科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 72-79.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

国内科技社团研究亟待重塑

孟凡蓉1,陈子韬2,袁梦1,王焕3   

  1. 1.西安交通大学 公共政策与管理学院,陕西 西安710049;
    2.上海交通大学 国际与公共事务学院,上海200030;
    3.中国人民大学 公共管理学院,北京100872
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-12 修回日期:2021-06-01 出版日期:2021-12-20 发布日期:2021-12-17
  • 通讯作者: 陈子韬
  • 基金资助:
    中国科协学服中心研究项目:“国内外科技社团动态发展分析”

Domestic studies on S&T societies need to be reintegrated urgently

Meng Fanrong1, Chen Zitao2, Yuan Meng1, Wang Huan3   

  1. 1. School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi′an Jiaotong University, Xi′an 710049, Shaanxi, China; 
    2. School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; 
    3. School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
  • Received:2020-12-12 Revised:2021-06-01 Online:2021-12-20 Published:2021-12-17

摘要:     科技社团是应对全球化风险的关键力量,也是国家治理与创新体系的重要构成,国内相关研究在经历四十余年发展后已经积累了大量研究成果,亟待梳理和归纳。文章采用系统性文献综述法,从期刊载体、作者机构、研究对象、研究类型、研究内容、理论基础六个方面展现国内科技社团研究现状,结果显示现阶段国内科技社团研究呈现出广而分散的特点,其根本原因则在于研究领域内在核心散乱。为了理顺和整合研究领域的研究内容,文章提出“概念-要素-理论”模型,强调科技社团作为组织的本质属性,以结构、功能、能力、绩效四个关键要素为抓手,深度融合组织理论、治理理论、创新理论。文章指出未来科技社团研究应从三方面着力,包括发挥研究机构和高校的理论优势、加强高质量专业期刊支持、总结实践工作经验和最佳实践。

关键词: 科技社团, 系统性文献综述, 理论模型, 国内研究

Abstract:    S&T societies are a key force to cope with the risks of globalization, and also constitute an integral part of Chinese national governance system and national innovation system. After more than 40 years of development, a large number of relevant domestic studies have been accumulated although the content are fragmented, which need to be sorted out and summarized urgently. Taking 420 related literatures from CAJD as samples, this paper adopted the systematic literature review method to present the current situation of domestic studies  on S&T society from six perspectives, which are carrier of periodicals, institution of author, research object, research type, research content, and theoretical basis. The result indicated that the amount of domestic studies on S&T society published in journals is limited, and the number of papers published in high-level journals is relatively small. As for the institution of the authors, most of the research are produced by a single author or by multiple authors from the same institution, and more than half of the authors come from S&T society itself. In terms of research object, both domestic and foreign S&T society are involved. What′s more, studies on domestic S&T society covered three levels including national, local and individual. In terms of research type, domestic studies on S&T society contains 7 research types, including countermeasures suggestion, theoretical exploration, practical case study, working experience summary, historical review, foreign experience introduction and description of current status. The content of domestic societies on S&T study covers social function, academic function, S&T innovation function, organizational management, organization development, theoretical exposition and related policy. As for the theoretical basis, most domestic studies on S&T society do not rely on specific theories. Besides the commonly used governance theory, other scattered theories such as organization theory, evaluation theory and innovation theory are also adopted. However, high-level journal paper on S&T societies are still lacking which cannot construct a systematic theoretical framework to lead the field. On the other hand, the majority of relevant research are practice-oriented and lack of theoretical basis. The fundamental reason lies in the chaos of the core of the domestic S&T society research field. 
   To solve this problem, we proposed the "concept-element-theory" model to re-integrate related research.First of all, we take the connotation of concept as the core to grasp the essential attribute of S&T society as a specific organization. Second, we take the key elements as starting points such as the structure, function, ability and performance of S&T society. Third, we further integrate the organizational theory, the governance theory and the innovation theory as basic support. 
    Suggestions for the future studies are as follows. First, the research institutions and universities should full play to their theoretical advantages to help clarify the theoretical orientation and promote cross-theory integration. Second, it′s essential to strengthen the support of high-quality professional journals and cultivate to enhance the integration of theory and practice. Third, practitioners need to be encouraged to participate in the research dialogue actively, and more attention should be paid on the selecting and summarizing of the best practice.

Key words: S&T society, systematic literature review, theoretical model, domestic study