竞争环境和技术战略对制造业创新绩效的影响

科研管理 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 25-33,44.

竞争环境和技术战略对制造业创新绩效的影响

王玉荣, 杨震宁, 李军

对外经济贸易大学国际商学院,北京 100029

收稿日期:2009-11-26 修回日期:2010-04-21 出版日期:2011-07-27 发布日期:2011-07-14
作者简介:王玉荣(1965-),女(汉), 江西鹰潭人,对外经济贸易大学国际商学院教授,博士生导师,研究方向为创新管理、企业投融资。杨震宁(1976-),男(汉),天津人,管理学博士,对外经济贸易大学国际商学院讲师,硕士研究生导师,研究方向为创业与创新管理。李军(1983-),男(汉),河南安阳人,对外经济贸易大学国际商学院,博士研究生,研究方向为技术经济与管理。
基金资助:
对外经济贸易大学"211工程"三期重点学科建设项目"经济全球化背景下我国制造业自主创新能力与动态竞争优势的互动研究"(73300015)部分研究成果(2009年-2011年)。

Influence of hyper-competitive environment and technical strategy on innovation performanceof Chinese manufacturing industry

Wang Yurong, Yang Zhenning, Li Jun

School of Business, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2009-11-26 Revised:2010-04-21 Online:2011-07-27 Published:2011-07-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 如何在超竞争环境下,获取竞争优势是每个制造业企业关注的关键问题。近年来,由于竞争环境快速多变,企业的静态资源、能力加速退化,战略管理研究学者逐渐开始重视制造业企业在创新过程中的技术战略选择问题。企业对技术战略的不同选择对创新绩效的影响可能并不相同,本文利用中国制造业企业的截面数据,构建理论模型来研究超竞争环境下,中国制造业企业不同类型技术战略选择对企业创新绩效的影响。在竞争环境的威胁性、复杂性和动态性背景下,讨论不同类型技术战略选择(低端技术战略和高端技术战略)的中国制造业企业的创新绩效的不同表现,进而总结制造业企业技术战略选择经验并提出政策性建议。

关键词: 超竞争环境, 中国制造业, 低端战略, 高端战略, 创新绩效

Abstract: Under the hyper-competitive environment, how to gain the competitive advantage is the key question which each enterprise in manufacturing industry should pay attention to. In recent years, the competitive environment is fast changeable, the degeneration of static resources and ability of enterprises accelerates. Scholars in the field of strategy management gradually start to study on technical strategy choices of enterprises in the manufacturing industry. Different technical strategy choices of enterprises have different influence on the innovation performance, cross-section data of enterprises in Chinese manufacturing industry is used to construct a theoretical model to study on the influence of different type technology strategy choices of enterprises in Chinese manufacturing industry on innovation performance under the hyper-competitive environment. Under the hostility, complexity, and dynamic environment, different type technical strategy choices (low-level technical strategy and high-level technical strategy) of enterprises in Chinese manufacturing industry has influence on innovation performance are discussed, then the experiences of technical strategy choices are summarized and the policy-type proposal is put forward.

Key words: hyper-competitive environment, Chinese manufacturing industry, low-level strategy, high-level strategy, innovation performance

中图分类号:

F425

王玉荣, 杨震宁, 李军. 竞争环境和技术战略对制造业创新绩效的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(7): 25-33,44.

Wang Yurong, Yang Zhenning, Li Jun. Influence of hyper-competitive environment and technical strategy on innovation performanceof Chinese manufacturing industry[J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(7): 25-33,44.

参考文献

[1] Duncan, R. B., Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environment Uncertainty [J], Administrative Science Quarterly, 1972, 17: 313-327. [2] Lawrence, P. R. & Lorsch, J. W. Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration Division of Research , Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University: Boston, 1967. [3] Tung, R. L. Dimensions of Organizational Environments: An Exploratory Study of Their Impact on Organizational Structure [J], Academy of Management Journal, 1979, 22: 672-693. [4] March, J. G. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning [J], Organization Science, 1991, 74(4): 71-87. [5] Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective [M], New York: Harper and Row, 1978. [6] Tan, J. & Litschert, R. J. Environment-strategy Relationship and its Performance Implication: An Empirical Study of the Chinese Electronic Industry [J], Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(1): 1-20. [7] Dess, G. & Beard, D. Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments [J], Administrative Science Quarterly, 1984, 29: 52-73. [8] Thompson, J. D. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory [M], McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967. [9] Child, J. Organization Structure, Environment and Performance: the Role of Strategic Choice [J], Sociology, 1972, 6(1): 1-22. [10] Mintzberg, H. The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research [M], Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, H. J., 1979. [11] Miles, R. E. & Snow, C. C. Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process [M], McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978. [12] Keats, B. W., and Hitt, M. a Causal Model of Linkages among Environmental Dimensions, Macro Organizational Characteristics and Performance [J], Academy of Management Journal, 1988, (31): 431-445. [13] Coe, D. T., E. Helpman and A. W. Hoffmaister. North-South R & D Spillovers [J], Economic Journal, 1997, 107(440): 134-149. [14] Eaton, J. and S. Kortum. Engines of Growth: Domestic and Foreign Sources of Innovation [J], Japan and the World Economy, 1997(9): 235-259. [15] Klepper S. Firm survival and the evolution of oligopoly [J], RAND Journal of Economics, 2002, 1: 37-61. [16] Filson, Darren. Product and Process Innovations in the Life Cycle of an Industry [J], Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2000, 49: 97-112. [17] Kang H. yungu, Adoption and Diffusion of Technological Innovation in the United States and Japanese Steel Industries , 2002. [18] H. Igor., Ansoff, From Strategic Planning to Strategic Management [M], New York and London Publications, 1976. [19] Milliken F J. Perceiving and interpreting environmental change: an examination of college administrators' interpretation of changing demographics [J], Academy of Management Journal, 1990, 33(1):42-63. [20] Yasai-Ardekani M. Structural adaptations to environments [J], Academy of Management Review, 1986, 11(1):9-21. [21] 谢家琳. 实地研究中的问卷调查法—组织与管理研究的实证方法 [M], 北京大学出版社, 2008. [22] Tan, J. & Tan, D., Environment-strategy co-evolution and Co-alignment: A Staged Model of Chinese SOEs under Transition [J], Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26: 141-157. [23] Markus, H.R. and Kitayama, S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychology Review [J], 1991(98):224-253. [24] Brislin, R. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In Triandis, H.C. and Berry, J.W. (eds.), Handbook of cross-culture psychology [M], Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1980, Vol.2:389-444. [25] Schwab, D.P. Construct validity in organizational behavior [J], Research in Organizational Behavior, 1980, 2:3-43. [26] Pedhazur, E.J. and Schmelkin, L.P. Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach [M], Hillsdale, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991. [27] Klein, K.J., Danserau, F. and Hau, R.J. Level issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis [J], Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19: 195-229.