动态能力理论认为环境复杂性导致更多的企业采取学习导向战略改进现有能力获得绩效的持续提升。然而,大多数研究忽视了学习导向战略与绩效间关系的中间路径与作用机制研究。因此,本研究首先对学习导向战略、IT能力和组织绩效间的关系进行探索性研究,接着以IT能力为中介变量,构建并验证了三者之间的关系。运用SPSS软件检验的模型验证显示,IT能力在学习导向战略和组织绩效间扮演了部分中介功能,学习导向战略对IT能力和组织绩效有显著正向影响,IT能力各个构面对组织绩效有不同程度的正效应。最后,建议企业可以通过在组织内部实施学习导向战略构建信息技术能力从而促进知识的传播、吸收与内化,差异化产品以快速响应顾客的需求,最终改进与提升组织绩效。
Abstract
As environments become increasingly complex, the theory of dynamic capabilities considers that a firm could adopt learning-orientated strategy for performance sustainability. However, majority researches neglect the mediative path and affective mechanism in the relationship between learning-orientated strategy and performance. By reviewing relevant literature, IT capability is considered as a mediator variable, and then the relationship between learning-orientated strategy and performance is built and testified. On the basis of a large-scale questionnaire investigation and empirical research using the software of SPSS, it is concluded that IT capability partially plays the mediative role between learning-orientated strategy and performance. Moreover, the learning-orientated strategy has a significantly positive effect on IT capability and organizational performance. Each aspect of IT capability has a positive effect on organizational performance with different degree. The findings indicate that business firms should implement learning-orientated strategy inside of organization to build IT capability, to push knowledge dissemination and absorption, to differentiate the product in response to customer needs, and finally to improve and raise organizational performance
关键词
动态能力 /
学习导向战略 /
IT能力 /
组织绩效
Key words
dynamic capability /
learning-orientated strategy /
IT capability /
organizational performance
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 焦豪,魏江和崔瑜.企业动态能力构建路径分析: 基于创业导向和组织学习的视角[J]. 管理世界,2008(4):91-106.
[2] Day, G. S. The Capabilities of Market-driven Organizations [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1994, 58(4): 93-123.
[3] Sinkula, J. M. Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning [J].Journal of Marketing, 1994, 58(1): 35-45.
[4] Roger, J. C., Tamer, S. C. and Zhao. Y. S. Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance [J].Industrial Marketing Management, 2002, 31: 515-524.
[5] Slater, S. F. and Narver, J. C. Market Orientation and The Learning Organization [J].Journal of Marketing, 1995, 59(3):63- 74.
[6] Hurley, R. F. and Hult, G. T. M. Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: an Integration and Empirical Examination [J].Journal of Marketing, 1998, 62: 42-54.
[7] Teece, D. J. Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: the Nature and Micro-foundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(4): 1319-1350.
[8] Muhanna, W. A. and Stoel, M. D. How Do Investors Value IT? An Empirical Investigation of the Value Relevance of IT Capability and IT Spending Across Industries [J]. Journal of Information Systems, 2010, 24(1): 43-66.
[9] Tippins, M. J. and Sohi, R. S. IT Competences and Firm Performance: IS Organizational Learning a Missing Link [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24: 745-761.
[10] Argyris, C.& Schon, D. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective[M].Reading, M.A: Addison-Wesley, l978.
[11] Yetton, P. W., Johnston, K. D. and Craig, C. F. Computer-aided Architects: A Case Study of Information Technology and Strategic Change[J].Sloan Management Review,1994, 35(4): 57-67.
[12] Anand V, Manz C.and Glick W.An Organizational Memory Approach to Information Management [J].Academy of Management Review.1998, 23(4): 796-809.
[13] Barney, J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage [J].Journal of Management, 1991, l7 (1): 99-120.
[14] Feeny, D. and Willcocks, L. P. Core IS Capabilities for Exploiting Information Technology [J]. Sloan Management Review, 1998, 39(3): 9-21.
[15] Ross, J. W., Beath, C. M. and Goodhue, D. L. Develop Long-term Competitiveness Through IT Assets [J]. Sloan Management Review, 1996, 38(1): 31-42.
[16] Man, Z. Information Technology Capability, Organizational Culture, and Export Performance [D]. Doctoral dissertation, Washington State University, 2005.
[17] Bharadwaj, A. S. A Resource-based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation [J].MIS Quarterly, 2000, 24, (1): 169-196.
[18] Neo, B. Factors Facilitating The Use of Information Technology for Competitive Advantage: An Exploratory Study[J].Information and Management,1988,15(3): 191-201.
[19] Henderson, J. C.& Venkatraman, N. Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations[J]. IBM Systems Journal, 1999, 38(2/3): 472-484.
[20] Broadbent,M. and Weill, P. Improving Business and Information Strategy Alignment: Learning From the Banking Industry [J]. IBM Systems Journal, 1993, 32 (1): 162-179.
[21] Boone, T. and Ganeshan, R. The Effect of Information Technology on Learning in Professional Service Organizations [J], Journal of Operations Management, 2001, 19: 485-495.
[22] Podsakoff, P.M. and Organ, D.W. Self-reported in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects [J], Journal of Management, 1986, 12(4): 531-544.
[23] Bharadwaj, A. S., Bharadwaj, S. G. and Been, R. K. Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin’s q [J]. Management Science, 1999, 45(7): 1008-1024.
[24] Baron R. and Kenny D. The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Consideration [J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173- 1182.
[25] Baker, W. B. and Sinkula, J. M. The Synergistic Effect of Market Orientation and Learning Orientation on Organizational Performance [J].Academy of Marketing Science, 1999, 27(4): 411-427.
基金
国家自然科学基金研究项目(编号:71202029,起止时间:2013-2015;编号:71202150,起止时间:2013-2015;编号:71173191,起止时间:2012-2015);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(编号:12YJC630076,起止时间:2012-2014;编号:11YJC630036,起止时间:2011-2013);北京市哲学社会科学规划项目(11JGC120,起止时间:2011-2013);北京市人才强教深化计划项目(PHR201107219)。
PDF(848 KB)
