多重情境下“核心-边缘”网络关系研究——基于云计算企业分阶段成长的分析

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.02.011

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 105-116.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.02.011

多重情境下“核心-边缘”网络关系研究——基于云计算企业分阶段成长的分析

陈岩，张睿倩，吴超楠，时准

北京邮电大学经济管理学院，北京100876

收稿日期:2023-07-03 修回日期:2023-09-21 出版日期:2024-02-20 发布日期:2024-01-23
通讯作者: 张睿倩
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目：“面向‘一带一路’的中国海外企业国际化经验转移机制研究：基于‘反向跳板’的理论视角”（72172018， 2021.10—2025.12）；中国工程院学部重大咨询项目：“6G带动数字经济双循环发展战略研究”（2022-XBZD-03，2022.03—2023.12）；北京邮电大学博士生创新基金资助项目：“云计算生态系统中网络结构与企业价值”（CX2020120，2020.05—2022.04）。

Research on " core- peripheral " network relationships in multiple contexts: Based on the phased growth of cloud computing enterprises

Chen Yan, Zhang Ruiqian, Wu Chaonan, Shi Zhun

School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China

Received:2023-07-03 Revised:2023-09-21 Online:2024-02-20 Published:2024-01-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 精准发挥有为政府和有效市场两方面力量推动大中小企业协同共赢是实现中国式创新的关键着力点，揭示我国本土多重情境下大中小企业协同合作的内在复杂机制具有重要意义。基于2016—2019年云计算企业数据，本文发现了云计算企业在我国数字化、市场、制度多重情境叠加下的分阶段成长规律。结果表明，数字化情境下建立“核心-边缘”网络关系对创建期、成长期企业成长影响为负，并对存活期企业成长影响为正；多市场接触情境能强化存活期正面影响而弱化成长期负面影响，国有资本支持情境能弱化创建期负面影响而强化存活期正面影响，且市场、制度交互情境能进一步增强存活期正面影响。本研究揭示了我国本土多重情境下中小企业从依附大企业到成长的微观过程，为数字化时代大中小企业合作共赢提供策略建议，并为我国分阶段运用有为政府和有效市场两股力量，进而精准释放中国式创新红利提供了实证依据和施策配方。

关键词: “核心-边缘”网络关系, 颠覆性技术, 多重情境, 中国式创新

Abstract: Based on the cloud computing enterprise data from 2016 to 2019, this paper empirically examined the complex mechanism of collaboration between enterprises in multiple contexts. It was found that cloud computing enterprises in different stages present heterogeneity under multiple contexts. The results showed that the "core- peripheral" network relationship has a negative impact on the enterprises in the start-up stage. It is worth mentioning that for cloud computing enterprises during the survival period, the "core-periphery" network relationship has a positive impact. At the same time, this paper further discussed the moderating effect of the multi-market contact nature and the state-owned institutional nature on the relationship between them. It was found in the study that the market context can strengthen the positive impact during the survival period and weaken the negative impact during the growth period, and the institutional context can weaken the negative impact in the start-up stage and strengthen the positive impact during the survival period. Furthermore, the superposition of market context and institutional context can enhance the positive impact of survival. This study revealed the micro-process of SMEs from dependence on large enterprises to growth under multiple contexts, and provided strategic suggestions for win-win cooperation between enterprises in the digital era. It also provided the empirical basis and policy formula for China to use the two forces of promising government and effective market in stages, and then accurately release the China-style innovation dividend. It also provided some empirical basis and policy formula for exerting the power of promising government and effective market, and then following the Chinese-style innovation.

Key words: “core-peripheral” network relationship, disruptive technology, multiple contexts, Chinese-style innovation

陈岩, 张睿倩, 吴超楠, 时准. 多重情境下“核心-边缘”网络关系研究——基于云计算企业分阶段成长的分析[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(2): 105-116.

Chen Yan, Zhang Ruiqian, Wu Chaonan, Shi Zhun. Research on " core- peripheral " network relationships in multiple contexts: Based on the phased growth of cloud computing enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(2): 105-116.

参考文献

[1].参考文献
[2]Lovejoy W S, Sinha A.Efficient Structures for Innovative Social Networks[J]. Management Science, 2015.
[3]Baldwin C, MacCormack A, Rusnak J.Hidden structure: Using network methods to map system architecture[J].Research Policy, 2014, 43(8):1381-1397
[4]Lipparini A, Lorenzoni G, Ferriani S.From core to periphery and back: A study on the deliberate shaping of knowledge flows in interfirm dyads and networks[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2014, 35(4):578-595
[5]Gawer A.Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework[J].Research Policy, 2014, 43(7):1239-1249
[6]Cattani G, Ferriani S.A Core/Periphery Perspective on Individual Creative Performance: Social Networks and Cinematic Achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry[J]. Organization Science, 2008.
[7]Capaldo A.Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(6):585-608
[8]Puranam P, Alexy O, Reitzig M.What's “New” About New Forms of Organizing?[J].Academy of Management Review, 2014, 39(2):162-180
[9]Joost R, Melissaa.S. Platform competition: A systematic and interdisciplinary review of the literature[J].Journal of Management, 2021, 6(47):1528-1563
[10]Cutolo D K M.Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Power asymmetries, risks, and strategies in the platform economy[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2020.
[11]王凤彬, 王骁鹏, 张驰.超模块平台组织结构与客制化创业支持——基于海尔向平台组织转型的嵌入式案例研究[J].管理世界, 2019, 35(02):121-150
[12]郑帅, 王海军.模块化下企业创新生态系统结构与演化机制——海尔集团—年的纵向案例研究[J].科研管理, 2021, 42(01):33-46
[13]Khanagha S, Ansari S S, Paroutis S, et al.Mutualism and the dynamics of new platform creation: A study of Cisco and fog computing[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2020.
[14]邓向荣, 汪小洁, 曹红.非连续性技术创新理论研究新进展[J]. 经济学动态, 2022(1):132-145.
[15]DENG Xiangrong, WANG Xiaojie, CAO Hong.New Research Progress on Discontinuous Technological Innovation Theory[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2022(1):132-145.
[16]郑彦宁, 袁芳.颠覆性技术研发管理研究[J].科研管理, 2021, 42(02):12-19
[17]黄子洋, 余翔, 尹聪慧.颠覆性技术的政策保护空间研究——基于战略生态位管理视角[J].科学学研究, 2019, 37(04):607-616
[18]Lifshitz-Assaf H.Dismantling Knowledge Boundaries at NASA: The Critical Role of Professional Identity in Open Innovation[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 2018, 63(4):746-782
[19]Ansari S S, Garud R, Kumaraswamy A.The disruptor's dilemma: TiVo and the US. television ecosystem[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(9):1829-1853
[20]Tsouri M.Knowledge networks and strong tie creation: the role of relative network position[J]. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2021.
[21]Hernandez E, Menon A.Corporate Strategy and Network Change[J]. The Academy of Management review, 2019, 1(46).
[22]S R, Srinivasan R, Tew J, et al.Correlation Between Strategic and Operational Risk Mitigation Strategies in Supply Networks[J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 7(201):225-248
[23]肖静华, 胡杨颂, 吴瑶.成长品：数据驱动的企业与用户互动创新案例研究[J].管理世界, 2020, 36(03):183-205
[24]Wang L, Jiang S, Zhang S.Mapping technological trajectories and exploring knowledge sources: A case study of 3D printing technologies[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 161:120251.
[25]Saranga H, Schotter A P J, Mudambi R.The double helix effect: Catch-up and local-foreign co-evolution in the Indian and Chinese automotive industries[J].International Business Review, 2019, 28(5):101495-
[26]Robinson D K R, Lagnau A, Boon W P C.Innovation pathways in additive manufacturing: Methods for tracing emerging and branching paths from rapid prototyping to alternative applications[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 146:733-750.
[27]Cennamo C.Competing in digital markets: A platform-based perspective[J].Academy of Management Perspectives, 2021, 2(35):265-291
[28]王凤彬, 李东红, 张婷婷, 等.产品开发组织超模块化及其对创新的影响——以丰田汽车为案例的研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2011(02):131-141.
[29]Hoffmann W, Lavie D, Reuer J J, et al.The interplay of competition and cooperation[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(12):3033-3052
[30]Mariotti F, Delbridge R.Overcoming Network Overload and Redundancy in Interorganizational Networks: The Roles of Potential and Latent Ties[J].Organization Science, 2012, 2(23):511-528
[31]邓新明, 珍叶.组群内多市场接触、移动壁垒高度与企业创新绩效[J]. 南开管理评论, 2020.
[32]邓新明, 郭雅楠.竞争经验、多市场接触与企业绩效[J]. 管理世界, 2020(11):111-132.
[33]Mariotti F, Haider S.Managing institutional diversity and structural holes: Network configurations for recombinant innovation[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 160:120-237.
[34]Ryu W, Reuer J J, Brush T H.The effects of multimarket contact on partner s

多重情境下“核心-边缘”网络关系研究——基于云计算企业分阶段成长的分析

Research on " core- peripheral " network relationships in multiple contexts: Based on the phased growth of cloud computing enterprises

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王象路, 罗瑾琏, 郭利敏, 闫佳祺. 情境-认知视角下科创企业技术创新演进路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(1): 42-50.
[2]	陈晓红, 张静辉, 汪阳洁, 何竺虔, 肖鸿翔. 数字技术赋能中国式创新的机制与路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(1): 13-20.
[3]	曲冠楠陈凯华陈劲. 颠覆性技术创新：理论源起、整合框架与发展前瞻[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(9): 1-9.
[4]	李宇方圆禹傅秋园. 中国式创新的理论内涵及路径演进的内在逻辑[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(11): 1-8.
[5]	胡晓杨德林马倩. 政府与市场共演化驱动下中国集成电路产业国产替代路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(11): 9-21.
[6]	刘云, 桂秉修, 王小黎. 基于引文网络的颠覆性技术发展路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(11): 32-44.
[7]	张睿倩, 刘昊倬, 谢一臻, 陈岩. 虚拟集聚型网络关系、制度逻辑差异与数字赋能型企业成长——基于云计算企业的研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(8): 92-101.
[8]	郑彦宁袁芳. 颠覆性技术研发管理研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(2): 12-19.
[9]	苏敬勤，刘建华，王智琦，陈悦，姜照华. 颠覆性技术的演化轨迹及早期识别—以智能手机等技术为例[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(3): 13-20.