本文就海峡两岸德温特专利数据库中的纳米专利数据,从时间、专利权人、分类代码和学科类别方面对两岸的纳米专利进行了统计分析比较;之后,结合时间轴上的专利手工代码共现网络,从频数、中介中心度的角度量化了两岸纳米专利研究的侧重点。进而从两岸技术演进的角度初步剖析了二者发展的差异,并就时下两岸发展的研究前沿进行了论证。最后,结合两岸的发展状况,提出了从四个方面完善两岸纳米产业发展的建议。
Abstract
First, the nano-patent of both sides of the Taiwan Strait is retrieved with subject term search in Derwent Innovation Index (DII), and then a comparison from the distribution of time, assignee, class code, and subject category is made. After that, through Derwent manual code co-occurrence analysis on the time zone, the special emphasis of Taiwan and Mainland China is distinguished with the indicators of manual codes’ frequency and centrality. Furthermore, in the perspective of technology evolution, the development divergence is described and the lately research front of both sides of the Taiwan Strait is revealed by empirical research, in which Taiwan’s focus is touch screen (t04-f02a2) and Mainland China’s concern is oxyethylene co-polymers (a05-h03). At last, four countermeasures are indicated from the standpoint of long term collaboration.
关键词
专利定量分析 /
纳米专利 /
专利手工代码共现 /
发展对策
Key words
patentometrics /
nano-patent /
patent manual code co-occurrence /
development strategy
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Alencar M, Porter A L, Antunes A. Nanopatenting patterns in relation to product life cycle[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2007, 74(9): 1661-1680.
[2] Roco M C. International perspective on government nanotechnology funding in 2005[J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2005, 7(6): 707-712.
[3] Baker S, Aston A. The business of nanotech[J]. Business Week. 2005, 14: 64-71.
[4] WIPO. Patent report 2009 - Statistics on worldwide patent activities[M]. Geneva, World Intellectual Property Organization Press, 2009.
[5] Porter A, Newman N. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research[M]. Berlin, Springer, 2005.
[6] Abraham B P, Moitra S D. Innovation assessment through patent analysis[J]. Technovation. 2001, 21(4): 245-252.
[7] Iversen E J. An excursion into the patent-bibliometrics of Norwegian patenting[J]. Scientometrics. 2000, 49(1): 63-80.
[8] Jaffe A B, Trajtenberg M, Fogarty M S. Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors[J]. American Economic Review. 2000, 18(5): 215-218.
[9] Lee J. Heterogeneity, brokerage, and innovative performance: endogenous formation of collaborative inventor networks[J]. Organization Science. 2010, 21(4): 804-822.
[10] Hegde D, Sampat B. Examiner citations, applicant citations, and the private value of patents[J]. Economics Letters. 2009, 105(3): 287-289.
[11] Agrawal A, Kapur D, Mchale J. How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data[J]. Journal of Urban Economics. 2008, 64(2): 258-269.
[12] Yoon B, Phaal R, Probert D. Morphology analysis for technology roadmapping: application of text mining[J]. R&D Management. 2008, 38(1): 51-63.
[13] Risov M, Kasravi K. Patent Mining-Discovery of Business Value from Patent Repositories. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawii: IEEE Press. 2007:1-10.
[14] Marinova D, Mcaleer M. Nanotechnology strength indicators: international rankings based on US patents[J]. Nanotechnology. 2003, 14: R1-R7.
[15] Hullmann A, Meyer M. Publications and patents in nanotechnology[J]. Scientometrics. 2003, 58(3): 507-527.
[16] Schummer J. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology[J]. Scientometrics. 2004, 59(3): 425-465.
[17] Tolles W M. Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology [M]. Arlington, NSF Press, 2001.
[18] Huang Z, Chen H, Yip A, et al. Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: Country, institution and technology field[J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2003, 5(3): 333-363.
[19] Porter A L, Youtie J, Shapira P, et al. Refining search terms for nanotechnology[J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2008, 10(5): 715-728.
[20] Kostoff R N, Stump J A, Johnson D, et al. The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature[J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2006, 8(3): 301-321.
[21] Chunjuan L, Yue C, Tianxia B. Patentometric study of global academies. 4th International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & 9th COLLNET Meeting. Berlin: Humboldt-Universit?t zu Berlin. 2008: 1-6.
[22] 王小晓,丁堃. 高速列车寿命预测技术专利计量分析[J]. 科技管理研究. 2010, 30(4): 212-215.
[23] Chen C. Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2004, 101(Suppl 1): 5303-5310.
[24] Chen C. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2006, 57(3): 359-377.
[25] Kleinberg J. Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams[J]. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 2003, 7(4): 373-397.
[26] 高继平,丁堃,刘宇等. 知识基础与前沿载文间的知识流动分析[J]. 情报杂志. 2009, 28(10): 98-102.
[27] 宋华,崔大祥,贺蓉等. 聚氧乙烯-聚氧丙烯-聚氧乙烯共聚物羧基化方法. 中国专利:CN200810038537.1, 2008-06-05.
基金
国家社会科学基金(08BTQ025,2009.01-2011.12);中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目(851003,2010.07-2012.07);中央高校基本科研业务费重大项目(851014,2010.07-2012.07)。
PDF(1100 KB)
