科研合作网络特征与团队知识创造关系研究

科研管理 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 104-112.

科研合作网络特征与团队知识创造关系研究

张鹏程, 彭菡

华中科技大学管理学院,湖北武汉 430074

收稿日期:2009-11-04 修回日期:2010-05-10 出版日期:2011-07-27 发布日期:2011-07-14
作者简介:张鹏程(1975-03),男(汉),湖北随州人,华中科技大学管理学院讲师,研究方向:组织理论与知识管理。彭菡(1984-12),女(汉),湖北云梦人,华中科技大学管理学院硕士研究生,研究方向:人力资源管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(70601012),起止时间:2007.1-2009.12;华中科技大学人文社会科学基金项目(2006009),起止时间:2007.1-2008.6。

On the relationship between scientific cooperative networks' characteristicsand teams' knowledge creation

Zhang Pengcheng, Peng Han

School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2009-11-04 Revised:2010-05-10 Online:2011-07-27 Published:2011-07-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 知识是21世纪最重要的资源,如何创造新知识成为一个关键问题,受到普遍关注。本文从社会网络结构特征的视角出发,对科研合作网络与知识创造绩效的关系展开了分析。为了验证我们的假设,本文选取了管理学领域的24个科研合作团队,收集了他们在6年时间发表的1494篇论文,并通过识别888个作者的合作关系建立合作网络模型。数据结果表明,合作网络的结构特征对团队知识创造绩效产生不同的影响:(1)合作网的派系数量与知识创造绩效呈正相关关系;(2)最大子图比例以及合作网络密度与其呈负相关关系;(3)中心性则与其无关。最后,本文从合作结构的角度提出了提高科研团队绩效的思路。

关键词: 知识创造, 合作网, 结构特征, 科研团队

Abstract: Knowledge is recognized as the most important resource in the 21st century, and it has become a vital issue to understand the creation of new knowledge. Therefore, the relationships between scientific cooperation networks and knowledge creation performance are analyzed in the perspective of social networks' structural characteristics. To testify the hypotheses, 24 scientific research teams in the management field are selected, and their data of 1,494 papers published in the six-year period are collected. Then, a cooperative network model is built based on their co-authorships among 888 authors. The results indicated that cooperative networks' structural characteristics made different effects on team knowledge creation performances: (1)the number of cliques had apositive impact on knowledge creation performance; (2)the proportion of maximal sub-graphs and networks density had negative correlations with knowledge creation performance;(3) networks centrality has no relation with knowledge creation performance. Finally, the suggestions to promote knowledge creation performance of scientific cooperation teams from aspect of teams' structure are provided.

Key words: knowledge creation, cooperative networks, structural characteristics, scientific research team

中图分类号:

张鹏程, 彭菡. 科研合作网络特征与团队知识创造关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(7): 104-112.

Zhang Pengcheng, Peng Han. On the relationship between scientific cooperative networks' characteristicsand teams' knowledge creation[J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(7): 104-112.

参考文献

[1] Argote, L., B. McEvily, et al. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes[J]. Management science, 2003, (49): 571-582. [2] Hansen, M. T., M. L. Mors, LV S, B.. Knowledge sharing in organizations: multiple networks, multiple phases [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(5): 776-793. [3] 韩维贺,季绍波.知识创造过程效果的实证研究—个人和团队层面[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2006(6) : 942-948. [4] 马宏建,芮明杰.知识管理策略与知识创造[J].科研管理, 2007, 8(1): 37-41. [5] 陈建勋,潘昌才,吴隆增.知识创造能否提升组织绩效?一项实证研究[J].科研管理, 2009, 30(1): 107-115. [6] 刘咏梅,王琦,彭连刚.中国知识管理研究现状综述与趋势分析[J].研究与发展管理, 2009, 21(2): 31-38. [7] 卢绍华.高校科技创新团队建设与管理初探[J].高等教育研究学报, 2005(28):51-53. [8] Guzzo RA, Dickson MW. Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness [J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 1996, (47): 307-338. [9] 柯江林,孙健敏,石金涛.变革型领导对R&D团队创新绩效的影响机制研究[J].南开管理评论, 2009, 12(6): 19-26. [10] 蒋日富,霍国庆,谭红军,郭传杰.科研团队知识创新绩效影响要素研究[J].科学学研究,2007, 25(2): 364-371. [11] Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(2): 242 266. [12] McFadyen, M.A. & Cannella, A. Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(5):735-746. [13] McFadyen, M.A., Semadeni, M. & Cannella, A. Value of Strong Ties to Disconnected Others: Examining Knowledge Creation in Biomedicine[J]. Organization Science, 2009,20(3):552-564. [14] Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer M. L. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(2): 316 326. [15] Oh, H., Chung, M., and Labianca, G.. Group social capital and group effectiveness: the role of informal socializing ties[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(6): 860-875. [16] Rulke, D. L., Galaskiewicz, J. Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance[J]. Management Science, 2000, 46(5): 612-625. [17] Granovetter, M. The strength of weak ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78(6): 1360-1380. [18] Burt, R.S. Structural Holes[M]. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press, 1992. [19] George C. Homans. The nature of social science[M]. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1967. [20] 林润辉,廖鸿成,谭劲松.中国管理学者论文合作网络研究 .第三届中国国际管理学年会,广州, 2008. [21] Katz J S, Martin B R.. What is research collaboration [J]. Research Policy, 1997, 26(1) : 1-18. [22] Dosi, G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories[J]. Research Policy, 1982, 11(3): 147–162. [23] Newman, M. E. J. The structure of scientific collaboration networks . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA , 2001, 98(2): 404-409. [24] 付允,牛文元,汪云林,李丁.科学学领域作者合作网络分析—以《科研管理》(2004 -2008)为例[J].科研管理, 2009, 30(3): 41-46. [25] 罗家德.社会网分析讲义[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2005. [26] 刘军.整体网分析讲义—UCINET软件实用指南[M].上海:上海人民出版社, 2009. [27] Luo, J. D. Particularistic trust and general trust-A network analysis in Chinese organizations[J]. Management and Organizational Review, 2005, 1(3): 437-458. [28] Seufert, A., vonKrogh, G., Bach, A. Towards knowledge networking[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1999, (3): 180-190. [29] Krackhardt, D. Organizational Viscosity and the diffusion of controversial innovations[J]. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1996, 22(2):177-199. [30] Shaw, M. E. Communication networks . In L. Berkowitz(Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology . New York: Academic Press, 1964: 111-147. [31] Wasserman, Stanley &Katherine Faust. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. [32] Liang, R. Moreland, L. Argote. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1995, 21(4): 384 393. [33] Hagstrom, W., Sharon, B. Hagstrom and Sharon reply: Universities and departments as units in the stratification of academic organizations[J]. Sociology of Education, 1972, (45): 450 458. [34] Levin, S, Stephan, P. Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists [J]. American Economic Review, 1991, 81:114-132. [35] Balkundi, P. & Harrison, D.A. Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure's effects on team viability and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(1): 49 68. [36] Hansen, M. The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44(1): 82-111. [37] Tsai, W. Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(5): 996-1004.