战略性知识披露对产品创新绩效的影响研究

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.10.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 战略性知识披露是企业参与开放式价值创造的重要渠道，但其与产品创新绩效的关系尚未明晰。基于资源编排理论，探索了战略性知识披露对产品创新绩效的影响机制及边界，利用213家中国汽车制造企业的经验数据，构建固定效应负二项回归模型进行实证分析。结果表明：战略知识披露能够提升产品创新绩效。影响机制检验表明，战略性知识披露可通过增强关系互惠性、释放合作信号和扩充公共知识池等渠道驱动产品创新。调节作用检验发现，知识模块化能力、知识回收能力以及二者的协同均能正向调节战略性知识披露与产品创新绩效之间的关系，且从作用差异看，知识模块化能力的调节作用最强。本文从外部知识获取的角度扩充了战略性知识披露推动产品创新的机制研究，为企业如何利用动态能力赋能开放式产品创新提供参考。

关键词: 战略性知识披露, 产品创新, 知识模块化能力, 知识回收能力

Abstract: Strategic knowledge disclosure is an important channel for enterprises to participate in open value creation, but its relationship with product innovation performance is not yet clear. Based on the resource orchestration theory, the mechanism and boundaries of the impact of strategic knowledge disclosure on product innovation performance were explored in this paper, and a fixed-effects negative binomial regression model was constructed for empirical analysis by using the 213 Chinese automobile manufacturing enterprises′ experiential data. The results showed that strategic knowledge disclosure can enhance product innovation performance. The influence mechanism test indicated that strategic knowledge disclosure can drive product innovation through channels such as enhancing relational reciprocity, releasing cooperation signals, and expanding the public knowledge pool. The moderating effect test found that knowledge modularization capability, knowledge retrieval capability, and the synergy of the two can positively moderate the relationship between strategic knowledge disclosure and product innovation performance, and in terms of difference in effects, the moderating effect of knowledge modularization capability is the strongest. This paper has expanded the research on the mechanism of strategic knowledge disclosure to promote product innovation from the perspective of external knowledge acquisition, and it will provide some reference for how enterprises utilize dynamic capabilities to facilitate open product innovation.

Key words: strategic knowledge disclosure, product innovation, knowledge modularization capability, knowledge retrieval capability

余良如, 于渤. 战略性知识披露对产品创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(10): 121-131.

Yu Liangru, Yu Bo. Research on the impact of strategic knowledge disclosure on product innovation performance[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(10): 121-131.

参考文献

[1] Knudsen M P, von Zedtwitz M, Griffin A, et al. Best practices in new product development and innovation: Results from PDMA’s 2021 global survey[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2023, 40(3): 257-275.
[2] Gr?nlund J, Sj?din D R, Frishammar J. Open innovation and the stage-gate process: A revised model for new product development[j]. California Management Review, 2010, 52(3): 106-131.
[3] Marzi G, Ciampi F, Dalli D, et al. New product development during the last ten years: The ongoing debate and future avenues[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2021, 68(1): 330-344.
[4] Salge T O, Farchi T, Barrett M I, et al. When does search openness really matter? A contingency study of health‐care innovation projects[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2013, 30(4): 659-676.
[5] 杨震宁, 赵红. 中国企业的开放式创新:制度环境、“竞合”关系与创新绩效[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(2): 139-160+224.
Yang Zhenning, Zhao Hong. Chinese enterprises' open innovation：Institutional environment, co-opetition relationship and innovation performance[J]. Management World, 2020, 36(2): 139-160+224.
[6] Ritala P, Stefan I. A paradox within the paradox of openness: The knowledge leveraging conundrum in open innovation[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2021, 93(2): 281-292.
[7] 郭海, 李晓宇, 王超. 开放悖论研究述评及展望[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2023, 35(4): 152-169.
Guo Hai, Li Xiaoyu, Wang Chao. A review and future prospects on the paradox of openness[J]. R&D Management, 2023, 35(4): 152-169.
[8] Wadhwa A, Bodas Freitas I M, Sarkar M B. The paradox of openness and value protection strategies: Effect of extramural r&d on innovative performance[J]. Organization Science, 2017, 28(5): 873-893.
[9] Ahlf?nger M, Gemünden H G, Leker J. Balancing knowledge sharing with protecting: The efficacy of formal control in open innovation projects[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2022, 40(2): 105-119.
[10] Lauritzen G D, Karafyllia M. Perspective: leveraging open innovation through paradox[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2019, 36(1): 107-121.
[11] Anton J J, Yao D A. The sale of ideas: strategic disclosure, property rights, and contracting[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2002, 69(3): 513-531.
[12] Alexy O, George G, Salter A J. Cui bono? The selective revealing of knowledge and its implications for innovative activity[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2013, 38(2): 270-291.
[13] Huang K G-L. Uncertain intellectual property conditions and knowledge appropriation strategies: Evidence from the genomics industry[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2017, 26(1): 41-71.
[14] Hsu D H, Hsu P-H, Zhao Q. Rich on paper? Chinese firms’ academic publications, patents, and market value[J]. Research Policy, 2021, 50(9): 1-18.
[15] Lampe H W, Ihl C. Released, but not lost: Motives and environments driving firms’ knowledge disclosure[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2021, 25(8): 1-32.
[16] Cui T, Ye J H, Tan C H. Information technology in open innovation: A resource orchestration perspective[J]. Information & Management, 2022, 59(8): 1-18.
[17] Xiao Y, Zhang H. New product advantage infused by modularity: Do resources make a difference?[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2021, 38(4): 473-493.
[18] Henkel J, Baldwin C Y, Shih W. IP modularity: Profiting from innovation by aligning product architecture with intellectual property[J]. California Management Review, 2013, 55(4): 65-82.
[19] Schmickl C, Kieser A. How much do specialists have to learn from each other when they jointly develop radical product innovations?[J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37(3): 473-491.
[20] Belenzon S. Cumulative innovation and market value: Evidence from patent citations[J]. The Economic Journal, 2012, 122(559): 265-285.
[21] Alnuaimi T, George G. Appropriability and the retrieval of knowledge after spillovers[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(7): 1263-1279.
[22] 余义勇, 杨忠. 战略性知识披露的内涵、研究议题与展望[J]. 南开管理评论, 2022, 25(6): 214-226.
Yu Yiyong, Yang Zhong. The connotation, research topics and prospect of strategic knowledge disclosure[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2022, 25(6): 214-226.
[23] Grant R M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(S2): 109-122.
[24] 刘梓毓, 杜玉申. 开放式知识披露：研究综述与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(4): 104-118.
Liu Ziyu, Du Yushen. Open knowledge disclosure: A review and prospects[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2023, 45(4): 104-118.
[25] Afuah A, Tucci C L. Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2012, 37(3): 355-375.
[26] Yang H, Phelps C, Steensma H K. Learning from what others have learned from you: The effects of knowledge spillovers on originating firms[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(2): 371-389.
[27] Sirmon D G, Hitt M A, Ireland R D, et al. Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management, 2011, 37(5): 1390-1412.
[28] 王象路, 罗瑾琏, 张超. 创新架构模块化对科创企业双元创新协同性的影响研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(11): 35-48.
Wang Xianglu, Luo Jinlian, Zhang Chao. The impact of innovation architecture modularization on the dual innovation synergy of sci-tech innovation enterprises[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2023, 45(11): 35-48.
[29] 应瑛, 俞洁璐, 范志刚等. 企业战略性知识披露与持续创新独占[J]. 科学学研究, 2023, 41(10): 1875-1886.
Ying Ying, Yu Jielu, Fan Zhigang, et al. Strategic knowledge disclosure and sustainable value appropriability[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2023, 41(10): 1875-1886.
[30] Yang H, Steensma H K. When do firms rely on their knowledge spillover recipients for guidance in exploring unfamiliar knowledge?[J]. Research Policy, 2014, 43(9): 1496-1507.
[31] Yayavaram S, Srivastava M K, Sarkar M. Role of search for domain knowledge and architectural knowledge in alliance partner selection[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(8): 2277-2302.
[32] Yang H, Phelps C, Steensma H K. Learning from what others have learned from you: The effects of knowledge spillovers on originating firms[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(2): 371-389.
[33] Von Krogh, Haefliger, Spaeth, et al. Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2012, 36(2): 649-676.
[34] 李晓曼, 宋红燕. 面向专利情报研究的SAO语义结构分析方法述评[J]. 情报科学, 2020, 38(10): 168-176.
Li Xiaoman, Song Hongyan. Review of SAO semantic structure analysis for patent intelligence research[J]. Information Science, 2020, 38(10): 168-176.
[35] Zakaryan A. Organizational knowledge networks, search and exploratory invention[J]. Technovation, 2023, 122(1): 1-14.
[36] Barrat A, Barthélemy M, Pastor-Satorras R, et al. The architecture of complex weighted networks[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004, 101(11): 3747-3752.
[37] Ahmadpoor M, Jones B F. The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance[J]. Science, 2017, 357(6351): 583-587.
[38] Murray F. The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life[J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33(4): 643-659.
[39] Newman M E J, Girvan M. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks[J]. Physical Review E, 2004, 69(2): 1-15.