科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 73-85.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.02.008

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国式现代化情景下产学研创新联合体的建设路径研究

张羽飞1,2,刘兵1,3, 原长弘4，张树满5   

  1. 1.河北经贸大学工商管理学院，河北 石家庄050061；
    2.河北经贸大学科技创新政策研究中心，河北 石家庄050061；
    3.河北省城乡融合发展协同创新中心，河北 石家庄050061；
    4.西安交通大学管理学院，陕西 西安710049；
    5.浙江工商大学工商管理学院，浙江 杭州310018

  • 收稿日期:2023-08-09 修回日期:2024-09-12 出版日期:2025-02-20 发布日期:2025-02-11
  • 通讯作者: 张树满
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目：“科技领军企业组建产学研创新联合体突破关键核心技术的模式与机制研究”（2023CGL007，2023.09—2026.12）。

Research on the construction path of IUR innovation consortium in the context of Chinese modernization

Zhang Yufei1,2, Liu Bing1,3, Yuan Changhong4, Zhang Shuman5   

  1. 1. School of Business Administration, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, Hebei, China;
    2. Research Centre for Science Technology and Innovation Policy, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, Hebei, China;
    3. Hebei Collaborative Innovation Center for Urban-Rural Integrated Development, Shijiazhuang 050061, Hebei, China;
    4. School of Management, Xi′an Jiaotong University, Xi′an 710049, Shaanxi, China;
    5. School of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2023-08-09 Revised:2024-09-12 Online:2025-02-20 Published:2025-02-11

摘要：      产学研创新联合体是构建产学研深度融合技术创新体系的最新创新模式，但当前建设仍面临着组织模式尚不清晰、体制机制尚不先进、组建路径尚不明确等问题。鉴于此，本文采用多案例研究方法，选取四家典型的产学研创新联合体最佳实践，深入剖析了政府主导型、高校主导型、科研院所主导型、企业主导型四类产学研创新联合体的组织模式创新与体制机制创新，提炼出产学研创新联合体的建设路径模型。研究发现：产学研创新联合体由领军组织牵头、联合上下游优势企业及高校院所共同组建，以政府战略要求为引导、以市场需求为牵引、以共同利益为纽带，利用创新组织方式和体制机制改革，有效打破了创新藩篱，攻克了创新难点，实现了创新主体和创新要素在链上各个环节的深度融合，从而大幅提升了联合体的整体创新效能。本文构建起一套系统的产学研创新联合体管理框架与管理工具，解决了从确定建设内容到实施建设方法，再到确立管理方式的全流程难题，为本土化的产学研合作及创新联合体理论注入了新的内容，对中国式现代化情景下的联合体建设实践具有一定启示。

关键词: 产学研创新联合体, 建设路径, 组织模式创新, 体制机制创新, 多案例研究

Abstract:     Industry-university-research (IUR) innovation consortium represents the latest endeavor to establish Chinese IUR deep integrated technological innovation system. However, current efforts in constructing IUR innovation consortia confront considerable challenges, including unclear organizational models, outdated institutional mechanisms, and unknown construction paths. In view of the prevailing circumstances, this paper employed a multi-case study methodology, selected four representative cases of government-led IUR innovation consortium, university-led IUR innovation consortium, research-institute-led IUR innovation consortium, and enterprise-led IUR innovation consortium as research subjects, and analyzed thoroughly the organizational mode innovation and institutional mechanism innovation within four IUR innovation consortia, finally deriving a comprehensive construction path model for IUR innovation consortia. The research findings revealed that constructing IUR innovation consortia should be led by leading organizations with active participation of upstream and downstream enterprises, universities and research institutes, guided by government strategic requirements, motivated by market demands, and bound together by common interests. Constructing IUR innovation consortia also needs to implement a series of organizational mode innovations to overcome innovation barriers, undertake a series of institutional mechanism innovations to break innovation bottlenecks, and effectively integrate diverse innovation entities and elements within the innovation chain and industrial chain, ultimately enhancing overall innovation efficiency. This paper has concluded comprehensive theoretical explanations from "what to build" to "how to build" and then to "how to manage" IUR innovation consortia, thereby developing Chinese localized research IUR and innovation consortia and offering valuable insights into practices of constructing IUR innovation consortia in the context of Chinese modernization.

Key words: IUR innovation consortium, construction path, organizational mode innovation, institutional mechanism innovation, multi-case study