科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 11-19.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2021.10.002

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国科技评价政策的变迁与演化:特征、主题与合作网络

宋娇娇1,徐芳2,3,孟溦1,4   

  1. 1.华东师范大学 公共管理学院,上海200062;
    2.中国科学院 科技战略咨询研究院,北京100190;
    3.中国科学院大学 公共政策与管理学院,北京100049;
    4.华东师范大学全球创新与发展研究院,上海200062

  • 收稿日期:2020-12-02 修回日期:2021-05-06 出版日期:2021-10-20 发布日期:2021-10-18
  • 通讯作者: 孟溦
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院战略研究与决策支撑系统建设专项(GHJ-ZLZX-2020-32-9);上海市2020年度“科技创新行动计划”软科学研究第一批重点项目(20692102100);上海市2020年度“科技创新行动计划”软科学研究第二批重点项目(20692117100)。

Changes and evolutions of science and technology evaluation policies in China: Characteristics, subjects and collaborative networks

Song Jiaojiao1, Xu Fang2,3, Meng Wei1,4   

  1. 1. School of Public Administration, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; 
    2. Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; 
    3. School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 
    4. Institute for Global Innovation and Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Received:2020-12-02 Revised:2021-05-06 Online:2021-10-20 Published:2021-10-18

摘要: 作为科技评价活动的“指挥棒”,科技评价政策的制定与实施已经成为政府优化资源配置、提高财政科技投入绩效、实现科技发展战略目标的重要科技管理手段。科技评价政策体系是否科学、合理直接影响着评价工作的效果和质量。研究以1978-2020年的中国科技评价政策为研究对象,对其基本特征、政策主题和合作网络的总体情况及变迁与演化进行了分析与总结。研究发现:政策主题呈现多元化发展趋势,覆盖了各类科技评价相关内容,但对科技规划、政策和发展领域评价关注不足;建设性条款和分类评价成为高频政策内容,但操作性不足;机构合作网络经历了“节点逐渐增多、合作频次大幅增加”的发展趋势,各机构联系的紧密性较为稳定,但机构间权力分布则稳定性不足。最后,从合理分配政策注意力、完善科技评价理论与方法以及加强机构协同性三方面提出改进建议。

关键词: 科技评价政策, 政策变迁, 基本特征, 政策主题, 合作网络

Abstract:     The evaluation of Science and Technology (S&T) plays a key role in the construction of S&T environment in China. As an institutional document of S&T evaluation activities, S&T evaluation policies at the national level directly guide the practical evaluation and affect the evaluation effectiveness. Taking 484 China′s S&T evaluation policies from 1978 to 2018 as the research samples, this study analyzes and summarizes the changes and evolutions of its basic characteristics, policy subjects and collaborative networks through systematic text mining and network analysis. On the whole, the number of S&T evaluation policies in China shows a steady rising trend. After 2016, the number of policies showed the stage characteristics of "blowout" growth. Projects, organizations, personnel and funds are the top four evaluation objects. Pre-evaluation and post evaluation are the most frequently used evaluation methods. Therefore, S&T evaluation in China since the reform and opening up could be divided into four stages: the recovery and reconstruction period (1978-1984), the exploration period (1985-1997), the development period (1998-2011) and the improvement period (2012 to now). It also founds that with the deepening of the development of evaluation activities, the subjects of S&T evaluation policy show a diversified development trend, which basically covers all elements of S&T activities. However, the current S&T evaluation policies mainly focus on organization, personnel and project evaluation, and pay less attention on evaluation of S&T planning, policy and development field. The content of evaluation policy has gradually improved and enriched from the initial evaluation methods, modes and application of evaluation results to each link of the evaluation activity chain, including evaluation methods, modes, procedures, indicators, application of evaluation results, classified evaluation and constructive clauses. Among them, constructive clauses and classified evaluation have existed in different development periods of S&T evaluation since the 1980s and 1990s, and are still the high-frequency content of S&T evaluation policies so far. This shows that despite the frequent occurrence of policies, there are still some problems in policy documents, such as too many guiding and normative opinions and insufficient practical contents. The number of nodes in the collaborative networks has increased as well as the frequency of cooperation. However, the proportion of jointly issued policies in the total number of policies is not high. In most cases, each department still adopts self-made rules, which is easy to cause "fragmentation" management dilemma. In general, China′s S&T evaluation policies have formed a relatively complete evaluation system after long-term development. In the future, the government should rationally allocate policy attention and increase the evaluation of macro-objects, for example, S&T planning and policy. The executable policy documents should be restrengthened, so as to avoid the deviation of policy implementation. The government should also strengthen the coordination of institutions in order to reduce the transaction cost etc.

Key words: science and technology evaluation policy, policy evolution, basic characteristics, policy subject, collaborative network