知识产权保护宽度、企业研发投资与社会福利

赵旭梅

科研管理 ›› 2013 ›› Issue (7) : 87-92.

PDF(922 KB)
PDF(922 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2013 ›› Issue (7) : 87-92.
论文

知识产权保护宽度、企业研发投资与社会福利

  • 赵旭梅
作者信息 +

The protection scope of intellectual property right, enterprise R&D investment, and social welfare

  • Zhao Xumei
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

知识产权保护宽度是激励创新企业开展研发投资的主要政策工具,它通过影响知识产权的盈利能力与获取成本,作用于研发企业和受让企业之间的知识产权交易。构建一个两企业、能力非对称的多阶段博弈模型,进行一般均衡分析,结果表明:只有在研发企业的投资支出达到一定规模后,增加保护宽度,才能提高企业收益,激励企业增加研发投资。在既定研发投资下,保护宽度的边际增加将提高技术转让成本,降低受让企业收益和社会福利水平;这一负面效果只有在实现研发投资扩张效应后,才能减缓。因此在增加保护宽度的同时,需要引入辅助措施,如对企业的研发投资采取税收优惠政策、促进企业间知识产权交易等加以协调。

Abstract

The protection scope of IPR is the primary policy tool for stimulating innovative enterprises to invest in R&D. It exerts an influence on the IPR transaction between transferor and transferee enterprises by affecting the acquisition cost and profitability of IPR. A multi-stage game model of two enterprises with asymmetrical abilities is built and general balanced analysis is conducted. Results show that expanding protection scope of IPR is able to raise enterprise income and stimulate enterprises to invest more on R&D only if the initial R&D investment reaches at a certain scale. Under the established R&D investment, expanding IPR protection scope margin would increase the cost of technology transfer, boosting profit for the transferor, meanwhile decreasing profit for the transferee and bringing the negative influence on social welfare. The negative side effect would be mitigated only after the distensible effect of R&D investment is achieved. Therefore, while expanding the protection scope of IPR, the auxiliary measures, such as preferential taxation policy for enterprise R&D investment and IPR trade promotion among enterprises, should also be introduced.

关键词

知识产权保护宽度 / 知识产权盈利 / 研发投资支出 / 企业预期收益 / 总社会福利水平

Key words

IPR protection scope / IPR earning / R&D investment / enterprise expected income / total social welfare level

引用本文

导出引用
赵旭梅. 知识产权保护宽度、企业研发投资与社会福利[J]. 科研管理. 2013(7): 87-92
Zhao Xumei. The protection scope of intellectual property right, enterprise R&D investment, and social welfare[J]. Science Research Management. 2013(7): 87-92
中图分类号: F204   

参考文献

[1] Scotchmer,Suzann著,刘勇译.创新与激励[M].上海人民出版社.2010:32. [2] Richard R. Nelson etc..How medical know-how progresses in SMEs[J].Research Policy.2011, 40(10):1339-1344. [3] Nordhaus,W. D.. Invention, Growth, and Welfare: A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change [R]. MIT Press. 1969:70-90. [4] Merges, R. and R. Nelson. On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope[J]. Columbia Law Review.1990, 90:839-916. [5] V. Denicolo. Two-stage Patent Races and Patent Policy[J]. RAND Journal of Economics.2000, 31(3):488 -501 [6] Scotchmer, Suzanne. The Political Economy of Intellectual Property Treaties[J].Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 2004,20(2):415-437. [7] 潘士远.最优专利制度研究[J].经济研究.2005(12):56. [8] O. Donoghue, T. and J. Zweim?ller. Patents in a Model of Endogenous Growth[J]. Journal of Economic Growth. 2004, 9:81-123. [9] Grossman,G..&E. Lai. International Protection of Intellectual Property: Corrigendum[J].American Economic Review. 2006, l96(1):456. [10] Gallini,N. and Scotchmer,S. Intellectual Property: When is it the Best Incentive System? [R].MIT Press.2001. [11] 任宗强等.企业内外创新网络协同演化与能力提升[J].科研管理,2011(9):7-1.

基金

北京市社科基金项目(12JGB072);教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(11YJC790298)。


PDF(922 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/