专利竞争优势与加速化陷阱现象的实证研究 —基于中国上市公司专利与盈余关系的考察

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. ›› Issue (6): 83-91.

专利竞争优势与加速化陷阱现象的实证研究 —基于中国上市公司专利与盈余关系的考察

徐欣¹, 唐清泉²

1. 中南财经政法大学会计学院, 湖北武汉 430073;
2. 中山大学管理学院, 广东广州 510275

收稿日期:2010-07-04 修回日期:2011-06-15 出版日期:2012-06-27 发布日期:2012-06-20
通讯作者: 徐欣(1980-),男(汉),湖北武汉人,博士;中南财经政法大学会计学院讲师,研究方向:财务理论与会计控制,企业创新投资与风险管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目《我国企业R&D创新投入的风险与有效性研究》(70772084)和广东省普通高校人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目《企业研发创新的激励机制研究——技术进步与产业提升的实现途径》(09JDXM79001)的研究成果。

The competitive advantage and acceleration trap of patents:Based on the relationship between patents and earnings of Chinese listed companies

Xu Xin¹, Tang Qingquan²

1. School of Accounting, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China;
2. School of Business, SUN YAT-SEN University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Received:2010-07-04 Revised:2011-06-15 Online:2012-06-27 Published:2012-06-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文在对我国上市公司专利数量和行业分布刻画的基础上,通过考察专利与会计盈余之间的关系,检验了专利竞争优势和加速化陷阱两种理论。研究发现,在2000年之后,上市公司的专利呈现快速增长的良好趋势,但是专利的行业分布并不均匀,主要集中在少数几个行业,这反映出我国企业技术创新能力发展的不平衡;总体而言,专利与盈余显著正相关,即专利竞争优势理论在我国大体成立,但是部分行业存在着加速化陷阱的现象,这些行业中数量激增的专利不能提高企业绩效;企业当期新增专利和存量专利对盈余有着不同的影响,新增专利对盈余有显著正向影响,而存量专利则不然,即我国专利存在经济时效。本文的结论为研究企业专利价值提供了新的视角和证据,并为国家深化企业自主创新和完善专利制度建设提供了决策依据和政策建议。

关键词: 专利, 会计盈余, 专利竞争优势, 加速化陷阱

Abstract: On the basis of the patents quantities of Chinese listed companies and industry distribution of patents, a relationship between patents and earnings is empirically analyzed to test the two theories of patent competitive advantage and acceleration trap. It is found that the number of patents of listed companies have a rapid growth after 2000. However, patents distribute unevenly in every industry, they mainly concentrate on a few industry. The fact indicates that the technology innovation ability of Chinese companies has an unbalance developed. Overall, there is a positive and significant relationship between patents and earnings. That means the theory of patent competitive advantage generally holds in China. But there are some phenomena of acceleration trap in some industries. The rapid growth of patents in these industries does not create the value for the enterprises. The incremental patents and patents stock have different effects on earnings. The incremental patents have positive and significant effects on earnings. However for the patents stock, it is not the case. Therefore, there is an economic limitation of patents in China. The conclusion provides the new perspective and evidence for patents value. Some valuable suggestions and decision-making basis for enterprise independent innovation and the development of the patent system are put forward.

Key words: patent, earning, competitive advantage of patent, acceleration trap

中图分类号:

徐欣, 唐清泉. 专利竞争优势与加速化陷阱现象的实证研究 —基于中国上市公司专利与盈余关系的考察[J]. 科研管理, 2012, (6): 83-91.

Xu Xin, Tang Qingquan. The competitive advantage and acceleration trap of patents:Based on the relationship between patents and earnings of Chinese listed companies[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, (6): 83-91.

参考文献

[1] Hamel, G., and C.K. Prahalad. Competing for the future [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1994, 72(4): 122－128.
[2] Dosi, G. Source, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation [J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 1988, 26(3): 1120－1171.
[3] 克里斯托夫-弗里德里克·冯·布朗. 创新之战[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 1999: 65－113.
[4] Gayle. Philip G. Market concentration and innovation: new empirical evidence on the Schumpeterian hypothesis [J]. Working Paper, University of Colorado, 2001.
[5] Cockburn, I., and Z. Griliches. Industry effects and appropriability measure in the stock market’s valuation of R&D and patents [J]. American Economic Review, 1988, 78: 419－23.
[6] Griliches, Z. Productivity, R&D and basic research at the firm level in the 1970s [J]. American Economic Review, 1986, 76(6): 141－154.
[7] Phillips, K., and J. Wrase. Is Schumpeterian"creative destruction"a plausible source of endogenous real business cycle shocks? [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2006, 30(11): 1885－1913.
[8] Barney, J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 8: 169－182.
[9] Grant, R.M. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation [J]. California Management Review, 1991, 33(3): 115－135.
[10] Scherer, F. M., and D. Harhoff. Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes [J]. Research Policy,2000, 29(4-5): 559－566.
[11] Griliches, Z. Market value, R&D and patents [J]. Economic Letters, 1981, 7: 183－87.
[12] Bloom, N., and J. V. Reenen. Patents, real options and firm performance [J]. The Economic Journal, 2002, 112: 97－116.
[13] Griliches, Z., B. Hall, and A. Pakes. R&D, patents, and market value revisited: Is there technology opportunity factors [J]. Journal of Economics of Innovation and New technology, 1991, 1(3): 183－201.
[14] Toivanen, O., P. Stoneman, and D. Bosworth. Innovation and the market value of UK firms, 1989-1995 [J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2002, 64(39): 39－61.
[15] 张波涛,李延喜,栾庆伟,包世泽.专利研发中"加速化陷阱"现象的实证研究——以机械制造业上市公司三种专利产出为例[J],科研管理, 2008(3): 89－97.
[16] 朱雪忠,乔永忠,万小丽.基于维持时间的发明专利质量实证研究[J],管理世界, 2009(1): 174－175.
[17] Hu, Albert Guangzhou. Knowledge flow in East Asia and beyond [J]. Working Paper, National University of Singapore, 2008.
[18] Gu, F. Innovation, future earnings, and market efficiency [J]. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 2005, 20(4): 385－418.
[19] Hall, B., A. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg. Market value and patent citation: A first look [J]. Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2000.