航空发动机关键核心技术突破的能力重构路径研究

郭永辉; 冯媛; 陈薪宇; 郭晓蓓

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.03.008

PDF(1484 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3) : 81-90. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.03.008 CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2025.03.008

航空发动机关键核心技术突破的能力重构路径研究

郭永辉 ¹ ,
冯媛 ² ,
陈薪宇 ¹ ,
郭晓蓓 ¹

作者信息 +

Research on the capability reconfiguration path of the key and core technology breakthroughs for aero-engines

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

突破关键核心技术,研制自主可控的航空发动机(简称航发)是民族复兴、大国崛起的必然选择。然而,目前尚存在组织、资源、创新能力等诸多困境,亟须能力重构。本研究基于能力重构理论视角,结合案例分析,探讨发动机技术突破过程的组织重构、资源重构和创新能力重构路径,得出重要结论:(1)航发关键核心技术突破是一个动态的多重能力重构过程,需要集成组织、资源和创新能力等多种能力要素,且随着技术突破的推进,不断演化,先后经历演化式重构和替换式重构两个阶段。(2)组织重构是航发关键核心技术突破的重要基础,从“飞发绑定”“飞发松绑”到“飞发分离”的组织重构最大化了发动机研制的自主权和灵活度;(3)资源重构是航发关键核心技术突破的关键和保障,从封闭式资源重组、开放式资源重组到资源军民融合共享的资源重构有效支撑和推动了航发技术突破;(4)创新能力重构是航发关键核心技术突破的核心,从测绘仿制、仿制与自研结合,再到自主研制的创新能力重构大大提升航发创新能力。

Abstract

To make breakthroughs in the key and core technologies and develop our own aero-engines is an important choice for national rejuvenation. However, there are still many capability dilemmas in technology breakthroughs of aero-engines, and there is an urgent need for capability reconfiguration. The reconfiguration paths for organization, resource and innovation capability were studied with the capability reconfiguration theory and in conjunction with case studies. Some important conclusions were drawn from this study as follows: (1) the technology breakthrough of aero-engines is a dynamic process of multiple capability reconfiguration which integrates organization, resource and innovation capabilities, and this process evolves continuously with technological breakthroughs and includes two stages, i.e. evolutionary reconfiguration and replacement reconfiguration; (2) organization reconfiguration is the foundation of technology breakthrough, and the organization reconfiguration from "plane-engine binding", "plane-engine loosening" to "plane-engine separation" maximizes the innovation autonomy and flexibility; (3) resource reconfiguration is the guarantee of technology breakthrough, and the reconfigurations from closed resource reconfiguration and open resource reconfiguration, to military-civilian resource sharing configuration effectively support technology breakthrough of aero-engines; and (4) innovation capability reconfiguration is the core of technology breakthrough, and the innovation capability reconfiguration from initial imitation to current independent R&D largely enhances the innovation capability of aero-engines.

导出引用

郭永辉, 冯媛, 陈薪宇, 等. 航空发动机关键核心技术突破的能力重构路径研究[J]. 科研管理. 2025, 46(3): 81-90 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.03.008

Guo Yonghui, Feng Yuan, Chen Xinyu, et al. Research on the capability reconfiguration path of the key and core technology breakthroughs for aero-engines[J]. Science Research Management. 2025, 46(3): 81-90 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.03.008

中图分类号： F273.1

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	黎明, 索建秦, 吴二平. 国外先进航空发动机技术带给我们的启示[J]. 航空制造技术, 2013(9):66-71. LI Ming, SUO Jianqin, WU Erping. Edification of advanced foreign aero engine technology[J]. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2013(9):66-71. 本文引用 [1]

[2]	张于喆. 建设科技强国亟需集中力量打好关键核心技术攻坚战[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2021(10): 75-89. ZHANG Yuzhe. Building a strong country in science and technology urgently requires concentrated efforts fight the battle of key core technologies[J]. Macroeconomics, 2021(10): 75-89. 本文引用 [2]

[3]	LAVIE D. Capability reconfiguration: An analysis of incumbent responses to technological change[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31(1):153-174. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379629 http://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amr.2006.19379629 本文引用 [3]

[4]	TEECE D J. Explicating dynamic capabilities[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(7):509-533. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	臧树伟, 张娜娜. 时机选择、追赶陷阱与企业能力重构[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(9):87-93. ZANG Shuwei, ZHANG Nana. Timing choice, catching-up trap and capability reconfiguration of enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(9):87-93. 本文引用 [3]

[6]	陈立新. 现有企业应对突破性技术变革的能力重构研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2008,(5):152-156. CHEN Lixin. Capability reconfiguration: Incumbents' responses to radical technology[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2008,(5):152-156. 本文引用 [1]

[7]

奉小斌, 刘琳琳, 俞逸涛. 双重网络嵌入对企业能力重构的影响[J]. 浙江理工大学学报, 2021, 46(2):143-152.

FENG

Xiaobin

, LIU

Linlin

, YU

Yitao

. The influence of dual network embedding on firm capability reconfiguration: Based on the moderating role of knowledge integration[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, 2021, 46(2):143-152.

本文引用 [1]

[8]	胡畔, 于渤. 追赶企业的本地搜索、能力重构与创新绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(7):72-80. HU Pan, YU Bo. Local search, capability reconfiguration and innovation performance of catch-up firms[J]. Science Research Management, 2017, 38(7):72-80. 本文引用 [2]

[9]

冯南平, 向巧, 沈荣骏, 等. 航空发动机关键核心技术攻关的组织策略研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2022, 24(4):222-230.

https://doi.org/10.15302/J-SSCAE-2022.04.019

摘要

尽快突破航空发动机产业的关键核心技术是保障国家战略安全的迫切需求，创新力量的有效组织成为关键核心技术攻关实践中亟待解决的瓶颈问题。本文梳理了我国航空发动机科研生产体系中的创新主体构成现状，剖析了实施协同创新面临的迫切问题；进一步阐明了航空发动机关键核心技术攻关过程中各主体的角色定位，涵盖政府、军队、中国航发、专业化维修企业、上 / 下游企业、高校和科研院所等。研究认为，统筹安排并科学布局关键核心技术攻关工作、设计相应制度与机制以引导激励各类主体主动对接国家战略、重视需求侧对技术发展的牵引作用、由领军企业主导构建一批面向用户需求与产品问题的创新联合体、以重大项目为载体构建创新生态系统，由此高效组织各类主体协同攻关航空发动机关键核心技术。

FENG

Nanping

, XIANG

Qiao

, SHEN

Rongjun

, et al. Organization strategies of innovation forces for the breakthrough of key core technologies in aero-engine industry[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2022, 24(4):222-230.

https://doi.org/10.15302/J-SSCAE-2022.04.019

本文引用 [3] 摘要

Achieving breakthroughs of key core technologies in the aero-engine industry is urgently required for guaranteeing national strategic security, and it demands effective organization of innovation forces. This study first analyses the major innovation forces and their problems regarding collaborative innovation in the current aero-engine scientific research and production system in China. Subsequently, it clarifies the roles of relevant forces in the research process of key core technologies, including the government, the army, the Aero Engine Corporation of China, professional maintenance enterprises, upstream and downstream enterprises, universities, and research institutes. Furthermore, we suggest that the breakthrough practice should be planned and organized in an overall manner, corresponding institutions and mechanisms should be created to encourage the innovation forces to closely align with national strategies, the driving role of the demand side should be emphasized, a number of innovation consortia aiming at user needs and product problems should be established by leading enterprises, and an innovation ecosystem should be established relying on major projects.

[10]	向巧, 胡晓煜, 孙培培. 振兴航空动力实现民族梦想[J]. 航空动力, 2018(1):7-11. XIANG Qiao, HU Xiaoyu, SUN Peipei. Opinion on the development of China aero engine industry[J]. Aerospace Power, 2018(1):7-11. 本文引用 [4]

[11]	EISENHARDT K M, GRAEBNER M E. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(1):25-32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 http://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 本文引用 [3]

[12]

余江, 陈凤, 张越, 等. 铸造强国重器:关键核心技术突破的规律探索与体系构建[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(3):339-343.

Jiang

, CHEN

Feng

, ZHANG

Yue

, et al. Forging pillars of scientific and technological power: Mechanism exploration and system construction for breakthrough of core and key technologies[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019, 34(3):339-343.

本文引用 [2]

[13]	NELSON R R, WINTER S G. An evolutionary theory of economic change[M]. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1982. 本文引用 [2]

[14]	邱泽奇. 技术与组织的互构[J]. 社会学研究, 2005(2):32-54. QIU Zeqi. The interconstruction of technology and organization[J]. Sociological Studies, 2005(2):32-54. 本文引用 [1]

[15]	王新华, 车珍, 于灏, 等. 网络嵌入、多途径知识集聚与创造力:知识流耦合的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2019, 22(3):28-39. WANG Xinhua, CHE Zhen, YU Hao, et al. Network embedding, multi-channel knowledge gathering and innovation: The regulation effect of knowledge flow coupling[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2019, 22(3):28-39. 本文引用 [4]

[16]	YANG H B, HENG Y F, ZHAO X. Exploration or exploitation? Small firms' alliance strategies with large firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2014, 35(1):146-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2014.35.issue-1 https://sms.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10970266/35/1 本文引用 [1]

[17]	胡保亮, 田茂利, 刘广. 资源重构能力与商业模式创新[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(8):73-80. HU Baoliang, TIAN Maoli, LIU Guang. Resource reconfiguration capability and business model innovation: A view based on dynamic capability bundle[J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(8):73-80. 本文引用 [2]

[18]	秦亚欣. 航空发动机军民融合发展研究[J]. 航空动力, 2021(4):67-69. QIN Yaxin. Research on civil-military integrated development of aero engine[J]. Aerospace Power, 2021(4):67-69. 本文引用 [1]

[19]

KILEN

C P

, HUNT

R A

. Robust project portfolio management: Capability evolution and maturity[J]. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2013, 6(1):131-151.

https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371311291062

http://www.emerald.com/ijmpb/article/6/1/131-151/144480

本文引用 [1] 摘要

The purpose of this paper is to increase understanding of project portfolio management (PPM) capability evolution, in order to guide the implementation and ongoing development of robust capabilities.