双轮快速审查制度改革对绿色专利的影响研究

徐蔼婷, 汪文璞

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12) : 177-187.

PDF(1504 KB)
PDF(1504 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12) : 177-187. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.019

双轮快速审查制度改革对绿色专利的影响研究

作者信息 +

Research on the impact of the reform of dual-stage fast-tracking system on green patents

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

双轮绿色专利快速审查制度改革是具有中国特色的绿色专利制度探索,是推进知识产权强国建设的“绿色”助力。基于2009—2019年我国282个城市的174 491条绿色发明专利数据,本文采用“范围拓展—口径调整”的改进专利续期模型测算专利价值,并运用强度双重差分法考察双轮制度改革能否同时促进绿色专利的升值与增量。研究发现:双轮制度改革能显著提升绿色专利价值,而对绿色专利数量仅能产生微弱的正向影响。就升值效应来看,次轮改革因其申请对象泛化、前置程序复杂化,政策效力不及首轮。就增量效应来看,首轮改革因受限于审查资源和数量条款,未实现绿色专利数量层面的突破;次轮改革则得益于申请范围的宽松化,能产生小幅的增量效应。进一步分析发现,企业是双轮制度改革中绿色专利升值效应的作用主体而非增量效应的作用主体。改革过程中滋生的“地方保护主义”使得高校的绿色专利价值下滑。异质性研究发现,在环境规制强度和知识产权保护水平较高的城市中,双轮制度改革能够发挥更佳的绿色专利升值和增量效应。本文对深化绿色专利快速审查制度改革、促进高价值绿色专利培育具有重要启示意义。

Abstract

The reform of dual-stage fast-tracking green patent system is an exploration of green patent system construction with unique Chinese characteristics, serving as a green booster for the construction of intellectual property power. Based on the data of 17,4491 granted green invention patents in 282 Chinese cities from 2009 to 2019, this paper used the "scope extension - caliber adjustment" improved patent renewal model to calculate the patent value. Then, an intensity differences-in-differences model was used to investigate whether the reform of the dual-stage fast-tracking system can produce the appreciation and incremental effects on green patents. The results showed that the two rounds of system reform can obviously improve the value of green patents, but only have a weak positive impact on the quantity of green patents. In terms of appreciation effect, the second-stage reform is less effective than the first-stage because of the generalization of the application object and the complexity of the pre-process. In terms of incremental effect, the first-stage reform failed to achieve a breakthrough in the quantity of green patents due to limited review resources and quantity provisions; while the second-stage reform benefits from the easing of the application scope, which can produce a small incremental effect of green patents. Further research showed that enterprises are the main actors of the appreciation effect but not of the incremental effect in the dual-stage reform. The "local protectionism" in the reform makes the value of the green patent produced by universities show a downward trend. The heterogeneity analysis showed that institutional reform can better improve the value and quantity of green patents in cities with stronger environmental regulation intensity and higher intellectual property protection level. This paper has provided important enlightenment for deepening the fast-tracking green patent system reform and promoting the cultivation of high-value green patents.

关键词

绿色专利快速审查制度 / 升值效应 / 增量效应 / 改进专利续期模型

Key words

fast-tracking green patent system / appreciation effect / incremental effect / improved patent renewal model

引用本文

导出引用
徐蔼婷, 汪文璞. 双轮快速审查制度改革对绿色专利的影响研究[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(12): 177-187 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.019
Xu Aiting, Wang Wenpu. Research on the impact of the reform of dual-stage fast-tracking system on green patents[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(12): 177-187 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.019
中图分类号: F124.3;G306.3   

参考文献

[1]
戴魁早, 王思曼, 黄姿. 绿色工厂建设促进了企业绿色创新吗?[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(11): 177-199.
DAI Kuizao, WANG Siman, HUANG Zi. Does the construction of green factory induce green innovation?[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2024, 41(11): 177-199.
[2]
肖冰, 许可, 肖尤丹. 专利审查能够影响专利维持时间吗?[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(7):1224-1234.
摘要
作为技术方案能否获得专利授权的核心程序,专利审查被认为是影响专利质量特别是维持时间的重要因素。但专利审查与专利维持时间各自所依据的评价标准存在显著差异,两者之间是否存在相关性是一个值得深入研究的问题。基于对六国两万余项发明专利的审查时间与维持时间相关性进行分析之后发现:不论基于授权国家的区别,还是技术领域的差异,专利审查与专利维持时间之间均不存在显著正向相关的关系。相反,过长的专利审查时间甚至对专利维持时间存在负面影响。
XIAO Bing, XU Ke, XIAO Youdan. Did patent examination have an impact on patent maintenance time?[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2018, 36(7):1224-1234.
[3]
KIM Y K, OH J B. Examination workloads, grant decision bias and examination quality of patent office[J]. Research Policy, 2017, 46(5):1005-1019.
[4]
鲁家婷, 吴景海. 我国绿色专利加速审查制度的改进研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2017, 36(2):79-82+90.
LU Jiating, WU Jinghai. Study on the improvement of China's accelerated green patent review system[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2017, 36(2):79-82+90.
[5]
武力超, 游子逸. 新发展理念下绿色专利优先审查制度的国际比较和政策效果分析[J]. 工信财经科技, 2022(6):13-27.
WU Lichao, YOU Ziyi. International comparison and policy effect analysis of green patent priority examination system under China's new development principles[J]. Review of Financial & Technological Economics, 2022(6):13-27.
[6]
LIU Rui, ZHU Xuezhong, ZHANG Meiyang, et al. Innovation incentives and urban carbon dioxide emissions: A quasi-natural experiment based on fast-tracking green patent applications in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 382:135444.
[7]
文家春. 专利审查行为对技术创新的影响机理研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2012, 30(6):848-855.
摘要
为了缓解越来越严峻的审查压力,各主要专利局近年来频繁对专利系统从审查行为的角度进行改革。本文对专利审查行为影响技术创新的机理从审查质量、审查周期和费用三个维度进行了系统分析,研究认为专利审查的犯错率过高、专利审查的周期过长、专利审查的费用标准过低,对技术创新可能产生阻碍效应。同时,专利审查系统内部存在审查质量与审查周期的相互影响关系,而在专利审查系统外部也存在专利审查行为与技术创新的循环影响关系。为此,本文提出我国专利局在缓解审查积压时,为了在保持审查系统内部平衡的基础上改善专利审查行为与技术创新间循环回路的运行效应,应尽快提高我国专利审查费用的标准和建立快速审查请求制度。
WEN Jiachun. Study on the impact mechanism of the patent examination behavior on technological innovation[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2012, 30(6):848-855.
In order to alleviate the more and more severe examination pressure in recent years, all major patent offices have carry out reforms on the patent system from the patent examination quality, period and cost frequently. This paper analyzes on the impact mechanism of the patent examination on technological innovation, and considers the high error rate, the long period and the low cost of the patent examination would hinder the technological innovation. Meanwhile, there are the interaction between the examination period and the examination quality in the patent examination system and the effect on technological innovation cycle. To this end, in order to avoid the hinder effect of the patent examination on technological innovation on the basis of the maintain the internal balance, this paper presents China patent office should improve the standards of the patent examination cost and establish a rapid examination of request system in alleviating the backlog.
[8]
郭亮, 姚清晨. 专利市场化视角下校企发明专利维持时间影响因素比较研究:以华为和华南理工为例[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(13):106-113.
摘要
专利市场化水平通过对专利权人预期收益率的影响与专利维持时间产生联系。对高校和企业发明专利维持时间及其影响因素进行比较,可为提升高校专利市场化水平提供借鉴。从专利市场化视角出发,以华为和华南理工大学(以下简称“华工”)为例,运用回归分析方法对发明专利维持时间影响因素进行研究。结果发现,华为发明专利维持时间较长,且在审查时间、发明人数和权利要求数方面存在较大差异;各自变量对二者发明专利维持时间的解释力度亦有区别。为提升高校专利市场化水平,提出应强化知识产权创造市场导向、优化发明专利性质布局、强化发明专利专业属性、促进校企科研合作等合理化建议。
GUO Liang, YAO Qingchen. Compare the factors of maintain time of the patents for invention of universities with enterprises in the perspective of marketization: Put South China University of Technology & Huawei Technologies co., LTD as examples[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2017, 34(13):106-113.
[9]
ZEEBROECK N V. Patents only live twice: A patent survival analysis of the determinants of examination lags, grant decisions, and renewals[R]. Working Papers CEB, 2007.
[10]
温芳芳, 罗爽. 早公开早授权是否有利于专利转化?:基于公开时滞与授权时滞的统计分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2023, 42(7):185-192.
WEN Fangfang, LUO Shuang. Is early publication and early authorization conducive to patent conversion? A statistical analysis of publication delay and authorization delay[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2023, 42(7):185-192.
[11]
于馨淼, 李文红. 专利质量认知与评价体系研究综述及展望[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(10): 2100-2109.
摘要
在推动知识产权高质量发展的背景下,专利质量的认知体系和评价体系的构建,是提升专利质量,打造高质量创新机制的重要依据。从专利质量的概念表述、专利质量评价指标体系、评价方法等方面对现有研究进行回顾,可以发现:学者们对专利质量的界定尚无统一定论且缺少对“专利本身的质量”的界定,导致专利质量认知体系不够清晰,在此基础上提出的评价指标及评价方法各有差异且缺少系统的梳理。针对现有研究的不足,提出了对未来的展望:明确承载专利质量的实体应为专利客体,从而确定专利客体质量的概念,在此基础上建立以专利客体质量为中心的专利质量认知体系,并基于系统的专利质量认知体系构建相应的指标体系和评价方法。
YU Xinmiao, LI Wenhong. Review and prospect of patent quality cognition and evaluation system[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2024, 42(10): 2100-2109.
In the context of promoting the high-quality development of intellectual property rights, the cognition of patent quality and the construction of the evaluation index system are important bases for improving patent quality and creating a high-quality innovation mechanism. Reviewing the existing research from the aspects of the concept of patent quality, patent quality evaluation index system and evaluation method, we can find that there is no unified conclusion on the definition of patent quality and the lack of definition of patent quality itself, which leads to the unclear patent quality cognition system, and the evaluation indexes and evaluation methods put forward on this basis are different and lack of systematic combing.In view of the shortcomings of the existing research, it puts forward the outlook of future: the entity carrying the patent quality should be the patent object, so as to determine the concept of patent object quality, and on this basis, establishing a patent quality cognition system centered on the quality of patent object, and constructing corresponding index system and evaluation method based on the systematic patent quality cognition system.
[12]
HIGHAM K, DE RASSENFOSSE G, JAFFE A B. Patent quality: Towards a systematic framework for analysis and measurement[J]. Research Policy, 2021, 50(4): 104215.
[13]
AKCIGIT U, BASLANDZE S, STANTCHEVA S. Taxation and the international mobility of inventors[J]. American Economic Review, 2016, 106(10):2930-2981.
We study the effect of top tax rates on “superstar” inventors' international mobility since 1977, using panel data on inventors from the US and European Patent Offices. We exploit the differential impact of changes in top tax rates on inventors of different qualities. Superstar inventors' location choices are significantly affected by top tax rates. In our preferred specification, the elasticity to the net-of-tax rate of the number of domestic superstar inventors is around 0.03, while that of foreign superstar inventors is around 1. These elasticities are larger for inventors in multinational companies. An inventor is less sensitive to taxes in a country if his company performs a higher share of its research there. (JEL F22, F23, H24, H31, J61, O31, O34)
[14]
PONTA L, PULIGA G, MANZINI R. A measure of innovation performance: The Innovation Patent Index[J]. Management Decision, 2021, 59(13): 73-98.
[15]
OG J Y, PAWELEC K, KIM B K, et al. Measuring patent value indicators with patent renewal information[J]. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2020, 6(1): 16.
[16]
SCHANKERMAN M, PAKES A. Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period[J]. The Economic Journal, 1986, 96(384):1052-1076.
[17]
徐蔼婷, 程彩娟, 祝瑜晗. 一种新的专利价值综合测度方法与应用研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2022, 39(3):130-151.
XU Aiting, CHENG Caijuan, ZHU Yuhan. A new approach of comprehensive measuring patent value and its application[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2022, 39(3):130-151.
[18]
张古鹏, 陈向东. 基于专利存续期的企业和研究机构专利价值比较研究[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2012, 11(4):1403-1426.
ZHANG Gupeng, CHEN Xiangdong. A comparison of patent values between corporations and research institutes based on patent renewal period[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2012, 11(4):1403-1426.
[19]
胡凯, 王炜哲. 如何打通高校科技成果转化的“最后一公里”?:基于技术转移办公室体制的考察[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(4):5-27.
HU Kai, WANG Weizhe. How to get through the “last mile” of technology transfer of universities? Research based on the technology transfer office system[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2023, 40(4):5-27.
[20]
赵亚雄, 王修华, 刘锦华. 绿色金融改革创新试验区效果评估:基于绿色经济效率视角[J]. 经济评论, 2023(2):122-138.
ZHAO Yaxiong, WANG Xiuhua, LIU Jinhua. Effectiveness measurement of green finance reform and innovation pilot zone: Based on the perspective of green economic efficiency[J]. Economic Review, 2023(2):122-138.
[21]
杨君, 肖明月, 蒋墨冰. 知识产权保护、技术创新与中国的资本回报率[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(2):137-145.
YANG Jun, XIAO Mingyue, JIANG Mobing. Intellectual property right protection, technological innovation and return to capital in China[J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(2):137-145.

基金

国家社会科学基金重大项目:“基于‘知识产权强国’战略的高价值专利判别、测度与驱动效应的统计研究”(22&ZD162)
国家社会科学基金重大项目:“基于‘知识产权强国’战略的高价值专利判别、测度与驱动效应的统计研究”(2022.12—2027.12)
浙江省登峰学科(浙江工商大学统计学)
浙江工商大学经济运行态势预警与模拟推演实验室资助。

PDF(1504 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/