知识源、知识获取方式与产业创新绩效研究—以中国高技术产业为例

科研管理 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 29-35.

知识源、知识获取方式与产业创新绩效研究—以中国高技术产业为例

樊钱涛

浙江科技学院经济管理学院,浙江杭州 310023

收稿日期:2009-10-09 修回日期:2010-03-15 出版日期:2011-05-27 发布日期:2011-06-14
作者简介:樊钱涛(1971-)男,浙江人,浙江科技学院经济管理学院副教授,研究方向为技术创新管理。
基金资助:
国家社科基金重点项目(08AJY036);我国先进制造业发展战略研究,起止时间: 2009.4.1-2011.4.1;教育部人文社会科学研究项目(10YJC630048);浙江省哲学社会科学规划立项课题(10CGGL08YB);浙江省自然科学基金项目(Y6110227)。

Knowledge source, knowledge acquisition, and industry innovation performance:The case of China's high-tech industries

Fan Qiantao

School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang University Of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China

Received:2009-10-09 Revised:2010-03-15 Online:2011-05-27 Published:2011-06-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于1995年到2007年的面板数据,本文分析了中国高技术产业在外部知识获取对于创新绩效的影响机制。研究结果表明企业不仅直接从外部获取知识还可以借助本地网络间接获取外部知识。不同类型知识的转移方式是不同的,总体上知识的异质性程度越高,知识转移的方式就会越复杂。

关键词: 知识源, 知识获取, 创新绩效, 高技术产业

Abstract: Based on the panel data from 1995 to 2007, the effect mechanism of knowledge acquisition on innovation performance is analyzed. The results show that enterprises not only acquire knowledge directly, but also draw knowledge indirectly by relying on local firm networks. Different types of knowledge are transferred differently. Overall, the more heterogeneity the knowledge is, the more complex its transfer is.

Key words: knowledge source, knowledge acquisition, innovation performance, high-tech industry

中图分类号:

樊钱涛. 知识源、知识获取方式与产业创新绩效研究—以中国高技术产业为例[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(5): 29-35.

Fan Qiantao. Knowledge source, knowledge acquisition, and industry innovation performance:The case of China's high-tech industries[J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(5): 29-35.

参考文献

[1] 林毅夫, 张鹏飞. 后发优势, 技术引进和落后国家的经济增长[J]. 经济学,2005 (1): 53-74. [2] 张海洋. R&D两面性, 外资活动与中国工业生产率增长[J]. 经济研究,2005(5): 107-117. [3] 金雪军, 欧朝敏, 李杨. 技术引进对我国 R & D 投入总量和结构的影响[J]. 科研管理,2008 (1): 97-101. [4] 孙建, 吴利萍, 齐建国. 技术引进与自主创新: 替代或互补[J]. 科学学研究,2009(1): 133-138. [5] Bin G. Technology acquisition channels and industry performance: An industry-level analysis of Chinese large-and medium-size manufacturing enterprises[J]. Research Policy. 2008 (2): 194-209. [6] Schilling M A, Phelps C C. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation[J]. Management Science. 2007 (7): 1113-1126. [7] 王昌林, 蒋云飞. 我国高技术产业发展及其政策调整[J]. 中国软科学,2008(8): 30-36. [8] Fritsch M, Franke G. Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation[J]. Research Policy. 2004(2): 245-255. [9] Griliches Z. Productivity, R and D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970’s[J]. The American Economic Review. 1986 (1): 141-154. [10] Cantner U, Graf H. The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis[J]. Research Policy. 2006(4): 463-480. [11] Giuliani E. Cluster absorptive capacity: Why do some clusters forge ahead and others lag behind?[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies. 2005(3): 269. [12] Aage, T. Absorptive capacity of industrial districts . Paper presented at the Conference paper DRUID, 2003(1) [13] Phene A, Fladmoe-Lindquist K, Marsh L. Breakthrough innovations in the US biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin[J]. Strategic Management Journal. 2006 (4): 369. [14] Ouchi W G. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans[J]. Administrative science quarterly. 1980(1): 129-141. [15] 盖文启. 新产业区发展的区域创新网络机制研究 . 北京大学博士论文, 2001. [16] Baptista R, Peter Swann K. Do firms in clusters innovate more?[J]. Globalization and the location of firms. 2004(27): 245. [17] Jacobs J. The economy of cities[M]. Vintage Books, 1970. [18] Glaeser E L, Kallal H D, Scheinkman J A, et al. Growth in cities[J]. Journal of political economy. 1992 (6): 1126. [19] Paci, R., Usai, S. The Role of Specialisation and Diversity Externalities in the Agglomeration of Innovative Activities . http://veprints.unica.it. 1999 (11 ) [20] Combes P P. Economic structure and local growth: France, 1984-1993[J]. Journal of urban economics. 2000(3): 329-355. [21] Acs Z J, Anselin L, Varga A. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge[J]. Research Policy. 2002(7): 1069-1085. [22] Hagedoorn J, Cloodt M. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?[J]. Research Policy. 2003(8): 1365-1379. [23] Capaldo A. Network structure and innovation: the leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability[J]. Strategic Management Journal. 2007 (6): 585. [24] Ronde P, Hussler C. Innovation in regions: what does really matter?[J]. Research Policy. 2005 (8): 1150-1172. [25] Benner M J, Tushman M L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited[J]. The Academy of Management Review. 2003 (2): 238-256.