企业知识结构属性对突破性创新绩效的影响

刘娜, 杜艳婷, 毛荐其, 王崇梅

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2) : 137-144.

PDF(1160 KB)
PDF(1160 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2) : 137-144. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.02.014

企业知识结构属性对突破性创新绩效的影响

作者信息 +

Impact of knowledge structure attributes on the breakthrough innovation performance of enterprises

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

企业知识基础是企业创新的起点。探清知识基础在结构上的分散和依赖程度对企业突破性创新的作用机制,有助于揭示知识基础提升企业突破性创新的有效路径。本文基于知识基础观和企业知识理论,研究企业知识基础结构属性即知识基础多样性和知识基础复杂性对企业突破性创新绩效的影响,以及企业知识整合能力对其影响的调节作用,利用中国医药制造业上市公司2008—2020年专利数据和财务数据进行零膨胀负二项回归验证相关假设并进行稳健性分析。研究发现:企业知识基础多样性对突破性创新绩效有倒U型影响,知识整合能力使其倒U型关系变缓,当知识整合能力越强时,会削弱企业知识基础多样性对突破性创新绩效的影响;企业知识基础复杂性正向影响突破性创新绩效,且受到知识整合能力的正向调节,当知识整合能力越强时,会提升企业知识基础复杂性对突破性创新的正向影响。本研究从企业知识基础结构属性的角度为企业提升突破性创新绩效提供理论支撑。

Abstract

Technology innovation is the primary subject of firms and it has a big part to play in China's efforts to build an innovative society. It is the main factor influencing social development. In addition, distinctive and ground-breaking breakthrough innovation, as opposed to progressive innovation, is crucial for businesses to achieve high-quality development in the context of the ongoing upheavals both domestically and internationally. For China to innovate and develop, firms must be clear about the procedures they follow before acquiring breakthrough innovation. Enterprise knowledge, as a substantial source of innovative activities, can be a crucial source of inspiration for firms striving to attain breakthrough innovation. Knowledge is the driving force behind innovation.

A firm's knowledge base is where its innovation starts. Exploring the mechanism of dispersion and dependence of knowledge base in structure on enterprises' breakthrough innovation is helpful to reveal the effective path of knowledge base to improve the enterprises' breakthrough innovation. The enterprise knowledge theory and the knowledge base idea are the foundations of the study. This study used the patent data and financial information from listed companies in China's pharmaceutical manufacturing sector to analyze the moderating effects of enterprise knowledge integration ability on the impact of enterprise knowledge infrastructure attributes, specifically knowledge base diversity and knowledge base complexity, on the breakthrough innovation performance of enterprises. The zero-inflated negative binomial regression method was used to verify the relevant hypothesis and perform robustness analysis.

The finding showed that : (1) A diverse enterprise knowledge base can aid in new knowledge exploration and boost the level of breakthrough innovation, but a diverse enterprise knowledge base in excess can have detrimental effects such as scale diseconomy and enterprise knowledge information overload, which hinder the promotion of breakthrough innovation. (2) The more existing portfolios there are, the fewer prospects there are for new portfolios, and organizations are more likely to look into fresh information in order to advance breakthrough innovation. (3) The efficacy of integrating existing knowledge pieces will raise the opportunity cost of seeking out new information and will lessen the beneficial effects of knowledge base diversity on breakthrough innovation when firms have strong knowledge integration skills. At the same time, knowledge integration skills may aid businesses in utilizing knowledge components, increasing the usage of knowledge components, and reducing the detrimental effects of knowledge base diversity on ground-breaking innovation. High knowledge integration skills can also lower coordination and integration costs for combining fresh and accumulated information, increasing the effectiveness of breakthrough innovation.

According to the research conclusions, the contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) By focusing on the knowledge infrastructure attributes and taking into account the significance of enterprise knowledge infrastructure, this study broadened the research perspective on breakthrough innovation by empirically demonstrating the influence of knowledge infrastructure attributes on breakthrough innovation as well as the moderating role of contextual factors. (2) This paper unified the diversity and complexity of knowledge bases into a single framework, which aids in a better understanding of how enterprise knowledge infrastructure attributes affect breakthrough innovation and advances the study of its causes.

The management insight from this study is also based on the research findings, and it is as follows: (1) Enterprise managers should carefully consider investigating the allocation of resources for new knowledge elements, maintain an appropriate level of knowledge base diversity, and avoid the negative effects of resource dispersion. (2) Businesses should consider how interdependent their knowledge bases are and look at any potential chances for innovation they may hold. (3) Organizations should take into account their own knowledge integration capabilities when deciding on their innovation strategy in order to better leverage the value of their knowledge management in innovation, create more logical innovation solutions, and increase the effectiveness of breakthrough innovation.

关键词

知识基础多样性 / 知识基础复杂性 / 知识整合能力 / 突破性创新

Key words

knowledge base diversity / knowledge base complexity / knowledge integration capability / breakthrough innovation

引用本文

导出引用
刘娜, 杜艳婷, 毛荐其, . 企业知识结构属性对突破性创新绩效的影响[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(2): 137-144 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.02.014
Liu Na, Du Yanting, Mao Jianqi, et al. Impact of knowledge structure attributes on the breakthrough innovation performance of enterprises[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(2): 137-144 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.02.014
中图分类号: F204   

参考文献

[1]
毕静煜, 谢恩. 伙伴社会价值对企业突破性创新的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(1):67-77.
BI Jingyu, XIE En. A research on the impact of partner's social value on firms' critical innovation[J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(1):67-77.
[2]
曾德明, 陈培祯. 企业知识基础,认知距离对二元式创新绩效的影响[J]. 管理学报, 2017, 14(8):1182-1189.
ZENG Deming, CHEN Peizhen. The impact of knowledge base and cognitive distance to firm's ambidexterity innovation performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2017, 14(8):1182-1189.
[3]
MELERO E, PALOMERAS N. The renaissance man is not dead! The role of generalists in teams of inventors[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(1):154-167.
[4]
FREEMAN C. Economics of industrial innovation[M]. London:Routledge, 2013.
[5]
ZHANG J, BADEN-FULLER C, MANGEMATIN V. Technological knowledge base, R&D organization structure and alliance formation: Evidence from the biopharmaceutical industry[J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(4):515-528.
[6]
CARLO J L, LYYTINEN K, ROSE G M. A knowledge-based model of radical innovation in small software firms[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2012:865-895.
[7]
陈志明. 企业知识基础对突破性创新绩效的影响效应研究:一个有调节的中介效应模型[J]. 南方经济, 2016(7):112-132.
CHEN Zhiming. Research on the influence of firm's knowledge base on its radical innovation performance:A mediated moderation model[J]. South China Journal of Economics, 2016(7):112-132.
[8]
阳艳兰. 企业知识基础广度与深度对创新绩效的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2016.
YANG Yanlan. The influence of enterprise knowledge breadth and depth on innovation performance[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2016.
[9]
王金凤, 王孟琪, 冯立杰. 外部知识异质性、知识多元化与突破式创新绩效:基于企业生命周期视角[J]. 软科学, 2020, 34(12):14-19.
WANG Jinfeng, WANG Mengqi, FENG Lijie. External knowledge heterogeneity, knowledge diversification and breakthrough innovation performance:Based on the perspective enterprise life cycle theory[J]. Soft Science, 2020, 34(12):14-19.
[10]
KRAFFT J, QUATRARO F, SAVIOTTI P P. The knowledge-base evolution in biotechnology: A social network analysis[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2011, 20(5):445-475.
[11]
ROSIELLO A, MALEKI A. A dynamic multi-sector analysis of technological catch-up: The impact of technology cycle times, knowledge base complexity and variety[J]. Research Policy, 2021, 50(3):104194.
[12]
ZHANG J, BADEN-FULLER C. The influence of technological knowledge base and organizational structure on technology collaboration[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2010, 47(4):679-704.
[13]
KAUFFMAN S, LOBO J, MACREADY W G. Optimal search on a technology landscape[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2000, 43(2):141-166.
[14]
陈旭, 刘春红, 高长春, 等. 知识多样性、知识网络密度与企业创新绩效[J]. 华东经济管理, 2020, 34(4):38-45.
CHEN Xu, LIU Chunhong, GAO Changchun, et al. Enterprise knowledge diversity, knowledge network density and innovation performance[J]. East China Economic Management, 2020, 34(4):38-45.
[15]
LIU N, MAO J, GUAN J. Knowledge convergence and organization innovation: The moderating role of relational embeddedness[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 125(3):1899-1921.
[16]
YAYAVARAM S, CHEN W R. Changes in firm knowledge couplings and firm innovation performance: The moderating role of technological complexity[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36(3):377-396.
[17]
NING L, GUO R, CHEN K. R&D subsidies, novelty of firm innovation and industrial technological complexity: The knowledge recombinant view[J]. R&D Management, 2022, 52(5): 820-837.
[18]
PHELPS C C. A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(4):890-913.
[19]
唐源, 邵云飞, 陈一君. 跨界行为, 知识整合能力对企业创新绩效的影响研究:基于知识获取和资源损耗的作用[J]. 预测, 2020, 39(4):31-37.
TANG Yuan, SHAO Yunfei, CHEN Yijun. Research on the influence of boundary spanning behavior and knowledge integration capability on enterprise innovation performance:Based on the role of knowledge acquisition and resource depletion[J]. Forecasting, 2020, 39(4):31-37.
[20]
WANG C, RODAN S, FRUIN M, et al. Knowledge networks, collaboration networks, and exploratory innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014, 57(2):484-514.
[21]
毛荐其, 郭夏夏, 毛才玮, 等. 基于专利数据的芯片领域技术创新动态测度[J]. 创新科技, 2022, 22(1):56-68.
MAO Jianqi, GUO Xiaxia, MAO Caiwei, et al. Dynamic measurement of technology innovation in the chip field based patent data[J]. Innovation Science and Technology, 2022, 22(1):56-68.
[22]
吕一博, 朱雨晴, 鲍丽宁. 内向型开放式创新与突破性创新绩效:网络位置的调节效应[J]. 管理科学, 2020, 33(5):86-100.
LYU Yibo, ZHU Yuqing, BAO Lining. Inbound open innovation and radical innovation performance:Moderating effect of network position[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2020, 33(5):86-100.
[23]
毕静煜, 谢恩, 魏海笑. 联盟伙伴技术多样性对企业突破性创新的影响:研发联盟组合特征的调节作用[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2021, 33(2):41-52.
BI Jingyu, XIE En, WEI Haixiao. Technological diversity of alliance partners and firms' breakthrough innovation:Moderating effect of R&D alliance portfolio's characters[J]. R&D Management, 2021, 33(2):41-52.
[24]
刘岩, 蔡虹, 裴云龙. 企业技术知识基础多元度对独立创新与合作创新平衡互补效应的影响[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(2):111-120.
摘要
整合独立创新与合作创新的协同作用对企业生存和发展具有重要意义。基于知识基础理论,构建技术知识基础相关与非相关多元度、知识整合能力对企业独立创新和合作创新协同性(互补性与平衡性两个维度)的影响效应模型,利用2009—2018年中国生物制药行业80家企业发明专利数据进行实证检验。结果表明,技术知识基础相关多元度对企业独立创新与合作创新互补性具有正向影响,对两类创新活动平衡性具有负向影响;技术知识基础非相关多元度对独立与合作创新互补性具有倒U型影响,对两类创新活动平衡性具有负向影响。企业知识整合能力负向调节技术知识基础相关多元度对独立创新和合作创新互补性的正向影响,削弱技术知识基础相关多元度与独立创新和合作创新平衡性之间的负向关系。同时,企业知识整合能力在技术知识基础非相关多元度与独立创新和合作创新互补性间起负向调节作用。
LIU Yan, CAI Hong, PEI Yunlong. The impact of the variety of enterprises' knowledge base on the complementary and balance effect between independent innovation and collaborative innovation[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2022, 39(2):111-120.

基金

国家自然科学基金面上项目:“面向创新链的前沿科技领域多层次创新网络结构、演化及绩效影响机制研究”(72174112)
国家自然科学基金面上项目:“面向创新链的前沿科技领域多层次创新网络结构、演化及绩效影响机制研究”(2022.01—2025.12)
山东省自然科学基金面上项目:“山东十强产业‘卡脖子’技术辨识与突破路径研究”(ZR2023MG049)
山东省自然科学基金面上项目:“山东十强产业‘卡脖子’技术辨识与突破路径研究”(2024.01—2026.12)
“山东省低碳试点城市碳排放达峰预测及深度减排路径研究”(ZR2020MG053)
“山东省低碳试点城市碳排放达峰预测及深度减排路径研究”(2021.01—2023.12)
泰山学者工程专项经费资助(Tsqn201909149)

PDF(1160 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/