多重情境下“核心-边缘”网络关系研究——基于云计算企业分阶段成长的分析

陈岩, 张睿倩, 吴超楠, 时准

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2) : 105-116.

PDF(1390 KB)
PDF(1390 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2) : 105-116. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.02.011

多重情境下“核心-边缘”网络关系研究——基于云计算企业分阶段成长的分析

作者信息 +

Research on "core- peripheral" network relationships in multiple contexts: Based on the phased growth of cloud computing enterprises

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

精准发挥有为政府和有效市场两方面力量推动大中小企业协同共赢是实现中国式创新的关键着力点,揭示我国本土多重情境下大中小企业协同合作的内在复杂机制具有重要意义。基于2016—2019年云计算企业数据,本文发现了云计算企业在我国数字化、市场、制度多重情境叠加下的分阶段成长规律。结果表明,数字化情境下建立“核心-边缘”网络关系对创建期、成长期企业成长影响为负,并对存活期企业成长影响为正;多市场接触情境能强化存活期正面影响而弱化成长期负面影响,国有资本支持情境能弱化创建期负面影响而强化存活期正面影响,且市场、制度交互情境能进一步增强存活期正面影响。本研究揭示了我国本土多重情境下中小企业从依附大企业到成长的微观过程,为数字化时代大中小企业合作共赢提供策略建议,并为我国分阶段运用有为政府和有效市场两股力量,进而精准释放中国式创新红利提供了实证依据和施策配方。

Abstract

Based on the cloud computing enterprise data from 2016 to 2019, this paper empirically examined the complex mechanism of collaboration between enterprises in multiple contexts. It was found that cloud computing enterprises in different stages present heterogeneity under multiple contexts. The results showed that the "core- peripheral" network relationship has a negative impact on the enterprises in the start-up stage. It is worth mentioning that for cloud computing enterprises during the survival period, the "core-periphery" network relationship has a positive impact. At the same time, this paper further discussed the moderating effect of the multi-market contact nature and the state-owned institutional nature on the relationship between them. 111It was found in the study that the market context can strengthen the positive impact during the survival period and weaken the negative impact during the growth period, and the institutional context can weaken the negative impact in the start-up stage and strengthen the positive impact during the survival period. Furthermore, the superposition of market context and institutional context can enhance the positive impact of survival. 112This study revealed the micro-process of SMEs from dependence on large enterprises to growth under multiple contexts, and provided strategic suggestions for win-win cooperation between enterprises in the digital era. It also provided the empirical basis and policy formula for China to use the two forces of promising government and effective market in stages, and then accurately release the China-style innovation dividend. It also provided some empirical basis and policy formula for exerting the power of promising government and effective market, and then following the Chinese-style innovation.

关键词

“核心-边缘”网络关系 / 颠覆性技术 / 多重情境 / 中国式创新

Key words

"core-peripheral" network relationship / disruptive technology / multiple contexts / Chinese-style innovation

引用本文

导出引用
陈岩, 张睿倩, 吴超楠, . 多重情境下“核心-边缘”网络关系研究——基于云计算企业分阶段成长的分析[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(2): 105-116 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.02.011
Chen Yan, Zhang Ruiqian, Wu Chaonan, et al. Research on "core- peripheral" network relationships in multiple contexts: Based on the phased growth of cloud computing enterprises[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(2): 105-116 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.02.011
中图分类号: F273.1   

参考文献

[1]
戚聿东, 肖旭. 数字经济时代的企业管理变革[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(6):135-152.
QI Yudong, XIAO Xu. Transformation of enterprise management in the era of digital economy[J]. Journal of Management World, 2020, 36(6):135-152.
[2]
AUTIO E, NAMBISAN S, THOMAS W. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2018, 12(1):72-95.
[3]
郑帅, 王海军. 模块化下企业创新生态系统结构与演化机制:海尔集团2005—2019年的纵向案例研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(1):33-46.
ZHENG Shuai, WANG Haijun. Structure and evolution mechanism of the enterprise innovation ecosystem in terms of modularity:A longitudinal case study on Haier Group from 2005 to 2019[J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(1):33-46.
[4]
肖静华, 胡杨颂, 吴瑶. 成长品:数据驱动的企业与用户互动创新案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(3):183-205.
XIAO Jinghua, HU Yangsong, WU Yao. Evolving product:A case study of data-driven enterprise and user-interactive innovation[J]. Journal of Management World, 2020, 36(3):183-205.
[5]
SUI P, TANNA S, ZHOU D. Financial contagion in a core-periphery interbank network[J]. The European Journal of Finance, 2020, 26(7-8):691-710.
[6]
马鸿佳, 王亚婧, 苏中锋. 数字化转型背景下中小制造企业如何编排资源利用数字机会?:基于资源编排理论的fsQCA研究[J/OL]. 南开管理评论:1-18[2023-06-17]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.F.20221001.1540.006.html.
MA Hongjia, WANG Yajing, SU Zhongfeng. How can manufacturing SMEs take advantage of digital opportunities?FsQCA research based on resource orchestration theory[J/OL]. Nankai Business Review:1-18[2023-06-17]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.F.20221001.1540.006.html.
[7]
李宏贵, 曹迎迎, 陈忠卫. 新创企业的生命周期、创新方式与关系网络[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2017, 39(8):16-27.
LI Honggui, CAO Yingying, CHEN Zhongwei. The lifecycle,innovation modes and relationship networks of new ventures[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2017, 39(8):16-27.
[8]
邓向荣, 汪小洁, 曹红. 非连续性技术创新理论研究新进展[J]. 经济学动态, 2022(1):132-145.
DENG Xiangrong, WANG Xiaojie, CAO Hong. New research progress on discontinuous technological innovation theory[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2022(1):132-145.
[9]
刘海兵, 刘洋, 黄天蔚. 数字技术驱动高端颠覆性创新的过程机理:探索性案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(7):63-81.
LIU Haibing, LIU Yang, HUANG Tianwei. The process and mechanism of digital technology driving high-end disruptive innovation: An exploratory case study[J]. Journal of Management World, 2023, 39(7):63-81.
[10]
邓建军, 刘安蓉, 曹晓阳, 等. 颠覆性技术早期识别方法框架研究:基于科学端的视角[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(5):674-684.
DENG Jianjun, LIU Anrong, CAO Xiaoyang, et al. Methodological framework of identifying disruptive technologies on emerging stage:Based on science[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(5):674-684.
[11]
郑彦宁, 袁芳. 颠覆性技术研发管理研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(2):12-19.
ZHENG Yanning, YUAN Fang. An analysis of disruptive technology management[J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(2):12-19.
[12]
LIPPARINI A, LORENZONI G, FERRIANI S. From core to periphery and back: A study on the deliberate shaping of knowledge flows in interfirm dyads and networks[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2014, 35(4).
[13]
LOVEJOY W S, SINHA A. Efficient structures for innovative social networks[J]. Management Science, 2010, 56(7):1127-1145.
What lines of communication among members of an organization are most productive in the early, ideation phase of innovation? We investigate this question with a recombination and selection model of knowledge transfer operating through a social network. We find that ideation is accelerated when people in the organization dynamically churn through a large (ideally the entire population) set of conversational partners over time, which naturally begets short path lengths and eliminates information bottlenecks. Group meetings, in which the content of conversations is available to all for consideration, are another way to learn in parallel and accelerate the ideation process, although for complex problems they may not offer significant advantages over the best decentralized networks. The idealized core-periphery graphs emerge as an important family on the time–cost efficient frontier. New sociometrics for the analyses of innovation processes emerge from this investigation.
[14]
JOOST R, MELISSAA. S. Platform competition: A systematic and interdisciplinary review of the literature[J]. Journal of Management, 2020, 47(6):1528-1563.
[15]
KHANAGHA S, ANSARI S S, PAROUTIS S, et al. Mutualism and the dynamics of new platform creation: A study of Cisco and fog computing[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2020, 43(3):476-506.
[16]
蔡宁, 刘双, 王节祥, 等. 平台生态系统战略更新的过程机制研究: 相互依赖关系, 构建的视角[J/OL]. 南开管理评论:1-19[2023-06-17]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.f.20230308.0928.002.html.
CAI Ning, LIU Shuang, WANG Jiexiang, et al. Process mechanism of platform-based ecosystem strategic renewal: An interdependence building perspective[J/OL]. Nankai Business Review:1-19[2023-06-17]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.f.20230308.0928.002.html.
[17]
陈威如, 王节祥. 依附式升级:平台生态系统中参与者的数字化转型战略[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(10):195-214.
CHEN Weiru, WANG Jiexiang. Platform-dependent upgrade:Digital transformation strategy of complementors in platform-based ecosystem[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37(10):195-214.
[18]
乔朋华, 张悦, 许为宾. 管理者心理韧性,战略变革与企业成长:基于香港联合证券交易所中资上市公司的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(2):269-280.
QIAO Penghua, ZHANG Yue, XU Weibin. Managerial resilience,strategy change and firm growth:An empirical study on Chinese listed companies in Hong Kong stock market[J]. Management Review, 2022, 34(2):269-280.
[19]
邓新明, 珍叶. 组群内多市场接触、移动壁垒高度与企业创新绩效[J]. 南开管理评论, 2020, 23(2):16-26.
DENG Xingming, ZHEN Ye. A research on within group multimarket competition,mobile barriers height and firm innovation performance[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2020, 23(2):16-26.
[20]
邓新明, 郭雅楠. 竞争经验、多市场接触与企业绩效:基于红皇后竞争视角[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(11):111-132.
DENG Xinming, GUO Yanan. Competitive experience,multi-market contact,and firm performance:Based on the perspective of Red Queen competition[J]. Journal of Management World, 2020, 36(11):111-132.
[21]
MARIOTTI F, HAIDER S. Managing institutional diversity and structural holes: Network configurations for recombinant innovation[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020,160:120237.
[22]
RYU W, REUER J J, BRUSH T H. The effects of multimarket contact on partner selection for technology cooperation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2020, 41(2):267-289.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目:“面向‘一带一路’的中国海外企业国际化经验转移机制研究:基于‘反向跳板’的理论视角”(72172018)
国家自然科学基金项目:“面向‘一带一路’的中国海外企业国际化经验转移机制研究:基于‘反向跳板’的理论视角”(2021.10—2025.12)
中国工程院学部重大咨询项目:“6G带动数字经济双循环发展战略研究”(2022-XBZD-03)
中国工程院学部重大咨询项目:“6G带动数字经济双循环发展战略研究”(2022.03—2023.12)
北京邮电大学博士生创新基金资助项目:“云计算生态系统中网络结构与企业价值”(CX2020120)
北京邮电大学博士生创新基金资助项目:“云计算生态系统中网络结构与企业价值”(2020.05—2022.04)

PDF(1390 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/