PDF(1096 KB)
PDF(1096 KB)
PDF(1096 KB)
中国制造业企业高质量发展的联动路径研究
Research on the linkage path of high-quality development of Chinese manufacturing enterprises
制造业是实体经济的基础,也是中国应对各类风险挑战的“压舱石”,因而探寻中国式现代化情境下中国制造业企业高质量发展的实现既是重要的现实问题,也是有待探索的关键科学问题。本文融合资源基础观与行业基础观,遵循TOE框架,以250家A股制造业企业为例,采用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)、必要条件分析(NCA)和人工神经网络(ANN)方法,探讨了技术水平、组织特质、行业特征的交互作用下,中国制造业企业高质量发展的多种联动路径组合。研究发现:第一,中国制造业企业高质量发展存在4条联动路径,其中组织与技术双元创新驱动型分布最普遍。同时,有2条路径会导致企业非高质量发展。第二,高管风险偏好是企业高质量发展的唯一必要条件且最有影响力的条件,并与企业的国际市场开拓能力构成核心条件。第三,外部产业结构因素与企业关键资源能力的多元逻辑互动是企业实现高质量发展并进而在新时期获取竞争优势的重要路径,且企业关键资源能力的影响更为显著。研究结论有助于深化对中国制造业企业高质量发展路径复杂性机理的认知,并为政策制定带来有益启示。
The manufacturing industry, often regarded as the cornerstone of the real economy, holds paramount importance for China in addressing various challenges in the contemporary era. Throughout China's modernization process, as the facilitator of industrial transformation and upgrading, it becomes imperative to investigate the interconnected path of high-quality development of Chinese manufacturing enterprises. By incorporating the perspectives of the resource-based view and industry-based view, this study follows the technology-organization-environment framework and identifies six crucial conditions influencing high-quality development. Subsequently, employing fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis, necessary condition analysis, and artificial neural network methods, this study investigates the configurations of high-quality development of manufacturing enterprises. The sample consists of 250 A-share listed manufacturing enterprises.
This study reveals several noteworthy findings. Firstly, there are 4 configurations of high-quality development of Chinese manufacturing enterprises, with the predominant model featuring a synergistic configuration to organizational and technological innovation. Meanwhile, 2 configurations are discerned that lead to non-high-quality development of manufacturing enterprises. Secondly, it is crucial to underline that the risk-taking spirit of top decision-makers stands as is the only necessary and most influential condition for achieving high-quality development of Chinese manufacturing enterprises. This condition consistently manifests in all four configurations of high-quality development of manufacturing enterprises, serving as the core condition alongside the enterprises' capacity to explore international markets. Thirdly, the interplay of external industrial structure dynamics with the core resource capabilities of enterprises emerges as a pivotal pathway through which enterprises can secure high-quality development and gain a competitive edge in the contemporary; the impact exerted by a firm's resource capabilities is especially pronounced.
The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the intricate mechanism governing the paths of high-quality development of Chinese manufacturing enterprises, while also providing valuable insights for policy formulation purposes.
制造业企业 / 高质量发展 / 模糊集定性比较分析 / 必要条件分析 / 人工神经网络
manufacturing enterprise / high-quality development / fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) / necessary condition analysis (NCA) / artificial neural network (ANN)
| [1] |
张军扩, 侯永志, 刘培林, 等. 高质量发展的目标要求和战略路径[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(7): 1-7.
|
| [2] |
李巧华. 新时代制造业企业高质量发展的动力机制与实现路径[J]. 财经科学, 2019(6): 57-69.
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
苏敬勤, 高昕. 情境视角下“中国式创新”的进路研究[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(1): 9-16.
|
| [10] |
蓝海林. 中国企业战略行为的解释:一个整合情境-企业特征的概念框架[J]. 管理学报, 2014, 11(5): 653-658.
|
| [11] |
戴翔, 杨双至. 数字赋能、数字投入来源与制造业绿色化转型[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(9): 83-101.
|
| [12] |
田晖, 程倩, 李文玉. 进口竞争、创新与中国制造业高质量发展[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(2): 222-232.
|
| [13] |
张平淡, 屠西伟. 制造业集聚、技术进步与企业全要素能源效率[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(7): 103-121.
|
| [14] |
赵宸宇, 王文春, 李雪松. 数字化转型如何影响企业全要素生产率[J]. 财贸经济, 2021, 42(7): 114-129.
|
| [15] |
武常岐, 张昆贤, 周欣雨, 等. 数字化转型、竞争战略选择与企业高质量发展:基于机器学习与文本分析的证据[J]. 经济管理, 2022, 44(4): 5-22.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
万骁乐, 毕力文, 邱鲁连. 供应链压力、战略柔性与制造企业开放式绿色创新:基于TOE框架的组态分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2022(10): 99-113.
|
| [19] |
杜运周, 刘秋辰, 陈凯薇, 等. 营商环境生态、全要素生产率与城市高质量发展的多元模式:基于复杂系统观的组态分析[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(9): 127-145.
|
| [20] |
张明, 杜运周. 组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用:定位、策略和方向[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(9): 1312-1323.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
郭然, 原毅军. 互联网发展对产业协同集聚的影响及其机制研究[J]. 统计研究, 2022, 39(6): 52-67.
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
张杰, 郑文平, 翟福昕. 竞争如何影响创新:中国情景的新检验[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014(11): 56-68.
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
程露, 苏敬勤, 于泽威. 基于知识搜索过程的科技型企业开放式创新行为框架:以大连机车为例[J]. 管理案例研究与评论, 2018, 11(6): 519-531.
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
王锋正, 赵宇霞, 夏嘉欣. 异质环境政策、高管风险偏好与绿色技术创新:基于中国重污染上市公司的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(11): 143-153.
|
| [33] |
于晓宇, 吴祝欣, 陈颖颖. 国有企业子公司转型升级的锁定效应:组织惯性的视角[J]. 管理案例研究与评论, 2019, 12(6): 638-651.
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
陈金勇, 舒维佳. 管理层风险偏好对技术创新的影响:基于内部控制的调节作用[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(3): 76-82.
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
鲁晓东, 连玉君. 中国工业企业全要素生产率估计:1999—2007[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2012, 11(2): 541-558.
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
丁守海, 冀承. 企业数字化与劳动收入份额新变化[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(2):345-354,404.
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
张虎, 韩爱华, 杨青龙. 中国制造业与生产性服务业协同集聚的空间效应分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2017, 34(2): 3-20.
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
蔡莉, 张玉利, 陈劲, 等. 中国式现代化的动力机制:创新与企业家精神:学习贯彻二十大精神笔谈[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(1): 3-22.
|
| [48] |
黄海昕, 苏敬勤, 张冰倩. 中小企业开放式创新的逻辑演化机理:基于多元制度情境视角的案例研究[J]. 管理案例研究与评论, 2017, 10(4): 339-354.
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |