高管团队异质性、战略双元与企业绩效

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 89-97.

高管团队异质性、战略双元与企业绩效

王益民, 王艺霖, 程海东

山东大学管理学院, 山东济南 250100

收稿日期:2014-03-28 修回日期:2015-05-05 出版日期:2015-11-25 发布日期:2015-11-21
作者简介:王益民(1971-),男(汉),山东菏泽人,山东大学管理学院(教授、博导),研究方向:战略管理,跨国公司管理.
王艺霖(1984-),女(汉),山东成武人,山东大学管理学院博士研究生,研究方向:战略管理.
程海东(1988-),男(汉),安徽安庆人,山东大学管理学院硕士研究生,研究方向:国际企业管理.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目"基于协同演化视角的制度转型期企业战略双元性实证研究" (71072110;2011-2013);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-11-0312;2012-2014);山东大学交叉学科培育项目(2014JC042;2014-2016)。

Top management team heterogeneity, strategic ambidexterity and firm performance

Wang Yimin, Wang Yilin, Cheng Haidong

School of Management, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China

Received:2014-03-28 Revised:2015-05-05 Online:2015-11-25 Published:2015-11-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以2008-2011年间医药行业上市公司数据为样本,分别从平衡维度和交互维度实证检验了战略双元与企业绩效之间的关系,并进一步验证了战略双元在高管团队异质性与企业绩效之间的中介效应。研究结果表明:平衡维度与交互维度的战略双元均对企业绩效具有显著影响,说明企业在不同时点上探索——开发两种战略导向交互作用、动态匹配的复杂平衡关系对于企业绩效具有重要意义;同时,平衡维度的战略双元在高管团队教育异质性与企业绩效之间起完全中介作用,在高管团队职业异质性与企业绩效之间起部分中介作用。交互维度的战略双元在高管团队职业异质性与企业绩效之间起完全中介作用。

关键词: 高管团队, 异质性, 战略双元, 企业绩效

Abstract: An empirical analysis is made using the data between 2008 and 2011 based on 68 China's A-share listed companies in the pharmaceutical industry. We analyses the relationship between strategic ambidexterity and firm performance from Balanced Dimension (BD) and Interactive Dimension (ID). The mediating effect of strategic ambidexterity between TMT heterogeneity and firm performance is also tested. The results of the empirical analysis show that strategic ambidexterity (BD) mediates entirely the relationship between top management team (TMT) heterogeneity in education and firm performance, and mediates partially the relationship between TMT heterogeneity in career experience and firm performance. Strategic ambidexterity (ID) mediates entirely the relationship between TMT heterogeneity in career experience and firm performance.

Key words: top management team (TMT), heterogeneity, strategic ambidexterity, firm performance

中图分类号:

F272.3

王益民, 王艺霖, 程海东. 高管团队异质性、战略双元与企业绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(11): 89-97.

Wang Yimin, Wang Yilin, Cheng Haidong. Top management team heterogeneity, strategic ambidexterity and firm performance[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(11): 89-97.

参考文献

[1] Duncan R B. The ambidextrous organization:Designing dual structures for innovation[J]. New York:North Holland, 1976, (1):167-188. [2] O'reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability:Resolving the innovator's dilemma[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2008, 28(1):185-206. [3] Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(7):509-533. [4] Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities:What are they?[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(10-11):1105-1121. [5]武亚军.中国本土新兴企业的战略双重性:基于华为、联想和海尔实践的理论探索[J].管理世界, 2009(12):120-136.Wu Yajun. The strategic duality of China's new domestic entrepreneurial firms:A theoretic exploration based on the practice of the companies-Huawei, Lenovo and Haier[J]. Management World, 2009(12):120-136. [6]王凤彬,陈建勋,杨阳.探索式与利用式技术创新及其平衡的效应分析[J].管理世界, 2012(4):96-112.Wang Fengbin, Chen Jianxun and Yang Yang. An analysis of the effect of the explorative and exploitative innovations and their balance[J]. Management World, 2012(4):96-112. [7]杨学儒,李新春,梁强,李胜文.平衡开发式创新和探索式创新一定有利于提升企业绩效吗?[J].管理工程学报, 2011, 25(4):17-25.Yang Xueru, Li Xinchun, Liang Qiang, Li Shengwen. Are exploratory and exploitative innovations bound to enhance firm performance?[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering/Engineering Management, 2011, 25(4):17-25. [8]罗彪,葛佳佳,王琼.探索型、挖掘型战略选择对组织绩效的影响研究[J].管理学报, 2014, 11(1):37-45.Luo Biao, Ge Jiajia, Wang Qiong. The effect of exploratory and exploitative strategy on firm performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2014, 11(1):37-45. [9] Simsek Z. Organizational ambidexterity:Toward a multilevel understanding[J]. Journal Management Studies, 2009, 46(4):597-624. [10] Raisch S., Birkinshaw J. Organizational ambidexterity:Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators[J]. Journal of Management, 2008, 34(3):375-409. [11] March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1):7l-87. [12] Gupta A. K., Smith K. G., Shalley C. E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(4):693-706. [13] Cao Q. Gedajlovic E. Zhang H. P. Unpacking organizational ambidexterity:Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects[J]. Organization Science, 2009, 20(4):781-796. [14] Hambrick D. C., Mason P. A. The organization as a reflection of its top managers[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2):193-206. [15] Hambrick D. C., Cho T. S., Chen M. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(4):659-684. [16]陈忠卫,常极.高管团队异质性、集体创新能力与公司绩效关系的实证研究[J].软科学, 2009, 23(9):78-83. Chen Zhongwei, Chang Ji. An empirical analysis of the relationship among top management team heterogeneity, innovation capacity and corporate performance[J]. Soft Science, 2009, 23(9):78-83. [17] Smith W. K., Tushman M. L. Managing strategic contradictions:A top management model for managing innovation streams[J]. Organization Science, 2005, 16(5):522-536. [18] Kor Y. Y. Experience-based top management team competence and sustained growth[J]. Organization Science, 2003, 14(6):707-719. [19] Lubatkin M. H., Simsek Z., Ling Y. E. A. Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms:The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration[J]. Journal of Management, 2006, 32(5):646-672. [20] Jansen J. J. P., George G., Van Den Bosch.F A. J. Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity:The moderating role of transformational leadership[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2008, 45(5):982-1007. [21] Carmeli A., Halevi M. Y. How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity:The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2009, 20(2):207-218. [22] Levinthal D. A. Adaptation on rugged landscapes[J]. Management Science, 1997, 43(7):934-950. [23] Coleman J. S. Social capital in the creation of human capital[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1988, 94(S):S95-S120. [24] Burt R. S. Structural holes and good ideas[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2004, 110(2):349-399. [25] Becker M. H. Sociometric location and innovativeness:Reformulation and extension of the diffusion model[J]. American Sociological Review, 1970, 35(2):267-304 [26] He Z. L., Wong P. K. Exploration vs. exploitation:An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(4):481-494. [27] Mom T. J. M., Van Den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Understanding variation in managers' ambidexterity:Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms[J]. Organization Science, 2009, 20(4):812-828. [28] Wadhwa A., Kotha S. Knowledge creation through external venturing:Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(4):819-835. [29] Venkatraman N., Lee.C H., Iyer B. Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth:A longitudinal test in the software sector[Z]. Unpublished Manuscript (earlier version presented at the Academy of Management Meetings, 2005). [30] Srivastava A., Lee H. Predicting order and timing of new product moves:The role of top management in corporate entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2005, 20(4):459-481. [31] Berry S. S. Cocoa, custom and socioeconomic change in rural western nigeria[M]. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1975.