PDF(1054 KB)
PDF(1054 KB)
PDF(1054 KB)
企业数字化转型驱动全要素生产率提升研究
Research on the promotion of total factor productivity driven by digital transformation of enterprises
深刻把握我国企业数字化转型发展契机,充分释放数字技术与数据资源在提升全要素生产率中的巨大乘数效应已成为新常态下我国企业高质量发展的必由之路。本文以国家权威政策语义体系为基础构建企业数字化转型指标,并将我国上市公司全要素生产率分解为“提升效应”与“平抑效应”,利用动态面板回归模型详细考察了数字化转型影响企业全要素生产率的渠道机制、波动特征以及非线性关系。研究发现,尽管数字化转型与企业全要素生产率之间存在明显的“倒U型”关系,然而当前阶段仍处于能够有效促进企业全要素生产率提升的“红利释放期”;数字化转型对企业全要素生产率变动产生显著“平抑效应”,从而打破了企业全要素生产率的高速增长路径并使其增长速度不可持续;数字化转型通过扩大规模经济与范围经济以及优化管理效率等途径促进了企业全要素生产率水平提升。本文揭示了近年来我国企业全要素生产率增长速度逐渐趋缓甚至接近停滞的原因,通过解析数字化转型对企业全要素生产率的影响路径与作用机制,为企业提质增效、助力向中高端价值链迈进提供了学术价值与政策启示。
Grasping the opportunity of digital transformation development of Chinese enterprises and fully releasing the huge multiplier effect of digital technology and data resources in improving total factor productivity have become the only way for Chinese enterprises to achieve high-quality development under the new normal. This paper constructed indicators for enterprise digital transformation based on the semantic system of national authoritative policies, decomposed the total factor productivity of listed companies in China into "enhancement effect" and "suppression effect", and used a dynamic panel regression model to examine in detail the channel mechanism, fluctuation characteristics, and nonlinear relationship of digital transformation affecting enterprise total factor productivity.The study found that although there is a clear inverted U-shaped relationship between digital transformation and total factor productivity, the current stage is still in the "dividend release period" that can effectively promote the improvement of total factor productivity; digital transformation has a significant "stabilizing effect" on the change in total factor productivity of enterprises, breaking the high-speed growth path of total factor productivity and making its growth rate unsustainable; and digital transformation has promoted the improvement of total factor productivity of enterprises by expanding economies of scale and scope, as well as optimizing management efficiency.This paper has revealed the reasons for the gradual slowdown or even stagnation in the growth rate of total factor productivity in Chinese enterprises in recent years. By analyzing the impact path and mechanism of digital transformation on total factor productivity, it has provided certain academic value and policy implications for enterprises to improve quality and efficiency and move towards the mid-to-high end value chain.
数字化转型 / 企业全要素生产率 / 提升效应 / 平抑效应
digital transformation / enterprise total factor productivity / enhancement effect / suppression effect
| [1] |
李振东, 陈劲, 王伟楠. 国家数字化发展战略路径、理论框架与逻辑探析[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(7): 1-10.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
焦勇. 数字经济赋能制造业转型:从价值重塑到价值创造[J]. 经济学家, 2020(6): 87-94.
|
| [4] |
韩峰, 姜竹青. 集聚网络视角下企业数字化的生产率提升效应研究[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(11): 54-77.
|
| [5] |
孙伟增, 毛宁, 兰峰, 等. 政策赋能、数字生态与企业数字化转型:基于国家大数据综合试验区的准自然实验[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(9): 117-135.
|
| [6] |
谢康, 廖雪华, 肖静华. 效率与公平不完全相悖:信息化与工业化融合视角[J]. 经济研究, 2021, 56(2): 190-205.
|
| [7] |
黄群慧, 余泳泽, 张松林. 互联网发展与制造业生产率提升:内在机制与中国经验[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(8): 5-23.
|
| [8] |
王贵东, 杨德林. 互联网提升了制造企业的全要素生产率吗?我国信息通信技术生产率悖论的再探讨[J]. 统计研究, 2023, 40(6): 63-76.
|
| [9] |
陈楠, 蔡跃洲. 人工智能, 承接能力与中国经济增长:新"索洛悖论"和基于AI专利的实证分析[J]. 经济学动态, 2022(11): 39-57.
|
| [10] |
程文. 人工智能,索洛悖论与高质量发展:通用目的技术扩散的视角[J]. 经济研究, 2021, 56(10): 22-38.
|
| [11] |
戚聿东, 肖旭. 数字经济时代的企业管理变革[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(6): 135-152.
|
| [12] |
陈中飞, 江康奇, 殷明美. 数字化转型能缓解企业"融资贵"吗[J]. 经济学动态, 2022(8): 79-97.
|
| [13] |
袁淳, 肖土盛, 耿春晓, 等. 数字化转型与企业分工:专业化还是纵向一体化[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(9): 137-155.
|
| [14] |
吴瑶, 夏正豪, 胡杨颂, 等. 基于数字化技术共建“和而不同”动态能力:2011-2020年索菲亚与经销商的纵向案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 38(1): 144-163.
|
| [15] |
赵宸宇. 数字化发展与服务化转型:来自制造业上市公司的经验证据[J]. 南开管理评论, 2021, 24(2): 149-163.
|
| [16] |
黄勃, 李海彤, 刘俊岐, 等. 数字技术创新与中国企业高质量发展:来自企业数字专利的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(3): 97-115.
|
| [17] |
罗佳, 张蛟蛟, 李科. 数字技术创新如何驱动制造业企业全要素生产率? 来自上市公司专利数据的证据[J]. 财经研究, 2023, 49(2): 95-109.
|
| [18] |
沈国兵, 袁征宇. 企业互联网化对中国企业创新及出口的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2020(1): 33-48.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
陈剑, 黄朔, 刘运辉. 从赋能到使能:数字化环境下的企业运营管理[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(2): 117-128.
|
| [21] |
卢宝周, 尹振涛, 张妍. 传统企业数字化转型过程与机制探索性研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(4): 83-93.
|
| [22] |
宋华, 陶铮, 杨雨东. “制造的制造”:供应链金融如何使能数字商业生态的跃迁:基于小米集团供应链金融的案例研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(9): 178-196.
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
We examine the relationship between data analytics capabilities and innovation using detailed firm-level data. To measure innovation, we first utilize a survey to capture two types of firm practices, process improvement and new technology development for 331 firms. We then use patent data to further analyze new technology development for a broader sample of more than 2,000 publicly traded firms. We find that data analytics capabilities are more likely to be present and are more valuable in firms that are oriented around process improvement and that create new technologies by combining a diverse set of existing technologies than they are in firms that are focused on generating entirely new technologies. These results are consistent with the theory that data analytics are complementary to certain types of innovation because they enable firms to expand the search space of existing knowledge to combine into new technologies, as well as the theoretical arguments that data analytics support incremental process improvements. Data analytics appears less effective for developing entirely new technologies or creating combinations involving a few areas of knowledge, innovative approaches where there is either limited data or limited value in integrating diverse knowledge. Overall, our results suggest that firms that have historically focused on specific types of innovation—process innovation and innovation by diverse recombination—may receive the most benefits from using data analytics.
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
张庆国, 黄杏子. 国有企业融资约束,全要素生产率与西部地区经济高质量发展[J]. 南开经济研究, 2021(6): 179-196.
|
| [27] |
黄昊, 宋伟, 王国红, 等. 制造业中小企业平台数据化能力对颠覆式创新的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(11): 32-40.
|
| [28] |
王鹏飞, 刘海波, 陈鹏. 企业数字化, 环境不确定性与全要素生产率[J]. 经济管理, 2023, 45(1): 43-66.
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
We study the effect of US food aid on conflict in recipient countries. Our analysis exploits time variation in food aid shipments due to changes in US wheat production and cross-sectional variation in a country's tendency to receive any US food aid. According to our estimates, an increase in US food aid increases the incidence and duration of civil conflicts, but has no robust effect on interstate conflicts or the onset of civil conflicts. We also provide suggestive evidence that the effects are most pronounced in countries with a recent history of civil conflict. (JEL D74, F35, O17, O19, Q11, Q18)
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |