“专精特新”认定政策与中小企业技术创新

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.03.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 企业创新尤其是中小企业创新是国家经济高质量发展的驱动力，也是增强链补短链，维护国家经济安全的保障，但创新具有经济正外部性的特征，加之中小企业在人才、资金等方面的限制，创新积极性不高，为此，国家出台“专精特新”资质认定政策，其灵魂就是赋能中小企业创新。本文基于2015-2021年深沪A股上市公司数据，构建多时点双重差分模型进行经验分析，探究该政策作用于中小企业技术创新的机制与影响效应。研究发现：总体上，“专精特新”资质认定政策能够显著提升中小企业的技术创新水平（研发投入和创新产出），但激励效应的持续性不强；机制检验表明，该政策能够通过“资源倾斜”效应推动中小企业技术创新，且存在“资质升级”和“区域差异”的异质性效应，相比于省、市级资质认定政策而言，国家级“专精特新”资质认定政策对中小企业技术创新的激励效应更强，验证了政策梯度培育的科学性，但也反映出省、市级资质认定可能存在资格审查不严、持续创新动力激励不足等问题；相比于欠发达地区，经济政治资源丰富地区的政策吸收效果较弱，因此政策应当因地制宜，规避区域性政策饱和风险。本文不仅拓展了“专精特新”资质认定政策影响企业创新的相关研究，并且为优化政策以持续促进中小企业高质量发展提供了经验借鉴。
关键词

关键词: 专精特新, 企业技术创新, 高质量发展

Abstract: The innovation of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) drives the national high-quality and self-reliance development and it is the basis for consolidating common prosperity. In addition, enterprise innovation has the characteristics of positive externality. Therefore, the State has issued the "specialized, refined, characteristic and innovative" qualification accreditation policy, the soul of which is to empower enterprise technological innovation. This paper explored the mechanism and impact of the policy on the technological innovation of SMEs, and based on the data of A-share listed companies in Shenzhen and Shanghai from 2015 to 2021, it constructed a time-varying DID model for empirical analysis. The research found that: (1) in general, the qualification accreditation policy of "specialized, refined, characteristic and innovative" enterprises can significantly improve the technological innovation level (R&D investment and innovation output) of SMEs, but the incentive effect is not strong; (2) the mechanism test showed that the policy can promote the technological innovation of SMEs through the "resource bias" effect, and there are heterogeneous effects of "qualification upgrading" and "regional difference"; (3) Compared with provincial and municipal qualification accreditation policies, the national "specialized, refined, characteristic and innovative" qualification accreditation policy has a stronger incentive effect on the technological innovation of SMEs, which verifies the scientific nature of policy gradient cultivation. However, it also reflected that there may be problems such as lax qualification examination and insufficient motivation for continuous innovation in provincial and municipal qualification accreditation. (4) Compared with less developed regions, the absorption effect of policies in regions rich in economic and political resources is weaker, so policies should be adapted to local conditions to avoid the risk of regional policy saturation. This paper has not only expanded the relevant research on the impact of "specialized, refined, characteristic and innovative" qualification accreditation policy on enterprise innovation, but also provided some experiences for optimizing the policy to continuously promote the high-quality development of SMEs.

Key words: "specialized, refined, characteristic and innovative" enterprise, enterprise technological innovation, high-quality development

陈金勇, 汪小池, 长昊东, 田洁. “专精特新”认定政策与中小企业技术创新[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(3): 20-30.

Chen Jinyong, Wang Xiaochi, Chang Haodong, Tian Jie. "Specialized, refined, characteristic and innovative" qualification accreditation policies and technological innovation of small and medium-sized enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(3): 20-30.

参考文献

[1]谢菁.我国“专精特新”企业支持政策的现状、不足与优化建议[J].科技管理研究,2023,43(03):44-52.
[2]曹虹剑,张帅,欧阳峣等.创新政策与“专精特新”中小企业创新质量[J].中国工业经济,2022,No.416(11):135-154.
[3] Anshul P, Sankalp S. Barriers to Innovation in Indian Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises[R]. ADBI Working Papers, 2016. https://www.adb.org/publications/barriers-innovation-indian-small-and-medium-sized-enterprises
[4] Szczepanska-Woszczyna K. Determinants of innovation Activities in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Poland [J]. Journal of Advanced Research in Management, 2014,5(10): 65-73.
[5] 徐军玲, 刘莉. 高新技术企业认定政策的创新增量效应及作用机制[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(08): 135-141.
[6] 徐扬，陶锋, 韦东明. 资质认定型创新政策能否促进企业技术创新“增量提质”——来自国家认定企业技术中心政策的证据[J]. 南方经济, 2022, 41(08): 113-132.
[7] 张杰，毕钰, 金岳. 中国高新区“以升促建”政策对企业创新的激励效应[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(07):76-91.
[8] 李宜航,许英杰,郭晓等.研发费用加计扣除政策对制造业企业研发投入的影响分析[J].税务研究,2022,No.447(04):121-129.
[9] Acemoglu，D.，U. Akcigit，H. Alp，N. Bloom，and W. Kerr. Innovation，Reallocation，and Growth[J]. American Economic Review, 2018, 108(11):3450-3491.
[10] Wang，Y.，J. Li，and J. L. Furman. Firm Performance and State Innovation Funding：Evidence from China’s Innofund Program[J]. Research Policy, 2017, 46(06):1142-1161.
[11]许静. 中小企业专精特新竞争力评价标准体系研究[C]//中国软科学研究会.第十四届中国软科学学术年会论文集.中国软科学杂志社,2018:12.
[12]刘志彪.产业政策转型与专精特新中小企业成长环境优化[J].人民论坛,2022,No.730(03):40-43.
[13] 张晓辉,赵爱民.加快专精特新中小企业国际化发展[J].宏观经济管理,2023,No.475(05):39-45.
[14] 张国良，张琼. 新时代中小微企业科技创新理念与发展对策研究[J]. 科学管理研究, 2018, 36(03):72-74.
[15] 李金华.我国“小巨人”企业发展的境况与出路[J].改革,2021,No.332(10):101-113.
[16] 董志勇,李成明.“专精特新”中小企业高质量发展态势与路径选择[J].改革,2021,No.332(10):1-11.
[17] 韩晶.推动“专精特新”中小企业持续健康发展[J].人民论坛,2022,No.734(07):90-93.
[18] 毛军权，敦帅.“专精特新”中小企业高质量发展的驱动路径——基于TOE框架的定性比较分析[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2023,65(01):150-160.
[19]李琼,汪德华.支持中小微企业创新的财政税收政策梳理与借鉴[J].财经问题研究,2022,44(03):72-82.
[20]张璠,王竹泉,于小悦.政府扶持与民营中小企业“专精特新”转型——来自省级政策文本量化的经验证据[J].财经科学,2022,66(01):116-132.
[21] Arrow K. J. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors[M]. Princeton University Press, 1962:609-626.
[22] Joseph E. Stiglitz. Money, Credit, and Business Fluctuations[J]. Economic Record, 1988, 64(04):307-322.
[23] Griliches Z. Productivity, R&D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970s[R]. NBER Working Paper, 1985. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c8342
[24] Bronwyn H. Hall. The Financing of Research and Development[J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2002, 18(01):35-51.
[25] Radas S., Ivan-Damir A., Azra T., et al. The effects of public support schemes on small and medium enterprises[J]. Technovation, 2015, 38(01):15-30.
[26] 张信东,王亚丹.政府研发支持与中小企业创新[J].西安财经学院学报,2017,30(01):59-66.
[27] Dai X. Y., Chapman G. R&D tax incentives and innovation: Examining the role of programme design in China[J]. Technovation,2022, 113(01):102419.
[28] 韩凤芹，陈亚平. 税收优惠真的促进了企业技术创新吗？———来自高新技术企业15%税收优惠的证据[J]. 中国软科学, 2021,36(11):19-28.
[29] 卫东.中小企业有四条可行之路专精特新[J].财经界,2000,18(03):27-28.
[30] 张晓燕.北交所新规如何助力“专精特新”中小企业发展[J].人民论坛,2021,No.720(29):72-75.
[31] 汪合黔,陈开洋.创新支持政策对企业研发投入和经营绩效的影响——来自专精特新“小巨人”企业的微观证据[J].南方金融,2022,No.555(11):22-35.
[32] Nelson. R R. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis: A Comparative Analysis[M]. Oxford University Press on Demand, 1993.
[33] Freeman C. The National System of Innovation in historical perspective[J]. Cambridge Journal of economics, 1995, 19(1): 5-24.
[34] 徐倪妮，郭俊华. 政府研发资助如何影响中小企业创新绩效[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(8):1516-1526.
[35] Jason Gush, Adam B J, Victoria L and Athenne L. The Effect of Public Funding on Research Output: the New Zealand Marsden Fund [J]. New Zealand Economic Papers, 2018, 52(2): 227-248.
[36] Arqué-Castells P. Persistence in R&D Performance and its Implications for the Granting of Subsidies[J]. Review of Industrial Organization, 2013, 43(3): 193-220.
[37] 姚佩怡.政府补助对中小企业创新的影响路径研究[J].技术经济,2022,41(02):26-37.
[38] 岳宇君,张磊雷,姬敏.政府补贴、技术创新与创业板公司高质量发展[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,No.183(02):3-14.
[39] Romano R E. Aspects of R&D subsidization[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1989, 104(04): 863-873.
[40] 安强身,张笑.信号传递、声誉约束与投资风险缓释[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2020,No.242(05):92-101.
[41] 袁东任,汪炜.信息披露、现金持有与研发投入[J].山西财经大学学报,2015,37(01):81-91.
[42] Stewart C Myers. The Capital Structure Puzzle[J]. Journal of Finance, 1984, 39(05): 575-592.
[43] 鞠晓生,卢荻,虞义华.融资约束、营运资本管理与企业创新可持续性[J].经济研究,2013,48(01):4-16.
[44] 武威,刘玉廷.政府采购与企业创新：保护效应和溢出效应[J].财经研究,2020,46(05):17-36.
[45] Bertrand M, Mullainathan S. Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2003, 111(5): 1043-1075.
[46] 余明桂,范蕊,钟慧洁.中国产业政策与企业技术创新[J].中国工业经济,2016,No.345(12):5-22.
[47] 雷根强,郭玥.高新技术企业被认定后企业创新能力提升了吗?——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].财政研究,2018,No.427(09):32-47.
[48] 刘行,赵健宇.税收激励与企业创新——基于增值税转型改革的“准自然实验”[J].会计研究,2019,No.383(09):43-49.
[49] 杨国超,芮萌.高新技术企业税收减免政策的激励效应与迎合效应[J].经济研究,2020,55(09):174-191.
[50] Petersen M A. Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2009, 22(01): 435-480.
[51] Jacobson L S, Lalonde R J, Sullvan D G. Earnings losses of displaced workers[J]. The American economic review, 1993,83(04): 685-709.
[52] Li P., Lu Y., Wang J.. Does flattening government improve economic performance? Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2016, 123(01): 18-37.
[53] Cantoni D., Chen Y., Yang D. Y. et.al. Curriculum and Ideology[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2014, 125(02):338-392.
[54] Hainmueller J. Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies[J]. Political Analysis, 2017, 20(01): 25-46.
[55] 石大千,丁海,卫平等.智慧城市建设能否降低环境污染[J].中国工业经济,2018,No.363(06):117-135.