科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 10-19.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.03.002

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

产业创新的科学知识特征对中国技术追赶的影响

李梦柯1,2,王芳1   

  1. 1.中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院,北京100190;
    2.中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院,北京100049
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-01 修回日期:2023-05-15 出版日期:2024-03-20 发布日期:2024-03-11
  • 通讯作者: 王芳
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目:“基于科学知识异质性的知识重组理论与实证研究”(72274191,2023.01—2026.12)。

Impact of scientific knowledge characteristics of industrial innovation on China′s technological catch-up

Li Mengke1,2, Wang Fang1   

  1. 1. Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
    2. School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2022-08-01 Revised:2023-05-15 Online:2024-03-20 Published:2024-03-11

摘要:    理解科学知识对后发经济体技术追赶的影响对创新经济理论与创新政策都有重要意义。本文结合知识基础理论和技术体制理论,提出科学技术特征属性的概念和分析框架,从知识异质性视角分析产业创新的科学知识特征因素对中国技术追赶过程的影响。通过分析美国专利及商标局1995—2019年的全球授予专利及其引用科学文献的数据,发现中国难以在科学关联度较高的领域、科学知识复杂多样化的领域和私有部门科学知识贡献度较高的技术领域提升技术水平和实现追赶;中国的技术追赶更依赖较为近期的科学知识,优势产业发展更依赖国外的科学知识来源;中国技术创新的本土科学知识来源主要来自公共部门的成果,私有部门产出科学对创新的作用不突出。研究结论揭示了中国优势技术领域发展的科学知识特征,为中国技术追赶提供了实证证据与政策启示。
关键词

关键词: 科学知识, 非专利引文, 科学技术特征, 后发经济体, 技术追赶

Abstract:    Understanding the impact of scientific knowledge on the technological catch-up of latecomer economies is of great significance to innovation economics theory and public policy. This paper combined the theory of knowledge base and technological regime to construct a theoretical framework for analyzing the scientific knowledge characteristics of technological innovation across different sectors from the perspective of heterogeneity of scientific knowledge. It proposed five dimensions, namely, scientific linkage, scientific cumulativeness, scientific appropriability, scientific diversity and scientific knowledge sources, to define the characteristics of scientific knowledge used in technological innovation across different sectors, and analyzed their impacts on the technological catch-up of China. The data were obtained from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and Lens dataset. This covers a total of 5,100,624 patents in 88 economies granted by USPTO from 1995 to 2019, and 5,837,518 resolved scientific literature. Based on the WIPO technology classification table, the sample patents were divided into 35 technology fields according to their first IPC code. The generalized least squares (GLS) model was used to analyze impacts of scientific-technological regimes on technological catch-up in China. The following four research findings were obtained from this research. First, it is difficult for China to catch up in the fields characterized with high degree of scientific linkage. Sectors characterized with high scientific linkage, such as nanotechnology, biotechnology and chemical pharmaceuticals, rely heavily on new discoveries and basic scientific research knowledge. Compared with developed economies, China needs to accumulate scientific knowledge foundations and improve its absorption and transformation capabilities in the long term, in order to stimulate a virtuous interaction between subsequent scientific output and technological innovation.Second, China is more likely to gain technological advantages in the fields that rely on relatively recent scientific research knowledge. These fields require less scientific accumulation and rely more on newly published scientific research knowledge, which favors emerging economies′ technological catch-up. Meanwhile, foreign scientific research presents a significant positive effect on China′s technological innovation. The development of relatively advantage industries in China heavily rely on foreign scientific knowledge. Expanding the geographic boundaries of scientific knowledge sources acts as an important way for latecomer economies to absorb heterogeneous and complementary scientific knowledge and enhance their innovation capabilities. Third, China faces difficulties in gaining technological advantages in sectors characterized with high diversity of scientific knowledge. Organizations with different knowledge endowments present significant differences in innovation motives and patterns. Chinese inventors have weaker abilities to master complex scientific knowledge and rely more on knowledge in narrow domains in the process of scientific knowledge transfer. They have not been able to effectively utilize the achievements of multiple scientific knowledge fields to generate high-quality innovation. Technology innovators need to have a certain depth and breadth of knowledge to combine the scientific knowledge required for technological innovation and carry out subsequent integrated innovation.Finally, it is difficult for China to gain technological advantages in sectors where contribution of corporate science is high. Private basic research plays an important role in innovation in such sectors. It is hard for firms to transform scientific knowledge into technological innovation without enough efforts in understanding and absorbing cutting-edge science. The domestic scientific knowledge cited by Chinese patents are mainly produced by public institutions. In contrast, developed economies have a higher proportion basic research investment in private sectors, resulting in outstanding technological innovation, especially in science-intensive fields. These research findings will contribute to understanding the impacts of scientific knowledge to innovation, as well as characteristics of scientific knowledge of advantageous technological fields in China, thus providing policy implications for technological catch-up. This will deepen the theories of technological regime and enrich empirical evidences on the relationship between science and technology. 

Key words: scientific knowledge, non-patent reference, characteristics of science and technology, latecomer economies, technological catch-up