网络位置、知识搜索与创新绩效的关系研究—基于全球制造网络与本地集群网络集成的观点

科研管理 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 18-26.

网络位置、知识搜索与创新绩效的关系研究—基于全球制造网络与本地集群网络集成的观点

胡保亮, 方刚

杭州电子科技大学管理学院, 浙江杭州 310037

收稿日期:2011-10-18 修回日期:2012-06-10 出版日期:2013-11-13 发布日期:2013-11-13
基金资助:
浙江省自然科学基金项目"全球制造网络中的浙江中小企业渐进性创新动态演化研究"(编号:Y6110298),起止时间:2011.01-2013.12;浙江省高校人文社科重点研究基地"决策科学与创新管理"项目"全球制造网络中的浙江中小企业渐进性创新与战略转型研究"(编号:RWSKZD02-201001),起止时间:2010.10-2013.09。

Network position, knowledge search, and innovation performance：Based on the perspective of global manufacturing network and local cluster network integration

Hu Baoliang, Fang Gang

School of Management, Hangzhou University of Electron Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310037, China

Received:2011-10-18 Revised:2012-06-10 Online:2013-11-13 Published:2013-11-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文采用全球制造网络与本地集群网络集成视角,提出了网络位置、知识搜索、创新绩效三者之间关系的理论假设;通过问卷调查收集我国173家企业数据并应用层次回归分析方法对这些假设进行了检验。研究发现:全球制造网络位置能够通过知识搜索(搜索宽度和搜索深度)的中介作用对创新绩效产生正向影响。研究同时发现本地集群网络位置对全球制造网络位置具有补充效应:能与全球制造网络位置一起对知识搜索具有显著的正向影响;在全球制造网络位置通过搜索深度影响创新绩效的机制中发挥正向调节作用。文章最后还探讨了本研究的理论贡献与管理启示,以及未来研究方向。

关键词: 网络位置, 知识搜索, 创新绩效, 全球制造网络, 本地集群网络

Abstract: Based on the perspective of the integration of Global Manufacturing Network (GMN) and Local Cluster Network (LCN), the hypotheses of relationship among network position, knowledge search, and innovation performance are proposed, and these hypotheses are tested by using hierarchical multiple regressions analysis with data collected from 173 firms. The results show that the scope and depth of knowledge search play the mediative roles in the relationship between GMN position and innovation performance. The results also suggest that LCN position has a supplement effect on the GMN position, namely together with GMN position, it has a positive impact on knowledge search with GMN position; it plays a moderative role in the impact of GMN position on innovation performance through the search depth. Finally, the theoretical contributions, management implications, and research suggestions are discussed.

Key words: network position, knowledge search, innovation performance, GMN, LCN

中图分类号:

F270

胡保亮, 方刚. 网络位置、知识搜索与创新绩效的关系研究—基于全球制造网络与本地集群网络集成的观点[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(11): 18-26.

Hu Baoliang, Fang Gang. Network position, knowledge search, and innovation performance：Based on the perspective of global manufacturing network and local cluster network integration[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, 34(11): 18-26.

参考文献

[1] Tsai, W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(5):996-1004.
[2] Wasserman, S., Faust, K. Social network analysis: Methods and applications[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[3] Kim, C., Park, J.H. The global research-and-development network and Its effect on innovation[J]. Journal of International Marketing, 2010,18(4):43-57.
[4] Pérez-Nordtvedt, L., Babakus, E., Kedia, B. L. Learning from international business affiliates: developing resource-based learning capacity through networks and knowledge acquisition[J]. Journal of International Management, 2010(16):262-274.
[5] 钱锡红,杨永福,徐万里. 企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效—一个交互效应模型[J]. 管理世界,2010(5):118-129.
[6] 王晓娟.知识网络与集群企业创新绩效--浙江黄岩模具产业集群的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2008,26(4):874-879,867.
[7] Chesbrough, H. Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape[M]. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2006.
[8] Kaisa, H., Paavo, R., Tiina, J. Exploring open search strategies and their impact on innovation performance[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2011, 15(3):525-541.
[9] Katila, R., Ahuja, G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(6):1183-1194.
[10] Laursen, K., Salter, A. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(2):131-150.
[11] Malecki, E.J. Connecting local entrepreneurial ecosystems to global innovation networks: Open innovation, double networks and knowledge integration[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation Management, 2011, 14(1):36-59.
[12] Salman, N., Saives, A. Indirect networks: an intangible resource for biotechnology innovation[J]. R&D Management, 2005, 35(2):203-215.
[13] Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Van den Oord, A. Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density[J]. Research Policy, 2008(37):1717-1731.
[14] Szulanski, G. Exploring stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996(17):27-43.
[15] Pillai, K.G. Networks and competitive advantage: a synthesis and extension[J]. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 2006(14):129-145.
[16] Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., Van den Oord, A. Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity[J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(7):1016-1034.
[17] Burt, R. S. Structural holes and good ideas[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2004, 110(2): 349-399.
[18] Cohen, W., Levinthal, D.A. Absorptive capability: A new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1):128-152.
[19] Freeman, L.C. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification[J]. Social Networks, 1979(1):215-239.
[20] Bonacich, P. Power and centrality: A family of measures[J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 1987(92):1170-1182.
[21] Alegrea, J., Chiva, R. Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test[J]. Technovation, 2008(28):315-326.
[22] Yang, M.L., Wang, A.M.L., Cheng, K.C. The impact of quality of IS information and budget slack on innovation performance[J]. Technovation, 2009(29):527-536.