预期理论着眼于减少后续发明竞赛中的重复投入,主张宽的专利宽度。发明竞赛理论与预期理论针锋相对,认为窄的专利宽度可以激励后续发明竞赛。租金耗散理论则提出了被预期理论所忽视的问题,即宽专利诞生前的发明竞赛同样导致专利租金耗散。本文认为,预期理论虽然曾一度主导着对专利宽度的研究、甚至主导了一些国家的专利政策,对专利宽度的研究要引入新的变量和新的视角,才能寻得促进新兴技术领域创新的最佳专利宽度。
Abstract
In order to reduce the repetitive investment in the competition for subsequent improvements to the patented technology, the prospect theory implies that widening patents scope is necessary for the initial inventors. On the contrary, the post-invention competition theory suggests that narrowing patent scope could retain more incentives for subsequent improvements. Rent dissipation theory proposes that invention competition prior to the granting of broad patents would probably result in rent dissipation; it has not been paid the adequate attention by prospect theory. It is suggested that although prospect theory has dominated the academic research on patent scope as well as patent policy in some countries, new factors and perspectives should be considered for pursuing optimal patent scope in order to promote the innovation in the new fields of technology.
关键词
专利宽度 /
预期理论 /
发明竞赛 /
租金耗散 /
后续创新
Key words
patent scope /
prospect theory /
invention competition /
rent dissipation /
subsequent innovation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Yoram Barzel. Optimal timing of innovation [J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1968,50(3):348-355.
[2] Edmund W. Kitch. The nature and function of the patent system [J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1977, 20(2):265-290.
[3] 伊利奇·考夫.专利制度经济学[M].柯瑞豪,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005:3-5.
[4] Robert P. Merges, Richard R. Nelson. On the complex economics of patent scope [J]. Columbia Law Review, 1990,90(4):839-916.
[5] 张卫东,童睿.租值消散理论述评[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,38(3):44-48.
[6] Mark F. Grady, Jay I. Alexander. Patent law and rent dissipation [J]. Virginia Law Review, 1992, 78: 305-350.
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"专利权本质论",审批编号09YJA820003,起止时间为2009年11月30日至2012年12月31日;专利"法定不侵权"抗辩——以北京司法实践为中心,北京市哲学社会科学规划项目(审批编号:10AbFX096)