英国服务创新政策分类模式与治理结构的经验启示

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 79-87.

英国服务创新政策分类模式与治理结构的经验启示

张炜, 赵娟

杭州电子科技大学管理学院, 江苏杭州 310018

收稿日期:2014-10-31 修回日期:2014-12-15 出版日期:2015-02-25 发布日期:2015-02-14
作者简介:张炜(1974-), 湖南怀化人, 博士, 教授, 主要研究方向:科技政策与创新管理。
赵娟(1988-), 陕西汉中人, 硕士, 主要研究方向:科技政策与创新管理。
基金资助:
浙江省高校重大人文社科项目(2013GH025, 2014.01-2015.12);“管理科学与工程”浙江省高校人文社科基地项目(ZD02-201402,2014.01-2014.12);浙江省社科规划项目(13ZJQN020YB, 2013.09-2014.12)。

The classification system and governance structure of Britain service innovation policy and its enlightenment to China

Zhang Wei, Zhao Juan

Management School, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China

Received:2014-10-31 Revised:2014-12-15 Online:2015-02-25 Published:2015-02-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文运用结构化案例分析方法, 通过对英国服务创新政策分类模式、治理结构和政策特征的翔实阐述, 以期对我国服务创新政策的制定提供有益借鉴。本研究指出, 英国服务创新政策主要分为供应导向型和需求导向型两类模式, 其形成了多方参与的共享治理模式, 具体特征包括:存在清晰明确、自上而下的决策机制链条;同一层级的部门之间存在横向的协同决策与政策执行;政策效果依赖于自下而上的反馈机制。基于服务创新政策评价清单和政策对比模型, 笔者指出, 我国服务创新政策体系存在三点不足, 即缺乏统一的服务创新治理结构;供应导向型服务创新政策比重过大, 需求导向型服务创新政策显著不足;服务创新政策定位存在偏差。基于此, 本文最终从完善服务创新治理结构、强化需求导向型服务创新政策、明确服务创新政策定位等方面提出了一系列政策性建议。

关键词: 服务创新政策, 分类体系, 治理结构, 经验启示

Abstract: This paper employs structured case analysis method to do detailed description of Britain' service innovation policy categorization model, governance structure and policy characteristics, in order to provide some useful references to the establishment of China' service innovation policy. This study points out that Britain' service innovation policy is mainly divided into two types—supply oriented and demand oriented service innovation policy. Britain' service innovation policy formed multi-participation shared governance model. This model has clear top-down decision-making mechanism chain and lateral collaborative decision-making and policy implementation among different departments of the same hierarchy. Besides, the consequence of policy governance model depends on the bottom-up feedback mechanism. Based on service innovation policy evaluation list and policy comparison model, we point out that three deficiencies exist on our service innovation policy systems: the lack of unified governance structure of service innovation; excessive proportion of supply oriented service innovation policy, and the significant lack of demand oriented service innovation policy; the deviation of service innovation policy positioning. According to above analysis, we finally put forward a series of policy suggestions to complete service innovation governance structure, strengthen demand oriented service innovation policy, and define service innovation policy orientation.

Key words: service innovation policy, classification system, governance structure, experience enlightenment

中图分类号:

G323

张炜, 赵娟. 英国服务创新政策分类模式与治理结构的经验启示[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(2): 79-87.

Zhang Wei, Zhao Juan. The classification system and governance structure of Britain service innovation policy and its enlightenment to China[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(2): 79-87.

参考文献

[1] 邸晓燕,郭铁成.英国企业创新政策的特点和启示[J].科技与法律,2012(1):1-6.Di Xiao-yan,Guo Tie-cheng.The characteristics of britain' enterprise innovation policy and its enlightenment [J].Science technology and law,2012(1):1-6. [2] Roy Rothwell.Public innovation policy:To have or to have not?[J].R&D Management,1986,16(1):25-36. [3] 徐大可,陈劲.创新政策设计的理念和框架[J].国家行政学院学报,2004(4):26-29.Xu Da-ke,Chen Jin.The principle and conceptual framework of innovation policy design[J].Journal of China National School of Administration,2004(4):26-29. [4] 蔺雷,吴贵生.服务创新:研究现状、概念界定及特征描述[J].科研管理,2005(2):1-6.Lin Lei,Wu Gui-sheng.Service innovation:Research summarization,concept and its characters[J].Science Research Management,2005(2):1-6. [5] Henry Ergas.Does technology policy matter?[J].Technology and Global Industry:Companies and Nations in the World Economy,1987:191-245. [6] Jari Kuusisto,Martin Meyer.Insights into services and Innovation in the knowledge-intensive economy[M].[S.l.]:National Technology Agency Tekes,2002. [7] Jakob Edler,Luke Georghiou.Public procurement and innovation—resurrecting the demand side[J].Research Policy,2007,36(7):949-963. [8] 陈向明.提高企业自主创新的财政政策[J].经济研究参考,2007(36):10-11.Chen Xiang-ming.The fiscal policy to improve enterprise independent innovation[J].Review of economic research,2007(36):10-11. [9] 吴家喜,邢小强,吴贵生.基于领先市场的国家创新政策[J].中国科技论坛,2009(5):30-34.Wu Jia-xi,Xing Xiao-qiang,Wu Gui-sheng.The national innovation policy which based on leading market[J].Forum on Science and Technology in China,2009(5):30-34. [10] 常静.重视“需求面”创新政策,完善新时期创新政策体系[C].七届中国科技政策与管理学术年会论文集,2011.Chang Jing.The appreciate of “Demand side” innovation policy,and the improvement of innovation policy system in the new period[C]//The 7th Conference of China Science and Technology Policy and Management' proceedings.2011. [11] 闵京基,潜伟.韩国中小企业技术创新现状与扶持政策[J].科学学研究,2004(6):600-605.Min Jing-ji,Qian Wei.South Korea's SMEs technology innovation status quo and support policy[J].Studies in Science of Science,2004(6):600-605. [12] 张雅娴,苏竣.技术创新政策工具及其在我国软件产业中的应用[J].科研管理,2001(4):65-72.Zhang Ya-xian,Su Jun.Technology innovation policy instrument and its application in software industry in our country[J].Science Research Management,2001(4):65-72. [13] 盛亚,钟涛.浙、苏、沪软件产业发展政策的比较分析——兼谈浙江省软件产业发展的政策建议[J].中国软科学,2008(8):104-109.Sheng Ya,Zhong Tao.The comparative analysis of software industry development policy in Zhejiang,Jiangsu,Shanghai,and discuss policy suggestions on the development of software industry in zhejiang province[J].China Soft Science,2008(8):104-109. [14] 伍蓓,陈劲,王姗姗.科学、技术、创新政策的涵义界定与比较研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(10):68-74.Wu Bei, Chen Jing,Wang Shan-shan.Study on definition and comparative research of science,technology and innovation policy[J].Science of Science and Management of S.&T.,2007(10):68-74. [15] Uwe Cantner,Andreas Pyka.Classifying technology policy from an evolutionary perspective[J].Research Policy,2001,30(5):759-775. [16] Isabel Maria Bodas freitas,Nick Von tunzelmann.Mapping public support for innovation:A comparison of policy alignment in the UK and france[J].Research Policy,2008,37(9):1446-1464. [17] 李春成,和金生.完善我国区域服务业创新的政策体系研究[J].科学学研究,2009(5):721-727.Li Chun-cheng,He Jin-sheng.Study on developing a policy system for regional serivces innovation in China[J].Studies in Science of Science, [18] Charles Edquist.Systems of innovation perspectives and challenges[J].African Journal of Science,Technology,Innovation and Development,2010,2(3):14-45. [19] Gary Marks,Liesbet Hooghe,Kermit Blank.European integration from the 1980s:State-centric V.Multi-level governance[J].JCMS:Journal of Common Market Studies,1996,34(3):341-378. [20] C.Jeffery.Sub-National mobilization and european integration:Does it make any difference?[J].Journal of Common Market Studies,2000,38(1):1-23. [21] Gary Marks,Liesbet Hooghe,Kermit Blank.欧洲一体化与欧盟治理[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2004.Gary Marks,Liesbet Hooghe,Kermit Blank.European integration and EU governance[M].Beijing:China social science press,2004. [22] 李响,蔡靖婧,严广乐.区域科技创新系统的多层次治理——苏格兰的经验与启示[J].自然辩证法研究,2012(2):100-105.Li Xiang,Cai Jing-jing,Yan Guang-le.The multi-level governance of regional science and technology innovation system:Experience and implication from scotland[J].Studies in Dialectics of Nature,2012(2):100-105. [23] The Coalition Government.Innovation and research strategy for growth[EB/OL].2011-12-8.http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/innovation/docs/i/11-1387-innovation-and-research-strategy-for-growth.pdf. [24] 魏江,陶颜,陈俊青.服务创新的实施框架及其实证[J].科研管理,2008(6):52-58.Wei Jiang,Tao Yan,Chen Jun-qing.The empirical study on the implementation framework of service innovation[J].Science Research Management,2008(6):52-58. [25] 张炜,巩键,陈璧辉.欧洲国家的开放式创新政策实践及其经验启示[J].自然辩证法研究,2013(3):52-57.Zhang Wei,Gong Jian,Chen Bi-hui.Open innovation policies and practices in european countries and its enlightenment to China[J].Studies in Dialectics of Nature,2013(3):52-57.