科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12): 177-187.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.019

• 论文 • 上一篇    

双轮快速审查制度改革对绿色专利的影响研究

徐蔼婷1，汪文璞2,1   

  1. 1.浙江工商大学统计与数学学院，浙江 杭州310018；
    2.浙江工商大学杭州商学院 经济与统计学院，浙江 杭州310000
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-27 修回日期:2024-11-13 出版日期:2024-12-20 发布日期:2024-12-06
  • 通讯作者: 汪文璞
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目：“基于‘知识产权强国’战略的高价值专利判别、测度与驱动效应的统计研究”（22&ZD162，2022.12—2027.12）；浙江省登峰学科（浙江工商大学统计学）和浙江工商大学经济运行态势预警与模拟推演实验室资助。

Research on the impact of the reform of dual-stage fast-tracking system on green patents

Xu Aiting1, Wang Wenpu2,1   

  1. 1. School of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China;
    2. School of Economics and Statistics, Zhejiang Gongshang University Hangzhou College of Commerce, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2023-09-27 Revised:2024-11-13 Online:2024-12-20 Published:2024-12-06

摘要：     双轮绿色专利快速审查制度改革是具有中国特色的绿色专利制度探索，是推进知识产权强国建设的“绿色”助力。基于2009—2019年我国282个城市的174 491条绿色发明专利数据，本文采用“范围拓展—口径调整”的改进专利续期模型测算专利价值，并运用强度双重差分法考察双轮制度改革能否同时促进绿色专利的升值与增量。研究发现：双轮制度改革能显著提升绿色专利价值，而对绿色专利数量仅能产生微弱的正向影响。就升值效应来看，次轮改革因其申请对象泛化、前置程序复杂化，政策效力不及首轮。就增量效应来看，首轮改革因受限于审查资源和数量条款，未实现绿色专利数量层面的突破；次轮改革则得益于申请范围的宽松化，能产生小幅的增量效应。进一步分析发现，企业是双轮制度改革中绿色专利升值效应的作用主体而非增量效应的作用主体。改革过程中滋生的“地方保护主义”使得高校的绿色专利价值下滑。异质性研究发现，在环境规制强度和知识产权保护水平较高的城市中，双轮制度改革能够发挥更佳的绿色专利升值和增量效应。本文对深化绿色专利快速审查制度改革、促进高价值绿色专利培育具有重要启示意义。

关键词: 绿色专利快速审查制度, 升值效应, 增量效应, 改进专利续期模型

Abstract:    The reform of dual-stage fast-tracking green patent system is an exploration of green patent system construction with unique Chinese characteristics, serving as a green booster for the construction of intellectual property power. Based on the data of 17,4491 granted green invention patents in 282 Chinese cities from 2009 to 2019, this paper used the "scope extension - caliber adjustment" improved patent renewal model to calculate the patent value. Then, an intensity differences-in-differences model was used to investigate whether the reform of the dual-stage fast-tracking system can produce the appreciation and incremental effects on green patents. The results showed that the two rounds of system reform can obviously improve the value of green patents, but only have a weak positive impact on the quantity of green patents. In terms of appreciation effect, the secondstage reform is less effective than the first-stage because of the generalization of the application object and the complexity of the preprocess. In terms of incremental effect, the first-stage reform failed to achieve a breakthrough in the quantity of green patents due to limited review resources and quantity provisions; while the second-stage reform benefits from the easing of the application scope, which can produce a small incremental effect of green patents. Further research showed that enterprises are the main actors of the appreciation effect but not of the incremental effect in the dual-stage reform. The "local protectionism" in the reform makes the value of the green patent produced by universities show a downward trend. The heterogeneity analysis showed that institutional reform can better improve the value and quantity of green patents in cities with stronger environmental regulation intensity and higher intellectual property protection level. This paper has provided important enlightenment for deepening the fast-tracking green patent system reform and promoting the cultivation of high-value green patents.

Key words: fast-tracking green patent system, appreciation effect, incremental effect, improved patent renewal model