中国制造业企业高质量发展的联动路径研究

薛奕曦, 张佳陈, 张译, 于晓宇

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7) : 29-39.

PDF(1096 KB)
PDF(1096 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7) : 29-39. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.07.004

中国制造业企业高质量发展的联动路径研究

作者信息 +

Research on the linkage path of high-quality development of Chinese manufacturing enterprises

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

制造业是实体经济的基础,也是中国应对各类风险挑战的“压舱石”,因而探寻中国式现代化情境下中国制造业企业高质量发展的实现既是重要的现实问题,也是有待探索的关键科学问题。本文融合资源基础观与行业基础观,遵循TOE框架,以250家A股制造业企业为例,采用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)、必要条件分析(NCA)和人工神经网络(ANN)方法,探讨了技术水平、组织特质、行业特征的交互作用下,中国制造业企业高质量发展的多种联动路径组合。研究发现:第一,中国制造业企业高质量发展存在4条联动路径,其中组织与技术双元创新驱动型分布最普遍。同时,有2条路径会导致企业非高质量发展。第二,高管风险偏好是企业高质量发展的唯一必要条件且最有影响力的条件,并与企业的国际市场开拓能力构成核心条件。第三,外部产业结构因素与企业关键资源能力的多元逻辑互动是企业实现高质量发展并进而在新时期获取竞争优势的重要路径,且企业关键资源能力的影响更为显著。研究结论有助于深化对中国制造业企业高质量发展路径复杂性机理的认知,并为政策制定带来有益启示。

Abstract

The manufacturing industry, often regarded as the cornerstone of the real economy, holds paramount importance for China in addressing various challenges in the contemporary era. Throughout China's modernization process, as the facilitator of industrial transformation and upgrading, it becomes imperative to investigate the interconnected path of high-quality development of Chinese manufacturing enterprises. By incorporating the perspectives of the resource-based view and industry-based view, this study follows the technology-organization-environment framework and identifies six crucial conditions influencing high-quality development. Subsequently, employing fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis, necessary condition analysis, and artificial neural network methods, this study investigates the configurations of high-quality development of manufacturing enterprises. The sample consists of 250 A-share listed manufacturing enterprises.

This study reveals several noteworthy findings. Firstly, there are 4 configurations of high-quality development of Chinese manufacturing enterprises, with the predominant model featuring a synergistic configuration to organizational and technological innovation. Meanwhile, 2 configurations are discerned that lead to non-high-quality development of manufacturing enterprises. Secondly, it is crucial to underline that the risk-taking spirit of top decision-makers stands as is the only necessary and most influential condition for achieving high-quality development of Chinese manufacturing enterprises. This condition consistently manifests in all four configurations of high-quality development of manufacturing enterprises, serving as the core condition alongside the enterprises' capacity to explore international markets. Thirdly, the interplay of external industrial structure dynamics with the core resource capabilities of enterprises emerges as a pivotal pathway through which enterprises can secure high-quality development and gain a competitive edge in the contemporary; the impact exerted by a firm's resource capabilities is especially pronounced.

The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the intricate mechanism governing the paths of high-quality development of Chinese manufacturing enterprises, while also providing valuable insights for policy formulation purposes.

关键词

制造业企业 / 高质量发展 / 模糊集定性比较分析 / 必要条件分析 / 人工神经网络

Key words

manufacturing enterprise / high-quality development / fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) / necessary condition analysis (NCA) / artificial neural network (ANN)

引用本文

导出引用
薛奕曦, 张佳陈, 张译, . 中国制造业企业高质量发展的联动路径研究[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(7): 29-39 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.07.004
Xue Yixi, Zhang Jiachen, Zhang Yi, et al. Research on the linkage path of high-quality development of Chinese manufacturing enterprises[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(7): 29-39 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.07.004
中图分类号: F272.3;F425   

参考文献

[1]
张军扩, 侯永志, 刘培林, 等. 高质量发展的目标要求和战略路径[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(7): 1-7.
ZHANG Junkuo, HOU Yongzhi, LIU Peilin, et al. The goals and strategy path of high-quality development[J]. Journal of Management World, 2019, 35(7): 1-7.
[2]
李巧华. 新时代制造业企业高质量发展的动力机制与实现路径[J]. 财经科学, 2019(6): 57-69.
LI Qiaohua. The dynamic mechanism and realization paths for high-quality development of manufacturing enterprises in the new era[J]. Finance & Economics, 2019(6): 57-69.
[3]
KESKIN H, AYAR ŞENTÜRK H, TATOGLU E, et al. The simultaneous effect of firm capabilities and competitive strategies on export performance: The role of competitive advantages and competitive intensity[J]. International Marketing Review, 2021, 38(6): 1242-1266.
[4]
SPANOS Y E, LIOUKAS S. An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: Contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(10): 907-934.
[5]
SLATER S F, NARVER J C. Market orientation, customer value, and superior performance[J]. Business Horizons, 1994, 37(2): 22-28.
[6]
LIN Y, CHEN A, ZHONG S, et al. Service supply chain resilience: A social-ecological perspective on last-mile delivery operations[J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2023, 43(1): 140-165.
[7]
HELFAT C E, KAUL A, KETCHEN JR D J, et al. Renewing the resource-based view: New contexts, new concepts, and new methods[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2023, 44(6): 1357-1390.
[8]
KRAKOWSKI S, LUGER J, RAISCH S. Artificial intelligence and the changing sources of competitive advantage[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2023, 44(6): 1425-1452.
[9]
苏敬勤, 高昕. 情境视角下“中国式创新”的进路研究[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(1): 9-16.
SU Jingqin, GAO Xin. Research on the approach of “Chinese-style innovation” from the perspective of context[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2019, 16(1): 9-16.
[10]
蓝海林. 中国企业战略行为的解释:一个整合情境-企业特征的概念框架[J]. 管理学报, 2014, 11(5): 653-658.
LAN Hailin. Explanation for Chinese firms' strategic behavior: An integrative conceptual framework of context and of firm characteristic[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2014, 11(5): 653-658.
[11]
戴翔, 杨双至. 数字赋能、数字投入来源与制造业绿色化转型[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(9): 83-101.
DAI Xiang, YANG Shuangzhi. Digital empowerment, source of digital input and green manufacturing[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022(9): 83-101.
[12]
田晖, 程倩, 李文玉. 进口竞争、创新与中国制造业高质量发展[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(2): 222-232.
TIAN Hui, CHENG Qian, LI Wenyu. Import competition, innovation and high-quality development of Chinese manufacturing industry[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2021, 39(2): 222-232.
[13]
张平淡, 屠西伟. 制造业集聚、技术进步与企业全要素能源效率[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(7): 103-121.
ZHANG Pingdan, TU Xiwei. Manufacturing agglomeration, technological progress and enterprise total factor energy efficiency[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022(7): 103-121.
[14]
赵宸宇, 王文春, 李雪松. 数字化转型如何影响企业全要素生产率[J]. 财贸经济, 2021, 42(7): 114-129.
ZHAO Chenyu, WANG Wenchun, LI Xuesong. How does digital transformation affect the total factor productivity of enterprises?[J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2021, 42(7): 114-129.
[15]
武常岐, 张昆贤, 周欣雨, 等. 数字化转型、竞争战略选择与企业高质量发展:基于机器学习与文本分析的证据[J]. 经济管理, 2022, 44(4): 5-22.
WU Changqi, ZHANG Kunxian, ZHOU Xinyu, et al. Digital transformation, choice of competitive strategy, and high-quality development of firms: From evidence of machine learning and text analysis[J]. Business and Management Journal, 2022, 44(4): 5-22.
[16]
BAKER J. The technology-organization-environment framework[G]//DWIVEDI Y K, WADE M R, SCHNEBERGER S L. Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Springer, 2012: 231-245.
[17]
PAPPAS I O, WOODSIDE A G. Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2021, 58: 102310.
[18]
万骁乐, 毕力文, 邱鲁连. 供应链压力、战略柔性与制造企业开放式绿色创新:基于TOE框架的组态分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2022(10): 99-113.
WAN Xiaole, BI Liwen, QIU Lulian. Supply chain pressure, strategic flexibility and open green innovation of manufacturing enterprises:Configuration analysis based on TOE framework[J]. China Soft Science, 2022(10): 99-113.
[19]
杜运周, 刘秋辰, 陈凯薇, 等. 营商环境生态、全要素生产率与城市高质量发展的多元模式:基于复杂系统观的组态分析[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(9): 127-145.
DU Yunzhou, LIU Qiuchen, CHEN Kaiwei, et al. The goals and strategy path of high-quality development[J]. Journal of Management World, 2022, 38(9): 127-145.
[20]
张明, 杜运周. 组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用:定位、策略和方向[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(9): 1312-1323.
ZHANG Ming, DU Yunzhou. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in management and organization research: Position, tactics, and directions[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2019, 16(9): 1312-1323.
[21]
BURGELMAN R A, GROVE A S. Strategic dissonance[J]. California Management Review, 1996, 38(2): 8-28.
[22]
ZHAO X, NAKONIECZNY J, JABEEN F, et al. Does green innovation induce green total factor productivity? Novel findings from Chinese city level data[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 185: 122021.
[23]
郭然, 原毅军. 互联网发展对产业协同集聚的影响及其机制研究[J]. 统计研究, 2022, 39(6): 52-67.
GUO Ran, YUAN Yijun. Research on the influence mechanism of internet development on industrial co-agglomeration[J]. Statistical Research, 2022, 39(6): 52-67.
[24]
CERINA F, MUREDDU F. Is agglomeration really good for growth? Global efficiency, interregional equity and uneven growth[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2014, 84: 9-22.
[25]
ALCHIAN A A. Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1950, 58(3): 211-221.
[26]
张杰, 郑文平, 翟福昕. 竞争如何影响创新:中国情景的新检验[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014(11): 56-68.
ZHANG Jie, ZHENG Wenping, ZHAI Fuxin. How does competition affect innovation: Evidence from China[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2014(11): 56-68.
[27]
MORGAN T, ANOKHIN S A, WINCENT J. New service development by manufacturing firms: Effects of customer participation under environmental contingencies[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2019, 104: 497-505.
[28]
XIAO P, SUN X. Does internationalization strategy promote enterprise innovation performance? The moderating effect of environmental complexity[J]. Managerial and Decision Economics, 2022, 43(6): 1721-1733.
[29]
TSOURI M, HANSON J, NORMANN H E. Does participation in knowledge networks facilitate market access in global innovation systems? The case of offshore wind[J]. Research Policy, 2021, 50(5): 104227.
[30]
程露, 苏敬勤, 于泽威. 基于知识搜索过程的科技型企业开放式创新行为框架:以大连机车为例[J]. 管理案例研究与评论, 2018, 11(6): 519-531.
CHENG Lu, SU Jingqin, YU Zewei. The behavior framework on open innovation of science and technology enterprises based on the external knowledge searching process: A case study of CRRC DALIAN[J]. Journal of Management Case Studies, 2018, 11(6): 519-531.
[31]
GU L. Executives' financial experience and myopic marketing management: A myopic loss-aversion perspective[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2023, 157: 113587.
[32]
王锋正, 赵宇霞, 夏嘉欣. 异质环境政策、高管风险偏好与绿色技术创新:基于中国重污染上市公司的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(11): 143-153.
WANG Fengzheng, ZHAO Yuxia, XIA Jiaxin. Heterogeneous environmental policies, executive risk preferences and green technology innovation:Empirical research based on China's heavy polluting listed companies[J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(11): 143-153.
[33]
于晓宇, 吴祝欣, 陈颖颖. 国有企业子公司转型升级的锁定效应:组织惯性的视角[J]. 管理案例研究与评论, 2019, 12(6): 638-651.
YU Xiaoyu, WU Zhuxin, CHEN Yingying. The lock-in effect of the transformation and upgrading of the subsidiaries of state-owned enterprises: From the perspective of organizational inertia[J]. Journal of Management Case Studies, 2019, 12(6): 638-651.
[34]
BENARTZI S, THALER R H. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110(1): 73-92.
[35]
陈金勇, 舒维佳. 管理层风险偏好对技术创新的影响:基于内部控制的调节作用[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(3): 76-82.
CHEN Jinyong, SHU Weijia. The influence of management's risk preference on enterprise innovation:Based on the internal control of regulation[J]. Soft Science, 2021, 35(3): 76-82.
[36]
DUL J. Identifying single necessary conditions with NCA and fsQCA[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(4): 1516-1523.
[37]
LI F, CHENG-XI AW E, WEI-HAN TAN G, et al. The eureka moment in understanding luxury brand purchases! A non-linear fsQCA-ANN approach[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2022, 68: 103039.
[38]
WANG G, TAN G W-H, YUAN Y, et al. Revisiting TAM2 in behavioral targeting advertising: A deep learning-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 175: 121345.
[39]
KERSTENS K, SHEN Z, VAN DE WOESTYNE I. Comparing Luenberger and Luenberger-hicks-moorsteen productivity indicators: How well is total factor productivity approximated?[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 195: 311-318.
[40]
鲁晓东, 连玉君. 中国工业企业全要素生产率估计:1999—2007[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2012, 11(2): 541-558.
LU Xiaodong, LIAN Yujun. Estimation of total factor productivity of industrial enterprises in China: 1999-2007[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2012, 11(2): 541-558.
[41]
GEBAUER H, FANG M, NIE H, et al. Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance?[J]. Economic Modelling, 2023, 118: 106101.
[42]
丁守海, 冀承. 企业数字化与劳动收入份额新变化[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(2):345-354,404.
DING Shouhai, JI Cheng. Enterprise digitization and the new change of labor income share[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2024, 42(2):345-354,404.
[43]
DU K, LI P, YAN Z. Do green technology innovations contribute to carbon dioxide emission reduction? Empirical evidence from patent data[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 146: 297-303.
[44]
GROSCHE T, KLOPHAUS R, SEREDYN'SKI A. Market concentration in German air transport before and after the air Berlin bankruptcy[J]. Transport Policy, 2020, 94(7): 78-88.
[45]
张虎, 韩爱华, 杨青龙. 中国制造业与生产性服务业协同集聚的空间效应分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2017, 34(2): 3-20.
ZHANG Hu, HAN Aihua, YANG Qinglong. Spatial effect analysis of synergetic agglomeration of manufacturing and producer services in China[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2017, 34(2): 3-20.
[46]
JONES C, TEMOURI Y. The determinants of tax haven FDI[J]. Journal of World Business, 2016, 51(2): 237-250.
[47]
蔡莉, 张玉利, 陈劲, 等. 中国式现代化的动力机制:创新与企业家精神:学习贯彻二十大精神笔谈[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(1): 3-22.
CAI Li, ZHANG Yuli, CHEN Jin, et al. The dynamic mechanism of Chinese path to modernization: Innovation and entrepreneurship:Essays on studying and implementing the spirit of the 20th CPC National Congress[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2023, 45(1): 3-22.
[48]
黄海昕, 苏敬勤, 张冰倩. 中小企业开放式创新的逻辑演化机理:基于多元制度情境视角的案例研究[J]. 管理案例研究与评论, 2017, 10(4): 339-354.
HUANG Haixin, SU Jingqin, ZHANG Bingqian. Open innovation logic evolution mechanism of SMEs: A case study based on multivariate institutional context[J]. Journal of Management Case Studies, 2017, 10(4): 339-354.
[49]
BRAUMOELLER B F. Guarding against false positives in qualitative comparative analysis[J]. Political Analysis, 2015, 23(4): 471-487.
[50]
DING H. What kinds of countries have better innovation performance? A country-level fsQCA and NCA study[J]. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2022, 7(4): 100215.
[51]
WHITE L, LOCKETT A, CURRIE G, et al. Hybrid context, management practices and organizational performance: A configurational approach[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2021, 58(3): 718-748.
[52]
CHATURVEDI S, RAJASEKAR E, NATARAJAN S, et al. A comparative assessment of SARIMA, LSTM RNN and Fb Prophet models to forecast total and peak monthly energy demand for India[J]. Energy Policy, 2022, 168: 113097.

基金

国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目:“社会-技术转型视角下的商业模式评估与改进方法研究——以电动汽车为例”(71802127)
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目:“社会-技术转型视角下的商业模式评估与改进方法研究——以电动汽车为例”(2019.01—2021.12)
国家自然科学基金面上项目:“大型企业创业型项目失败的情绪反应与恢复机制:一个多层模型”(71972126)
国家自然科学基金面上项目:“大型企业创业型项目失败的情绪反应与恢复机制:一个多层模型”(2020.1—2023.12)
国家自然科学基金重大项目:“创新驱动创业的重大理论与实践问题研究”(72091310)
国家自然科学基金重大项目:“创新驱动创业的重大理论与实践问题研究”(2021.01—2025.12)
国家自然科学基金重点项目:“数字经济时代中国企业战略与创业的微观基础理论研究”(72232010)
国家自然科学基金重点项目:“数字经济时代中国企业战略与创业的微观基础理论研究”(2023.01—2027.12)

PDF(1096 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/