科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 157-168.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.04.016

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

科技人员流动、研发补贴对协同创新的影响研究

腾达1，武靖州1，苏显方2   

  1. 1.中国财政科学研究院，北京100142；
    2.贵州财经大学应用经济学院，贵州 贵阳550025

  • 收稿日期:2023-10-17 修回日期:2024-12-07 出版日期:2025-04-20 发布日期:2025-04-11
  • 通讯作者: 苏显方
  • 基金资助:
    贵州省哲学社会科学一般项目：“贵州市场化化解政府隐形债务的重点和路径研究”（21GZYB56，2021—2024）；国家社会科学基金一般项目 ：“西南民族地区区域性返贫的防范与韧性治理机制研究”（23BMZ063，2023—2027）。

Research on the impacts of scientific and technological personnel mobility and R&D subsidies on collaborative innovation

Teng Da1, Wu Jingzhou1, Su Xianfang2   

  1. 1. Chinese Academy of Fiscal Sciences, Beijing 100142, China;
    2. School of Applied Economics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, China
  • Received:2023-10-17 Revised:2024-12-07 Online:2025-04-20 Published:2025-04-11
  • Contact: SU Xianfang

摘要：     协同创新是我国“完善科技创新体制机制”系列部署中的关键环节，科技人员流动和政府研发补贴都对协同创新具有重要影响，然而鲜有关于结合科技人员流动和政府研发补贴两因素对协同创新影响的研究。本文利用系统GMM模型估计科技人员流动和政府研发补贴对协同创新的影响机制，并考察了政府研发补贴的门槛效应和市场化水平的调节效应。研究发现：（1）科技人员流动产生的知识溢出效应对产学、政产协同创新有显著的正向影响。（2）政府研发补贴通过激发协同创新的积极性，降低研发成本，促进了产学、政学、政产学协同创新。（3）市场化程度对产学协同创新有正向影响，但市场化程度负向调节了科技人员流动和政府研发补贴对产学协同创新的正向影响。（4）当政府研发补贴处于合适水平时，科技人员流动能更好地提高各类型协同创新的水平。本文的研究为政府合理利用研发补贴手段，更好地发挥科技人员流动对政产学协同创新的促进作用提供了相关的理论依据。

关键词: 科技人员流动, 政府研发补贴, 协同创新, 市场化水平

Abstract:    Collaborative innovation is a key link in the deployments of "the system and mechanism of technological innovation" in China. The technology personnel mobility and government R&D subsidies have important impacts on collaborative innovation. However, there is little research on the combined effects of the two factors. This paper used a system GMM model to estimate the combined effects of the two factors and examined the threshold effect of government R&D subsidies and the moderating effect of marketization level. The research found that: (1) the knowledge spillover effect generated by the technology personnel mobility has a significant positive impact on industry-academia and government-industry collaborative innovation; (2) By stimulating the enthusiasm and reducing R&D costs, government R&D subsidies have promoted industry-academia, government-academia, and government-industry-academia collaborative innovation; (3) The degree of marketization has a positive effect on university-industry collaborative innovation, however, the degree of marketization negatively moderates the positive effects of scientific and technological personnel mobility and government R&D subsidies on university-industry collaborative innovation; and (4) when government R&D subsidies are at an appropriate level, the technology personnel mobility can better improve the level of various types of collaborative innovation. This study has provided a theoretical basis for the government to make reasonable use of R&D subsidies and better leverage the role of technology personnel mobility in promoting collaborative innovation between government, industry and academia.

Key words: technology personnel mobility, government R&D subsidy, collaborative innovation, marketization level