科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 169-181.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.04.017

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于TOPSIS方法的碳中和路径评估

闫瑾,闫昊本,刘兰翠   

  1. 北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院,北京100875
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-22 修回日期:2025-02-24 出版日期:2025-04-20 发布日期:2025-04-11
  • 通讯作者: 刘兰翠
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重点项目:“碳中和实施路径及其技术”(22AZD094,2022.05—2024.12)。

Assessment of carbon neutrality pathways based on the TOPSIS method

Yan Jin, Yan Haoben, Liu Lancui   

  1. Business School, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • Received:2024-07-22 Revised:2025-02-24 Online:2025-04-20 Published:2025-04-11

摘要:     与已达峰的发达国家相比,我国碳排放总量大,实现碳中和目标时间紧任务重,而我国能源安全供给形势严峻,且仍属于发展中国家,高质量发展是首要问题,因此迫切需要评估碳中和路径是否符合我国国情和发展需求。本文提出了一种能够考虑我国特有国情、综合可行性与合意性维度的定量评估方法。结合我国能源安全、发展要求和碳排放等国情,本文构建了中国碳减排路径与中国发展需求适合度的指标体系,采用引入时间维度的TOPSIS方法,并结合耦合协调度与障碍度模型,对已有碳减排路径进行了评估。研究发现:(1)现有减排路径在一定程度上能够兼顾我国发展需求,但仍存在“安全-环境-经济”不可能三角问题。(2)提升大部分路径的适配度,应增强路径的安全性,特别是粮食安全,同时应在达峰后大力推广非化石能源技术、加大经济发展的持续推进。(3)现有路径存在指标披露不足或指标设置忽视我国具体政策的问题。本研究不仅为我国减排路径提供了定量的衡量框架,也为我国未来减排路径建模方向和策略设计提供了科学依据。

关键词: 碳中和, 减排路径评估, TOPSIS, 耦合协调度, 障碍度

Abstract:     Compared with developed countries that have already reached their carbon emission peaks, China has a large total carbon emission volume but the timeline is short, while the task is heavy to achieve the carbon neutrality goal. Additionally, China is facing a severe energy security supply situation, and as a developing country, high-quality development remains a priority. Therefore, it is urgent to assess whether the carbon neutrality pathways align with China′s national conditions and development needs. In view of this, this paper proposed a quantitative evaluation method that considers China′s unique national conditions and integrates both feasibility and desirability dimensions. Based on China′s national conditions such as energy security, development requirements and carbon emissions, this paper constructed an index system to evaluate the compatibility of China′s carbon reduction pathways with its development needs, and employed the TOPSIS method with the integration of a temporal dimension, coupled with coupling coordination degree and obstacle factor models, to assess existing carbon reduction pathways. The study found that: (1) existing reduction pathways can balance china′s development needs to some extent, but there still exists the "security-environment-economy" trilemma; (2) to improve the compatibility of most pathways, the security of the pathways should be strengthened, especially food security, while also promoting non-fossil energy technologies vigorously and continuously advancing economic development after the peak is reached; and (3) the existing paths have problems such as insufficient indicator disclosure or the neglect of China′s specific policy requirements in their setup. This study not only provides a quantitative assessment framework for China′s emission reduction pathways but also offers a scientific basis for future modeling directions and strategy design regarding emission reduction in China.

Key words: carbon neutrality, emission reduction pathway assessment, TOPSIS, coupling coordination degree, obstacle degree