国家高新区强弱空间极化的演化分析

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 121-127.

国家高新区强弱空间极化的演化分析

王松, 胡树华

武汉理工大学管理学院,湖北武汉 430070

收稿日期:2010-11-10 修回日期:2011-03-14 出版日期:2012-03-27 发布日期:2012-03-24
作者简介:王松(1987-),男,湖北枣阳人,武汉理工大学管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为区域经济、战略管理。
胡树华(1961-),男,湖北鄂州人,武汉理工大学管理学院教授,博导,研究方向为产业创新、区域创新。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重点项目"构建区域创新体系战略研究"(08AJY015);国家自然科学基金"产品-产业-区域的集成创新理论研究与实证分析"(70673075)。

The evolution of spatial polarization between strongnational hi-tech zones and weak national hi-tech zones

Wang Song, Hu Shuhua

School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China

Received:2010-11-10 Revised:2011-03-14 Online:2012-03-27 Published:2012-03-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以2000-2008年国家高新区数据为依据, 构建了国家高新区强弱综合指数,在此基础上,运用极化指数测量了国家高新区的极化水平及其空间方向。研究结果表明:近9年间国家高新区整体极化趋势呈现"M"型特征,并在南方-北方表现为增强,而在发达城市-次发达城市、沿海-内陆方向上稍微减弱;就平均极化水平而言,发达城市-次发达城市方向>沿海-内陆方向>南方-北方方向。最后根据实证结果,相应地推导出我国国家高新区均衡政策的选择域:北京、西安、天津、武汉、成都、大连、长春、沈阳,并相应地提出了一些建议。

关键词: 国家高新区, 空间极化, 均衡政策

Abstract: Based on the data of national hi-tech zones between the years of 2000 and 2008, the comprehensive strength index of national hi-tech zones is constructed, and then their polarization level and spatial direction are measured by the polarization index. The study results show that the overall polarization tendency of national hi-tech zone presents characteristics of "M" style in the past six years, and the level strengthens in south-north dimension, weakens in developed cities-less developed cities dimension and in coastal-inland dimension; and the average polarization level in developed cities-less developed cities dimension is strongest, however, the average polarization level in south-north dimension is the weakest. According to the empirical results, cities of Beijing, Xian, Tianjin, Wuhan, Chengdu, Dalian, Changchun, and Shenyang are deduced as the selective regions of balanced policy from national hi-tech zones, at last, some suggestions are put forward accordingly.

Key words: national hi-tech zone, spatial polarization, balanced policy

中图分类号:

F207

王松, 胡树华. 国家高新区强弱空间极化的演化分析[J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(3): 121-127.

Wang Song, Hu Shuhua. The evolution of spatial polarization between strongnational hi-tech zones and weak national hi-tech zones[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(3): 121-127.

参考文献

[1] 李永周,姚婳,桂彬.网络组织的知识流动结构与高新区集聚创新机理[J].中国软科学,2009(5):89-95. [2] 安士伟,贾学锋.我国高新区空间布局研究[J].科技进步与对策,2004(7):144-145. [3] shujie yao, liwei zhu. Understanding Income Inequality in China: A Multi-Angle Perspective[J].Economics of Planning,1998(31):133-150. [4] Jinjun Xue. Urban-Rural Income Disparity and Its Significance in China[J].Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics,1997(38):45-59. [5] Ottaviano G, Puga D. Agglomeration in the Global Economy a Survey of the New Economic Geography[J].Word Economy, 1998,21(6):707-731. [6] Puga D. The Rise and Fall of Regional Inequality[J].European Economic Review, 1999(43):303-334. [7] 韩伯棠,李强,朱美光等.基于熵理论的高新区发展不均衡度评价[J].科学学研究,2005,23(3):342-346. [8] 黄宁燕,梁战平.我国高新技术产业开发区的发展状况及趋势[J].科学学研究,1999,17(2):79-87. [9] 刘荣增.我国高新技术产业开发区发展态势评价[J].科技进步与对策,2002(11):27-29. [10] 何坤.中国高新技术产业开发区发展布局研究[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,24(3):28-31. [11] 黄春玲,余颖,黄卓.国家高新区产出效率的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005, 26(2):100-103. [12] 韩伯棠.我国高新技术产业园区的现状及二次创业研究[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,2007. [13] 徐陈生.基于DEA我国高新区相对效率评价[J].科技进步与对策,2007,24(8):117-119. [14] 权进民,姚兰,史本山.基于DEA 的国家级高新区可持续发展能力评价[J].软科学,2008,22(1):75-77. [15] 张芮,赵丽,杨洪焦.区域经济差异测量方法述评[J].统计与决策,2008(4):50-53. [16] ESTEBAN J, RAY D. On the Measurement of Polarization[J].Econo-metrica,1994, 62:819-851. [17] WOLFSON M C. When Inequalities Diverge[J].American Economic Review,1994, 84:353-358. [18] ZHANG X, KANBUR R. What Difference Do Polarization measures Make? An Application to China[J].Journal of Development Studies,2001,37:85-98. [19] TSUI K, WANG Y. Polarization Ordering and New Classes of Polarization Indices .Memo: The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1998.