知识员工角色压力对生活满意度的影响研究——一个被调节的中介效应模型

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 162-169.

知识员工角色压力对生活满意度的影响研究——一个被调节的中介效应模型

高中华¹, 赵晨²

1. 首都经济贸易大学工商管理学院, 北京 100070;
2. 首都师范大学管理学院, 北京 100089

收稿日期:2013-08-09 修回日期:2015-01-05 出版日期:2015-11-25 发布日期:2015-11-21
通讯作者: 赵晨
作者简介:高中华(1984－),女,山西祁县人,首都经济贸易大学工商管理学院副教授,研究方向:组织行为与人力资源管理.
赵晨(1983－),男,黑龙江佳木斯人,首都师范大学管理学院副教授,研究方向:组织学习与知识分享.
基金资助:
首都经济贸易大学2013年度科研基金项目;国家自然科学基金青年项目(编号:71302170; 71302119,起止时间:2014.01-2016.12);教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(编号:13YJC630036,起止时间:2013.05-2015.12);国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:71572119,起止时间:2016.01-2019.12);国家自然科学基金创新群体项目(编号:71121001; 71421061,起止时间:2012.01-2017.12);北京市优秀人才培养资助项目(编号:2013D005019000002,起止时间:2014.01-2016.12)。

The effect of the knowledge worker's role stress on life satisfaction: A moderated mediation model

Gao Zhonghua¹, Zhao Chen²

1. College of Business Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China;
2. School of Management, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100089, China

Received:2013-08-09 Revised:2015-01-05 Online:2015-11-25 Published:2015-11-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于对528名知识员工的两阶段调查,探讨了角色压力对生活满意度的影响、家庭干涉工作的中介作用以及社会支持的调节作用。层次回归与调节路径分析结果表明:知识员工角色压力对其生活满意度不仅可以产生直接消极影响,而且当社会支持较低时,还会通过家庭干涉工作的完全中介作用产生间接消极影响;该作用机制具体表现为被调节的中介效应,即家庭干涉工作在角色压力与生活满意度之间的中介作用受到社会支持的负向调节,在较高社会支持水平下,家庭干涉工作对生活满意度的影响将不再显著,并且角色压力也不再通过家庭干涉工作的中介作用对生活满意度产生间接影响。

关键词: 知识员工, 角色压力, 家庭干涉工作, 社会支持, 生活满意度

Abstract: This paper explores the effect of knowledge worker's role stress on life satisfaction, the mediating effect of family interference with work and the moderating effect of social support on the mediation of family interference with work based on the data collected from the two-round investigation made to 528 knowledge workers. The results of hierarchical regression and moderated path analysis show that the role stress not only has a direct negative impact on life satisfaction, but also has an indirect negative impact through the full mediating effect of family interference with work when the social support from various sources is at a lower level. This mechanism embodies in a form of the moderated mediation such that social support weakens the mediating effect of family interference with work between role stress and life satisfaction. In other words, family interference with work will no longer have a significant impact on life satisfaction when the social support arrives at a higher level and consequently the mediating effect of family interference with work between role stress and life satisfaction is not significant any more.

Key words: knowledge worker, role stress, family interference with work, social support, life satisfaction

中图分类号:

F272.92

高中华, 赵晨. 知识员工角色压力对生活满意度的影响研究——一个被调节的中介效应模型[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(11): 162-169.

Gao Zhonghua, Zhao Chen. The effect of the knowledge worker's role stress on life satisfaction: A moderated mediation model[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(11): 162-169.

参考文献

[1]彼得·德鲁克. 21世纪的管理挑战[M].北京:机械工业出版社, 2006.Druck P. Management challenges for 21st centuries[M]. Beijing:China Machine Press, 2006. [2]廖建桥,文鹏.知识员工定义、特征及分类研究述评[J].管理学报, 2009, 6(2):277-283.Liao J., Wen P. Review of the study on definition, characters and classification of knowledge worker[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2009, 6(2):277-283. [3] Hobfoll S. E. Conservation of resources:A new attempt at conceptualizing stress[J]. American Psychologist, 1989, 44(3):513-524. [4] Eatough E. M., Chang C. H, Miloslavic S. A., et al. Relationships of role stressors with organizational citizenship behavior:A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2011, 96(3):619-632. [5] Thomas C. H, Lankau M. J. Preventing burnout:The effects of LMX and mentoring on socialization, role stress, and burnout[J]. Human Resource Management, 2009, 48(3):417-432. [6] Halbesleben J. R., Harvey J., Bolino M. C. Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(6):1452-1465. [7] Hobfoll S. E. The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process:Advancing conservation of resources theory[J]. Applied Psychology:An International Review, 2001, 50(3):337-421. [8] Ngo H., Foley S., Loi R. Work role stressors and turnover intentions:A study of professional clergy in Hong Kong[J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2005, 16(11):2133-2146. [9] Doane L. S, Schumm J. A, Hobfoll S. E. The positive, sustaining, and protective power of resources:Insights from conservation of resources theory[M]. Handbook of Social Resource Theory, Springer, 2012, 301-310. [10] Amstad F. T, Meier L. L., Fasel U., et al. A meta-analysis of work-family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations[J]. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2011, 16(2):151-169. [11] Michel JS, Kotrba L M, Mitchelson J K, et al. Antecedents of work-family conflict:A meta-analytic review[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2011, 32(5):689-725. [12]王永丽,何熟珍.工作家庭冲突研究综述:跨文化视角[J].管理评论, 2008, 20(5):21-27. Wang Y., He S. A review of work-family conflict from the cross-cultural perspective[J]. Management Review, 2008, 20(5):21-27. [13] Greenhaus J. H., Collins K. M., Shaw J. D. The relation between work-family balance and quality of life[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2003, 63(3):510-531. [14] Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance[M]. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press, 1957. [15] Michel J. S., Mitchelson J. K., Pichler S., et al. Clarifying relationships among work and family social support, stressors, and work-family conflict[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2010, 76(1):91-104. [16] Ito J. K., Brotheridge C. M. Resources, coping strategies, and emotional exhaustion:A conservation of resources perspective[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2003, 63(3):490-509. [17] Hobfoll S. E., Freedy J., Lane C., et al. Conservation of social resources:Social support resource theory[J]. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1990, 7(4):465-478. [18] Peterson M. F., Smith P. B., Akande A., et al. Role conflict, ambiguity, and overload:A 21-nation study,[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38(2):429-452. [19] Gutek B. A., Searle S., Klepa L. Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, 76(4):560-568. [20] Zimet G. D., Dahlem N. W., Zimet S. G., et al. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support[J]. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1988, 52(1):30-41. [21] Diener E. D., Emmons R A, Larsen R J, et al. The satisfaction with life scale[J]. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985, 49(1):71-75. [22] Ashford S. J., Tsui A. S. Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness:The role of active feedback seeking[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34(2):251-280. [23]温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰等.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报, 2004,36(5):614-620.Wen Z., Zhang L., Hou J., et al. Testing and application of the mediating effects[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2004, 36(5):614-620. [24] Edwards J. R., Lambert L. S. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation:A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis[J]. Psychological Methods, 2007, 12(1):1-22. [25] Hammer L. B., Kossek E. E., Anger W. K., et al. Clarifying work-family intervention processes:The roles of work-family conflict and family-supportive supervisor behaviors[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2011, 96(1):134-150. [26]王永丽,张智宇,何颖.工作-家庭支持对员工创造力的影响探讨[J].心理学报, 2012, 44(12):1651-1662.Wang Y., Zhang Z., He Y. The research on the effects of work-family support on employees' creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(12):1651-1662.