高考少数民族加分政策是针对少数民族考生民族身份的照顾性政策,但由于该政策在实施过程中的效度缺乏分析研究,使得该政策在少数民族增加高等教育机会的获得上作用不明。本文通过对贵州少数民族考生与汉族考生成绩、加分政策效果的对比和分析,得出结论如下:(1)贵州少数民族考生与汉族考生的成绩差距是客观存在的,农村考生中的差距更为明显;(2)少数民族考生在考科的差距上表现出文化选择特性;(3)贵州少数民族加分政策和预科政策对少数民族考生的补偿非常显著。未来的高考改革中,要合理的差别对待城乡少数民族考生间的差距,充分评估涉及高考少数民族的加分政策;考科改革要充分考虑课程的文化属性,即不同考生群体对不同科目的选择性差异。本文还对高考中实现民族间相对公平的努力方向给出了一定基础数据。
Abstract
The policy of awarded points for minority candidates in the national college entrance examination is a policy for the care of the national identityofminority candidates. But due to lack of analysis on the validity of the policy implementation process, the effects of the policy are not obvious to increase higher education opportunities for the minorities. In this paper, by analyzing and comparing the results of scores and awarded points policy between minority candidates and Hancandidates in Guizhou Province, the following findings may be drawn out: (1) Achievement gap between minority candidates and Hancandidates in Guizhouis an objective reality and the disparity is more obvious among ruralcandidates;(2) The gap of minority candidates in examining subjects presents cultural selective features; (3) The awarded points policy and the pre-education policy is very effective to compensate for minority candidates.The future reform on the national college entrance examination should reasonably take different measures for urban and rural minority candidates and assessfully the awarded pints policy for minority candidates. The reform on examining subjects should take full account of the cultural attributes of the curriculum, which means the different candidate groups on the selection of subjects are different.The paper also presents some basic data to achievea relatively faireffortamong different nationalities in the national college entrance examination.
关键词
少数民族 /
高考加分 /
区域性 /
效度 /
公平
Key words
minority ethnic groups /
awarded points inthe national college entrance examination /
regionalism /
validity /
fairness
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 程家福,董美英,李瑛.高考加分政策的异化及治理:资本视角[J].黑龙江高教研究,2011(7):8-11.
[2] 刘晓红.宪政视野下高考加分政策的教育"公平"之辩[J].现代教育管理,2011(2):25-27.
[3] 中华人民共和国教育部. 2012年全国教育事业发展统计公报.教育部门户网站:http://www.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_1485/201308/xxgk_155798.html. 2013-08-16.
[4] 李霞,刘家壮,戎晓霞.高等教育最优投资双层规划模型研究[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(5):102-106.
[5] Li Chunling,Social and Political Changes and Inequality in Educational Opportunities: On the Impact of Family Background and Institutional Factors on Educational Attainment (1940-2001)[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2003,4:62-79.
[6] Li Yu,Lin Hong,Institutional Change and the Generative Mechanisms of Educational Inequality: Educational Attainment for Urban Children in China (1966-2003)[J]. Social Sciences in China,2007,1:72-81.
[7] 龙耀海.关于我国高考民族加分政策的思考[J].民族论坛,2010(9):I0010-I0011.
[8] 甲任,黄辛建.少数民族高考加分制度的历史合理性——以少数民族科举照顾政策为视角[J].前沿,2011(23):224-226.
[9] 肖伟颜.高考加分政策该不该取消[J].大观周刊,2012(6):278.
[10] 乔一.浅析新时期我国少数民族高考加分政策的公正性[J].时代报告(下半月),2012(6):142.
[11] 宗玉蓉,田园,陈敏华.少数民族学生高考加分政策存在的问题及对策[J].江苏高教,2010(1):152-153.
[12] 何晓知.我国高考加分政策的问题与建言[J].求索,2011(5):174-176.
[13] 崔华华,方美.对我国高考加分政策的理性分析及思考[J].高教探索,2010(3):82-86.
[14] 田恒平.加分:一项让人爱恨交加的高考政策[J].齐鲁学刊,2010(5):100-104.
[15] 颜色盛,李美霞.分省录取模式下高考少数民族加分政策探析[J].中国考试,2012(7):54-59.
[16] 张玲.对少数民族考生高考加分政策的思考——积极的视角[J].中国考试,2012(7):60-64.
[17] 舒海兵,叶五一,李熠熠,缪柏其.非实验数据政策效应评估理论与实证研究方法[J].中国管理科学,2007(6):140-148.
[18] James E. Anderson,Public Policy—Making[M]. OLrlando,Florida:holt,Rinehart and Winston,Inc. 1984:84.
[19] 王巍.基于科学发展观的政府领导绩效评价方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2006(z1):546-550.
[20] 王国顺,张仕璟.基于问卷调查的企业文化测量模型改进及实证分析[J].中国管理科学,2005(z1):605-610.
[21] 杨文国,黄钧,池宏,祁明亮.信息缺失下的应急方案选择模型及算法研究[J].中国管理科学,2007(z1):729-732.
[22] 黄逸宇.从美国实践看高等教育权利的平等化[J].凤凰周刊,2010(33).
[23] 段拉卡.高考加分:规范胜于取消[J].教育与职业,2012(16):3.
[24] 王升云.坚持和完善高考少数民族加分政策[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2012,32(1):22-27.
[25] 冯菊香,郝琦.高考加分政策对西部教育发展的负效应[J].探索与争鸣,2009(8):64-66.
[26] 金东海,王爱兰.关于我国少数民族学生高考优惠招生政策若干问题的思考[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2007,44(1):84-88.
[27] 何龙."高考加分很公平"是一种错位判断.羊城晚报(A2版),2011-9-23.
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(11YJA880114)。
