PDF(1159 KB)
PDF(1159 KB)
PDF(1159 KB)
全球视角下科研人员职业幸福感的量化比较研究
A quantitative comparative study of researchers' professional happiness from a global perspective
职业幸福感是近年来在管理学领域被广泛提及的概念,高水平的职业幸福感可以激发员工的满意度、忠诚度,提升创新活力和机构劳动力市场竞争优势,而如何提升科研人员的幸福感是目前亟待解决的现实问题。本研究基于2021年全球科研人员调查数据,构建职业幸福感评估DEA模型,采用秩统计方法分析比较全球学术劳动力市场中主要国家科研机构资源配置情况与科研人员职业幸福感的关系,并进一步通过Tobit模型分析影响幸福感的组织因素。实证结果表明,我国科研机构在维持科研人员职业幸福感方面仍有不足,与欧美发达国家存在显著差距,这体现在机构资源投入不足、科研人员工作满意度和忠诚度偏低等方面。大部分科研人员存在幸福感规模报酬递增情况,表明通过增加资源投入仍能有效提升科研人员幸福感水平。而官僚主义是损害科研人员幸福感的主要原因。研究结论对于我国科研机构优化资源配置、提升科研人员职业幸福感水平,进而在全球学术劳动力市场中提升人才吸引力,激发人才创新活力具有重要实践启示。
Professional happiness is a widely mentioned concept in the field of management in recent years, and a high level of professional happiness could stimulate employees' job satisfaction and loyalty, improve the vitality of innovation and competitive advantages of institutions in the labor market, but how to enhance the happiness of researchers is a real problem that needs to be solved urgently at present. Based on the survey data of global scientific researchers in 2021, this study constructed a DEA evaluation model for assessing professional happiness level, analyzed and compared the relationship between resource allocation of scientific research institutions and professional happiness of researchers in major countries in the global academic labor market using the rank statistics method, and further analyzed with the Tobit model the organizational factors affecting happiness level. The empirical results showed that there are still shortcomings in maintaining the happiness of researchers in China's research institutions, and most researchers have increasing returns on the scale of happiness, in which bureaucracy are the main factor that damages researchers' happiness. The research conclusions will have important practical implications for Chinese scientific institutions to optimize resource allocation, improve the level of researchers' professional happiness, and then enhance the attraction of talents in the global academic labor market and stimulate innovation vitality of researchers.
职业幸福感 / 科研人员 / 学术劳动力市场 / DEA-Tobit模型
professional happiness / researcher / academic labor market / DEA-Tobit model
| [1] |
谢宝国, 王芳, 缪佳玲, 等. 职业使命感对科研人员职业幸福感的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(5): 184-192.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
STEPTOE A. Happiness and health[J]. Annual Review of Public Health, 2019, 40(1): 339-359.
|
| [5] |
邢占军. 我国居民收入与幸福感关系的研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2011, 25(1): 196-219+245-246.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
妥艳媜, 白长虹, 王琳. 旅游者幸福感:概念化及其量表开发[J]. 南开管理评论, 2020, 23(6): 166-178.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
钱忠好, 李友艺. 家庭农场的效率及其决定:基于上海松江943户家庭农场2017年数据的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(4): 168-181+219.
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
周建中, 闫昊, 孙粒. 我国科研人员职业生涯成长轨迹与影响因素研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(10): 126-141.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
张丽华, 吉璐, 陈鑫. 科研人员职业生涯学术表现的差异性研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(5): 182-190.
|
| [24] |
王涛利, 蒋凯. 中美高校预聘长聘教职制的比较研究:基于八所高校的制度文本分析[J]. 中国高教研究, 2022(10): 53-60.
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
任华亮, 郑莹, 张庆垒. 职业幸福感对员工创新绩效的影响:工作价值观和工作自主性的双重调节[J]. 财经论丛, 2019(3): 94-103.
|
| [27] |
邹琼, 佐斌, 代涛涛. 职业幸福感:概念、测量水平与因果模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(4): 669-678.
|
| [28] |
张耀方, 韩海波. 大学科研人员减负:缘起、实践与展望[J]. 中国高校科技, 2020(Z1): 30-34.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |