本研究开发了一套针对创新政策中利益相关者分析的政策量化方法与工具,以京、沪、浙、粤与苏五地区域创新政策为样本开展了量化分析。研究结果显示,五区域创新政策中利益相关者分布结构呈多样化、完备化的特点,其核心利益相关者为股东、竞争者;五区域政策中,利益相关者在"利益-权力"结构上表现出利益与权力的普遍不对称,重利益轻权力现象显著;基于分布结构与内容结构的聚类分析结果与以往理论成果的进一步对比显示,多数利益相关者群体存在政策体现与理论预期的不契合。区域间量化结果对比为区域创新政策趋同化的论断提供了支持。
Abstract
A set of innovation policy quantitative methods and tools for analyzing stakeholders in innovation policy is developed, and then the methods and tools are put into practice for quantitatively analyzing the regional innovation policies of Beijing, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Guangdong, and Jiangsu, and several results are obtained as follows: Firstly, the distribution structure of stakeholders of innovation policies in these five regions is diversified and comprehensive, and the main bodies are shareholders and competitors. Secondly, the interest-power structure of stakeholders presents a universally unsymmetrical, and the regional innovation policy attaches more importance to interest rather than power significantly. Thirdly, based on the results of cluster analysis of distribution structure and content structure, some gaps between the presence of regional innovation policy and theoretical expectation are found. Finally, the contrast between the regional innovation policy quantitative results provides a supports for the thesis of regional innovation policy assimilation from stakeholder perspective.
关键词
区域创新政策 /
利益相关者 /
分布结构 /
"利益-权力"结构
Key words
regional innovation policy /
stakeholder /
distribution structure /
interest-power structure
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 盛亚.企业技术创新管理:利益相关者方法 [M].上海: 光明日报出版社,2009.
[2] 盛亚,单航英.利益相关者与企业技术创新绩效关系:基于高度平衡型利益相关者的实证研究 [J].科研管理, 2008,29(6): 30-35.
[3] Vedung E. Public policy and program evaluation[M]. Transaction Pub.,2000.
[4] 李瑛,康德颜,齐二石.政策评估的利益相关者模式及其应用研究[J].科研管理,2006,27(2): 51-56.
[5] 王瑞祥.政策评估的理论,模型与方法[J].预测, 2003,22(03): 6-11.
[6] 詹·法格博格,兰德维尔等.牛津创新手册(中文版)[M].北京: 知识产权出版社,2009.
[7] Rothwell R. and W. Zegveld. Reindusdalization and Technology[M]. Logman Group limited.,1985.
[8] Bodas Freitas, I.M. and N. Von Tunzelmann. Mapping public support for innovation: A comparison of policy alignment in the UK and France[J].Research Policy.2008.37(9): 1446-1464.
[9] 陈劲,王飞绒.创新政策: 多国比较和发展框架 [M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2005.
[10] Freeman, R.E.Strategic management: A stakeholder approach [J]. Boston:Pitman, 1984.46.
[11] Elias, A.A., R.Y. Cavana and L.S. Jackson. Stakeholder analysis for R&D project management[J]. R&D Management, 2002. 32(4): 301-310.
[12] 刘凤朝,孙玉涛.我国科技政策向创新政策演变的过程,趋势与建议—基于我国289 项创新政策的实证分析[J].中国软科学, 2007(005): 34-42.
[13] 利贝卡普加里等. 产权合同中的分配问题 [M].上海:三联出版社,1994.
[14] 彭纪生,仲为国,孙文祥.政策测量、政策协同演变与经济绩效:基于创新政策的实证研究[J].管理世界, 2008(09):25-36.
[15] 张雅娴,苏竣.技术创新政策工具及其在我国软件产业中的应用[J].科研管理, 2001,22(004): 65-72.
[16] Lipsey, M.W. and D.B. Wilson, Practical meta-analysis[M]. Sage Publications Inc.,2001.
[17] Flanagan, K., E. Uyarra and M. Laranja, Reconceptualising the ’policy mix’ for innovation [J].Research Policy. 2011. 40(5): 702-713.
[18] 赵修卫.现代科技创新政策发展的四个特点[J].科学学研究, 2007,24(6): 895-900.
基金
浙江省自然科学基金《创新网络的政策重构及其激励机制研究:利益相关者方法》(Y7100740);国家自然科学基金《CoPS创新的风险生成机理及控制策略研究:利益相关者网络视角》(71272142)。
PDF(912 KB)
