道州, 苗欣苑, 邱祎杰. 我国集成电路产业发展的竞争态势与对策研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(5):47-56.
|
| [4] |
王克敏, 刘静, 李晓溪. 产业政策、政府支持与公司投资效率研究[J]. 管理世界, 2017, 282(3):113-124+145+188.
|
| [5] |
胡凯, 刘昕瑞. 政府产业投资基金的技术创新效应[J]. 经济科学, 2022(1):36-49.
|
| [6] |
杨敏利, 李昕芳, 仵永恒. 政府创业投资引导基金的引导效应研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(11):8-16.
|
| [7] |
刘光明. 政府产业投资基金:组织形式、作用机制与发展绩效[J]. 财政研究, 2019 (7):71-76.
|
| [8] |
吴晓波, 张馨月, 沈华杰. 商业模式创新视角下我国半导体产业“突围”之路[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(3):123-136+9.
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
张果果, 郑世林. 国家产业投资基金与企业创新[J]. 财经研究, 2021, 47(6):76-91.
|
| [12] |
李宇辰, 郝项超, 刘精山. 政府产业基金对企业创新的影响机制研究: 政治关联视角[J/OL]. 科技进步与对策:1-10[2023-10-01]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1224.G3.20230530.1404.004.html.
|
| [13] |
程小可, 杨程程, 姚立杰. 内部控制、银企关联与融资约束:来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 审计研究, 2013(5):80-86.
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
曹云祥, 宫旭红. 商业信用能否缓解企业信贷约束:基于企业产权异质性的实证分析[J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2015, 35(6):82-92.
|
| [16] |
范小云, 董二磊. 银行信贷、商业信用与企业出口:基于联立方程模型的经验分析[J]. 中国经济问题, 2015(1):36-49.
|
| [17] |
方红星, 楚有为. 公司战略与商业信用融资[J]. 南开管理评论, 2019, 22(5):142-154.
|
| [18] |
郭玥. 政府创新补助的信号传递机制与企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018 (9):98-116.
|
| [19] |
韩岚岚, 马元驹. 内部控制对费用粘性影响机理研究:基于管理者自利行为的中介效应[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2017, 38(1):131-144.
|
| [20] |
林斌, 饶静. 上市公司为什么自愿披露内部控制鉴证报告?:基于信号传递理论的实证研究[J]. 会计研究, 2009(2):45-52+93-94.
|
| [21] |
胡楠, 薛付婧, 王昊楠. 管理者短视主义影响企业长期投资吗?:基于文本分析和机器学习[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5):139-156+11+19-21.
|
| [22] |
钟芳. 机构投资者实地调研能缓解企业非效率投资吗?[J]. 财经问题研究, 2020 (4):56-65.
|
| [23] |
谭劲松, 林雨晨. 机构投资者对信息披露的治理效应:基于机构调研行为的证据[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016, 19(5):115-126+138.
|
| [24] |
温军, 冯根福. 异质机构、企业性质与自主创新[J]. 经济研究, 2012, 47(3):53-64.
|
| [25] |
黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?:宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(4):60-73.
|
| [26] |
周煊, 程立茹, 王皓. 技术创新水平越高企业财务绩效越好吗?:基于16年中国制药上市公司专利申请数据的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2012(8):166-179.
|
| [27] |
闫静波, 贺小刚, 陈元, 等. 困境企业价值再造:实质性创新还是策略性创新?[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(6):92-110.
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
肖作平, 廖理. 公司治理影响债务期限水平吗?:来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2008(11):143-156+188.
|
| [30] |
张继德, 廖微, 张荣武. 普通投资者关注对股市交易的量价影响:基于百度指数的实证研究[J]. 会计研究, 2014(8):52-59+97.
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
This study develops a firm life cycle proxy using cash flow patterns. The patterns provide a parsimonious indicator of life cycle stage that is free from distributional assumptions (i.e., uniformity). The proxy identifies differential behavior in the persistence and convergence patterns of profitability. For example, return on net operating assets (RNOA) does not mean-revert (spread of 7 percent after five years between mature and decline firms) when examined by life cycle stage, which has implications for growth rates and forecast horizons. Further, determinants of future profitability such as asset turnover and profit margin are differentially successful in generating increases in profitability conditional on life cycle stage. Finally, investors do not fully incorporate the information contained in cash flow patterns and, as a result, undervalue mature firms. The cash flow proxy is a robust tool that has applications in analysis, forecasting, valuation, and as a control variable for future research.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |